Islam in a Nutshell

Subject: Islam in a Nutshell

Perhaps some of you did not know........


This, not the Chinese nor the Russians, represents the greatest threat to the world and might be the fulfillment of the book of Revelation in the Holy Bible.

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: 'Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.'

Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life. Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.

Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.

When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the Other components tend to creep in as well.

Here's how it works:
As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part, be regarded as a Peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

United States -- Muslim 0.6%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1.8%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:

Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims (continual demands for concessions to Sharia). They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines -- Muslim 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:

Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 15%

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad, militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian
Churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:

Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:

Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and is on-going in:

Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace. Here there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 100%

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their
blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

'Before I was nine, I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel.' -- Leon Uris,'The Haj'

It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable by death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.

Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But their birth rates are higher than the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's population by the end of this century.

Well, boys and girls, today we are letting the fox guard the henhouse. The wolves will be herding the sheep!

NOTE: Has anyone ever heard a new government official being identified as a devout Catholic, a devout Jew or a devout Protestant? Just wondering.

Devout Muslims are being appointed to critical Homeland Security positions? Doesn't this make you feel safer already?  
That should make the United States much safer, huh! Was it not "Devout Muslim men" that flew planes into U.S. buildings only 10 years ago?

We must never forget this. Was it not a Devout Muslim man who killed 13 at Fort Hood ? (He killed"From within" - don't forget that).

Also: This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start to finish. Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking out about any atrocities.

Can a good Muslim be a good American?
This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his reply:

Theologically - no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God of Arabia

Religiously - no. Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256)

Scripturally - no. Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.

Geographically - no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

Socially - no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.

Politically - no. Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America,
the great Satan.

Domestically - no. Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34)

Intellectually - no. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.

Philosophically - no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually - no. Because when we declare 'one nation under God,' the Christian God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quran's 99 excellent names.

Therefore, after much study and deliberation we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. - - - They obviously cannot be both 'good' Muslims and good Americans. Call it what you will, it's still the truth. You had better believe it! The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future. This religious war is bigger than we know or understand.

Can a Muslim be a good soldier?

Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, opened fire at Ft. Hood and Killed 13.
He is a good Muslim!

Footnote: The Muslims have said that they will destroy us from within. SO FREEDOM IS NOT FREE.


NY Muslim: This is Islam! To Hell With Obama, America and Democracy!

1400 shocking years of Islam in 5 minutes -- MUST WATCH!!!

Islam for Dummies





This 'one page website' contains some basic information EVERYBODY in the West should know about islam.

Inform yourself about islam, what it is, the dangers, the background, the goal, and why islam is DIFFERENT than any other religion out there today.

Read this 'one page website', watch every single video on it and create awareness by sharing it with as many people as you can.

If you know nothing about islam you need to do some research, otherwise you won't know what you are talking about. This is a good place to start and get some basic INDEPENDENT INFORMATION and FACTS. It will take approximately 60 minutes to read this page and approximately 6 hours to watch all the videos as well.

Islam has a fundamentally different way of thinking, so it may be hard for any Westerner to comprehend it. Remember that the truth is not always what we want to hear, but it is always what we need to hear. So, you have to be open-minded and you have to be willing to consider things. At first you will probably be as surprised as everybody is, since islam is a pretty scary religion.

Read it... let it sink in... read it again... act on it. It may take a little while before the penny drops so make sure you bookmark this page to find your way back if needed. After reading this page you should be able to have a decent conversation about islam.

Islam for beginners:

First off: the definition of "ISLAM" (the religion / ideology):
Islam is based on the koran and the sunna: islam is simply everything that is written down in the koran, the sira (Mohammed's biography) and the hadith (traditions). "The trilogy".

Note: since the sunna is found in the sira and the hadith, these three books contain all the doctrine of islam: the trilogy. Everything that is written in this trilogy is islam. If something is not written in this trilogy, then it is simply not islam.

And second: the definition of "MUSLIM" (a person):
A muslim is a person who follows and practices the beliefs of Islam.

Note: the Arabic word "islam" is built around the root [s-l-m] and means submission. In Arabic, the preposition "mu" + the root, is the person performing the root action. So, a muslim (mu s-l-m) is a person who submits to islam.

Critical: understanding the difference between "islam" and "muslims".

Notice the difference between the words "islam" and "muslim", they are not the same. Although this may seem obvious, a lot of (liberal) people get those two terms mixed up:

-- A muslim is a person.
-- Islam is what a muslim is supposed to believe in and follow (words and laws written down in books).

Many muslims are innocent misguided believers.

Not every muslim is a bad person, simply because most -- especially in the West -- do not follow the teachings of islam, or not yet anyway. Not every person does what he is expected to do. You may, if you will, compare this in some way with drugs: drugs are bad, but not all drug users are bad people. And even the nazi's were not all bad people (think about Oskar Schindler), but nazism itself is bad. Like drugs and nazism most people were sucked into it.

Also not every Christian is a good person, the mafia for instance was catholic. And likewise certainly not every muslim is a bad person. God has given each person a free will.

However, we must acknowledge that EVERY muslim does support a theocracy (the sharia) when supporting islam, and follows a cult leader (Mohammed) who wants to kill all non-muslims, and has also sworn to follow his doctrine (the shahada). Therefore there is reason for concern, even with your well meaning moderate muslim neighbour.

It is safe to say that the religion that adheres to a person has a significant impact on the way a person acts lives and thinks. The difference is that the Bible does NOT command to kill and the islamic doctrine clearly does. Islam inspires (or you might say brainwashes) muslims to do bad things, therefore, the more interaction* any muslim has with islam, the more that muslim will be influenced by islam.

-- A passive muslim will have no interaction with islam.
-- A moderate muslim will have little interaction with islam.
-- A devout muslim will eat, sleep and breathe islam.

Being "against islam" IS NOT THE SAME as being "against muslims". In fact: many, if not most, muslims in the West are just ordinary people who do not have -- or want -- any interaction* with islam whatsoever (yet). They just live their lives much like anybody else.

However: peaceful muslims do need to understand that islam is NOT what they hope or think it is, and that Mohammed and Allah do NOT agree with their point of view.

* Interaction with islam through mosques, imams, religious leaders, the koran, country, environment, circle of friends, acquaintances, upbringing and so on.

So, for the record:
Islam is bad but it does not mean that all muslims are bad.

And vice versa:
If you know (a) good muslim(s) IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT ISLAM IS GOOD.

Criticizing a religion should not be confused with hate towards its adherents.

Islam itself is indefensible if you care about human rights. However, almost all muslims in the West do not (yet) live according to islam, or only to a minimal extent.

This gradually changes if islam grows. As history taught us this process of islamization can take decades or centuries but it is inevitable once a point of no return has been reached. Therefore this is what should be prevented.

The problem is not intrinsically with all muslims, it is with islam, and it is with muslims that are influenced heavily by islam. They know they are not allowed to integrate, they must dominate.

And... they have the core text of islam to back them up, so it is not hard to convince other muslims to do the same. After all: ALL muslims have already committed to the words of Mohammed (eventhough most don't have a clue).

There are several elements that influence any person's behavior: religion, the culture of the land, the people surrounding you, and of course the way you are brought up.

That is why at this time in the West -- unlike in muslim dominated areas and countries -- we still see so many moderate and passive muslims. Most muslims in the West are influenced by the Western culture and by the many non-muslims surrounding them.

This of course will change gradually but permanently when the land becomes more islamic and the number of muslims in the country grows. As we have seen -- without exception -- in the many countries already conquered by islam.

Note: there are many different muslims in the world, there is however only ONE islam.

About muslims:

There are currently around 1.62 billion muslims in the world today. That number is expected to grow to 2.2 billion by 2030. Again: every muslim is a person, so every muslim is different. Not every Nazi in the third reich was quite as evil as Himmler or Goebbels. Likewise not every muslim is as evil as Osama bin Laden or Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi.

For instance, Steven Spielberg's movie "Schindler's List" showed us that Oskar Schindler was a member of the Nazi Party but still he saved 1200 Jews from Hitler's death camps. Just as there were many good and peaceful Germans during WW2, and also many good people living in the former USSR, there are also many millions of decent muslims. However, if they were honest, they would leave their religion as it is NOT AT ALL peaceful.

This is what ALL muslims believe. NO EXCEPTION:

It is important to realize that ALL MUSLIMS share TWO COMMON BELIEFS.

1.) There is no God but Allah.
2.) Mohammed is his messenger.

This means that ALL muslims believe in whatever Mohammed has said (or Allah through Mohammed), and agree with whatever Mohammed has said. And consequently believe in and agree with whatever Mohammed has done. No matter what it is. (After all it is the word of Allah, their god.)

Again: it is very important to understand this. EVERY muslim (passive, moderate or devout), believes the words of Mohammed to be true. Eventhough most of the passive and moderate muslims in the West have NO CLUE what this means or what this includes, they still have committed to the words of Mohammed.

One of the things that Mohammed said is that he is the "excellent example" for all muslims and that all muslims MUST follow his deeds, teachings and commands for all times (koran 33:21). So knowing this, to understand islam all you need to do is find out what Mohammed said and did (which is what is written down in the islamic trilogy: koran, hadith and sira), to find out what islam is all about. We'll get to that later.

Now, in the West we make no distinctions: we call every muslim a muslim. Including people we know like your friendly muslim neighbor, muslim colleague, muslims on tv etc. and while we see and 'somewhat' know them we think that every muslim is like them and that they are the ones that represent islam.

Looking through a collectivist lens we think that that particular random muslim we see is representing islam. Of course it is not. Every muslim is different, and the ONLY muslim that represents islam is Mohammed himself, all other muslims are just "on the way" to match his "perfection".

There are -- like there are with any religion -- basically 3 different kinds of muslims: non-practicing ("passive") muslims, partially practicing ("moderate") muslims, and practicing ("devout") muslims.

1.) Non-practicing muslims (passive muslims)

Many muslims IN THE WEST are non-practicing muslims, or passive muslims. They are only muslims in the statistics and are mostly muslim by birth without a choice. They do not follow and practice the beliefs of islam or act like it in any way: they may drink alcohol, don't pray, eat pork, don't do ramadan, don't wear a burka or headscarf, don't go to the mosque, don't read the koran, and so on.

Or maybe some do like to celibrate ramadan and eid (like an atheist celibrates Christmas) but otherwise know nothing about islam. They are totally clueless about what islam is. And you probably wouldn't know they are muslim unless they tell you.

Passive muslims are ONLY possible in free (non-islamic) countries, the more islamic a country gets, the less they will be tolerated. So, if they were honest, they would leave their religion.

In short: a passive muslim is not (really) a muslim.

Note: if you are a passive muslim reading this, watch this:
Protecting muslims from anti-muslim bigotry and violence. (5:38)

If you are thinking of becoming a muslim watch this, and please think again:
Understanding islam in under 60 seconds. (0:59)

2.) Partially practicing muslims (moderate muslims)

There are also many partially practicing muslims, or moderate muslims, in the west. Moderate muslims are those who DENY or IGNORE part of their faith and only PICK OUT those parts of islam that they WANT to belief in. There is however no theological basis for their views: what they believe in is NOT what is written in the islamic scripture.

And that is why it never lasts when islam grows...

Moderate muslims are mostly peaceful and decent people, but: they are still (knowingly or unknowingly, it doesn't matter) rooting for an ideology that wants to see unbelievers AND THEMSELVES(!) submitted or killed. Islam says CLEARLY: kill all the unbelievers. And islam says CLEARLY: kill all the hypocrites (and... that means moderate muslims not willing to participate in jihad).
A moderate muslim is NOT following all the teachings of islam

Our popular perception in the West is shaped by our Judeo-Christian centric western culture. We generaly consider all religions in the light of Judaism and Christianity, assuming that tolerance, forgiveness, and "ten commandment type mandates" are common to all religions. A moderate muslim has adapted to these western standards and is westernized, not BECAUSE of what islam says but IN SPITE of what islam says.

This might be your neighbour or colleague at work and they are often refered to by liberals and politicians to show how peaceful islam is. But in reality these are offcourse really not representative muslims at all, because a muslim is a person who follows and practices the beliefs of islam (or who supports jihadis and others who do by voting for politicians who support Sharia and by tithing a portion of their income to jihadis and terrorist organizations). Any "peaceful muslim" is NOT (yet) following the teachings of islam.

In short: a "moderate muslim" is moderate when he ACTS MAINLY LIKE A CHRISTIAN.

Note: if you are a moderate muslim reading this, do yourself a favor and watch this video open-minded and unprejudiced:
Three questions for moderate muslims. (6:45)

Islamization begins when there are sufficient muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges. Once a society is dominated by muslims religious leaders will take over and establish the sharia, and moderate muslims will be out of the picture and totally irrelevant, or worse... impossible. Any moderate muslim should seriously ask himself: are the words of Mohammed really what i (want to) believe in?

SO FAR the majority of the muslims (approximately 75%) IN THE WEST are either "passive muslims" or "moderate muslims". THANK GOD.

Also a certain percentage of moderate muslims are not fully knowledgable about their faith (yet) or not fully practicing their faith (yet). It has been demonstrated that the more devout (islamic) a muslim becomes and the more he learns about the islamic ideology, the more dedicated and committed he becomes to the teaching of the koran, the hadith, and demands of historical islam.

3.) Practicing muslims (devout muslims)

Most muslims in the world today however are practicing muslims, or devout muslims. They follow and practice the beliefs of islam and as such are OBLIGED to worship Allah EXACTLY as Mohammed did. And according to the koran and sunna that is THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE WAY to profess the faith of islam...

Note: if you are a muslim reading this, watch:
Who killed Mohammed? (24:10)

Muslims in the world follow islam not half heartedly. They state that a muslim NEEDS to face what the koran teaches and NEEDS to follow it COMPLETELY, or else it would mean that they would have a better moral structure than what Allah or Mohammed had.

ISIS and AL-QAEDA for instance are devout muslims since they do EXACTLY what Mohammed did and EXACTLY what islam says in the koran, the sira and the hadith.

ISIS and AL-QAEDA are notorious because they operate worldwide, but they are in no way an exception. There are many more islamic terrorist groups that spread terror in the world in the name of islam.

Just to give you an idea, here are some of the other -- less famous -- jihadi groups:

Boko Haram, Jabhat al-Nusra, Hamas, Hezb'Allah, Al-Shabaab, The Muslim Brotherhood, Taliban, Abdullah Azzam, Shaheed Brigade, Abu Nidal Organization, Abu Sayyaf, al-Aqsa Foundation, al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, Al-Badr, al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya, Al Ghurabaa, al-Haramain Foundation, Al-Itihaad al-Islamiya, al-Qaeda in Iraq, al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, Takfir wal-Hijra, Al-Umar-Mujahideen, Ansar al-Islam, Jamaat Ansar al-Sunna, Ansar Dine, Ansaru, Armed Islamic Group of Algeria, Army of Islam, Osbat al-Ansar, Caucasus Emirate, Deendar Anjuman, Dukhtaran-e-Millat, East Turkestan Islamic Movement, East Turkestan Liberation Organization, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, El Kaide Terör Örgütü Türkiye Yapilanmasi, Great Eastern Islamic Raiders' Front, Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, Haqqani network, Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami, Harkat-al-Jihad al-Islami in Bangladesh, Harkat-ul-Mujahideen, Harakat-Ul-Mujahideen/Alami, Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin, Hezbollah Military Wing, Hezbollah External Security Organisation, Hilafet Devleti, Hizb ut-Tahrir, Hizbul Mujahideen, Hofstad Network, Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, Indian Mujahideen, Aden-Abyan Islamic Army, Islamic Jihad -- Jamaat Mujahideen, Islamic Jihad Union, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, Jaish-e-Mohammed, Jamaat Ul-Furquan, Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh, Jamiat al-Islah al-Idzhtimai, Jamiat ul-Ansar, Jamiat-e Islami, Jemaah Islamiyah, Jamaah Ansharut Tauhid, Jund al-Sham, Jundallah, Kata'ib Hezbollah, Khalistan Commando Force, Khalistan Zindabad Force, Khuddam ul-Islam, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group, Palestine Liberation Front, Islamic Jihad Movement in Palestine, People's Congress of Ichkeria and Dagestan, Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine -- General Command, Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan, Society of the Revival of Islamic Heritage, Stichting Al Aqsa, Students Islamic Movement of India, Supreme Military Majlis ul-Shura of the United Mujahideen Forces of Caucasus, Tehreek-e-Nafaz-e-Shariat-e-Mohammadi, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, United Liberation Front of Assam, World Uygur Youth Congress, Al-Shabab (Africa), Al Murabitun (Africa), Al-Qaeda (Afghanistan), Al-Qaeda (Islamic Maghreb), Al-Qaeda (Indian Subcontinent), Al-Qaeda (Arabian Peninsula), Hamas (Palestine), Palestinian Islamic Jihad (Palestine), Popular Front for the Liberation of (Palestine), Hezbola (Lebanon), Ansar al-Sharia-Benghazi (Lebanon), Asbat Al-Ansar (Lebanon), ISIS (Iraq), ISIS (Syria), ISIS (Cauacus), ISIS (Libya), ISIS (Yemen), ISIS (Algeria), ISIS (Philippines), Jund al-Sham (Afganistan), Al-Mourabitoun (Lebanon), Abdullah Azzam Brigades (Lebanon), Al-Itihaad al-Islamiya (Somalia), Al-Haramain Foundation (Saudi Arabia), Ansar-Al-Sharia (Moroccon), Moroccon Mudjadine (Morocco), Salafia Jihadia (Morocco), Boko Haram (Afrika), Islamic movement (Uzbekistan), Islamic Jihad Union (Uzbekistan), Islamic Jihad Union (Germany), DRW True-Religion (Germany), Fajar Nusantara Movement (Germany), DIK Hildesheim (Germany), Jaish-e-Mohammed (Kashmir), Jaish al-Muhajireen wal-Ansar (Syria), Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (Syria), Jamaat al Dawa al Quran (Afghanistan), Jundallah (Iran), Quds Force (Iran), Kata'ib Hezbollah (Iraq), Al-Itihaad al-Islamiya (Somalia), Egyptian Islamic Jihad (Egypt), Jund al-Sham (Jordan), Fajar Nusantara Movement (Australia), Society of the Revival of Islamic, Heritage (Terror funding, WorldWide offices), Taliban (Afghanistan), Taliban (Pakistan), Tehrik-i-Taliban (Pakistan), Army of Islam (Syria), Islamic Movement (Israel), Ansar Al Sharia (Tunisia), Mujahideen Shura Council in the Environs of (Jerusalem), Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (Libya), Movement for Oneness and Jihad (West Africa), Palestinian Islamic Jihad (Palestine), Tevhid-Selam (Al-Quds Army), Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group (Morroco), Caucasus Emirate (Russia), Dukhtaran-e-Millat Feminist Islamists (India), Indian Mujahideen (India), Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen (India), Ansar al-Islam (India), Students Islamic Movement of (India), Harakat Mujahideen (India), Hizbul Mujhaideen (India), Lashkar e Islam (India), Jund al-Khilafah (Algeria), Turkistan Islamic Party, Egyptian Islamic Jihad (Egypt), Great Eastern Islamic Raiders' Front (Turkey), Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami (Pakistan), Tehreek-e-Nafaz-e-Shariat-e-Mohammadi (Pakistan), Lashkar e Toyiba (Pakistan), Lashkar e Jhangvi (Pakistan), Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat (Pakistan), Jamaat ul-Ahrar (Pakistan), Harkat-ul-Mujahideen (Pakistan), Jamaat Ul-Furquan (Pakistan), Harkat-ul-Mujahideen (Syria), Ansar al-Din Front (Syria), Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (Syria), Jamaah Anshorut Daulah (Syria), Nour al-Din al-Zenki Movement (Syria), Liwa al-Haqq (Syria), Al-Tawhid Brigade (Syria), Jund al-Aqsa (Syria), Al-Tawhid Brigade (Syria), Yarmouk Martyrs Brigade (Syria), Khalid ibn al-Walid Army (Syria), Hezb-e Islami Gulbuddin (Afganistan), Jamaat-ul-Ahrar (Afganistan), Hizb ut-Tahrir (Worldwide Caliphate), Hizbul Mujahideen (Kasmir), Ansar Allah (Yemen), Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (USA), Jamaat Mujahideen (India), Jamaah Ansharut Tauhid (Indonesia), Hizbut Tahrir (Indonesia), Fajar Nusantara Movement (Indonesia), Jemaah Islamiyah (Indonesia), Jemaah Islamiyah (Philippines), Jemaah Islamiyah (Singapore), Jemaah Islamiyah (Thailand), Jemaah Islamiyah (Malaysia), Ansar Dine (Africa), Osbat al-Ansar (Palestine), Hizb ut-Tahrir (Group connecting), Islamic Caliphates across the world into one world Islamic Caliphate), Army of the Men of the Naqshbandi Order (Iraq), Al Nusra Front (Syria), Al-Badr (Pakistan), Islam4UK (UK), Al Ghurabaa (UK), Call to Submission (UK), Islamic Path (UK), London School of Sharia (UK), Muslims Against Crusades (UK), Need4Khilafah (UK), The Shariah Project (UK), The Islamic Dawah Association (UK), The Saviour Sect (UK), Jamaat Ul-Furquan (UK), Minbar Ansar Deen (UK), Al-Muhajiroun (UK) (Lee Rigby, London 2017 members), Islamic Council of Britain (UK) (Not to be confused with Offical Muslim Council of Britain), Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah (UK), Al-Gama'a (Egypt), Al-Islamiyya (Egypt), Armed Islamic men of (Algeria), Salafist Group for Call and Combat (Algeria), Ansaru (Algeria), Ansar-Al-Sharia (Libya), Al Ittihad Al Islamia (Somalia), Ansar al-Sharia (Tunisia), Al-Shabab (Africa), al-Aqsa Foundation (Germany), al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades (Palestine), Abu Sayyaf (Philippines), Aden-Abyan Islamic Army (Yemen), Ajnad Misr (Egypt), Abu Nidal Organization (Palestine) and Jamaah Ansharut Tauhid (Indonesia).

This list is not complete, there are more.

No matter what politicians want you to believe: WE ARE NOT AT WAR WITH ISIS, destroying ISIS will not solve anything. Boko Haram for instance has killed far more people than ISIS. When ISIS is destroyed some other islamic terror group WILL take it's place.



A message for any muslim reading this:

 DEAR MUSLIMS, YOU ARE DECEIVED AND LIED TO. Read the sira: Mohammed was a FALSE prophet, he was a narcissistic psychopath. He STOLE his stories from the Bible and various pagan religions, and altered them. Islam is poisoned propaganda that tries to BRAINWASH you.

 If the Bible is corrupted than the koran is a lie, because the koran says that "Allah gave the Bible" (koran 57:25, 53:36-42, 5:44, 4:163, 5:46, 7:157). And: "Allah's words never change" (koran 6:34, 6:115, 10:64, 18:27). But, if the Bible is not corrupted the koran is also a lie because it contradicts both the Old and the New Testament.

 Islam is a false religion. [http://www.falseislam.org/] ISLAM IS A CANCER THAT BRINGS NOTHING GOOD. ISIS is 100% islam, there is NOT A SINGLE CRIME that ISIS does today that Mohammed himself did not do 1400 years ago.

And due to purification -- since "moderate muslims" that do not engage in Jihad are considered to be hypocrites -- no one is more victimized by islam than muslims. THAT is why so many muslims are killed by other (more devout) muslims.

Don't let yourself be brainwashed, think for yourself.

All the information is out there... if you are willing to see it.

Wake up!




About islam:

Islam is a monotheistic (one God) totalitarian religion system. Islam is a military religion and is characterized by the DOCTRINE of ABSOLUTE SUBMISSION and OBEDIENCE to Allah (the sharia) by following the example of the warrior Mohammed as the SELF-PROCLAIMED "last prophet" of God.

There is no such thing as a "moderate Islam". That is a construct of western society (wishful thinking). There is only one islam, so islam is islam. No confusion here.

Islam is what is written in the trilogy: the koran, the sira and the hadith. ISLAM is the PROPAGANDA that BRAINWASHES MUSLIMS to FOLLOW THE EXAMPLE OF MOHAMMED.

Approximately 14% of the textual doctrine of islam can be found in the koran.
Approximately 26% of the textual doctrine of islam can be found in the sira.
Approximately 60% of the textual doctrine of islam can be found in the hadith.

Koran: 152.006 words
Sira: 274.838 words
Hadith (Bukhari): 645.745 words
 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Total trilogy: 1.072.589 words

The goal of islam:

Islam has but ONE goal: make sharia the law of the land. In EVERY land. Worldwide.

Everything else is subordinate to this.

So, the goal of islam is not to convert every human being in the world to become a muslim. THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF ISLAM IS TO DOMINATE AND CONTROL THE WORLD AND TO ESTABLISH THE SHARIA WORLDWIDE. So that every human will live under the rule of Allah.

The goal of islam is to "conquer the world" step by step and to set-up one islamic state.

Absolute submittance to the laws of Allah. For everyone. Either as a muslim or a dhimmi.

What is islam?

Islam was founded in Arabia in the 7th century and is based on and written by the teachings of the warlord Mohammed who wrote it gradually in a period of approx. 23 years. Islam is more than a religion, IT IS A COMPLETE CIVILIZATION including politics and laws. As laid down in the koran: "islam is a complete way of life, not a sunday religion".

Islam is a TOTALITARIAN IDEOLOGY, it controls EVERY aspect of life: not just how to pray but also how to think, how to dress, how to sleep, what to eat, how to look, how to speak, how to live, how to act, how to make love, how to name your children, how to spit, how to drink, how to pick your nose, what foot you should enter and exit the toilet, how many pieces of toiletpaper you must use, and so on and on and on.

Islam is all consuming. In islam you don't have to think for yourself, everything is decided for you, many muslims gives this some form of peace and inner contentment. But this also means that islam does not leave ANY room for own interpretations or thinking. It is one big brainwashing machine. THERE IS NO ROOM FOR FREEDOM OR OWN BELIEFS AT ALL IN ISLAM. Islam controls literally E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G.

In islam there is no 'golden rule', no compassion and no such thing as right and wrong, there's only that which is commanded and that which is forbidden.

Islam is a religion of laws. These strict codes are given by Allah through the "prophet" Mohammed to formulate all of life since these laws are his will for all mankind AND CANNOT BE DOUBTED. The entire structure of islam does not provide for mercy, grace or forgiveness. Just law. There is no love of God in islam. Only control, hate and domination of people. The koran is not a book of freedom, it is a book of slavery and chattel. basically islam is: obedience or dishonor, submission or shame, surrender or death.

Islam is part "MILITARY-POLITICAL IDEOLOGY" and part "RELIGION". And because it is a religion of laws, there is no conversion that comes from the heart, but a surrender that comes from fear. There is no personal relationship possible to Allah like with other religions. Just obedience to his laws (so that one does not go to hell, or face the shame of community leaders). And yet, no muslim really knows if they have ever obeyed the laws enough. Unless you die in a Jihad, then it is written that you will go straight to paradise:

[Bukhari 1,2,35] Mohammed said, "The man who joins jihad, compelled by nothing except sincere belief in Allah and His Prophets, and survives, will be rewarded by Allah either in the afterlife or with the spoils of war. If he is killed in battle and dies a martyr, he will be admitted into Paradise..."

[Bukhari 4,52,142] Mohammed: "To battle Kafirs in jihad for even one day is greater than the entire earth and everything on it. A spot in Paradise smaller than your riding crop is greater than the entire earth and everything on it. A day or a night's travel in jihad is greater than the entire world and everything on it."

The islamic scripture is the only scripture that explicitly and repeatedly combines calls to violence with the promise of Paradise.

Islam is essentially an ideology of eternal global war. The basic divide in Islamic theology is between the "House of War" and the "House of Islam". It advocates the permanent incorporation of the non-islamic "Dar al-Harb" (the "House of War") into the "Dar al-Islam" (the "House of islam" or "House of Submission"). The term "House of War" indicates that all areas under non-Islamic rule are viewed as a place of war until such areas cease to exist worldwide and are submitted to forces which are loyal to Allah and his Prophet.

[Sahih al-Bukhari 6924] Allah's Messenger said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: La ilaha illallah (There is no god but Allah), and whoever said La ilaha illahllah, Allah will save his property and his life from me."

[Sahih Muslim 33] The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer, and pay Zakat and if they do it, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf except when justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah.

In the entire koran the words "Love" and "Honor" appear exactly zero times.

But the word "beheading" is mentioned forty-one times in the sira, nine times in the hadith of Bukhari and once in the koran. And the words "kill" and "fight" are mentioned no less than 32.213 times in the koran and the sunna.

Islam is a dominant medieval religion of conquerors, just like the vikings and the Mongols had their Gods and beliefs. The only difference is that Mohammed, the leader and founder of islam, wrote a book (the koran), so the ideology did not die with him after his death.

Note: the Arabic word "islam" means "submission", NOT "peace". Many muslims would like you to believe that it means peace, it does not. Peace is ONLY possible after submission to islamic rule and islamic law (Sharia). So, peace is identical with submission to islam and the absence of the sharia is the absence of peace. Islam only has it's "peace" if the land is controlled by the sharia in controlled areas. Just like the Nazi's had there "peace" in areas controlled by the Gestapo. Peace in islam means when there is no more reason to fight (and all the land is conquered).

There is NO GREATER THREAT IN THE WORLD TODAY than the STEP BY STEP islamisation of the free countries in the West, GRADUALLY changing democratic rule of law into medieval sharia law.

"ISLAM" means "SUBMISSION" (to Allah's will, which is the sharia).

Why is islam different than any other religion?

Islam is not like any other religion in the world today, it is different. There are many more than three reasons for this, but there are three MAIN reasons.


In islam there is no separation of church (mosque) and state. So, the religion is the state, and the state is the religion, they are one and the same. All laws are already written in the koran and in the sunna. This means: the mosque decides and the imam rules.

2.) The second main reason is: ISLAM PERMITS LYING TO ADVANCE ISLAM.

So any muslim can actually put his hand on the koran and swear an oath, or sign an agreement (remember Turkey and Iran...) to A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G while lying and it would be NO PROBLEM AT ALL, as long as it is for the good or the benefit of islam. As long as it advances islam it's fine. This is called taqiyya.

3.) The third main reason is that unlike all other religions ISLAM IS NOT JUST A PERSONAL RELIGION, ISLAM IS A THEOCRACY.

Islam is not a personal religion like for example Christianity and Judaism are. Islam is a complete manual for a civilization. Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components and ALL of them are mandatory (for both muslims AND non-muslims).

In fact, the religious part of islam is only about 14%. So islam is not just a religion with things you can just do for yourself like fasting and praying. It has many more elements, like the sharia which will affect EVERY detail of social life for both muslims AND non-muslims.

If there is a majority of muslims in any place they'll want to implement the koran and replace (man made) democratic / ciminal law with the laws of the sharia. Because islam does not accept ANY law besides Allah's law. (That means for instance if somebody steals his hand must be cut of, adulterers must be stoned, apostates must be killed, and so on.)

But it goes further than this: 60% of the doctrine of islam IS ABOUT NON-MUSLIMS. THE DOCTRINE OF ISLAM IS FAR MORE CONCERNED WITH THE UNBELIEVERS (for instance how non-muslims should be humiliated, converted and killed) THAN IT IS WITH THE BELIEVERS (for instance how muslims should pray, act or how to be a good muslim).

Islams says that EVERYBODY should live under the rules of islam: muslims AND non-muslims. So, even if you are not a muslim islam DEMANDS that you follow the rules of their sharia, or the punishment is severe, most likely death.

The more islam calls the shots in a country, the more the sharia wil be implemented in a country. This starts with seemingly harmless things (like demanding rooms for prayer and so on) and ends (after many years) with full implementation of the sharia replacing democracy and man made laws.

This is a step by step almost unnoticeable process, which is known as "creeping sharia".

Also important to know:

According to islam IT IS AN OBLIGATION FOR MUSLIMS TO INTERFERE WITH NON-MUSLIMS. And, as you might have guessed, not in a very nice way, the rules of the sharia are not very pleasant for non-muslims:

9.3% of the trilogy is anti-Jew text (how to fight and kill jews).
31% of the trilogy is devoted to jihad (how to fight and kill non-muslims).
60% of the trilogy is devoted to kafirs (how to subjugate and humiliate non-muslims).

However, spreading the ideology does NOT happen through the trilogy alone. It is estimated that less than 10% of all muslims HAVE ACTUALLY READ THE KORAN. In fact: most ex-muslims became ex-muslims after understanding what the koran actually stands for and teaches them.

SPREADING THE IDEOLOGY OF ISLAM HAPPENS MAINLY THROUGH THE MOSQUES, imams, religious leaders, environment (circle of friends, acquaintances) and upbringing. Most muslims just do what they are taught by the mosques and/or by example from childhood, sometimes after generations of brainwashing.


After Nazism and Communism, islam is the third totalitarian ideology that threatens humanity. It is a pernicious and deceitful ideology, which disguises itself perfectly since it is part "religion".

Islam sees the world as eternally divided into two opposing camps:

1.) Dar al-Harb (land of war, ruled by the infidels).
2.) Dar al-Islam (land of peace, ruled by muslims).

Any country that is not islamic and not ruled by muslims is seen as a land of war.

We, in the west (the infidel kafirs), are living in "Dar al-Harb", the land of war that needs to be changed urgently according to the muslims in "Dar al-Islam", the land of islam.

Have no illusions about this!
Europe belongs like America to the Dar al-Harb and MUST be subjugated.

Islam did not come to earth to coexist with other religions, but to dominate the world. In over 1400 years islam has never done anything but sow death and destruction. Jihad and killing are the head of islam. Take them away and you'll take the head of islam.

Peace is ONLY possible in islam if islam is spread everywhere. This is why the islamic legal codes says: "Jihad means war against non-muslims until the islamic law applies everywhere. Jihad as a war to make peace".

This means:
Jihad will not stop until the land is dominated by islam and controlled by the sharia.

The jihadist movement is the driving force behind today's global terrorist wave, which is conducted under the guise of a religious armed struggle, the jihad. A verse like: "kill them wherever you may find them" (koran 2:191, 4:89, 4:91) is typical.

Abul Ala Maududi, the most influential Pakistani thinker of the 20th century wrote:

 "Islam is not only a religion, but a revolutionary ideology and jihad refers to that revolutionary struggle."

There are over 1400 hadiths about jihad, 98% of which is about killing the kafir...

If we want to get a picture of how the first jihadists in the seventh century made themself master of the Arabian Peninsula, then we can learn from the rise of ISIS. Everything that ISIS is doing against innocent people now, Arab Muslims in early islam have done before against other innocent people.

The so-called 'Caliph' Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi (the leader of ISIS) has a doctorate in islamic studies and knows EXACTLY what islam is all about: ISIS is spreading islam as Mohammed would have wanted it, and as Mohammed propagated it himself. The jihadists who kill in the name of islam justify their actions by the existence of infidel kafirs.

Today, islam with its universal Jihad, has allready gained control over more than 50 countries around the world. North Africa, The Middle East and Turkey were up until to the 7th century Christian (various denominations). Fortunately, the first islamic invasion of Europe by muslims was encountered at Poitiers in 732, and the second in 1683 was stopped at Vienna.

The jihad today however is no longer conducted by states with armies since it is no longer possible. Once any islamist government would start a war against the West, they would simply be destroyed by Western armies. Therefore the tactics of jihad has changed.

Islam has found a different way to colonize the West: hijrah

1.) through the uterus
2.) through immigration
3.) through the conversion of unbelievers


Several Western European cities already have complete muslim "free states" where muslim immigrants behave like occupiers, where Western government no longer dare to intervene.

Throughout the world the integration policy has failed because islam does not WANT to integrate. And the Koran does not want integration: "make with the Jews and Christians no agreements, because when you do that, you become one of them".

Don't let anybody fool you:
A harmonious multicultural society with islam exists NOWHERE and WILL NEVER EXIST. History shows that muslims, as long as they are in the minority, are very tolerant, but once in power are the enemies of democracy.

The west does not need or want any medieval Sharia law, where we should always fear for our lives. Islam brings nothing good. Islam brings only death, misery, fear, inequality, cruelty, chaos and cultural degradation.

It is INCONCEIVABLE that some modern academics STILL continue to propagate islam as a gentle and peaceful religion, and keep insisting that there is no inherent problem with immigration and islamization.

Just before the second world war too many people's eyes where closed to the dangers of the Nazis. We are living in freedom today because many good man, gave their life FOR US. It is now OUR DUTY to the next generations not to shut our eyes to the dangers of islam.

Most Germans were "moderate", yet the Nazis murdered 60 million people.


Islam has said many times THEY WILL DESTROY US FROM WITHIN.



ISLAM and JIHAD (the holy war against infidels as a religious duty):

The goal of jihad is to implement the the law of Allah (sharia) worldwide (because you can't force a person to believe in Allah but you can force him to live by the sharia).

In islam, jihad is a COMMUNAL OBLIGATION with the goal of ESTABLISHING THE SHARIA WORLDWIDE as the law of the land. This obligation might be met BY ALL MEANS POSSIBLE: via war, money, the pen, the sword, moral support, politics, and even deceit for the cause.

Jihad is the struggle to establish the sharia worldwide.

So, jihad is MUCH MORE than terrorism and war alone.

If we would ONLY have jihad of the sword [islamic terrorism], we would not have a big problem since the actual numbers that are killed are not enough to change a country. Many more people are killed by for instance drunk drivers on a saturday night.

First and foremost we need to worry about the SHARIA, not about TERRORISM.

Changing the textbooks and culture step by step over many years, THAT is what changes a free country. So the jihad of mouth, speech and money is far more important and dangerous than the jihad of the sword.

The fact that currently muslim countries like Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, The United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia are not taking in ANY muslim refugees forcing them towards non-muslim countries, is Jihad.

The fact that rich oil states like Saudi Arabia are funding mosques, islamic schools and universtities in Europe and non-muslim countries, is Jihad.

The fact that Turkey is funding politicians in Western governments and politics and is currently blackmailing Europe, is Jihad.

They are all different ways to "fight" the holy war and to work towards the goal of total islamic domination of the world so that every human will live under Allah's laws (Sharia).

The koran explains in more than 100 verses ISLAM AND JIHAD ARE INSEPARABLE.

Muslims have been waging jihad AGAINST ALL OTHER RELIGIONS for over 1400 YEARS, checked only by the ability of non-muslims to defend themselves.

TILL THIS VERY DAY not ONE WEEK has gone by (EVER!) that islamic fundamentalists do NOT attempt to KILL Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and atheists in the name of Allah.

Note: NONE of these other religions are at war with each other!

Approximately 90% of the worlds VIOLENT conflicts TODAY are in MUSLIM LANDS.

Approximately 95% of all VIOLENCE in the world TODAY has to do with ISLAM.

Here are SOME of the MAIN ARMED CONFLICTS involving islam TODAY:

Afghanistan: muslims against muslims.

Bangladesh: muslims against Hindus (Bengalis) and Buddists (Chakmas).

Bosnia: muslims against Serbian Orthodox Christians and Roman Catholics.

Central African Republic: muslims against Christians.

Cote d'Ivoire: muslims against indigenous and Christians.

Cyprus: muslims against Christians.

East Timor: muslims against Christians.

Indonesia: muslims against province of Ambon Christians.

Kashmir: muslims against Hindus.

Kosovo: muslims against Serbian Orthodox Christians.

Kurdistan: muslims against Christians (Protestant, Chaldean Catholic, Assyrian Orthodox).

Macedonia: muslims against Macedonian Orthodox Christians.

Middle East: muslims against Jews and Christians.

Nigeria: muslims against Christians and Animists.

Pakistan: muslims against Suni and Shi'ite .

Philippines: muslims against Christians.

Russia: muslims against Chechnya Russian Orthodox Christians.

Serbia: muslims against province of Vojvodina Serbian Orthodox and Roman Catholics.

Sri Lanka: muslims against Buddhists and Hindus Tamils.

Syria: muslims against muslims.

Tajikistan: intra-islamic conflict.

Thailand: muslims against Pattani province Buddhists.


ISIS leader Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, 14th May 2015:

 "Islam was never a religion of peace, islam is the religion of fighting.

 No-one should belief that the war that we are waging is the war of the Islamic State, it is the war of all muslims, but the Islamic State is spearheading it.

 It is the war of muslims against infidels"


Did you know this?

270 MILLION(!) non-believers have been MURDERED BY MUSLIMS SO FAR. That is 528 people EACH DAY, and 22 people EACH HOUR. The number of muslims that were killed by muslims is unknown but even many times more than that (estimated 2-3 times more).

60 MILLION Christians were MURDERED in the Middle East and North Africa.

80 MILLION Hindus were KILLED by Jihadists in India.

120 MILLION African slaves DIED at muslim hands.

10 MILLION Buddhists were KILLED by Jihadists.

Amount of text devoted to jihad in islam (how to fight non-muslims):

Koran: 24%

Sira: 67%

Hadith: 21%

Total trilogy: 31%

Abul Ala Maududi, the founder of Jamaat-e-Islami, in his book "Jihad in Islam":

 "Islam is not a normal religion like the other religions in the world, and Muslim nations are not like normal nations. Muslim nations are very special because they have a command from Allah to rule the ENTIRE world and to be over every nation in the world. Islam is a revolutionary faith that comes to DESTROY any government made by man.

 Islam doesn't look for a nation to be in better condition than another nation. Islam doesn't care about land or who owns the land. The goal of Islam is to RULE THE ENTIRE WORLD and submit ALL of mankind to the faith of Islam. Any nation or power in this world that tries to get in the way of that goal Islam will FIGHT and DESTROY. In order for Islam to fulfill that goal, Islam can use every power available every way it can be used to bring worldwide revolution. This is jihad."

About "radical islam":

Islam has three books that muslims follow: the koran which is the book muslims believe is the word from Allah to Mohammed through the angel Gabriel, this is 14% of the islamic trilogy. The Hadith, the deeds and the spoken word of Mohammed, covers 60% of islamic text. And the Sira which is the biography of Mohammed is 26% of the trilogy.

NOWHERE in these books is there a distinction between "islam" and "radical islam", there is only ONE islam, the term "radical islam" is a smokescreen originally invented by the appeasing Western media in an attempt not to offend muslims. If media reporting on islam only used the word "islam" it would be seen as attacking the muslim faith, so to avoid this the term "radical islam" was created.

By using the term "radical islam" this implies there are two korans, two hadiths and two siras, one for the "everyday islamic follower" and one for the "radical follower".

This subject has been researched by many eminent scholars and they ALL reach the same conclusion: there is only ONE islam and it has remained unchanged for over 1400 years, the people who have tried to change it are either DEAD or IN HIDING.

Furthermore, 85% of muslims take the text LITERALLY, because the doctrine of islam says they have to, there is no other way, and there is no room for different interpretations.

The term "radical" is however justified when you talk about the FOLLOWERS of islam, since muslims follow islamic text and teachings: Approximately 20-25% are devout muslims (and the word radical applies to this group), approximately 60% are described by using the term moderate, the remaining percentage can be described as passive.

Islam is NOT "hijacked" by radical muslims, ISLAM IS A VERY RADICAL IDEOLOGY.

If islam gave up its doctrine that Allah hates all non-muslims, and wants muslims to wage jihad against them until they are either conquered, killed, enslaved or converted.

If islam gave up its doctrine of death to anyone who insults Mohammed or islam.

If islam gave up its doctrine of death to any muslim who leaves islam.

If islam gave up its doctrine that it is okay to brutalize women and molest children.

If islam gave up its doctrine that a muslim cannot be a true friend to a non-muslim.

If islam gave up its doctrine that a muslim should lie to non-muslims to advance islam.

If islam gave up its cruel barbaric sharia law and its doctrine that sharia must the supreme law everywhere in the world.

If islam could teach a God of love for all humanity who are all his children and could teach that muslims should love all non-muslims just the same.

Then, perhaps, islam could stop being a totalitarian political ideology and could start becoming a worthwhile religion.

But..., then it wouldn't be islam anymore, would it?

How mainstream media and most journalists think today is extremely worrisome. Many of them want to CHANGE the world, not report it.

Which is leading to biased reporting or even total omission of inconvenient or unpopular stories, instead of giving facts and truth. A clash between ratio and emotion, not reporting what they see, but what they would like to see.

The truth is unfortunately all too often sugar coated by mainstream media and politicians who have NEVER EVEN READ THE KORAN, let alone understand it. THEY ARE PRACTICING WISHFUL THINKING. If anybody says "islam is hijacked by radicals" it means they either know absolutely nothing about islam or they are lying (taqiyya).

While the fact of the matter is that ISLAM MAY VERY WELL BE THE GREATEST THREAT TO THE FREE WORLD IN HISTORY, EVER. Islam so far has killed (far) more people than nazism and communism together and... ISLAM IS STILL VERY MUCH ALIVE TODAY, AND STRONGER THAN EVER.


Women's rights in islam.

In islam Allah created women to be the property of men, to do with them whatever they desire at any time. In islam a woman is always the property of a man, like a dog. She can either be treated good or bad, it's up to the owner.

[Koran 33:51] You may have whomever you desire; there is no blame.

Islam and sharia dictate that every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property. This can be either as a child, a wife or a concubine. Islam and sharia dictate that a woman is ALWAYS INFERIOR TO THE MALE and islam and sharia allow beatings to enforce the rule of the male. The koran says for instance:

[Koran 2:223] Women are your plowed fields: go into your fields when you like.

Slave-girls are sexual property for their male owners:

[Koran 4:24] And (forbidden to you) are married women, except those whom your righthand owns. Such Allah has written for you. Lawful to you beyond all that, is that you can seek using your wealth in marriage and not fornication. So whatever you have enjoyed from them give them their obligated wage. And there is no fault in you in what ever you mutually agree after the obligation. Allah is the Knower, the Wise.

Husbands may hit their wives if they merely fear highhandedness in their wives (regardless of whether they are actually highhanded or not):

[Koran 4:34] Allah has made men superior to women because men spend their wealth to support them. Therefore, virtuous women are obedient, and they are to guard their unseen parts as Allah has guarded them. As for women whom you fear will rebel, admonish them first, and then send them to a separate bed, and then beat them. But if they are obedient after that, then do nothing further; surely Allah is exalted and great.

This hadith equates camels, slaves and women:

[Abu Dawud 11,2155] Mohammed said: If one of you marries a woman or buys a slave, he should say: "O Allah, I ask You for the good in her, and in the disposition You have given her; I take refuge in You from the evil in her, and in the disposition You have given her." When he buys a camel, he should take hold of the top of its hump and say the same kind of thing.

In 5.3% of the verses in the koran concerning women, the status of women is held in HIGH ESTEEM. BUT THERE IS A CATCH: this applies ONLY if she is a mother and ONLY in reference to her children.

In 23.35% of the verses in the koran concerning women, women are TREATED AS EQUAL. BUT HERE IS ALSO A CATCH: this applies ONLY if she obeys her husband and submits to her husband COMPLETELY.

In 71.35% of the verses in the koran concerning women, the status of women is simply TO BE SUBJUGATED.

For example:

Women are Weak -- (Bukhari 8:73:230)
Women are Stupid -- (Bukhari 3:48:826)
Women are Crooked -- (Bukhari 7:62:113)
Women Lack Gratitude -- (Bukhari 1:2:28)
Woman are an Evil Omen -- (Bukhari 4:52:110)
Women are like Devils -- (Sahih Muslim 8:3240)
Most Women are Destined for Hell -- (Muslim 36:6596)

Sir Winston Churchill said:

 "The fact that in islamic law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of islam has ceased to be a great power among them."

WOMEN'S RIGHTS and islam can NOT coexist.

LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) rights in islam.

There are simply none, the penalty is death.

Abd-Allaah ibn 'Abbaas said: "the highest point in the town should be found and the homosexual should be thrown head first from it, then stones should be thrown at him".

Abu Bakr (the father of Aisha and Mohammed's first successor), had a homosexual burned at the stake. The fourth Rightly-Guided Caliph, Mohammed's son-in-law Ali, ordered homosexuals to be thrown from the minaret of a mosque and stoned.

So, there are varying opinions on how the death penalty is to be carried out in islam. Abu Bakr recommended toppling a wall on the evil-doer, or else burning alive. Ali bin Abi Talib ordered death by stoning or thrown head-first from the top of a minaret (according to Ibn Abbaas, this last punishment must also be followed by stoning).

LGBT RIGHTS and islam can NOT coexist.

And, to complete the list...

LIBERTY and islam can NOT coexist.

FREE SPEECH and islam can NOT coexist.

FREE PRESS and islam can NOT coexist.

DEMOCRACY and islam can NOT coexist.

OTHER RELIGIONS and islam can NOT coexist.

ATHEISM and islam can NOT coexist.

HUMAN RIGHTS and islam can NOT coexist.

CRITICAL THINKING and islam can NOT coexist.

And, did you know this?

MODERATE MUSLIMS and islam can NOT coexist.

Islam is expansionistic and kills freedom wherever it takes root.

The main objective of Western democracies is to safeguard our natural rights against tyranny, so that all people might live in freedom and safety. But since Islamic supremacy, as a monolithic political ideology, stands in direct opposition to the ethic of this golden rule, islam poses an immense danger to human life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

Its adherents, once muslims islamize a region in numbers great enough to control the government, imposing their totalitarian ways on all others within their political control.

This islamic modus operandi of literally forcing people to lose their freedom and submit to a Mohammedan way of life enforces a fascist philosophy on others that brooks no opposition.

Merely questioning islam can be considered apostasy (the crime of leaving islam) and is punishable by death. In Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 84, Hadith 57, Mohammed says: "Whoever changed his islamic religion, then kill him!".

For this reason, among others, the ideology of islam must be exposed outright and fought against vigorously, lest the future of the West become a deadly, totalitarian one.

Note: this is just as important for (moderate) muslims, as it is for non-muslims.


The growth of islam:

The growth of islam is almost solely due to incredibly high birth rates. The "fastest growing religion in the world" is actually the "fastest breeding religion in the world".

Next to the staggering birth rates islam hardly grows. New converts are won by FEAR and DECEIT ONLY and NEVER by free will (such as is the case with Christianity, or any other religion). Muslims are either forced in their religion or are lied to if force is not possible.

Another main reason that islam is still growing today is because it's structure makes it very easy to become a muslim, but very difficult to leave the religion.

In muslim countries it is impossible for a muslim to become an ex-muslim or death awaits.

And likewise in muslim countries it is virtually impossible for non-muslims NOT to become a muslim if you're not. Unless you want to go through life as a dhimmi (inferior people who are treated pretty much like the jews were treated in WW2 by the Nazi's): through force.

In non-muslims countries (in the West) AT THE VERY LEAST shame awaits from family and community. And since islam is a complete way of life which controls EVERYTHING, leaving islam will in most cases also mean leaving your life, your family, father, mother and everything you are and value.

And likewise in non-muslim countries (in the West) many that became a muslim did so knowing absolutely NOTHING about islam and having a completely wrong image of what islam really is ("the religion of peace"): through deceit.

Yusuf al-Qaradawi, head of the Muslim Brotherhood and a leading scholar of Sunni islam (90% of muslims), said islam exists only because people fear being murdered if they leave:

 "If they had gotten rid of the aposty punishment, islam wouldn't exist today...

 Opposing apostasy is what kept islam to this day."

The growth of islam is based on:

1.) Converting, subjugating, or killing unbelievers.
2.) Killing apostates.
3.) Conquering the world -- by all means possible -- until all man-made (democratic) laws are gone and everyone lives under the sharia.

Why do muslims KILL?

Many muslims and apologists would like you to believe that islam is a religion of peace and that killing is strictly forbidden. This is a lie, it is simply NOT true.

Muslims say that islam forbids them from killing innocent people. What most of them won't tell you is that in islam ONLY DEVOUT MUSLIMS ARE CONSIDERED TO BE INNOCENT.

The koran and hadith state very clearly in many verses the command to kill, whether it is unbelievers, apostates, hypocrites, homosexuals, blasphemers, honor killings, those who wage war against islam, those who defame Allah or Mohammed, those who do not follow the sharia, etc, etc.

There are many, many reasons in islam to kill.

Mohammed mentioned jihad no less than 1.293 times in the hadiths alone.

Killing and jihad is not only related to islamic terrorist organisations. Jihad is part of the entire 1.6 billion muslim community world-wide. What we in the West define as "terrorism" is simply "the law" in many muslim dominated areas: just plain "state run terror".

Jihad is the most heroic duty that every muslim at some point is encouraged to engage in, to kill the unbeliever to please Allah is a fast-track ticket to Jannah (paradise).

Such a loving, tolerant, merciful god!


Must Watch: 1400 Years of Islamic History in a Few Minutes - Brigitte Gabriel

The six forms of islamic deceit:

1.) Taqiyya: tactical deceit for the purposes of spreading islam.

Taqiyya [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hT8-4Mq2pBE] (Shia) or Muda'rat (Sunni) is defined as dissimulation about one's muslim identity.

It comes from the verse in the koran that says: "Let believers not make friends with infidels in preference to the faithful" (Surah 3:28). And: "When it is possible to achieve an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible, and lying is obligatory if the goal is obligatory" (Reliance of the Traveler, Para r8.2).

Examples include any lying to protect islam, or to protect a muslim. The practical application of this deception:

When muslims are few in numbers: "we are from the religion of peace".
When muslims are numerous: "islam deserves a special status".
When muslims outnumber you: "islam or else...".

2.) Kitman: deceit by omission.

Kitman is characterized by someone telling only PART of the truth, and not the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Often kitman results in a gross distortion of the truth.

For example, when a muslim says that jihad really refers to an internal, spiritual struggle. He is not telling that the koran uses jihad and its derivatives 59 times. Of those, only 16 (27%) could be considered "internal" with no object as the target of the struggle based on the context of the surah.

Another example of kitman is to quote ONLY the few peaceful passages from the koran, knowing full-well that that passage was later abrogated (cancelled) by a more militant, contradictory verse.

"There is no compulsion in religion" (Surah 2:256 -- Early Medina) is abrogated by: "Are they seeking a religion other than Allah's, when every soul in the heavens and earth has submitted to Him, willingly or by compulsion?" (Surah 3:83 -- Later Medina)

Or: "Permission to take up arms is hereby given to those who are attacked, because they have been wronged" (Surah 22:39 -- Late Mecca) is abrogated by: "When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere for them" (Surah 9:5 -- Late Medina).

3.) Tawriya: deceit by ambiguity.

Tawriya is defined as concealing, and it could be called "creative lying". It is OK to break the intent of the oath, as long as you don't break the letter of the oath. (Reliance of the Traveler, sections o19.1 and o19.5)

For example: suppose someone protests that surah 1 of the koran demeans Christians and Jews, because it is a supplication muslims make to Allah seventeen times a day to keep them from the path of "those with whom God is angry" and "those who have lost their way".

A muslim might respond: "surah 1 never mentions Jews or Christians". He is practicing tawriya, because while surah 1 does not mention Jews and Christians by name, he knows full-well that the word "those" refers to Jews and Christians.

Another example: when a muslim responds to your greeting of "Merry Christmas!" He might say, "I wish you the best." In your mind, you think he has returned a Christmas greeting. In actuality, he has expressed his wish for you to convert to islam; he wishes the best for you which, in his view, is becoming a muslim.

4.) Taysir: deceit through facilitation.

This is a subtle doctrine that essentially means that if a muslim is unable to fulfil some aspect of his religious practice, then he is not obligated to attempt to do so (not having to observe all the tenets of sharia).

For example: a muslim would not sin by eating non-halal ("haram") food if no halal food is available or by missing prayers if there is no place or opportunity to pray.

Another example: muslims living in non-muslim countries can claim that they don't believe in various parts of the sharia (stoning adulterers, cutting thieves hands off, and so on), instead they can just set it aside by the doctrine of Taysir, waiting until circumstances change so that they can apply it.

5.) Darura: deceit through necessity.

In one sense the name says it all: anything that a muslim is compelled by necessity to do (to engage in something "haram" or forbidden), even to the point of denying faith, is covered (and permitted) by this doctrine.

For example: If a muslim is forced by necessity to go to a secular (Western) Court, rather than a Sharia Court to obtain his rights, that is Darura. Eventhough a muslim is not allowed to believe in man-made laws.

6.) Muruna: the temporary suspension of sharia.

Muruna means using flexibility to blend in with the enemy or the surroundings in order that muslim immigrants appear moderate, so the community gets the false sense that the early immigrants are not a threat, at least until the muslim community has gained strenght.

Thus, muslims may forget some of the commands in the koran, as long as they are pursuing a better command. Muslims striving to advance islam, therefore, can deviate from their islamic laws in order to cause non-muslims to lower their guard and place their trust in their muslim counterpart.

The late Mustafa Kemal Atatürk ("Father of Turkey") said about islam:

 "This absurd theology is a rotting corpse which poisons our society."

Mohammed repeatedly told muslims to deceive Kafirs if it would advance islam:

As an example, Mohammed asked: "Who will kill Ka'b, the enemy of Allah and Mohammed?". Bin Maslama rose and responded: "O Mohammed! Would it please you if I killed him?". Mohammed answered: "Yes". Bin Maslama then said: "Give me permission to deciev him with lies so that my plot will succeed". Mohammed replied, "You may speak falsely to him."

"Jihad is deceit." [Bukhari 5,59,369 and 4,52,268]

Remember: this is the man all muslims are supposed to emulate! Ask yourself, honestly: if it is permitted to lie to advance islam, why should anyone believe a follower of islam?


The "moderate" side of islam:

There is NO "moderate islam" in the mosques.

There is NO "moderate islam" in the koran, the sira or the hadith.

There is NO "moderate islam" in Mecca.

There is NO "moderate islam" in ANY muslim dominated country.

If you want to find a "moderate islam" follow the MAINSTREAM MEDIA, browse the NEWSPAPERS after a terrorist attack, or listen to all those POLITICIANS who keep insisting islam is "a religion of peace" but have NEVER EVEN READ THE KORAN and KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT ISLAM.


And like all myths it exists only in the imagination of those who tell the stories.

"Moderate islam" is not what most muslims believe, "moderate islam" is what most liberals and politicians BELIEVE or HOPE that muslims believe.

This generation of Western leaders seeks the affirmation of their secular liberalism in a moderate islam. EVEN IF THEY HAVE TO MAKE IT UP.

Cognitive dissonance...

When Western leaders insist that islam has nothing to do with the latest islamic atrocity, they are NOT referencing a religion practised by muslims, but AN IMAGINARY RELIGION that they imagine muslims must practice. Because the alternative is the end of everything that they believe in (and have invested in).

And even when they do find out they are wrong, it is very hard to come back from a position taken after you once so fiercely defended it in public.

When they claim that the latest batch of islamic terrorists don't speak for islam, they aren't defending muslims, they are really defending multiculturalism. Assuming that muslims believe in multiculturalism because they do.

Most politicians devoutly apologize for any disrespect to islam, but muslims don't care.

Instead of fighting a war against the reality of islam, our leaders have chosen to fight a war against reality. They don't have a plan for defeating the fascist islamic ideology, but for defeating reality.

Most Western leaders claim to be fighting narratives, but they have no interest in actually challenging the islamic narrative of superiority that is the root cause of all conflicts. Instead they take great pains not to offend muslims.

This DOES NOT challenge the islamic supremacist narrative, instead IT AFFIRMS IT. The so called intellectuals who refuse to criticise islam are allowing the ideology to take over Western values and are helping islam to islamise the West.

Liberals in muslim countries fight against islam. But liberals in the West fiercely defend it... until reality catches up with them and it is too late.

There is no such thing as a "moderate" or "non-wahabistic" or "non-salafistic" islam. There is only ONE islam and it is written in the koran and sunna.

The term "moderate islam" is an invention of liberal academics, secular theologians and politicians.




Erdogan, the current Prime Minister of Turkey, said (among other things):

 "Our goal is to be the islamic state. Our legacy is islam.

 The term 'moderate islam' is ugly and offensive. THERE IS NO 'MODERATE ISLAM'. Islam is islam.

 THE MOSQUES ARE OUR BARRACKS, the domes are our helmets, the minarets are our bayonets and the faithful are our soldiers.

 Democracy is just the train we board to reach our destination [a repressive sharia society], once we reach our destination, we get off."

Just a little friendly reminder: Hitler was once elected to power by democracy too. After he came to power he abolished democracy at the first opportunity he got, became a dictator and declared himself supreme leader, Fuhrer of Germany.

The "reformation" of islam:

You may know some moderate muslims and therefore think that islam itself is also moderate or that islam can be reformed to fit "whatever a moderate muslim might think islam is".

It is frequently said that moderate muslims can solve the problem of jihad and terror. Everyone has met nice muslims, some of whom are even willing to admit that islam has problems.

But we have to understand that what we call: "moderation", is simply: "ignoring the violence and hate". The jihad cannot be removed, it can only be denied by ignoring it. A moderate muslim has the same koran, sunna, Allah and Mohammed as a jihadist has.

Here is the problem: islam cannot be changed by anybody, moderate or not because islam is the civilizational doctrine found in the koran, sira and hadith. It is already written down, and the writer -- who said that nothing may ever be changed -- is dead. So there is the end of the story. It really is that simple.

Nobody can change the sunna and the koran. Their words are eternal, perfect and universal. Nobody can change islam, it is fixed, eternal, unchangeable, forever and frozen by its unalterable doctrine. The koran is "what Mohammed said", it is NOT "what muslims say". Jihad and Hijrah are the core and can never be separated.

Muslims can only choose not to practice the dark side of islam, that is if they live in a FREE country and have that choice. They cannot change it or get rid of it. Therefore a reformation of islam will never happen because MUSLIMS CANNOT CHANGE ISLAM, ISLAM CHANGES MUSLIMS.

The "moderate" side of muslims:

There are approximately 1.62 billion muslims in the world today.

Approximately 85% of those believe that A WIFE SHOULD ALWAYS OBEY her husband (1.39 billion).

Approximately 68% of those believe that SHARIA SHOULD RULE (1.1 billion).

Approximately 47% of those believe that there should be DEATH FOR ADULTERY (748 million).

Approximately 37% of those believe that there should be DEATH FOR LEAVING ISLAM (584 million).

More than 65% of muslims IN THE WEST say that RELIGIOUS RULES (the sharia) are MORE IMPORTANT to them than the laws of the country in which they live...

27 MILLION black people are STILL owned as SLAVES in muslim countries. TODAY.


Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi about islam in the West:

 "With your democratic laws we will colonize you and with our laws of the Koran we will dominate you."

Let this sink in:

Every country which islam has entered has become a muslim country within a couple of hundred years.

Egypt was once Christian.
Iraq was once Christian.
Turkey was once Christian.
Syria was once Christian.
Afghanistan was once Buddhist.
Pakistan was once Hindu.
200 years ago Indonesia was Hindu and today it's 90% muslim.
That's just to name a few.

Islam has arrived in Europe, USA, and Australia and is currently outbreeding the Judeo Christian majority by 8-1.

Now, think about this for a second...

Almost every country now occupied by islam used to be a blooming Christian nation once, much like the West is today.

Turkey -- used to be a christian nation -- now completely islamic

Lebanon -- used to be a christian nation -- now completely islamic

Egypt -- used to be a christian nation -- now completely islamic

Iran -- used to be a christian nation -- now completely islamic

Iraq -- used to be a christian nation -- now completely islamic

Syria -- used to be a christian nation -- now completely islamic

All of North Africa -- used to be christian -- now completely islamic

Afghanistan -- used to be a buddhist nation -- now completely islamic

Pakistan -- used to be a hindu nation -- now completely islamic

And so on...

Afghanistan -- Sunni (80%), Shiism (19%)
Albania -- Sunni (70%)
Algeria -- Sunni (99%)
Azerbaijan -- Sunni (14%), Shiism (85%)
Bahrain -- Sunni (81%)
Bangladesh -- Sunni (89%)
Djibouti -- Sunni (94%)
Egypt -- Sunni (90%)
Gaza -- Sunni (98.7%)
Iraq -- Sunni (38%), Shiism (58%)
Iran -- Sunni (9%), Shiism (89%)
Indonesia -- Sunni (90%)
Yemen -- Sunni (80%), Shiism (19%)
Jordan -- Sunni (92%)
Kuwait -- Sunnism (59.5%), Shiism (25.5%)
Kyrgyzstan -- Sunni (75%)
Kazakhstan -- Sunni (70.2%)
Kosovo -- Sunni (99%)
Libya -- Sunni (97%)
Mali -- Sunni (90%)
Maldives -- Sunni (99%)
Morocco -- Sunni (99%)
Mauritania -- Sunni (99%)
Niger -- Sunni (80%)
Uzbekistan -- Sunni (88%)
Oman -- Ibadi (67%), Sunnism (32%), Shiism (1%)
Pakistan -- Sunni (91.2%), Shiism (3.8%)
Palestine -- unknown
Qatar -- Sunni (85.5%), Shiism (9.5%)
Saudi Arabia -- Sunni (89.7%), Shiism (10%)
Senegal -- Sunni (91%)
Somalia -- Sunni (99%)
Syria -- Sunni (74.8%), Shiism (13.2%)
Tajikistan -- Sunni (90.2%), Shiism (4.8%)
Chechnya -- Sunni (94%)
Tunisia -- Sunni (98%)
Turkey -- Sunni (75.8%), Shiism (20.4%)
Turkmenistan -- Sunni (84.7%), Shiism (4.3%)
United Arab Emirates -- Sunni (80.5%), Shiism (15.4%)
West Bank -- Sunni (75%)
Western Sahara -- Sunni (99%)

Why do you think that is? Why not HALF the nation or a PART of it?

It is simply because islam seeks world domination. Islam is a DOMINANT and INTOLERANT religion of SUBMISSION and when it enters a nation sooner or later 99% of ALL people with other religions -- or no religion -- either:


The very few non-muslims who still live in islamic countries today (1-5%) are being heavily discriminated upon and are treated as INFERIOR people.


Other religions -- or atheism -- and islam simply can NOT coexist.

A fact of life:

Islam has eventually taken over EVERY country it has moved in to, do you honestly think it will be any different in YOUR country? Let this sink in for a minute.



The POLITICS of Islam:

Islam is both a RELIGION and a POLITICAL SYSTEM. It is the political system that affects everyone and has subjugated civilizations for over 1400 years, Muslims and non-muslims. It is therefore mainly the POLITICAL SYSTEM that NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED by non-muslims.

Islamic politics are outlined in the life of Mohammed and his traditions. The koran declares that Mohammed is the perfect pattern of life. Political Islam is mostly determined by the example of Mohammed as found in 3 books -- the koran, the sira (his biography) and hadith (traditions). Until you know Mohammed, you cannot know islam.

Differing POINTS OF VIEW (muslims and non-muslims):

There is a tacit social assumption that only a muslim's point of view about islam is the "right" view. However, OVER HALF OF ISLAMS DOCTRINE IS ABOUT THE NON-MUSLIM (the "kafir"). This means the non-muslim has a unique point of view, that is quite different from the muslim (who is to subjugate the kafir).

As an example: on several occasions Mohammed had enemies assassinated. For muslims this was a TRIUMPH, since the enemies had denied the prophet-hood of Mohammed. For kafirs it was an ACT OF EVIL. As you can see, these are two different views.

Apologists might say that others have done worse. By definition, these points of view cannot be resolved, but ALL SIDES MUST BE HEARD and not just the muslims point of view.

Amount of text devoted to kafirs in islam (how to subjugate non-muslims):

Koran: 64%

Sira: 81%

Hadith: 37%

Total trilogy: 60%

THE DOCTRINE OF ISLAM IS FAR MORE CONCERNED WITH THE UNBELIEVERS (for instance how non-muslims should be humiliated, converted and killed) THAN IT IS WITH THE BELIEVERS (for instance how muslims should pray, act or how to be a good muslim).

Separating RELIGION from POLITICS:

The Islamic religion itself is of no consequence to non-muslims. However, THE POLITICS OF ISLAM is of the GREATEST IMPORTANCE. For example: prayer is a religious act, but demanding that rooms in public schools be set aside and work stopped for prayer is a political act.

When Muslims pressure us to change work, play, schools, traditions, politics, laws, AND EVEN THE WHOLE CULTURE, those are POLITICAL DEMANDS. [concessions to Sharia; changing our government to sharia with one concession at a time.] If we reject these political demands (as is of course our right) there is NO RELIGIOUS CONSEQUENCE to muslims. Therefore it is first and foremost THE POLITICAL DOCTRINE THAT MUST BE DEALT WITH.

Political islam is basically that part of islam that has to do with the kafirs (the non-muslims).


Read this twice:
Islam is not just about RELIGION, that is only a small part of it. It is mostly about POLITICS.

Islam is a fascist, political, absolute and totalitarian ideology that aims to CONTROL the RELIGIOUS, SOCIAL and POLITICAL LIFE of mankind in ALL its aspects based on TOTAL submission to its teachings and authority.

A very, very dangerous ideology.

There is no excuse for islam...

Islam is built on a house of cards and crumbles as soon as any intelligent person takes a critical look at it. There is NO PLACE FOR DEBATE IN ISLAM because it cannot stand on its own. IT IS INDEFENSIBLE.

The koran has NO logical path to truth, love, and life. The koran EXPLICITLY dictates the use of lying, hate and killing everyone who does not follow islam. THESE ARE THE FUNDAMENTALS.


Criticizing or denying any part of the koran is punishable by death.

Criticizing or denying Mohammed is a prophet is punishable by death.

Criticizing or denying allah, the moon god of islam is punishable by death.

A muslim who becomes a non-muslim is punishable by death.

A non-muslim who leads a muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.

Any infidel (anyone who won't convert to islam) is punishable by death.

A non-muslim man who marries a muslim woman is punishable by death.

A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.

Girls' clitoris should be cut-off (per Mohammed's words in book 41, kitab al-adab, hadith 5251).

A woman can have one husband, but a man can have up to four wives, only Mohammed can have more.

A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.

A man can beat his wife for insubordination.

Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand.

Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.

A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).

A woman's testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man's testimony.

A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.

A woman should not drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).

A woman should not speak alone to a man who is not her husband or a relative.

Meat to be eaten must only come from animals that have been sacrificed to allah (halal).

Muslims must engage in taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance islam.

And so on...

Saudi Arabia: the birthplace of islam.

In Saudi Arabia, the "Vatican" of islam, which is generally seen as a peaceful "moderate" islamic kingdom, people are executed for blasphemy, executed for apostasy, a woman is not allowed to drive, not allowed to leave the house with a mahram, not allowed to vote. The Western "ally" Saudi Arabia has beheaded TWICE AS MANY people as ISIS last year.

This is what islam is: Saudi Arabia has NOT misunderstood islam.

Iran, which stones people to death for adultery, has NOT misunderstood islam.

Yemen, which marries children at the age of nine, has NOT misunderstood islam.

In Afghanistan, Iran, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Nigeria, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, United Arab Emirates and Yemen being an atheist (having no faith) is punishable by death. So far over 40 islamic countries have anti-women laws.

Islam is...

Death for apostasy.
Death for blasphemy.
Death for adultery.
Death for homosexuality.
Gender segregation.
Gender discrimination.
Unequal testimony between man and woman in legal proceedings.
Child marriages.
Imprisonment for being raped.
Polygamist marriages.
Marriages not requiring the consent of the bride.
No free speech.
No freedom of religion.
No Bibles.
No churches.
And so on...

In EVERY country where islam calls the shots, all you see is INEQUALITY, BRUTALITY, VIOLENCE and FEAR IMPOSED BY THE STATE.


The sharia. [syn: Sharia Law]

What is the sharia? It is the koran, the sira (the biography of Mohammed) and the hadith (Mohammed's traditions) reduced down to a legal, cultural and civilizational code. Sharia dictates a complete way of life for both the muslim and the non-muslim. (Its goal is to rule all.) The most complete sourcebook for Sharia Law is "Umdat al-Salik", or "Reliance of the Traveller", which can be downloaded here.

According to the sharia:

-- There is no freedom of religion or freedom of speech.
-- There is no equality between people (for instance between muslims and non-muslims).
-- There are no equal rights for men and women.
-- There is no democracy or a separation between religion and state politics.

The sharia is the most important part of islamic doctrine. Sharia is islam and islam is Sharia. Sharia includes law, but it also includes how to raise a family, theology, philosophy and every aspect of daily living. The Sharia includes pronouncements for both muslims and non-muslims (kafirs). The Sharia is a complete manual for a civilization.

The Sharia does not allow free speech. It is for instance forbidden to make a joke about Mohammed. Blasphemy, offcourse, is also forbidden. The Sharia says that constitutions and democratic laws are manmade and a product of ignorance.

The koran says: "The Sharia is Allah's law and must replace all other governments".


What exactly is included in the Sharia:

Honor killings
Burning infidels alive
Supremacy and global domination
Warfare and conquest
Limb amputations
Genital mutilation
Death to apostates
Forced conversion
Sex slavery and rape
Misogyny and sexism
Women enslavement
Wife beating
Child marriage and rape
Brutality against homosexuals
Bigotry and hatred
Robbery and pillage
Extortion of nonbelievers
Persecution and death for blasphemy and atheism
Animal cruelty
Prohibition of music and singing
Destruction of all pre-islamic antiquities
And so on...

More specifically, the Sharia (among other things) commands that:

1.) The mosque and state are not separate. [It says that there is NO separation of Church and State]

2.) Jihad may be waged against injustice or an unjust nation, as islam defines the terms. (Classical texts say islam is justice, and no islam is injustice. Therefore, a "just war" can be waged against a nation or people who do not submit to islam.)

3.) Jihad may be waged to spread islam and force conversions -- a holy war. (Koran 8:39, 9:5, 9:11-12, 9:14, 9:29, 9:33, 61:9 and 48:28.)

4.) A captive in jihad may be executed, enslaved, ransomed for money, exchanged for other prisoners, or released freely. (Koran 47:4, 33:25-27 and 4:24.)

5.) A woman captive of jihad may be forced to have to sex with her captors -- now owners. (Koran 4:24.)

6.) Property can be destroyed or confiscated during jihad. (Koran 59:2 and 59:5.)

7.) Jihad may be waged to collect spoils. (Koran 8:1, 8:7, 8:41 and 48:20.)

8.) A second-class submission tax, called the jizyah, must be imposed on Jews and Christians -- and other religious minorities -- living in islamic countries. (Koran 9:29 offers three options to Jews and Christians: (1) Fight and die; (2) convert to islam; (3) or keep their religion, but pay a tribute or submission tax, the jizyah, while living under islam. In islamic history, vanquished Jews and Christians became known as "dhimmis". This word appears in koran 9:8 and 9:10, meaning a "treaty" or "oath," but it can also mean those who are "condemned" "reviled" or "reproved" (Koran 17:18, 17:22 and 68:49). The word "submission" in Koran 9:29 can also be translated as "humiliation", "utterly humbled", "contemptible" or "vile".)

9.) Slavery is allowed. (Koran 5:89, 24:33 4:36, 4:24, 23:1-7 and 33:52.)

10.) A male owner may have sex with his slave-women, even prepubescent slave-girls. (Koran 4:24 and 23:1-7.)

11.) Slaves may be beaten.

12.) Apostasy laws, including execution, may be imposed on anyone who leaves islam -- an apostate. (Koran 4:88-89, 9:73-74, and 9:123.)

13.) Blasphemy laws, including imprisonment or execution, may be imposed on critics of islam or Mohammed. (Koran 3:186, 33:57-61, 9:61-66, 9:73 and 9:123.)

14.) Drinkers and gamblers may be flogged. (Koran 2:219, 4:43, and 5:90-91.)

15.) An injured plaintiff -- a private citizen -- has the options of forgiving or exacting legal and literal revenge -- physical eye for physical eye (qisas). (Koran 5:45 and 2:187-189.)

16.) The hand of a thief may be cut off. (Koran 5:38.)

17.) A robber may be crucified or his alternate hand and foot cut off. (Koran 5:33.)

18.) Homosexuals may be imprisoned, flogged, or executed.

19.) Fornicators may be flogged. (Koran 24:2.)

20.) Adulterers may be stoned to death.

21.) False accusers of sexual crimes may be flogged eighty times. (Koran 24:1-4, 24:13, 2:228, 4:34 and 2:223.)

22.) A woman inherits half what a man does. (Koran 4:11.)

23.) A woman's testimony in a court of law counts half of a man's testimony. (Koran 2:282.)

24.) A man may legally and irrevocably divorce his wife, outside of a court of law, by correctly pronouncing three times "you are divorced". (Koran 2:229.)

25.) A wife may re-marry her ex-husband if, and only if, she marries another man, has sex with him, and then this second man divorces her. (Koran 2:230.)

26.) Husbands may hit their wives. (Koran 4:34.)

27.) A man may be polygamous with up to four wives. (Koran 4:3 and 33:50-52.)

28.) A man may simply get rid of one of his "undesirable" wives. (Koran 4:128.)

29.) A mature man can marry a prepubescent girl -- Mohammed himself was 53 years old when he married the 6 year old Aisha. (Koran 65:1-4.)

30.) A woman must wear a head covering and maybe a facial veil. (Koran 24:31, 33:53 and 33:59.)

Furthermore: the first three murders are forgiven in islam and in sharia law (this is about muslim on muslim murders, all infidels can ALWAYS be killed at will under islam).

Sharia police [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvb-UKKPzKk] are the authorities that people report information to. [Your fellow citizens rat on you and help enslave you; the system could not function without citizens helping to enslave their fellow citizens. Hint: this is how you can throw a monkey wrench into the works -- by refusing to report others.] These are also the men who implement the punishments such as floggings and stoning of women. Many times women are even arrested for doing things like making their husbands angry.



Know your history:

In 1400 years no nation has ever become NOT completely islamic after islam has entered it... EVER.


In what kind of world will you live, OR THE NEXT GENERATIONS, if YOU let this happen and now look the other way, want to be politically correct or just don't want to think and talk about it because it is a taboo?

It is of the HIGHEST IMPORTANCE to address this issue NOW.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali:

 "Political correctness is a weapon used to silence people who tell the truth.

 There is a huge difference between being tolerant and tolerating intolerance."

Defending islam

Many can not understand islam. The mind just can't comprehend it because it is such a fundamentally different way of thinking. We, in the West, are so accustomed to the Western way of thinking based on the Judeo-Christian culture, the 10 commandments, equality for all, the golden rule (the principle of treating others as one would wish to be treated), tolerance and forgiveness we assume that these mandates are automatically common to ALL religions.

Unfortunately, they are not. The doctrine of islam clearly goes against almost everything we in the West believe in and stand for. Islam has -- for instance -- no "Golden Rule". No equal rights. No critical thinking. No freedom of speech. No democracy. No liberty. No LGBT's. No atheism. Extreme cruelty in punishments and for animals, and much, much more.

Despite the overwhelming evidence that islam brings nothing good, many people just can't believe it to be true and therefore simply deny the idea. Blocking it from their minds. On top of this, we all know some nice moderate muslims we don't want to offend. This is why we see that so many people in the West (including ignorant westernized muslims!) are still in total denial about islam, looking the other way, or even promoting it. Politicians, media, liberals and educators... Much like an ostrich with its head in the sand.

Luckily, there is hope... People all over the world are slowly but surely starting to wake up. And eventhough, for most people it takes some time before the penny has dropped. And eventhough, you need to have some necessary knowledge to see it... Once you do see it, it can never be "unseen".

Islam, the ultimate brainwashing machine.

The process of indoctrination that poisons minds is called: Dawah. Almost all muslims are brainwashed, most of them since birth generation after generation after generation. If you want to obtain OBJECTIVE knowledge about islam, always talk to an ex-muslim, never to a muslim, for obvious reasons.

It's truly funny to see muslims never have any factual support for their sayings. It proves they don't know islam by heart, only from imams. You'll find that when muslims -- or apologists -- are trying to defend islam, it usually comes down to this:

1.) You know nothing about islam. / There are also good things in the koran.
2.) What you are saying is taken out of context. / Most muslims don't see it like that.
3.) Others have done bad things as well (Christians, Jews, America, Crusades...).
4.) You're racist. / You're islamophobic. / You're a hatemonger.
5.) Look at the Bible.

It (almost) never goes any further than this, no facts, no arguments. That is what happens when people want to defend something that is indefensible.

Just in case you were wondering, here's the answer to these questions:

1.) There are good things in the koran. But, the koran is dualistic [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjKTpQQY4wE] -- otherwise islam could never have survived. The peaceful verses from the koran were all written in Mecca (when Mohammed was still a religious leader), but all these verses (without exception) are replaced (abrogated) [http://www.koran-at-a-glance.com/] by "better" (read: violent) verses in the koran written in Medina. The koran says: if two verses contradict each other the later verse is always the better one.

2.) Every possible context is in the sunna, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHmsL0p6jnI] and it usually refers to Mohammed's life or traditions. The "view" or "opinion" that anybody has bout islam is NOT IMPORTANT, it does NOT change what is written in islam and... views can change.

So, it has nothing to do with "interpretations". It has everything to do with following the prophets actions. The ONLY opinion that counts is the opinion of Mohammed himself, and he saw islam exactly like ISIS sees it. There is no crime that ISIS has done that Mohammed himself has not done himself 1400 years ago.

3.) First: killing is never right and history is sometimes brutal and bad things have happened, but naming other bad things does not excuse islam. Second: in terms of number of deaths islam reaches lonely heights. For 1400 years, until this very day, EVERY MONTH [http://www.bbc.com/news/world-30080914] more people are killed in the name of islam [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_To-cV94Bo] than were killed in the entire Spanish inquisition in 350 years. [http://www.strangenotions.com/spanish-inquisition/] Islam murders more people EVERY DAY than the KKK has in the last 70 years. [http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/shipp/lynchingyear.html] Islam has made about 9 times more victims than Stalin and Hitler combined (and this only the non-muslim victims, there were also about 2-3 times as many muslims killed because they were "not islamic enough"). Third, the reason for killing: We must not forget that the jihadists who kill in the name of islam justify their actions ONLY by the existence of non-muslims. This means, just because a person is not a muslim he must be killed. That is different than fighting for peace or for example fighting to liberate Europe from Hitler. Fourth: about the crusades, do you know why there were crusades at all? Because of islamic terrorists were trying to take over the Christian world. [https://www.politicalislam.com/jihad-lead-crusades/] The crusades did not start the muslim belief that everyone who is not a muslim must die, they were a reaction to muslims acting on that belief.

4.) A racist is someone who excludes a race, islam is NOT a race, [https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/site/racism.aspx] it is an ideology. An ideology, with a little bit of religion. The Sharia even is a complete handbook for a civilization. A phobia is an unjust fear of something, the fear of islam is absolutely justifiable. [https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/islamophobia.aspx] The islamic doctrine is full of hate speech, appointing the hate speech of islam may be uncomfortable but is not hate speech, it is telling the truth.

5.) There is a huge difference between the violence in the Bible (OT) and the violence in the trilogy of islam, being: ALL the violence in the Bible is DESCRIPTIVE. While the violence in islam is FOR ALL TIMES and is PRESCRIPTIVE. The Bible (OT) is a history book, there are no eternal laws in the Bible other than the 10 commandments. The Bible does not call for eternal violence and the koran very clearly does. So, yes it's true that there is violence in the Bible but every story in the Bible refers to ONE specific situation, place and time. The koran however is a book of laws and commands, and because the words of Allah (spoken by Mohammed, of course) are the highest, are perpetual, are to be taken literally and can never be doubted, there is no other interpretation possible. Not 1400 years ago, not now, never.

[See this about how the Bible goes from the violence in the Old Testament to the non-violence of Jesus in the New Testament (Jesus never harmed anyone); the Koran is written in a dialect that very few people can understand today, and everything in it is constantly being abrogated or replaced by whatever any imam decide to change at the moment. The Koran is also arranged from longest sura to shortest instead of chronologically, intentionally obscuring the fact that Mohammed went from peaceful (10 new followers per year) to extremely violent (10,000 new followers per year -- people love violence, raping, pillaging, murdering, terror). Mohammed himself said, "I have been made victorious with terror." https://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2015/12/17/islams-only-hope-for-true-reform-comes-from-a-surprising-source-and-what-of-americas-only-hope-for-reform/]
[Count the number of people that Islam has maimed, raped, tortured, enslaved, murdered, etc. vs the number that Christians have done that to, rather than just compare the Koran and Bible, though -- that's more important.]
We have a progression in both Testaments of the Bible from the Old Covenant to a New Covenant. And the New Covenant is literally and even physically embodied in the Word, Messiah Jesus.
And what is it that Jesus taught? What did He command? Violence? No, the Virgin-born fulfillment of Isaiah 9:6 came to be "the Prince of peace." And Jesus taught even as He was being led away to be viciously flogged and then crucified, "Put your sword back in its place," Jesus said to him, "for all who draw the sword will die by the sword."
Liberals completely fail to comprehend this: the Bible begins with violence and moves to peace.
Not so the Qur'an. Not so Muhammad. When you read a Qur'an, understand that "Muhammad was like two different persons at two different times and the Quran is like two contradictory books pasted together." Understand that in Islam you have 1390 Years of Violence and only 10 years of Peace.
When Mohammad first began to proselytize his new religion in Mecca and claim that he was receiving revelations from Allah, he was decidedly the underdog. And correspondingly all of his revelations centered around peaceful coexistence and tolerance.
But then Mohammad went to Medina in what is today called "Al Hijra." He was able to garner followers and became militarily powerful. And suddenly all of the revelations of his Qur'an took a decidedly violent turn.
The Qur'an was NOT organized in any kind of chronological order; rather, it was organized by length, from the longest to the shortest suras.
When you re-arrange the Qur'an by chronology, you get this order: and you get not violence to peace as the Holy Bible gives, but peace to VIOLENCE.
So, for example, do your own research. Consider the very first violent Sura 2:191-193 found in the Qur'an which states, "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing... but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.  And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)". And lo and behold, when you examine the chronological order and look to the right column to see where it was organized according to the tradition based on length of sura, you find that this edict found in Sura 2 to "kill them wherever you may find them" is the VERY FIRST sura Mohammad conveniently claimed he received from Allah when he arrived in Medina and became the dominant power.
This is not merely a command for violence; it is a UNIVERSAL COMMAND for violence. I'll talk about that more.
Keep going down the list of violent suras and look at where they are found, whether they were written earlier in Mohammad's Mecca phase or later when he arrived at Medina and became militarily powerful.
You will find that without any question, the vast overwhelming majority of violent sura that commanded violence and death were given in Medina just as the vast overwhelming majority of suras commanding any kind of "peace" was given in Mecca.
A simple historic statement of fact: Mohammad and the Qur'an takes us from peace to viciousness and hate and murder and death and slaughter.
Now, this is bad, but it actually gets WORSE. Because Islam has a doctrine called "abrogation" by which later suras correct and supercede earlier ones.
In other words, if Mohammad first said "peace" and then he said "war," the ONLY correct interpretation of the Qur'an MUST BE WAR... (Excerpt: See full article at link)
And hence we have examples of blatantly obvious abrogation in the Qur'an such as:
  In Surah 58, Al Mujadilah, verse 12, the believers are commanded to give alms before a private consultation with the Messenger. In verse 13 they are told that it is no longer necessary.
  In Surah 33, Al Ahzab, verses 50-51 Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) is allowed to marry and divorce an unlimited number of women. In verse 52 he is prohibited to continue to do so.
  In Surah 73, Al Muzzammil, verses 2-4, the prophet of Islam is commanded to spend about half of the night in prayer and reading of the Quran. In verse 20 of the same Surah this is changed into what is easy for him and those who followed his example.
But this Islamic view of Allah is in very direct contrast to the Judeo-Christian God of the Bible, and so we have passages like Numbers 23:19: "God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?"
Sneering liberal pseudo-intellectuals claim that Christianity has the same issue of abrogation, BUT WE DON'T. And they are frankly moral idiots of the very lowest order to make such a blatantly false claim. Here's why:...
The fact that the Qur'an does NOT begin with violence and then end with peace, but rather the opposite, and the fact that abrogation forces true Muslims to accept that the later "revelations" to Mohammad supercede previous ones, puts Islam in a deep, dark pit of endless violence that is NOT true of Christianity.
Which is why Christianity and Christ are attacked all the damn TIME by liberals and Christians don't unleash waves of violent hate the way Muslims routinely do the moment they even THINK their Prophet might be getting insulted.
We are left with a giant problem of Islam: we find that Islam, Mohammad and the Qur'an spent ten years deceiving people by preaching peace and tolerance in order to grow strong and powerful, and then the rest of history practicing force and violence and terror the moment they were able to gain the upper hand.
We find that Islam does NOT mean "peace" as liberals love to adoringly say; it means "submission." AND YOU WILL SUBMIT OR ELSE YOU WILL BE KILLED.
A historical study of Mohammad's life reveals that the "Prophet of Peace" had fought in over thirty violent military campaigns and had at least another thirty campaigns planned at the time of his death in 632 AD. In fact I can quote you Islamic sources that state, "that the Prophet waged jihad operations 77 times in the first 10 years as head of the Muslim community in Medina." But it is a fact of history that when Mohammad showed up at Medina, he became a violent terrorist warmonger who waged unrelenting war until he defeated and subjugated everyone around him. What you will also find is that Islam did NOT practice peace after Mohammad's death; in fact it split due to terrifying, graphic and vicious violence that continues to this very day as the viciousness created Sunni and Shiite Islam. But within 100 years of Mohammad's death, warring, violent Muslims were attacking Christian Europe and had killed an looted and pillaged their way all across the entirety of Europe before finally being crushed by Charles "the Hammer" Martel at the Battle of Tours in France in 732. Violent warring Muslims had already poured across Africa and seized the Christian realms established by St. Augustine. All of the vast peaceful Christian provinces of North Africa had fallen to the bloody sword of Allah by 711. Violent, warring Muslims poured into Christian Spain to be finally defeated by El Cid. Violent, warring Muslims poured into the Christian Byzantine Empire and besieged Constantinople and the Christian Emperor pleaded with the Pope to send Christian warriors to defend a Christian realm from Muslim conquest in what became known as the Crusades.
The United States of America, from its infancy, almost immediately came into contact with violent, warring Islam as the violent, warring Muslims from the Islamic Barbary States began a vicious campaign against the United States. So we had ten years of "peace" and yes, fourteen centuries of violence and war.
The ONLY thing in history that has stopped Islam from violence against their "infidel" neighbors is raw military power and the Muslims' naked fear of the "infidels'" willingness to use it.
The Muslims who are attacking us are doing nothing more than reading their Qur'ans in light of the life of their moral and spiritual paradigm, their Prophet, Mohammad. Their lives are matching his teachings, and that is why they are "killing us wherever they may find us."
Jesus, by contrast, never harmed anyone. He was the Lamb of God who never harmed anyone or ever commanded anyone to ever harm anyone. Jesus is the antithesis of Mohammad.
If you want peace, there is ultimately one one place and one Person to go to: to the foot of the Cross, to the feet of Jesus, who came to allow violence to prevail so He could ultimately prevail against all violence when He returns as King of kings and Lord of lords.
So, how then do you reform Islam? If you have any honesty or intelligence, you ought to see the nearly insurmountable difficulty by now.
There is only one possible way and it is interesting where it is found:
It is found in the Qur'an itself.
What you have to do is go to one interesting and frankly incredibly embarrassing period for Muslims: when Mohammad received his "Satanic Verses."... (Excerpt -- see full article at link: https://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2015/12/17/islams-only-hope-for-true-reform-comes-from-a-surprising-source-and-what-of-americas-only-hope-for-reform/)

Mohammed was once a refugee taken in by the Jewish city of Medina. Within 5 years he had driven out, executed, or enslaved every Jew there... In Mecca, before jihad, islam only grew at the rate of 10 new muslims per year, the religion of islam was clearly a total failure. But when Mohammed went to Medina and turned to jihad, islam grew at an average rate of 10,000 new muslims per year, so the jihad of islam (convert or die) was a huge "success". [http://www.islam-for-dummies.com/]

Therefore, the fundamental difference is: if a Christian kills in the name of Christ, he does so in total opposition to the life and teachings of Christ, and the entire New testament. However, if a muslim kills in the name of Allah, he has full justification to do so from the life and teachings of Mohammed, and from the koran. That is exactly why nowhere in the world Christians are murdering muslims in the name of the Bible. We see Christians around the world building hospitals, orphanages, universities, etc., muslims blow them up. Actually, the world would be quite a peaceful place without islam.

Mohammed himself said: "I have been made victorious with terror." (Bukhari 4.52.220)

The disturbing message of the "most peaceful verse in the koran"

Koran 5:32 is generally considered to be the "most peaceful verse in the koran", it is quoted in almost every discussion with a muslim, liberal or apologist like this:

"If anyone killed a person it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind."
However, this verse is rarely quoted in full, the complete verse actually is:

"If anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or for spreading mischief in the land, it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind."
What is left out is that it is no problem to kill a person in retaliation of murder, and it is no problem to kill a person if he is "spreading mischief in the land". But what does "spreading mischief in the land" actually mean? Well, the answer kan be found in the islamic sripture, Koran Tafsir Ibn Kathir:

"Mischief is disobeying Allah, because whoever disobeys Allah on the earth, or commands that Allah be disobeyed, he has committed mischief on the earth."

"The hypocrites (muslims) commit mischief on earth by disobeying their Lord on it and continuing in the prohibited acts. They also abandon what Allah made obligatory and doubt His religion."

"The hypocrites' (muslims) behavior if they take disbelievers as Awliya' (protectors or helpers or friends), and their claim that it is for peace, is itself mischief, although in their ignorance, they do not see it to be mischief."

So it is actually ok to kill a person in retaliation of murder, all unbelievers (non-muslims), and all muslims who disobey Allah, all muslims who doubt islam, or all muslims who have disbelievers as friends (note: it is no problem to be "friendly", it is not ok to be "a friend").

In the very next verse we find what must happen those who commit mischief, koran 5:33:

"The recompense of those who do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified, or their hands and their feet be cut off on opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter."

So much for the "most peaceful verse in the koran"...


1.) Muslims who are islamists themselves.
2.) Muslims or non-muslims that are scared of islamists.
3.) Muslims or non-muslims that know nothing about islam.
4.) Muslims or non-muslims that have not lived in muslim dominated areas.
5.) Muslims or non-muslims that don't want to offend (other) muslims.

Islam is simply indefensible:

If you condemn murder you condemn Mohammed.

If you condemn thievery you condemn Mohammed.

If you condemn rape you condemn Mohammed.

If you condemn pedophilia you condemn Mohammed.

If you condemn terrorism you condemn Mohammed.

If you condemn Mohammed you MUST condemn islam for the koran says Mohammed did all of those things and all muslims must ultimately be like him, THERE IS NO COMPROMISE.


The biggest problem we are facing today:


You may still think islam is just like any other religion and therefore it is wrong to be against islam. It is only in the last 20 years or so that all the major islamic sources have been translated and not so long ago islam was mainly something from the Middle East far away. Now it is coming closer rapidly to the west and people are starting to slowly wake up.

The fact is, most Western people have had very little personal interaction with muslims so far. Moreover, because muslims in the west are STILL A TINY MINORITY and those few muslims that Westerners do interact with are often "moderate muslims". Or, if not, on their best behavior, being surrounded as they are by a sea of "infidels".

Most Westerners are completely blind to the fact that islam does not share the Western values or basic worldview. For many it is far easier to act as if critics of islam have a problem with muslims, than it is to accept the uncomfortable truth that islam is different.

Although there are some media and websites that do document the hard and ugly truth of islam, these are usually drowned out by the overwhelming majority that keeps insisting there is NOTHING TO FEAR FROM ISLAM. Emanated from schools, universities, news rooms, vips, politicians and so on...

They either ARE VERY NAIVE, or DENY THE FACTS, or just HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT. They point at their neighbour or co-worker and say this is a good muslim so all of islam must be good... Let's not insult him, that's not fair. This is really the SAME THING as saying that Nazi Germany was good because there were also many good Germans in WW2

The average muslim living in the West knows NEXT TO NOTHING about islam. So when your muslim friends tell you islam is peaceful, they may actually truly believe it. Unfortunately, islam is NOT defined by your neighbour, your co-worker or any other peaceful Westernized muslim, islam is defined by Allah and Mohammed. And Allah and Mohammed say CLEARLY: "Fight the unbelievers, unless you can't fight them. If you can't fight them, deceive them until we're strong enough."

Know this:

If violence and mayhem seem to follow muslims wherever they go (not to mention plague the entire islamic world!) Most people in the West still choose to remain IGNORANT because it is far more CONVENIENT to stay ignorant than to say the TRUTH.

Eventhough: islamic doctrine CLEARLY calls on muslims to have ENMITY for and strive to SUBJUGATE NON-MUSLIMS whenever possible.

Eventhough: muslims initiated HOSTILITIES against- and were the SCOURGE of the west for a thousand years.

Eventhough: most of the so-called "muslim world" rests on land that was VIOLENTLY SEIZED from non-Muslims.

Eventhough: reportedly some 270 MILLION NON-MUSLIMS have been killed SO FAR by the jihad (the number of killed muslims by muslims is unknown but even many, many times more than that).

And eventhough: many modern day muslims maintain THE SAME WORLDVIEW that animated their ancestors.

If you have no idea what islam is you may think being against islam is the same as being against jews or christians and it is wrong to be against islam because it is racism or fascism... ISLAM IS HOWEVER NOT LIKE ANY OTHER RELIGION, it is a very dangerous ideology with no room for people who think differently.


This may be an uncomfortable message to you or you may not like the message, but you have to be open-minded, you have to be willing to consider things you don't like. It is -- unfortunately -- THE TRUTH.

It is only in the last 20 years or so that all the major islamic sources have been translated, people (muslims and non-muslims) are starting to wake up. Let's hope it's not too late...

Therefore EVERYBODY that really knows what islam is about, does- or should NOT want islam. So education and information is the key: please INFORM YOURSELF and others around you, and form your own independent and unprejudiced opinion.


Adolf Hitler, in his book "Mein Kampf":

 "Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator, by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of ALLAH."

Did you know this?
The koran has EVEN MORE ANTI-JEW TEXT (9.3% of the whole trilogy is anti-jewish) than Mein Kampf ("only" 7% of Hitler's Mein Kampf is anti-jew text).

Anti-Jew text in the trilogy:

Meccan koran: 1%

Medinan koran: 17%

Sira: 12%

Hadith: 8.9%

Total Trilogy: 9.3%

The koran is mainly a book of MILITARY DIRECTIVE and FASCIST DOCTRINE. The koran is just one book (a trilogy), it is full of hate speech and it is written by just one man: Mohammed. JUST LIKE HITLER WROTE "MEIN KAMPF".

Islam has not so much to do with religion and cannot be compared with the Bible (Bible means library: collection of books) or the Torah or any other religious book. [See https://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2015/12/17/islams-only-hope-for-true-reform-comes-from-a-surprising-source-and-what-of-americas-only-hope-for-reform/]

Islam is also VERY SPECIFIC and VERY CLEAR about how to act and live. ISLAM DOES NOT LEAVE ANY ROOM FOR DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS like the Bible or the Torah does.

The koran contains at least 109 verses that call muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to hell if they do not join the slaughter.

Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the koran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text. They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subjective as anything else in the koran.

The religion of peace:

Islam is based upon two principles: submission and duality. Duality is a major principle of islam since islam would never have survived without it. This means: the islamic doctrine has two things to say on almost any major subject that contradict each other.

For instance, We can see duality in how the koran and Mohammed's life are divided. First comes the part of the koran written in Mecca, where Mohammed is still just a religious preacher, Mohammed says: you have your religion, i have mine. Then comes the part of the koran written in Medina, where Mohammed became a jihadi warrior, Mohammed says: you must submit to islam or harm will come to you. The two positions clearly contradict each other, so which one is true?

For this reason a lot of non-muslims are CONFUSED about islam. You may hear seemingly sincere muslims quote PEACEFUL, tolerant verses from the koran. And on the other hand you see terrorists quoting VIOLENT, intolerant verses from the koran. You might have heard that islam is "a religion of peace". And still you see that much of the violence in the world is perpetrated by muslims...


Non-muslims are DECEIVED, when you are told that islam is about love and peace you should know that those verses are all from the MECCAN KORAN. The MEDINAN KORAN (which was written after the Meccan koran) is only full of HATE, WAR and VIOLENCE.

So, there are actualy TWO DIFFERENT KORANS IN ONE BOOK. One part was written in Mecca and one part was written in Medina: when Mohammed was a religious teacher in MECCA the only violence was verbal and fist fights. But when he went to MEDINA, he became a POLITICIAN and a JIHADIST WARRIOR. [See https://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2015/12/17/islams-only-hope-for-true-reform-comes-from-a-surprising-source-and-what-of-americas-only-hope-for-reform/]

All of those peaceful verses of the koran have however been ABROGATED (canceled). The abrogation principle of the koran says: "when something from a later chapter (known as a surah) conflicts with something from an earlier chapter, the later one is always the better one". [See https://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2015/12/17/islams-only-hope-for-true-reform-comes-from-a-surprising-source-and-what-of-americas-only-hope-for-reform/]

Therefore ALL THE PEACEFUL VERSES OF THE KORAN HAVE BEEN NULLIFIED... and every true muslim and islamic religious leader knows this to be true: no less than 71 of the koran's 114 surah contain abrogated verses (according to most estimates).

Unfortunately, there are very few verses of tolerance and peace to abrogate or even balance out the many that call for nonbelievers to be fought and subdued until they either accept humiliation, convert to islam, or are killed. Mohammed's own martial legacy -- and that of his companions -- along with the remarkable stress on violence found in the koran have produced a trail of blood and tears across world history until this very day.
[See this about how the Bible goes from the violence in the Old Testament to the non-violence of Jesus in the New Testament (Jesus never harmed anyone); the Koran is written in a dialect that very few people can understand today, and everything in it is constantly being abrogated or replaced by whatever any imam decide to change at the moment. The Koran is also arranged from longest sura to shortest instead of chronologically, intentionally obscuring the fact that Mohammed went from peaceful (10 new followers per year) to extremely violent (10,000 new followers per year -- people love violence, raping, pillaging, murdering, terror). Mohammed himself said, "I have been made victorious with terror." https://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2015/12/17/islams-only-hope-for-true-reform-comes-from-a-surprising-source-and-what-of-americas-only-hope-for-reform/]

So when a muslim (or anybody else for that matter) tells you islam is "a religion of peace" THEY ARE EITHER LYING or ARE PRACTICING WISHFUL THINKING.

Besides this: let's not forget ISLAM PERMITS LYING and DECEIVING (taqiyya) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hT8-4Mq2pBE] to deceive unbelievers (non-muslims). It has been said many times that taqiyya is islam's most important ideological wartool, and this could very well be true.


Did you know this?

Mohammed was once a refugee taken in by the Jewish city of Medina. Within 5 years he had driven out, executed, or enslaved every Jew there... In Mecca, before jihad, islam only grew at the rate of 10 new muslims per year, the religion of islam was clearly a total failure. But when Mohammed went to Medina and turned to jihad, islam grew at an average rate of 10.000 new muslims per year, so the jihad of islam (convert or die) was a huge "success".

Allah's Messenger said: "I have been made victorious with terror".
-- Sahih al-Bukhari 2977, (on Jihaad), Book 56, Hadith 186

Islam is all about Mohammed:

It is a BASIC PRINCIPLE of islam that a muslim MUST follow the example of the prophet Mohammed. YOU CANNOT BE A MUSLIM IF YOU DON'T FOLLOW THE EXAMPLE OF MOHAMMED. This is stated in the koran no less than 91 times! Mohammed is pure islam: ninety-one verses in the koran say that every muslim is to imitate Mohammed in all things.

Is sex slavery islamic? Look to Mohammed. He had sex slaves, so when ISIS has sex slaves, it is 100% islamic. What are women's rights in islam? Look to Mohammed. He said that women could be beaten, had to always obey their husbands and could be part of a harem. He also said that slaves were to be treated "well".

In islam, Mohammed is given the honor of being the "uswa hasana". He is viewed as "the perfect model of conduct for all muslims", and Allah asserts his morality as being "sublime". According to islam Mohammed is the perfect human being, the divine prototype.

According to Allah himself (speaking through Mohammed, of course) Mohammed is the most "beautiful pattern of conduct" and "example for mankind to follow!" (koran 33:21), as well as the "exalted standard of character" (koran 68:4).

In islam, muslims are intended to emulate the behavior and example of Mohammed directly and literally, and every muslim needs to speak as Mohammed and act like Mohammed.

ISLAM IS FAR MORE BASED ON MOHAMMED THAN ON ALLAH. In fact: the islamic doctrine (the koran, sira and hadith) is only 14% about Allah and a whopping 86% is about Mohammed.

So, to understand islam, you must first know the life of Mohammed. Every Muslim's desire is to live a life IDENTICAL to his. His every word and deed are the PERFECT MODEL for being a muslim and therefore every muslim is automatically a Mohammedan. The religion of islam is not about worshipping Allah, IT IS ABOUT WORSHIPPING ALLAH EXACTLY AS MOHAMMED DID.

MOHAMMED HOWEVER WAS AN EXTREMELY RUTHLESS VICIOUS ARABIAN WARLORD, seeking subjects, slaves and total dominance. Also he was a child molester, a narcissist, a pedophile, a mass murderer, a terrorist, a misogynist, a polygamist, a lecher, a cult leader, a rapist, a torturer, an assassin and a looter.

(Former muslim Ali Sina offered $50,000 to anyone who could prove this wrong based on Islamic texts. The reward has gone unclaimed.) http://www.faithfreedom.org/challenge.htm

Mohammed beheaded a whole tribe (Banu Qurayza), even children were killed. He killed 300 people himself with his hands and sword, and many many more were butchered in his name.

What did Mohammed do? Here is a checklist:

(This list ONLY contains verifiable historical TRUE FACTS from muslim religious resources.)

#01.) Have sex with a 9-year-old girl? Yes.
#02.) Advocate beheading? Yes.
#03.) Require women to cover their faces? Yes.
#04.) Befriend Christians and Jews? No.
#05.) Own slaves? Yes.
#06.) Marry his daughter-in-law? Yes.
#07.) Approve of prostitution? Yes.
#08.) Gluttonize? Yes.
#09.) Recommend wife-beating? Yes.
#10.) Hit his own wife? Yes.
#11.) Kill prisoners of war? Yes.
#12.) Advocate suicide attacks? Yes.
#13.) Kill apostates? Yes.
#14.) Tell sick persons to heal them-selves by drinking camel urine? Yes.
#15.) Beat children who don't pray? Yes.
#16.) Have boys as young as 13-years-old beheaded? Yes.
#17.) Have eleven wives? (at one time) Yes.
#18.) Approve of Sex with Minors? Yes.
#19.) Lie? Yes.
#20.) Enslave women and children? Yes.
#21.) Stone adulterers to death? Yes.
#22.) Torture a man out of greed? Yes.
#23.) Consider men and women equal partners? No.
#24.) Steal? Yes.
#25.) Kill someone for insulting him? Yes.
#26.) Preach love for people of all religions? No.
#27.) Extort money from other religions? Yes.
#28.) Keep women as sex slaves? Yes
#29.) Force conversions to Islam? Yes.
#30.) Encourage acts of terror? Yes.
#31.) Kill a woman? Yes.
#32.) Capture a woman and rape her? Yes.
#33.) Encourage the rape of women in front of their husbands? Yes.

So, what crime exactly has ISIS committed that Mohammed did not?



Wake up non-muslims, since islam says CLEARLY: kill all the unbelievers.

AND, WAKE UP MUSLIMS! (that don't believe in ISIS), since islam says CLEARLY: kill all the hypocrites (and... that means you!). Ask yourself: is this really what I believe in???

About Mohammed:

Mohammed was not just a religious leader, he was MAINLY a political and military leader.

Mohammed was an orphan who rose from poverty to become the first ruler of all of Arabia. He created a new RELIGION, new METHODS OF WAR and a new POLITICAL SYSTEM including a LEGAL CODE (the Sharia).

Mohammed was NOT a prophet, he was a warlord who never prophesied ANYTHING.

Mohammed was qua religion (this in addition to his military career) no more than just a dangerous cult leader like Charles Manson, Jim Jones, David Koresh etc., just 1400 years earlier. A dangerous madman in his time who proclaimed himself(!) the last prophet of God and wrote the koran himself.

We all know how it ended with the other cult leaders. And that is unfortunately also the ONLY real solution for islam. How sad it may be for some liberals and semi-muslims who would like to celibrate ramadan and eid but otherwise totally know nothing about Islam.

In two (simplified) sentences:

The basic reason for the violence of muslims in the world comes down to this:

1.) Muslims should worship Allah LIKE MOHAMMED DID, according to islam.
2.) Mohammed was a warlord, (mass)murderer, pedophile, thief, fascist, and rapist.

So, according to the sources (Koran, Sira, Hadith), every "good" Muslim should be like Mohammed. And the less radical (in the eyes of Westerners) muslims are in fact NOT good muslims if you read the sources carefully.

What ISIS and many many other muslim terrorist organizations in the world are doing today, is EXACTLY the same as what Mohammed did 1400 years ago on the Arabian Peninsula. NOTHING has changed except the weapons, and it will NEVER change, unless the sources are changed and that will never happen since the word of Allah is absolute and can never be doubted.

Mohammed was the world's GREATEST WARRIOR. No one today wages war in the name of Caesar, Alexander the Great, Napoleon or any other military leader. However, every year many people STILL DIE because of Mohammed. After 1400 years, TODAY ISLAM IS MORE POWERFUL THAN IT HAS EVER BEEN. Mohammed said that one day all of the world would live under his rule of law.

Make no mistake: most muslims may not be murderers or terrorists, but many of them are radical (in the eyes of Westerners) and the Sharia is a wish for many muslims. After Nazism and Communism, islam is now the third totalitarian ideology that threatens humanity and it is extremely important for everyone (muslims and non-muslims) not to increase the percentage of muslims in a free country for there will be a point of no return.



HIJRAH, JIHAD BY IMMIGRATION. [syn: Creeping Sharia; Sharia of the Womb; Stealth Jihad; Immigration Jihad; ]

The koran teaches muslims to migrate, and convert the people of the new lands to islam.

Islam rates emigration so highly that the islamic calender only started when Mohammed emigrated from Mecca and went to Medina. Emigration is a very essential way to spread islam all over the world and is seen as a highly important form of jihad in islam.

The koran states there are only two ways to guarantee that you will go to heaven:

1.) Kill and be killed in the name of Allah (jihad).
2.) Die while emigrating to spread islam (hijrah -- jihad by emigration).

Note: technically there is a third way, your good deeds must outweigh your bad deeds. But since it impossible for any person to count their good and bad deeds, this one is all but useless for any muslim.

Basically there are 3 MAIN PHASES of MUSLIM IMMIGRATION (Hijrah):

Play the victim -- Claim islamophobia -- More tolerant of others

Threatening -- Demand sharia Law -- Intolerant of infidels

Militant -- Strict sharia law -- Kill/Subdue all infidels

How islam progressively takes over countries:

In Dr. Peter Hammond's book "Slavery, Terrorism and Islam", he documents the way muslims slowly develop a presence in various countries and as their population numbers build, become more aggressive and assertive about exercising Sharia law.

Dr. Hammond notes in his book:
 "Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.

 Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.

 Open, free, democratic societies are particularly vulnerable. When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well."
 ["Creeping Sharia" due to continual demands and concessions to Sharia.][syn: Creeping Sharia; Sharia of the Womb; Stealth Jihad; Immigration Jihad; ]

The takeover of a country begins when the population of muslims reaches a critical mass, and they being to agitate for various privileges. This is how it works:

1.) Studies show that as long as a muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a PEACE-LOVING MINORITY and not as a threat to anyone.

2.) At 2% and 3% they begin to PROSELYTIZE from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with RECRUITING from the jails and if possible among street gangs.

3.) From approximately 4% to 5% on they exercise an INORDINATE INFLUENCE IN PROPORTION to their percentage of the population.

They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves along with threats for failure to comply. They will insist on celebrating MUSLIM HOLIDAYS (like ramadan and eid) and many CHRISTIAN HOLIDAYS (like Easter and Christmas) will more and more become pressured upon.

4.) When muslims reach 6% to 10% of a population, they will increase LAWLESSNESS as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris car-burnings). Any non-muslim action that offends islam will result in UPRISINGS AND THREATS (Mohammed cartoons, Salman Rushdie, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Geert Wilders).

At this point, they will also work to get the ruling government to allow them TO RULE THEMSELVES UNDER SHARIA (the islamic military law) starting in the bigger cities in ghettos.

5.) After reaching 10% to 20% expect RIOTING, JIHAD MILITIA FORMATIONS, SPORADIC KILLINGS (Theo van Gogh, Charlie Hebdo, Bataclan) and CHURCH AND SYNAGOGUE BURNINGS.

6.) At 20% to 40% you will find widespread MASSACRES, chronic TERROR ATTACKS and ongoing MILITIA WARFARE.

7.) From 40% to 60% you may expect UNFETTERED PERSECUTIONS of non-believers and other religions, SPORADIC ETHNIC CLEANSING (genocide), use of SHARIA LAW as a weapon and JIZYA (the tax placed on infidels).


It is important to understand that in some countries with well under 100% muslim populations, such as France, the minority muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% muslim, and within which they live by the Sharia.

Sir Winston Churchill, 1899:

 "Individual muslims may show splendid qualities, but THE INFLUENCE OF THE RELIGION paralyses the social development of those who follow it. NO STRONGER RETROGRADE FORCE EXISTS IN THE WORLD.

 ISLAM is as DANGEROUS in a man as RABIES in a dog."

As a MINORITY they are SHEEP.

As an EQUALITY they are FOXES.

As a MAJORITY they are WOLVES.

Let's keep them sheep!

Note: for 1400 years up until this day this pattern has NEVER changed.


Besides this: there is the influence of islam on a growing muslim population.

The bigger the muslim population in any country will be, the bigger the influence of islam will be on the muslims living in that country. No person (muslim or non-muslim) in the world is BORN as a devout muslim. SO, THE MORE A MUSLIM IS INFLUENCED BY ISLAM through the mosques, imams, the koran, envirement and so on, THE MORE THEY WILL BE "BRAINWASHED" BY THE DOCTRINE OF ISLAM.

Know this:

This means:
Even your "moderate muslim" neighbor or colleague may very well become a "devout muslim" when the influence of islam grows. Even if this seems unlikely to you now: HISTORY HAS TAUGHT US THAT LESSON TIME AND TIME AGAIN IN MANY COUNTRIES!

History has shown us time and time again that when the muslim population grows radicalism will start growing rapidly among muslims, like a cancer.

Many countries before us have witnessed that most "radical muslims" are moderate before they decide to practice islam perfectly based on the koran, hadith, and following Mohammed.

Even though the majority of muslims in a country are moderate today, that does not mean that radicalism can not be majority someday. When a muslim population grows, STEP BY STEP radicalism, intolerance, and violence in the name of islam will grow and become a more common phenomenon.

A moderate muslim will only stay moderate as long as they don't practice islam, but who can guarantee that a moderate muslim will never become a radical muslim?

As long as there is interaction with other muslims, ANY moderate muslim will still have the potential to become a radical. Just waiting for somebody who reads the koran cover to cover, knows and practices islam perfectly and knows exactly how to live and how to behave as a muslim, then sooner or later he WILL become a radical.

Always remember this:

There is only ONE islam and that is the one described in the koran/sunna.

And islam is very clear:

No freedom of speech, no freedom of press and no freedom of religion. No equality between a man/woman and muslims/non-muslims. Death sentences for apostates, hypocrites (moderate muslims), unbelievers (atheists), believers of other religions (Hindus, Jews, Buddhists, Christians, etcetera) and all non-muslims, blasphemers, homosexuals, etcetera. Death sentences for anyone who criticizes islam, Allah, Mohammed or anything written in the koran/sunna.

There are however non-practicing (passive) muslims, partial-practicing (moderate) muslims, and practicing (devout) muslims, just like in any other religion.

But how do we know when a non-practicing or partial-practicing muslim will become a practicing one? We can never know, but the bigger islam is growing in a country the bigger the chance that they will. So, we can never point at a single non-practicing or partial-practicing muslim and say that they represent islam, for clearly they do not.

It is CRITICAL for every free country in the world to keep the muslim population WELL UNDER 5-10%, or your liberty and rights will truely be at stake and your rights will SLOWLY AND ALMOST UNNOTICABLY start becoming less and less and less and less and less.

Step by step...


Dhimmis: how non-muslims are treated in muslim countries.

Islam is based upon two principles: submission and duality. Islam's first principle is submission and that is declared in the very names islam and muslim. Islam means to submit and muslim is one who has submitted.

Islam is a chain of submission. The ranking of authority is:

1.) Allah
2.) Mohammed
3.) The muslim man
4.) The muslim woman
5.) The kafir (non-muslim)
6.) The dhimmi
7.) The slave

Dhimmis are Christians, Jews and other non-muslims (defined by muslims as "kafirs") living in islamic countries as second-class subjects with virtually no rights as citizens.

The Sharia and the status of a dhimmi are the root cause of the disappearance of Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism and Hinduism in islamic countries.

The dhimma is a treaty "granted" by Mohammed to the Jewish and Christian populations whom he had subjected and included other peoples vanquished by the muslims. Through this they were considered to be "protected" by their "treaty of surrender", horrible rules that the conquered kafirs were coerced into obeying.

In muslim dominated areas and countries, till this very day, muslims are enforcing a dhimmi treaty with kafirs (non-muslims). Here are some examples of the conditions under which kafirs in islamic countries are subjugated (how the dhimma treats the kafir as a dhimmi):

Kafirs are forbidden to build new churches.

Kafirs are prohibited from issuing their call to prayer any louder than can be heard from the sidewalk of the church.

A church shall not be higher than 15 feet.

Kafirs cannot build houses greater in height than the height of houses owned by muslims.

Kafirs are forbidden from attaining any position of authority over muslims.

Kafirs shall not vote, nor will they be recognized as citizens in any muslim nation.

Kafirs are prohibited from serving in the military, police force nor hold any government position.

Kafirs shall not testify in muslim courts nor will they be permitted to sue any muslim.

Kafirs shall not give shelter in their churches or homes to any non-muslim.

Kafirs shall not teach any other religion but islam to any muslim.

Kafirs shall not manifest any other religion but islam publicly, they shall not attempt to convert any muslim, and they will not prevent any non-muslim from leaving their religion to become a muslim if they so wish.

Kafirs shall not own or carry any weapons.

Kafirs shall not drive cars, although they will be able to operate mopeds and ride bicycles.

Kafirs shall not display their books in the marketplace.

Kafirs will pay the islamic tax (Jizya) of 50% of their income.

Once a year all kafirs must shave their heads and kneel before the muslims to present the Jizya.

Any act of disobedience by an individual kafir could result in collective punishment and nullify the treaty (dhimma) and cause the muslims to riot, murder and burn down the homes and churches of the kafirs.

It should be absolutely clear that these laws are enacted and enforced with one goal only: to make any non-muslim leave their faith and convert to islam, which is exactly what almost every non-muslim did in Turkey, the Balkans, North Africa, the Middle East and any other muslim dominated area in the world.

The same thing happened to the Buddhists and the Hindus when they were forcibly subjected to rules just like these and so, after a while, in utter desperation, they converted or escaped from the totalitarian islamic countries... if they had the chance.

On the example of Turkey we can see perfectly how submission works. Islam keeps working until 100% of a civilization gives way to islam. Turkey used to be a 100% Christian nation. In the year 1900 approx 70% was islamic. Today Turkey is 99.7% islamic. Over a period of time every single last Christian in Turkey will be gone. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3SmLzY-cZI] They will have immigrated or have been killed in a street riot. Islam does not cease until submission is 100%.


Islam is the only "religion" to find CARTOONS OFFENSIVE but not murder, child abuse, rape, pedophilia, genocide, torture, infanticide, incest, bestiality, genital mutilation, slavery, beating wives, burning people alive, killing infants and children, destroying churches, temples and artifacts, having multiple wives, beheading and burning all people of other religions or no religion.

Here are some verses taken from the koran:

1.) Kill any one who INSULTS Islam or Mohammed. (Koran.33;57-61).

2.) Kill all muslims who LEAVE Islam. (Koran.2;217/4;89/Bukhari.9;84-57).

3.) Koran can NOT be doubted. (Koran.2;1).

4.) Islam is the ONLY acceptable religion. (Koran.3;85).

5.) Muslims MUST fight (jihad) to non-muslims, even if they don't want to. (Koran.2;216).

6.) Non-muslims are PIGS and APES. (Koran. 2;62-65/Koran.5;59-60/Koran.7;166).

7.) Non-muslims can NOT be friends with muslims. (Koran.5;51).

8.) Non-muslims are SWORN ENEMIES of muslims and islam. (Koran.4;101).

9.) Non-muslims can be RAPED as SEX SLAVE. (Koran.4;3 24/5;89/23;5/33;50/58;3/70;30).

10.) Non-muslims are the vilest of creatures deserving NO MERCY. (Koran.98;6).

11.) Muslims MUST TERRORIZE non-muslims. (Koran.8;12 59-60/ Bukhari.4;52;220).

12.) Muslims MUST STRIKE TERROR into non-muslims hearts. (Koran.8;60).

13.) Muslims MUST LIE to non-muslims to strengthen and spread Islam. (Koran.3;28?16;106).

14.) Muslims are allowed to BEHEAD NON-MUSLIMS (Koran.47;4).

15.) Muslims are GUARANTEED to go to heaven IF THEY KILL non-muslims. (Koran.9;111).

16.) Marrying and divorcing PRE-PUBESCENT CHILDREN is OK. (Koran.65;4).

17.) WIFE BEATING is OK. (Koran.4;34).

18.) RAPING WIVES is OK. (Koran.2;223).

19.) Proving rape REQUIRES FOUR MALE MUSLIM WITNESSES. (Koran.24;13).

20.) Muslims are allowed to CRUCIFY and AMPUTATE non-muslims. (Koran.8;12/47;4).


And some more verses...

Koran 2:191-193 "And slay the unbelievers wherever you find them. Kill them wherever you encounter them. And drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]... but if desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah."

Koran 2:244 "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

Koran 3:28 "Muslims must not take the infidels as friends."

Koran 3:56 "I will make the disbelievers suffer severely in this world and the next. As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."

Koran 3:85 "Any religion other than islam is not acceptable."

Koran 4:34 "Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other . . . as for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them."

Koran 4:74 "To anyone who fights in Allah's way, whether killed of victorious, we shall give a great reward."

Koran 4:76 "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah."

Koran 4:95 "Allah has granted a grade higher to those who fight with their possessions and bodies compared to those who sit at home. Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward."

Koran 4:104 "Do not be faint-hearted in pursuing the enemy. And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain."

Koran 5:33 "Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize islam. Punished by death, crucifixion of the amputation of an alternate hand and foot."

Koran 5:82 "You are sure to find that the most hostile to the believers are the Jews."

Koran 8:12 "I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the koran. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them."

Koran 8:57 "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."

Koran 8:60 "Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels. The disbelievers should not think they have won -- they cannot escape."

Koran 8:65 "The unbelievers are stupid; urge the muslims to fight them."

Koran 9:5 "When opportunity arises kill the infidels wherever you find them. Wherever you find the polytheists, kill them seize them, besige them, ambush them."

Koran 9:14 "Fight them, Allah will punish them by your hands and bring them to disgrace."

Koran 9:29 "Fight Christian and Jews who do not believe in Allah until they submit."

Koran 9:30 "The Jews an Christians are perverts, fight them."

Koran 9:123 "Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood. You have in Mohammed a beautiful pattern of conduct. O you who believe! Fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

Koran 22:19 "Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked on iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies."

Koran 47:35 "So, do not lose heart and cry out for peace."

Koran 48:29 "Mohammed is the messenger of Allah. Those with him are harsh, hard and ruthless towards the disbelievers and merciful among themselves."

Koran 47:4 "Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them."

Muslim 1:33 "I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Mohammed is the messenger of Allah."

Bukhari 52:177 "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."

Bukhari 52:220 'I have been made victorious with terror.'

Tabari 9:69 "Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us."

Surah 4:89 "Round up the infidels where ever you find them and slay them."


Islam is taking over Europe without a fight, and America is next. Just because we let it happen and maybe rather not speak -- or even wanna hear -- about it.

So, here are some things we, the infidels in the West, all need to understand:

We need to understand that the average muslim living in the West knows next to nothing about islam. So when you know some muslims that tell you islam is peaceful, they may actually truly believe it (despite what it says in the koran and the sunna, despite 1400 years of violence, and despite what is happening in all muslim countries).

We need to understand what islam means: No 'Golden Rule'. No equal rights. No critical thinking. No free press. No liberty. No atheism. No freedom of religion. No freedom of speech. No democracy. No LGBT's. No tolerance or forgiveness. Fear, cultural degradation, extreme cruelty in punishments and for animals, and much, much more.

We need to understand that living under the islamic religious police is similar -- or worse -- than living under the Gestapo or Stasi.

If you want to know what islam is, take a look at Saudi Arabia, or ISIS, that is 100% pure islam with 100% pure sharia. It is the wrong direction, yet we're going there. Like every "moderate" islamic country is going there, step-by-step. Untill the land is 100% ruled by the sharia. And it is virtually irreversible if we don't act.

But nevertheless... we are doing nothing to stop it. We are welcoming it in. We are even inviting it!

We need to understand that islam is not defined by your neighbour, your co-worker or any other peaceful Westernized muslim you might know. Islam is defined by Allah and Mohammed. And Allah and Mohammed say clearly: "Fight the unbelievers, unless you can't fight them. If you can't fight them, deceive them until we're strong enough."

We also need to understand that islamization is almost always irreversible, only a civil war will reverse it.

We need to understand that there will be a point of no return, soon. And that there will be no second chance after that. Is this what we want for the next generations? A second Lebanon, Bosnia, Iran, etc.. In Europe? In America? In Australia?

Make no mistake: it WILL happen if we don't do something. Just like it happened -- without exception -- in the 55+ islamic countries before us: step by step.

We need to wake up! Do the right thing, before it is too late. Either we do something about this now, or we WILL have an islamic revolution / civil war within the next 20 years exactly like happened in Iran, Afghanistan, Lybia, Lebanon, Bosnia etc. before us.

You need to make a choice now, before it is too late.

Make a decision. Speak out. Get informed. Inform others. Vote wisely.

If you don't, you'll always have to remember: you could have prevented it, but you choose to do nothing.

But, you can never say you didn't know about it.

And you can never say you haven't been warned about it.


Why islam and the West are fundamentally incompatible:

The truth about Jesus and Mohammed: Jesus wasn't a violent warlord, Jesus never killed anyone, Jesus never forced a young girl to have sex, Jesus never beat a woman, Jesus never beheaded anyone, and Jesus never established a form of misogynistic, homophobic law named Sharia.... Mohammad did all of those things. [See https://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2015/12/17/islams-only-hope-for-true-reform-comes-from-a-surprising-source-and-what-of-americas-only-hope-for-reform/]

Jesus said: thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself
-- Matthew 5:14

Mohammed said: fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah
-- Ibn Ishaq 992

The koran contains the most violent of all religious texts, so you have to ask youself, where's the evidence Angel Gabriel dictated these violent texts? Islam, sharia Law and islamic terrorism is all born from the words of the koran and the actions of Mohammed.

Many Muslims are innocent misguided believers, but Mohammed was a merchant turned militant terror war-monger who slaughtered many innocents from 624 AD, in bloody raids, battles, invasions and crusades for power, territory and profit.

Three hundred and sixty (360) gods became one god: Allah, symbolised by the black stone Kaaba in Mecca and the crescent moon-god and denied and rejected the divinity of Jesus Christ: the antichrist.

The koran espouses oppression and abuse against women and children, violence and death to non-believers and apostates, and dominance over all other religions and the world.

Conversely, Jesus, the Son of God, Holy Spirit and Prince of Peace, performed 37 amazing miracles to prove who He really is. He is loved because He first loved us, and not because of any threat of punishment. But all will be held personally accountable. The two greatest commandments are, to love God and love your neighbour as yourself, on these two hang all the laws and prophets.

Western societies are shaped by Judeo-Christian centric western culture: laws, society, culture and politics are based on the commandments from the Bible.

THE 10 COMMANDMENTS (Christians must follow these according to God in the Bible):

1.) You shall have no other gods before Me -- Exodus 20:2-17, Deuteronomy 5:6-21

2.) You shall not make idols -- Exodus 20:2-17, Deuteronomy 5:6-21

3.) You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain -- Exodus 20:2-17, Deuteronomy 5:6-21

4.) Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy -- Exodus 20:2-17, Deuteronomy 5:6-21

5.) Honor your father and your mother -- Exodus 20:2-17, Deuteronomy 5:6-21

6.) You shall not murder -- Exodus 20:2-17, Deuteronomy 5:6-21

7.) You shall not commit adultery -- Exodus 20:2-17, Deuteronomy 5:6-21

8.) You shall not steal -- Exodus 20:2-17, Deuteronomy 5:6-21

9.) You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor -- Exodus 20:2-17, Deuteronomy 5:6-21

10.) You shall not covet -- Exodus 20:2-17, Deuteronomy 5:6-21

Islamic societies are shaped by islamic culture: laws, society, culture and politics are based on the commandments from the koran.

ISLAMIC COMMANDMENTS (muslims must follow these according to Allah in the koran):

01.) You will rape, marry, and divorce pre-pubescent girls -- koran 65:4

02.) You will enslave for sex and work -- koran 4:3, 4:24, 5:89, 33:50, 58:3, 70:30

03.) You will beat sex slaves, work slaves, and wives -- koran 4:34

04.) You will need 4 muslim male witnesses to prove a rape -- koran 24:13

05.) You will kill those who insult islam or Mohammed -- koran 33:57

06.) You will crucify and amputate non-muslims -- koran 8:12, 47:4

07.) You will kill non-muslims to receive 72 virgins in heaven -- koran 9:111

08.) You will kill anyone who leaves islam -- koran 2:217, 4:89

09.) You will behead non-muslims -- koran 8:12, 47:4

10.) You will kill and be killed for Allah -- koran 9:5 (verse of the sword)

11.) You will terrorize non-muslims -- koran 8:12, 8:60

12.) You will steal from non-muslims -- koran chapter 8 (booty/spoils of war)

13.) You will lie to strengthen islam -- koran 3:28, 16:106

Islam is as compatible with Western civilizations as Vikings and Mongols are.


It is a primitive, backwards, 7th century ideology that has no place in the modern world and is NOT comparable to the West in ANY way. It is violence and unrestrained savagery.

In Christianity, Christians are not expected to emulate Christ. In islam, muslims are intended to emulate the behavior and example of Mohammed directly and literally. [Count the number of people that Islam has maimed, raped, tortured, enslaved, murdered, etc. vs the number that Christians have done that to, rather than just compare the Koran and Bible, though -- that's more important.]

Jesus preached compassion and love. Mohammed was a vicious warlord, a pedophile, a polygamist, and a murderer. He killed 300 people himself with his hands and sword.

These figures couldn't be more different, yet liberal multiculturalists today STILL try to make a false-equivalency between Jesus and Mohammed, the SELF-PROCLAIMED prophet.

There is a reason why Europe has kicked islam out 3 times before through out history.

Allah is NOT God. Allah to begin was a moon god. It is satan. This allah even admits he is satan. Allah even says he wants to bring as many people to hell with him.

The Bible's Book of Revelations describes the Saracens perfectly. Even down to the fact that they yell allahu akbar. Even down to the fact that they behead people. Even down to the fact that they force people to join their satanic religion or kill them. The islamic anti-Christ which the Bible told us about. Their return of the fake Jesus Christ which will fool many people. When really it's satan the Beast, the great deceiver. Allah in the koran calls himself "The greatest of deceivers". The Bible calls satan "The great deceiver". [See https://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2015/12/17/islams-only-hope-for-true-reform-comes-from-a-surprising-source-and-what-of-americas-only-hope-for-reform/]

Islam is the most demonic satanic thing. Who in their right mind will worship and kill for a paedophile? What type of sense is that. Mohammed was a mass murder, a rapist and a thief. He raped a woman the same day he slaughtered her husband and an entire village. He raped Aisha when she was 9 years old. That is the best person muslims look up to and will kill for and die for. Something doesn't add up right?

There is a reason why muslims must bow down towards hell with their asses facing up towards God. Christians praise the Lord standing up with their arms outstretched towards heaven, looking up. Muslims break all the 10 commandments. Satan is their god. Allah is a moon god not the almighty God.

Jesus said: I am the way, the truth and the life
-- John 8:12-14

Mohammed said: I don't know were we're going, or what will be done with me and you
-- Koran 46:9

Ayatollah Khomeini:

  "ISLAM IS NOT A RELIGION OF PACIFISTS, those who study jihad will understand why islam wants to conquer the whole world.

  Those who know nothing of islam pretend that islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are WITLESS. Islam says: KILL all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all. Islam says: KILL the [the non-muslims], put them to the sword and scatter [their armies]. Islam says: KILL in the service of Allah those who may want to kill you. Islam says: whatever good there is exists thanks to the SWORD and in the shadow of the sword. People cannot be made obedient except with the sword."

Jesus' last words: forgiveness.

Mohammed's last words: kill all the Jews and Christians...

Mohammed further said:
"Wherever you find Christians and Jews, KILL ALL OF THEM and RAPE THEIR WOMEN."




The power of islam is that it crawls GRADUALLY an SLOWLY over time in a nation so people won't wake up until it is too late to change anything. Islam does not declare "war" or "attacks a nation" like with conventional conquerors, so there is no "Pearl Harbor" to wake people up.

The laws of sharia are being implemented step by step everywhere in the West. Headscarfs everywhere, muslim-only swimming pools, prayer rooms etc., renaming Christian holidays like christmas and easter, special privileges for muslims, removing christian signs from packaging in the supermarkets, forcing halal food to non-muslims, etc. etc. etc. The list goes on and on... [muslims demand continuous concessions to Sharia law, until the country is Sharia]

In some countries like Germany and England you can even go to prison for insulting islam. Once we find one thing normal the next step will come, and the next, and the next... It shouldn't take you much imagination to see where it will end.

This is called "creeping sharia". Islam will creep in SLOWLY but SURELY and this is exactly what makes islam so dangerous and almost unstoppable, since many people will not see the danger or wil play down the danger until it is too late... ["Creeping Sharia" due to continual demands and concessions to Sharia.][syn: Creeping Sharia; Sharia of the Womb; Stealth Jihad; Immigration Jihad; ]

Just like many Jews (and others) have played down Hitler's evil before 1939...

And just like many Christian, Buddhist and Hindu nations before us have played down islam evil before it was too late... We have the history of 55+ now islamic countries to learn from.

What is happening in Europe and America today is very similar to what happened in Germany during Hitler's rise to power. Back then all the warnings were also ignored.

In the beginning huge parties continued into the night, and even after Hitler started jailing Jews and shipping them off to the gas chambers the older Jews still kept saying: "It can't happen here, not in an educated, civilized society like Germany".

Just a few weeks later, those same people were pushed like cattle into rail cars headed for the concentration camps. They thought the good times and prosperity would last forever.

Most people today are also oblivious regarding the islamic invasion of the West that is under way. They too have a false sense of security. They seem to be believing the narrative that islam means peace. BUT THERE WILL BE NO PEACE.

All ex- and non-muslims in the east in muslim majority countries already know this too well. Islam plans to take over Europe and Africa first... then America and then to turn the world against Israel and jews. But Westerners are just too naive and don't want to believe it. We are being deceived through our own system.

Our leaders just can not -- or will not -- comprehend that the world will regress to dark ages under islam, despite all the advances humanity as achieved. Cruelty and injustice will reign but will be claimed as just and right. We already know islam and muslims all too well. The West does not want to know but prefers to believe in comforting and placating lies and deception.

The worst part is the west is not helping the poor or the victims but instead has taken in mostly the pepetrators of cruelty and injustice and given them sanctuary and much aid. What an irony. And the anti-christian liberals that so fiercely support the muslims, as they hate Christ and Christians even more, do not want to understand that they too will be subjugated by muslims.

It will happen if we don't stop it! We have already seen many, many non-muslim provinces and states turning into muslim states and provinces, were only the strong remain as followers of other religions until they die or suffer. It will happen, not because islam is good but because the methods used to turn people to it.


The koran CLEARLY calls for the subjugation and annihilation of all kafirs (non-muslims). Until this is renounced by so-called peaceful muslims, they can never be trusted, and why should they be?

Even if -- for the sake of argument -- a moderate muslim at this point in time truly is ignorant and truly still believes that islam is a "religion of peace". What will happen when they find out the truth? After all, EVERY MUSLIM is committed to the words of Mohammed (remember: there is no God but Allah, and Mohammed is his messenger).

That's why we need to stop islam in the West now, while it's still in its infancy. No matter how difficult it may seem, it will never get any easier, only harder, harder and before you know it it will be impossible. The point of no return is now.



Here are some ideas. Without bloodshed, however this might again be an uncomfortable message to some:

1.) Stop all muslim immigration, all migrants that are not refugees should be deported.

2.) Firm anti-sharia laws and anti-jihad laws in the constitution and a strong ban on the propagation of islam.

3.) The "Medinan koran", the "Sira", and the "Hadith" should be forbidden books just like "Mein Kampf" is because they are all full of hate. Just the Meccan koran (which is still 64% of the koran) should be allowed. A Meccan koran published in the Arabic language should also be prohibited. Even though this will mainly be a symbolic measure, it does send a message and makes things clear for all.

4.) All mosques should be closed since truely only hatred is preached. No more islamic schools. No more islamic meeting places or neighborhood centers. No more islamic foundations. No more Arabic language should be taught on the universities.

5.) Child support for one child maximum.

6.) There should be more integration, mixing and dispersion of western moderate muslims with the population of the country to avoid (or in some cities it is allready dissolve) muslim ghettos with sharia law.

7.) All muslims must forswear political islam and political islam should be forbidden. Also they must forswear all the violence of islam and the Sharia since it is simply incompatible with human rights and a free society.

8.) Every citizen of 18 years and older in the country (muslims and non-muslims) should sign a statement and give a pledge to the constitution of the country they live in. Including: acceptation of equal rights for everyone (regarding gender, sexual orientation, religion and beliefs). Including: acceptation that the holocaust did happen. And including: acceptation of separation of church and state. If anyone is unwilling to do this there is obviously no place for them in a free society and they therefore should be deported if possible and their passport should be revoked. Besides this there should be much more heavy penalties for extremists.

9.) There should be mandatory lessons and education at all schools about the dangers of islamisation just like there is on the holocaust. Especially muslims should be educated about what islam is since many are just decent people and haven't got a clue.

AND -- since islam is the ultimate brainwashing machine that can make any "moderate muslim" a "devout muslim" in 10 years or less -- all imams and islamic scholars/leaders should be deported and unwanted since they are the brainwashers of society that want to change YOUR LAWS.

10.) No people with dual passports in government or as a civil servant in managerial positions to avoid any conflict of interest.

In short:

Deport all imams.
Close all mosques.
Educate all muslims.

And stop pampering islam!

The most important:

It is CRITICAL, for both muslims and non-muslims, to keep the muslim population in ANY country, city, district and community WELL UNDER 5-10% MAXIMUM AT ALL TIMES to ensure preservation of human rights, democratic institutions and the rule of law.

Remember: only 10% of the Germans was a Nazi in WW2, moderates are irrelevant.

Footnote: it is important to note that the problem is not necessarily bad people, but bad ideology. Nobody is born into the world as a radical muslim. Every baby is a blank page. It is the teachings of islam, the influence of the islamic doctrine, that makes people a Mohammedan.

There are also millions of good and decent muslims in the world today (not BECAUSE of islam but IN SPITE of islam) but as long as the doctrine of islam is not prohibited you just can not trust that they are not sooner or later drawn to the extremist side (not only in terms of Jihad but also in terms of extreme thinking like Sharia etc.), especially if the percentage of muslims is rising in a community.

There is thus only one REAL solution: the source must be forbidden, so: islam should simply be forbidden. No one is born as a terrorist, islam makes terrorists and radicals.


What can YOU do?

1.) EDUCATE YOURSELF. Teach yourself the DOCTRINE and HISTORY of islam. Know the truth!

2.) EDUCATE OTHERS. Publicly call attention to the HUMAN RIGHTS ATROCITIES created by islam's political ide­ology and focus first and foremost on the POLITICS OF ISLAM, not the religion.

3.) MOTIVATE POLITICALLY. To remain silent in the suffering of persecuted Christians, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists is to side with the oppressors and participate in evil.

4.) DEMAND A CALL TO ACTION AT GOVERNMENT LEVEL to refuse to tolerate these opposing acts of our freedoms.


Dietrich Bonhoeffer:

  "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless.

  Not to speak is to speak.

  Not to act is to act."

WHAT KIND OF LIFE will we pass on to the NEXT GENERATIONS?

Let's be clear about this: no one knows for sure what the future has in store or how things will develop in the next decades in the west. But, we can probably be sure of this: if we don't do SOMETHING this may very well end in something very nasty like anarchy (people taking the law into their own hands), civil war, or maybe even genocide like in Bosnia '95.

IN ONLY 20 YEARS large parts of the west can very well be under SHARIA LAW... if we let this happen. Don't think this will not happen! ALREADY there are many muslim ghettos in the big cities of Europe which already have Sharia law and are basicly no-go areas for the police. That's TODAY!

Don't take your freedom for granted! Wake up and GET INFORMED about what ISLAM really is and means as soon as you can...


Know your history, and HAVE A VISION. Not for today, not for tommorow, but for 20 years from now, or maybe even much sooner than that. Years pass quickly!


If the answer is no it's time for you to wake up now, there is still time to turn things around. 10 -- 20 YEARS FROM NOW IT MAY LIKELY BE TOO LATE to change anything anymore. Today is not too late, but it will take all of us to stand as one voice against the islamization of our countries in the West. Don't let this run its course.

There are NO rights inside the sharia for non-muslims.

Take this message very, very seriously since the death of the free world begins with submission and it will be very hard to regain lost (hard-won) freedoms once they are gone. As a matter of fact, it may very well NEVER come back once it's gone. SO PROTECT THE FREEDOMS YOU CURRENTLY HAVE!



We are safe in the West? This won't happen here?

Think again. The world we live in will not be [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HhNPcWSk_E] the world our children and grandchildren will live in. If we allow it to happen. It is not 'terrorism' it's Jihad to establish the Sharia, we need to recognize it for what it is.

We need to stop pretending we can compromise with a doctrine that says its purpose is to submit or annihilate us.

After so many years of peace and prosperity many people in the West have started to think that it all came naturally, that they are entitled to it. But the truth is: many have fiercely fought and worked very hard for it. Many people have paid a high price for OUR freedom and currently we're just giving it away!

All the countries in the West have been OVERRUN by imams and mosques, especially in the last 20 years. If we compare the West in the '80s with today, we see the increased influence of islam EVERYWHERE. With growing dominance. From Saudi Arabia and other countries the entire world has been flooded with huge amounts of money and thousands of imams, textbooks, mosques, lobbyists, internet trolls and so on.

Yet, still many of us feel uncomfortable even talking about islam because we all know some nice moderate muslims we don't want to offend. WAKE UP PEOPLE, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE! Most muslims know NOTHING about islam and have NO IDEA what they actually believe in.

We need to stop normalizing a fascist ideology.

After the Nazi's were defeated in WW2 all the Nazi's didn't suddenly vanish into thin air. All Germans were still there, but we just didn't ACCEPT the Nazi ideology anymore, it was no longer generally accepted.

Exactly this is what needs to happen with the islamic ideology as well, if we want to have any chance of solving this problem without a civil war or bloodshed, which WILL happen, as history taught us if we let this run its course. Obviously, the longer we will wait, the harder it will be.


Deport all imams.
Close all mosques.
Educate all muslims.

There will be a point of no return, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55Cp2eUkwCM] sooner than you may think. If nothing changes EUROPE WILL BE AN ISLAMIC CONTINENT IN JUST 2 GENERATIONS OR LESS. And there will be no second chance after that, for islam does not give back what it has conquered.

Either we close all mosques now, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4-wZ6PSAlw] or inevitably we WILL have a civil war.


Educate yourself on islam's impact on the West.

When are we going to stop islam in the West? Now, when it is difficult? Or sometime later, when it can't be done anymore? Think about it, the point of no return is now. We need to rise from our lethargy very soon, or we'll be crying over our children every day.

So, inform yourself and form your own INDEPENDENT and UNPREJUDICED opinion. Create awareness, however you can. Demand action from government and media if you can. Learn from the history of the 55+ countries already conquered by islam, for ALL OF THEM have exactly the same story: if we do not fight islam with our voice and vote today, we WILL either have to submit to the sharia, or fight islam in a civil war tomorrow.

It all starts with awareness. Ordinary people like you, like us, we need to speak up. Share it on social media, talk with friends and colleagues about it. Stand up and speak out now before it's too late. Decide today what you want kind of future you want for your children. If you're not afraid to speak out against nazism, do not be afraid to speak out against islam. Remember: islam is an ideology, it is NOT a race.

Wake up, before it will be too late to change anything the 'easy' way!

Want to know more?

Read the information [https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/] that is withheld from you by ignorant politicians, miseducated media, apologist educators and brainwashed muslims, share it with others as well. Sign up for Bill Warner's newsletter here. [https://cspipublishing.us15.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=bb10be5467765cc275c84e173&id=6c5b015c10] Read the books [https://www.amazon.com/Bill-Warner/e/B00FAWN654/] and watch the videos of Dr. Bill Warner, [https://www.politicalislam.com/] and others, [http://www.wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam_on_the_Net] on FaceBook [https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerauthor/] or YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0Uu4XnRS1hiz3JCpNFIuUg/videos?sort=p&view=0&flow=grid] for the facts.

We have two choices for our future: expel islam or become islamic.

It's not too late... yet.

Independent Publisher empowered by WordPress

These are some additional good primers on Islam:

Facing Islam Blog  ISLAM 101

Chronology of Muhammad with Glossary.pdf - Google Drive

Facing Islam Blog  New Documentary on Muhammad and Islam - VIDEO

Facing Islam Blog Especially for Muslims

For Current News about Islam and Migrants, see the following (if you subscribe for email updates, they will keep you up to date):

There Is No Moderate Islam. Islam Is A Religion Of The Public Space.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Islamist Prime Minister of Turkey:
"The term 'moderate Islam' is ugly and offensive. There is no 'moderate Islam'. Islam is Islam."

Formally and technically speaking, this is correct and proven to be so. Islam is comprehensive system of social practice on all levels which does not change. There are some variations in Islamic culture. There are different groupings of Islamic culture, such as Sunni, Shia and Sufi.

Nevertheless, Islam overall has worked the same way for approximately fourteen centuries. We see this specifically in the recent history of the Ottoman Empire and the current principles and priorities of Turkish PM Erdogan.

I have a large and comprehensive set of references for Islam, Islamic history, Islamic politics, Islamic law and Islamic religion. My primary references are Dr. Andrew Bostom ( professor of medicine ) and Dr. Bill Warner ( PhD physics ) of Political Islam.

In order to begin to assess Islam and Political Islam, one must know the key material and analysis given by Drs Bostom and Warner.

Without these resources, there is no overall way to understand or evaluate Islam.

There are other important sources, such as Robert Spencer M.A. and numerous other subject matter experts. I strongly recommend Robert Spencer. However I rely primarily on Drs Bostom and Warner.

This is my statement as a professional theologian and as someone deeply concerned about Islamic Sharia law and Islamic jihad. Both Sharia and jihad proceed on multiple levels. Most westerners completely fail to understand this important point.

Nevertheless, Sharia and jihad are becoming more and more influential in the West as well as worldwide. Major examples of global Political Islam are the Muslim Brotherhood and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation.

If one does not understand the principles and models of Political Islam, it is impossible to address the major global issues of Sharia and jihad. If one studies in particular Drs Bostom and Warner, then one will quickly and directly understand the theory and practice of Islam.

I can and do provide many more references and resources. The point is that these are the key references. The analyses and evidence provided by Drs Bostom and Warner are comprehensive and they are sufficient.

You have been helped.

Daniel Greenfield explains Islam 101:
Every devout Muslim is an "Islamist". Islam is not a personal religion. It is a religion of the public space.
A "moderate" Muslim would have to reject Islam as a religion of the public space, as theocracy, and that secularism would be a rejection of Islam.

Nothing in Islam exists apart from anything else. While liberals view culture and religion as a buffet that they can pick and choose from, it is a single integrated system. If you accept one part, you must accept the whole. Once you accept any aspect of Islam, you must accept its legal system and once you accept that, you must accept its governance and once you accept that, you lose your rights.

Bill Warner, PhD: To Know Islam, Know Mohammed

To study Islam requires that one read ( or at least skim ) the two books by Andrew Bostom. The A. Lappen reviews for these on Amazon give the quick summaries.
The Legacy of Jihad Paperback -- March 1, 2008
by Andrew G. Bostom M.D. (Editor), Ibn Warraq (Foreword)
Paperback: 759 pages
Publisher: Prometheus Books (July 10, 2008)
ISBN-10: 1591026024

Sharia Versus Freedom: The Legacy of Islamic Totalitarianism Hardcover -- September 18, 2012
by Andrew G. Bostom (Author)
Hardcover: 735 pages
Publisher: Prometheus Books; 1St Edition edition (September 18, 2012)
ISBN-10: 1616146664

Erdogen - The term 'Moderate Islam' is ugly and offensive. There is no 'Moderate Islam'. Islam is Islam.

Does Jihad Really Have "Nothing to do with Islam"?
by Denis MacEoin
February 24, 2018 at 5:00 am

  "National Security officials are prohibited from developing a factual understanding of Islamic threat doctrines, preferring instead to depend upon 5th column Muslim Brotherhood cultural advisors."  --  Richard Higgins, NSC official.

  At the heart of the problem lies the fantasy that Islam must be very similar to other religions, particularly Judaism and Christianity, out of which it was, in fact derived.

  The use of force, mainly through jihad, is a basic doctrine in the Qur'an, the Prophetic sayings (ahadith), and in all manuals of Islamic law. It is on these sources that fighters from Islamic State, al-Qa'ida, al-Shabaab, and hundreds of other groupings base their preaching and their actions. To say that such people have "nothing to do with Islam" could not be more wrong.

Recently, US National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster once again downplayed the significance of faith by claiming that Islamic ideology is "irreligious"; meanwhile, up to 1.5 billion Muslims continue claiming, as they have done for 1400 years, that it is.

As Stephen Coughlin, an expert on Islam, told Gatestone, "It is the believers who define their religion, not the non-believers. If someone says his religion is that the moon is made of green cheese, that has to be your starting point."

On February 20, 2017, President Trump appointed McMaster, a serving Lieutenant General of the US Army, to the important position of National Security Advisor, after the forced resignation of Michael T. Flynn. McMaster came to the post with a reputation for stability, battlefield experience, and intelligence. According to the Los Angeles Times:

  "It is not an overstatement to say that Americans and the world should feel a little safer today," tweeted Andrew Exum, an author and academic who saw combat in Afghanistan and writes widely about military affairs."

After the controversies surrounding McMaster's predecessor in office, McMaster came as a safe hand.

It was not long before divisions opened up within the NSC, however, with quarrels, firings, and appeals to the president. Many controversies remain today. By July, it was reported that Trump was planning to fire McMaster and replace him with CIA Director Mike Pompeo. By August, however, McMaster's position seemed secure.

U.S. National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

It is not the purpose of this article to discuss issues McMaster's spell at the NSC has brought to light, except for one: McMaster's position on Islam and terrorism. It became a cause for contention early in McMaster's incumbency and continues to engender divisions, not just among NSC staff, but also with the president. The general's viewpoint, which he has often expressed, is that international terrorism has nothing to do with the religion of Islam, a notion he seems to believe to the point where he has banned the use of the term "radical Islamic terrorism" -- a term that Trump uses often.

In an all-hands meeting of the NSC on February 23, 2017, three days after his appointment as NSC Director, McMaster said jihadist terrorists are not true to their professed religion and that the use of the phrase "radical Islamic terrorism" does not help the US in working with allies to defeat terrorist groups:

  "The phrase is unhelpful because terrorist organizations like ISIS represent a perversion of Islam, and are thus un-Islamic, McMaster said, according to a source who attended the meeting."

More recently, on December 3, in an interview with Fox News Sunday anchor Chris Wallace, McMaster stated that "we make sure we never buy into or reinforce the terrorist narrative, this false narrative that this is a war of religion". He followed this by elaborating on the criminality and supposed secularism of Muslim terrorists:

  "Those who adhere to this ideology are really irreligious criminals who use a perverted, what the President has called a wicked interpretation of religion, in an effort to recruit young, impressionable people to their cause, to foment hatred".

In taking that stance, McMaster has broken with many members of his own staff, several of whom he was later to fire, and with the Trump administration itself. This desire to deny a connection between Islam and terrorism or to distinguish between a "pure" Islamic religion and "perversions" of it had been for many years a characteristic of the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations, as well as Hillary Clinton's tweets, when "this has nothing to do with Islam" was an oft-repeated refrain.

One of the people whom McMaster fired is Richard Higgins, a top NSC official who had written a memoir in which he warned of the dangers of radical Islam and its alliance with the far Left. In a lengthy document, Higgins wrote:

  Globalists and Islamists recognize that for their visions to succeed, America, both as an ideal and as a national and political identity, must be destroyed...Islamists ally with cultural Marxists...[but] Islamists will co-opt the movement in its entirety...

  Because the left is aligned with Islamist organizations at local, national, and international levels, recognition should be given to the fact that they seamlessly interoperate through coordinated synchronized interactive narratives...

  These attack narratives are pervasive, full spectrum, and institutionalized at all levels. They operate in social media, television, the 24-hour news cycle in all media and are entrenched at the upper levels of the bureaucracies.

Clearly, Higgins did not mince his words, yet what he wrote seems entirely appropriate for the NSC, a body charged with the protection of the United States from radicalism of all kinds. According to Meira Svirsky, writing for the Clarion Project

  Lamenting the lack of education given to government officials about radical Islam, Higgins previously wrote, "National Security officials are prohibited from developing a factual understanding of Islamic threat doctrines, preferring instead to depend upon 5th column Muslim Brotherhood cultural advisors." [1]

Higgins's stress on the lack of education about Islam is a vital recognition that something has been going wrong for years when it comes to American and European official responses to the religion and its followers. Rightly cautious about genuine Islamophobia, the growth of hate speech and intercommunal strife, governments and their agencies have adopted policies and measures to preserve calm even in the face of growing levels of terrorism by Muslims. Europeans in Paris, Barcelona, Manchester, London, Brussels, Berlin and Nice, to name just a few places, are at the forefront of attacks inspired by Islamic State, al-Qa'ida and other radical groups. But the US has suffered the heaviest casualties, with thousands slaughtered in the 9/11 attacks.

In the face of a renascent and at times violent Islam, politicians have adopted the policy of denying any connection between terrorist events and Islam. Many religious leaders have done the same. McMaster has adopted this policy, keeping him in line with established approaches:

  "HR McMaster, a respected army lieutenant general, struck notes more consistent with traditional counterterrorism analysts and espoused consensus foreign-policy views during a meeting he held with his new National Security Council staff on Thursday".

According to Svirsky:

  McMaster believes the "Islamic State is not Islamic," going so far as to describe jihadists as "really irreligious organizations." As did former president Obama, he opposes use of any language that connects Islam to terrorism.

  McMaster also rejects the notion that jihadists are motivated by religious ideology. Instead, he says they are motivated by "fear," a "sense of honor" and their "interests," which he describes as the roots of human conflict for thousands of years. He believes U.S. policy must be based on "understanding those human dimensions."

There may be signs that McMaster, though he still has some way to go, at least recognizes that some deeply religious Islamic organizations are a threat to the West. Writing on December 13, Meira Svirsky cites a speech McMaster gave at Policy Exchange in Washington:

  "Declaring the ideology of radical Islam an obvious and 'grave threat to all civilized people,' U.S. National Security Adviser General H.R. McMaster singled out the Muslim Brotherhood and its brand of political Islam as a specific threat".

In that speech, the general spoke of Turkey and Egypt as two major sources of support for the Brotherhood, including its Palestinian branch, Hamas. He clearly sees the threat, but does not, as yet, fully understand the meaning of its religious dimension (however much other factors play a role in terrorism).

I have no wish to be disrespectful towards McMaster, who carries out a vital task in securing the lives and property of so many Americans, but I fear his statements show that he has little or no knowledge of Islam, its teachings, or its history. Either that or he has invented a form of Islam that bears no resemblance to the religion that many of us have spent most of our lives studying. Not implausibly, he has given ears to advisors, possibly including Muslims, who have sought to play down any possible link between violence and the Muslim faith.

This willingness, even eagerness, to misrepresent Islam plays directly into the hands of anti-Western Muslims, radicals who anticipate the coming of an apocalyptic global Caliphate. In a recent article, Professor Richard Landes of Boston University lists the many ways in which this is done:

  Only the most fervent of true believers could think that, even with Allah's help, the global Caliphate was possible. In order to succeed, da'wa [outreach; proselytizing] Caliphaters needed the assistance of the targeted kuffar population to:

    Disguise their ambition to subject the kuffar, by downplaying jihadi acts of war and their deployment among the targeted population.
    Insist that "except for a tiny minority," the "vast majority" of Muslims are moderate and peaceful, and Islam is a "Religion of Peace" that has nothing to do with the violence of jihadists.
    Accept those who fight for the Caliphate with da'wa as "moderates" who have "nothing to do" with "violent extremists."
    Engage these "moderate" Caliphaters as advisors and consultants in intelligence and police work, as prison chaplains, community liaisons, college teachers, and administrators.
    Present Caliphater war propaganda as reliable information, as news.
    Attack those who criticize Islam (including Muslims) as xenophobic and racist Islamophobes.
    Adopt the Caliphater's apocalyptic enemy as their own, so that the kuffar join in an attack on one of their key allies.
    Legitimate jihadi terrorism as "resistance" and denounce any recourse to violence in their own defense as "terrorism."
    Respect the dignity of Muslim beliefs even as Muslims heap disdain on their beliefs.
    Take seriously Caliphater invocations of human rights when, in reality, they despise those rights for women, slaves, and infidels.
    Welcome an angry "Muslim Street" in the heart of their capital cities.

At the heart of the problem lies the fantasy that Islam must be very similar to other religions, particularly Judaism and Christianity, out of which it was, in fact derived. This would mean that Islam consists only of doctrines about a single God, heaven and hell, sin and punishment, spiritual endeavor, together with practices such as prayer, fasting, pilgrimage, and alms-giving. There would be nothing to concern us were that the case, and certainly no reason to connect the faith with a few supposedly fanatical people who have misguidedly distorted it and turned to violence.

But that would be to ignore the totality of Islam. Apart from 12 years at the start of Muhammad's mission, Islam has encompassed far more than worship and moral behavior. From the moment Muhammad led his followers from Mecca to Medina in the year 622, his religion became a system of government, of law, and of war. Several battles were fought with his Meccan opponents; the Jews of Medina were either driven out by force or executed and enslaved, and Muhammad returned to Mecca as its conqueror. On his death, his first successor embarked on a two-year war to bring recalcitrant tribes back within the fold, sent out armies to the north and, in just a few years, began the wave of invasions that made Muslims victorious across most of the known world. Of the first four "rightly-guided" caliphs, one was assassinated by an Iranian captive and the other two by other Muslims. Muhammad's grandson, Husayn, was killed with his family in Karbala in 680 by the second of the Umayyad caliphs, before further internal wars. Jihadi wars continued, year in and year out, after that; they are still invoked by modern terrorists. Islam has never been at peace with the non-Muslim world.

The use of force, mainly through jihad, is a basic doctrine in the Qur'an, the prophetic sayings (ahadith), and in all manuals of Islamic law. (For examples, see here, here, here and here.)

If jihad were permitted only in self-defence, then excuses implying aggression, as we have seen, would need to be readily available to justify attacks. As the Washington Post wrote a fortnight after the attack on the United States on 9/11/2001:

  At the heart of the bin Laden opus are two declarations of holy war -- jihad -- against America. The first, issued in 1996, was directed specifically at "Americans occupying the land of the two holy places," as bin Laden refers to his native Saudi Arabia, where 5,000 U.S. troops have been stationed since the 1991 Persian Gulf War. The two holy places are Muslim shrines at Mecca and Medina.

  In 1998, he broadened the edict to include the killing of "Americans and their allies, civilians and military . . . in any country in which it is possible to do it."

It is on such Islamic sources that fighters from Islamic State, al-Qa'ida, al-Shabaab, and hundreds of other groupings base their preaching and their actions. To say that such people have "nothing to do with Islam" could not be more wrong.

It is not only wrong, it is demeaning to the many ex-Muslims such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali or Ibn Warraq and reformist Muslims who are fully aware of the connection, but are often apparently considered delusional or even fanatical. Last year saw the publication of Ibn Warraq's detailed study, The Islam in Islamic Terrorism: The Importance of Beliefs, Ideas, and Ideology, which takes the reader through all the violent or violence-promoting individuals and groups in Islamic history, with discursions on the thinking behind them. With few exceptions, these individuals and groups are far from minor or obscure.

In chapter one of his book, Ibn Warraq examines what he calls the "Root Cause Fallacy", whereby politicians, security advisers, and others deflect attention from religion as a motivator for terrorism. He shows that most radicals and terrorists are not primarily inspired or justified by poverty, lack of knowledge of Islam, lack of education, the Arab-Israeli conflict, Palestine, anti-Semitism, U.S. Foreign policy, Western Imperialism, or revenge for the Crusades. He refers (p. 31) to David Wurmser of the American Enterprise Institute and his view that:

  "Westerners attribute too many of the Arab world's problems 'to specific material issues' such as land and wealth. This usually means a tendency 'to belittle belief and strict adherence to principle as genuine and dismiss it as a cynical exploitation of the masses by politicians. As such, Western observers see material issues and leaders, not the spiritual state of the Arab world, as the heart of the problem'".

Overall, Ibn Warraq draws on an extensive body of scholarship, mainly from leading Western scholars of Islam and authoritative sources such as The Encyclopedia of Islam. McMaster and others, who repeat the mantra that Islamic terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, are hardly in a position to override comment by individuals who have spent a lifetime deeply involved in the study of Islam through its original sources.

Ibn Warraq, moreover, cites (pp. 139-140) several Western and Muslim scholars who have said repeatedly that the idea that the "true jihad is a spiritual struggle" is completely unauthentic. It is arguments based on a reading of texts in Arabic, Persian, Urdu and other languages that deserve to be treated as the basis for policy-making, identifying which people may be potential terrorists, or evaluating the true intentions of US-based Muslim associations such as CAIR or ISNA.

Clare Lopez, vice president of research and analysis at the Washington-based Center for Security Policy, has commented on the broad lack of knowledge about Islam and how it has distorted thinking within national bodies. Beginning with criticism of McMaster, she raises broader issues:

  McMaster is just wrong for NSC on so many counts. I think at least in part because, like others across national security at his level, who made rank in years post-9/11, he was systematically denied fact-based training about Islam, jihad, Shariah and the MB [Muslim Brotherhood] -- whose affiliates, associates, operatives, fellow travelers and useful fools remain embedded within and close to the federal government and local law enforcement at various levels.

  Now, of course, anyone who's ever taken the oath to the Constitution has an affirmative obligation to know the enemy and that McMaster did not do this is his responsibility alone.

  Those who got promoted within the military-security establishment over the past eight years got there precisely because of a "willful blindness about Islam".

The problem for the United States government, Congress, Senate -- and many important agencies which find themselves called on to discuss, monitor, report on, or make policies about Islam, American Muslims, Muslims worldwide, and more -- is knowing where to look for accurate and authentic information. In the past, all of these have depended on Muslim academics, uncritical and cosmetic non-Muslim professors and commentators such as John Esposito, Karen Armstrong and the many teachers identified by Campus Watch; numerous university and college Islamicists with vested interests in posts funded by Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and other Muslim states (see here); self-appointed Islamic authorities such as CAIR, and amateurs within US institutions.

Criticism of Islam has become taboo and has been denounced as a right-wing or even far-right prejudice. The present writer, however, a political centrist, sees nothing wrong in bringing reasoned and fact-based criticism to bear on Islam, just as one would to every other ideology, from Marxism to Fascism. One can also appreciate the stunning contributions Muslims have made to science, art, architecture, calligraphy, music, and the spiritual endeavors of Sufis and Shi'i mystical philosophers. It is important for everyone to step back and bring accuracy and balance to the way we regard a large and expanding religion.

  Denis MacEoin has an MA in Persian, Arabic and Islamic History from Edinburgh University and a PhD (1979) in an aspect of Shi'i Islam in 19th-century Iran. He taught Arabic and Islamic Studies in the Religious Studies Department of Newcastle University and has published many books and articles on Islamic topics.

[1] There is evidence that the international Muslim Brotherhood is working for influence in US politics and that it has already placed people within several US bodies. See here.

Muslim Brotherhood Deepens Its Ties on Capitol Hill

Get Free Exclusive Gatestone Content:
Recent Articles by Denis MacEoin

Death of Democracy? - Part I, 2018-02-07
by Denis MacEoin
February 7, 2018 at 5:00 am

  "The result of 25 years of multiculturalism has not been multicultural communities. It has been mono-cultural communities... Islamic communities are segregated." -- Ed Husain, former Muslim extremist.

  This approach, giving social-services, is based on the belief -- oft-refuted -- that Muslim extremists (both Muslims-by-birth and converts) have suffered from deprivation. It also greatly rests on the naïve assumption that rewarding them with benefits -- for which genuinely deprived citizens generally need to wait in line -- will turn them into grateful patriots, prepared to stand for the national anthem and hold hands with Christians and Jews.

  The British government has shown itself incapable of enforcing its own laws when it comes to its Muslim citizens or new immigrants. Rather than stand up to our enemies, both external and internal, are we so afraid of being called "Islamophobes" that we will sacrifice even our own cultural, political, and religious strengths and aspirations?

For many complex reasons, Europe is in an advanced state of decline. In recent years, several important studies of this condition have appeared, advancing a variety of reasons for it: Douglas Murray's The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam, James Kirchik's The End of Europe: Dictators, Demagogues, and the Coming Dark Age, as well as Christopher Caldwell's ground-breaking 2010 study, Reflections on the Revolution in Europe: Immigration, Islam and the West. Soeren Kern at Gatestone Institute has also been detailing the steady impact of immigration from Muslim regions on countries such as Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.

It is clear that something serious is happening on the continent in which I live.

The threat is not restricted to Europe, but has a global dimension. Michael J. Abramowitz, President of Freedom House, writes in his introduction to the organization's 2018 report:

  A quarter-century ago, at the end of the Cold War, it appeared that totalitarianism had at last been vanquished and liberal democracy had won the great ideological battle of the 20th century.

  Today, it is democracy that finds itself battered and weakened. For the 12th consecutive year, according to Freedom in the World, countries that suffered democratic setbacks outnumbered those that registered gains. States that a decade ago seemed like promising success stories -- Turkey and Hungary, for example -- are sliding into authoritarian rule.

For Douglas Murray, immigration and the problems it is throwing up are the key topic. He is uncompromising in his negative response to the social change that has been brought about by the excessive and barely controlled immigration of people who, for the most part, do not share the most basic values of the countries in which they now live.

Certainly, Europe's current state of decline owes much to the widely recognized fact that Muslims are the first newcomers to Europe who, over several generations, are resistant to integrating into the societies of which they now form a part. This rejection of Europe's humanitarian, Judeo-Christian values applies, not just to the successive waves of refugees and economic migrants who have washed up on the shores of Greece, Italy and Spain since the start of the Syrian civil war, but to generations of Pakistanis and Bangladeshis in the UK, North Africans in France, and Turkish "guest workers" in Germany.

A former Muslim extremist, Ed Husain, writes in his book, The Islamist: Why I Joined Radical Islam in Britain, what I Saw Inside and why I Left:

  The result of 25 years of multiculturalism has not been multicultural communities. It has been mono-cultural communities.... Islamic communities are segregated. Many Muslims want to live apart from mainstream British society; official government policy has helped them do so. I grew up without any white friends. My school was almost entirely Muslim. I had almost no direct experience of 'British life' or 'British institutions'. So it was easy for the extremists to say to me: 'You see? You're not part of British society. You never will be. You can only be part of an Islamic society.' The first part of what they said was true. I wasn't part of British society: nothing in my life overlapped with it.

According to Ed Husain (right), a former Muslim extremist, "The result of 25 years of multiculturalism has not been multicultural communities. It has been mono-cultural communities... Islamic communities are segregated." (Image source: CNN video screenshot)

In July 2015, arguing for an anti-extremism bill in parliament, Britain's prime minister at the time, David Cameron, admitted:

  "For all our successes as a multi-racial, multi-faith democracy, we have to confront a tragic truth that there are people born and raised in this country who don't really identify with Britain -- and who feel little or no attachment to other people here. Indeed, there is a danger in some of our communities that you can go your whole life and have little to do with people from other faiths and backgrounds."

Countless polls and investigations reveal that refusal to integrate is no figment of the supposedly "Islamophobic" political "right". A 2006 poll carried out by ICM Research on behalf of the Sunday Telegraph, for example, presented worrying findings: 40% of British Muslims polled said they backed introducing shari'a law in parts of Britain, and only 41% opposed it, leaving another 20% unclear. Sadiq Khan, the Labour MP involved with the official task force set up after the July 2005 attacks, said the findings were "alarming". Since then, similar findings have shown that the younger generation of Muslims is more conservative, even radical, than their parents or grandparents:

Commenting on a major 2016 ICM poll of Muslim opinion, Trevor Phillips, who had been Britain's foremost advocate of multiculturalism, said that, with respect to the Muslim community, he had made a 180° turn:

  "for a long time, I too thought that Europe's Muslims would become like previous waves of migrants, gradually abandoning their ancestral ways, wearing their religious and cultural baggage lightly, and gradually blending into Britain's diverse identity landscape. I should have known better."

Another major 2016 review on social equality carried out on behalf of the British government by Dame Louise Casey, found Muslims the least well integrated community. In summarizing her work for the National Secular Society, Benjamin Jones wrote:

  "Despite decades of failures, it is worth noting that problems integrating Muslim minorities are hardly rare around the world, and this is not a problem unique to the United Kingdom. That brings us to the final unsayable thing -- well known to most British people but unmentionable to officials and politicians: Islam is a special case."

Polls carried out in other countries across Europe showed similar or worse results.

Those are only one half of a more complicated and disturbing picture. While Muslims find it hard to abandon the prejudices, doctrines, and outright hatreds (for Jews, for example) that they have imported from their home countries -- or developed as young men and women while living in European states where they were born and raised -- vast numbers of non-Muslims, including politicians, church leaders, civil servants, policemen and women, and many well-meaning people bend over backwards to accommodate them and the demands they make on their host societies.

It would take a book to summarize all the episodes in which Western officialdom, notably in Europe, has abandoned its own historical values in order to protect Islam and radical Muslims from criticism and rebuke. We are not speaking of the proper interventions of the police, courts, and social agencies to safeguard ordinary Muslims from physical attacks, vituperative insults, assaults on mosques, or basic denials of the rights they are entitled to enjoy as citizens of Western countries -- much as we expect them to protect Jews, ethnic minorities, or vulnerable women from similar expressions of physical and verbal bigotry. Providing such support for the victims of prejudice should be applauded as an essential expression of post-Enlightenment liberal democratic values. Legislating and acting against outright discrimination is, perhaps, best exemplified in the way post-World War II German governments have criminalized anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial.

Ironically, what anti-Semitism there is today in Germany comes increasingly from Muslims.

According to Manfred Gerstenfeld:

  Jens Spahn, a board member of Chancellor Merkel's Christian Democrat Union (CDU), and a possible successor to Merkel, remarked that the immigration from Muslim countries is the reason for the recent demonstrations [about immigrants] in Germany.
  Stephan Harbarth, deputy chairman of the CDU/ CSU faction in the Bundestag  --  the German parliament  --  said, "We have to strongly confront the antisemitism of migrants with an Arab background and those from African countries."
  The CDU interior minister of the federal state of Hessen, Peter Beuth, remarked, "We have to avoid an immigration of antisemitism." He said this after a study on behalf of the state's security service concluded that antisemitism among Muslims "both quantitatively and qualitatively has at least as high relevance as the traditional antisemitism of the extreme right."

Despite this moral response, European countries, including Germany, have shown genuine weakness when face-to-face with radical Islamic ideology, hate preachers, and basic Muslim values regarding women, non-Muslims, LGBT people, and obedience to Western laws.

Before looking at some of the reasons, motivations, and outcomes of this deeply pervasive weakness, here are a handful of examples of pusillanimity from the UK alone.

Last October, it was reported that Queen's Counsel Max Hill, who acts as the British government's independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, argued that British fighters for Islamic State, who had returned or planned to return to the UK, should not be prosecuted but reintegrated into society on the grounds that they had acted "naively". This lenience extended to hate preachers who had given sermons and lectures exhorting Muslims to take direct action that has in the past led to actual terrorist attacks.

Before that, Prime Minister David Cameron and then Home Secretary Theresa May had "proposed measures including banning orders, extremism disruption orders and closure orders, which would allow premises used by extremists to be shut, and make it easier to restrict the activities of individuals and organisations."

In 2015, May had proposed a counter-extremism strategy which said laws would be introduced to "ban extremist organisations that promote hatred and draw people into extremism" and "restrict the harmful activities of the most dangerous extremist individuals". Mrs May also vowed to use the law to "restrict access to premises which are repeatedly used to support extremism". Yet Max Hill QC, the man in charge of British terrorist legislation wants none of that. And May's counter-terrorism measures, proposed again since she became Prime Minister, remain unlegislated.

The same month (October 2017) that Hill undertook the rehabilitation of jihadists and hate preachers, it was reported that the British Home Office (formerly run by Theresa May, now by Amber Rudd MP) was "looking at a new strategy to reintegrate extremists that could even see them propelled to the top of council house waiting lists if needed".

  Extremists who had nowhere suitable to live could be put in social housing by the local council and could have their rent paid if necessary, according to reports.

  They could also be given priority on waiting lists and helped into education and training or found a job with public bodies or charities.

This proposal would include returnees from the Islamic State in Syria, and overall would include some 20,000 individuals known to the security services. Around 850 British subjects have gone to Syria to fight or support fighters, and 350 of them have come back home, with only a tiny handful so far prosecuted.

This approach, giving social services, is based on the belief -- oft-refuted -- that Muslim extremists (both Muslims-by-birth and converts) have suffered from deprivation. It also greatly rests on the naïve assumption that rewarding them with benefits -- for which genuinely deprived citizens generally need to wait in line -- will turn them into grateful patriots, prepared to stand for the national anthem and hold hands with Christians and Jews.

We now therefore use double standards: one for Muslims and one for the rest of our population. On January 16, 2018, in England, Daniel Grundy, was jailed for six months on a charge of bigamy. However, Muslim men in polygamous marriages are rewarded by the state:

  Husbands living in a "harem" with multiple wives have been cleared to claim state benefits for all their different partners.

  A Muslim man with four spouses - which is permitted under Islamic law - could receive £10,000 a year in income support alone. [not even considering the children]

  He could also be entitled to more generous housing and council tax benefit, to reflect the fact his household needs a bigger property.

  Ministers have decided that, even though bigamy is a crime in Britain, polygamous marriages can be recognised formally by the state - provided they took place overseas, in countries where they are legal.

Actually, British Muslim men do not even have to go abroad to find wives. At least one Muslim dating site run from the UK offers contact with Muslim women who are eager to enter into polygamous marriages. It has not been closed down. The British government has shown itself incapable of enforcing its own laws when it comes to its Muslim citizens or new immigrants.

In a similar vein are official attitudes to a common Muslim practice of female genital mutilation, which has been illegal in the UK since 1985. Politico reported last year:

  "Medical staff working in England's National Health Service recorded close to 5,500 cases of female genital mutilation (FGM) in 2016, but no one has been successfully prosecuted since the practice was banned over 30 years ago."

Meanwhile, the practice is rising. The police and the Crown Prosecution Service are too frightened of seeming racist or "Islamophobic" to apply the law.

Max Hill's notion that departing fighters have been naïve is itself a staggering misconception on the part of a man educated at Newcastle's prestigious Royal Grammar School and Oxford University. No one heading for Syria will have been blithely unaware of the multitude of videos broadcast by the mainstream media and all the social media, showing the beheading of hostages, the executions of homosexuals, the lashing of women, the heads spiked on fences, the use of children to shoot victims or cut their throats, and all the other excesses committed by the terrorist group.

Rather than stand up to our enemies, both external and internal, are we now so afraid of being called "Islamophobes" that we will sacrifice even our own cultural, political, and religious strengths and aspirations? The next part of this article will examine just how major this betrayal has been and how much greater it will become.

  Dr. Denis MacEoin taught Arabic and Islamic Studies and has written books and numerous articles about Islam, including a large volume entitled Obstacles to Integration, not yet published. He is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at New York's Gatestone Institute.

Death of Democracy? - Part II, 2018-02-12
by Denis MacEoin
February 12, 2018 at 5:00 am

  The irony, of course, is that so many people, have adopted a way of interpreting human rights and liberal values in a manner that often undermines them.

  It is time for some home truths. Islam has been at war with the West for some 1,384 years, with very little respite. When Muslim Arab armies invaded Syria in 634, went on to destroy all but a rump of the Christian Byzantine empire (which it finally defeated when the Ottoman Turks conquered Constantinople in 1453), took control of Spain, Portugal, Sicily and other lands on the north Mediterranean coast, it was the start of endless jihad wars.

  Most importantly, we seem unable to understand that Islam is, above all else, a totalitarian project covering all aspects of human life from the spiritual to the material, from law to government to clothing to food to sex to taxation and more. This totalitarianism rejects democracy in the most basic way, as having come from mere humans rather than divinely, from Allah.

  Unfortunately, concluding that modern terrorism "has nothing to do with Islam" or that "Islam is a religion of peace" visibly contradicts the historical record.

Much of the weakness we have identified in so many modern European states comes, ironically, from many of our strengths. We have much to be proud of. However imperfectly at times, we have replaced tyranny with democracy, guaranteed freedom of speech and the press, ensured rights for all citizens, provided legal and political foundations for the growing empowerment of women, struggled against racist and religious bigotry, brought homosexual men and women out of the closet, given protections to the environment and wildlife, extended healthcare provision to most people, abolished the death sentence in all European countries (and Israel), and instituted regulations to block and punish crimes such as people trafficking, slavery, and drug smuggling.

The best example of what this means is to be found in the state of Israel. It is precisely because Israel and a majority of Israelis have, from the beginning, combined Jewish ethical values with Western Enlightenment beliefs, that makes it stand out so sharply against all its neighbours. Human rights abuses in Iran, the Arab states, Turkey, and beyond guarantee that Israel, however much abused by international bodies and media, and however flawed, is, in fact, a bastion of democracy, human rights, equality under the law and the positive values that go with them.

The irony, of course, is that so many people, have adopted a way of interpreting human rights and liberal values in a manner that often undermines them. Political correctness, as it developed through the 1980s and 1990s began with good intentions. Words, political policies, and action that were either intended or inadvertently constructed to offend people on account of their race, disabilities, sexuality and so forth, must be replaced by "correct" terms that would not give offence. Much good was done by that, and today there are expressions that one would never find in respectable publications or hear on public broadcasts. They have rightly been set to one side in all decent discourse.

Many practitioners of political correctness, however, have taken matters to the point where even perfectly rational, well argued, and intelligent speech or behaviour was condemned. This could be, and evidently is, done to inhibit debate -- a new type of censorship made vivid by faculty and students in most Western universities in which speakers offering alternative viewpoints (such as pro-Israel academics) are banned from coming onto campus, while students frightened of being upset by a lecture that presents a different viewpoint create "safe spaces" that will not exist upon their graduation to soothe their feelings. This has become so destructive of the very purpose of the university, that in December 2017 Jo Johnson, the UK Higher Education Minister, told universities to stop the practice of "no-platforming" speakers. Inevitably, student leaders attacked him for saying so.

As anti-establishment groups shifted from support for the working classes and moved to an emphasis on solidarity with those termed by Frantz Fanon "the wretched of the earth", their compassion for suffering people in the Third World was all but eclipsed by a conviction that all today's evils stem from imperialism and colonialism. Up until the 1970s, this same conviction was expressed in support for communist states, regardless of how oppressive they might be.

Concomitant with the belief that the world's sufferings go back to imperialist and colonialist states in Europe and America, there developed a growing contempt for white people who were citizens of those states. Even though Britain, France, and Portugal had abandoned their empires in Africa and elsewhere, they were still tainted with that description. Equally, even though Israel had never been a colonizing enterprise and had actually served as a refuge for some of the most persecuted people in the world, it was still attacked with the same slur.

This contempt for the West translated well into many causes, but nowhere more closely than with the growing strength of radical Islam. After the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979, and a widespread perception that Muslims should now be regarded as the greatest victims of Western hegemony, Westerners in increasing numbers fell in line with an Islamic interpretation of history and hopes of an apocalypse to rectify the injustices of the past.

More than one radical who had been a thorn in the flesh of the Western democracies went so far as to convert to Islam and throw in their lot with the anti-Western firebrands of Iran and the Arab world. Roger Garaudy, a leading figure in the French Communist Party and a convicted Holocaust denier, became a hero for that denial in the Muslim world and converted to Islam in 1982. Carlos the Jackal (Ilich Ramirez Sanchez), who described himself as a Marxist-Leninist "professional revolutionary" and made himself a terrorist, did so around the year 2000.

Many others became enthusiastic supporters of Islamic terrorist groups such as Hamas. In 2010, Che Guevara's eldest daughter, Aleida, travelled to Lebanon to express her admiration for the radical Shi'i group Hizbullah. Judith Butler, a revolutionary American professor, stated that "understanding Hamas/Hezbollah as social movements that are progressive, that are on the left, that are part of a global left, is extremely important". This from a woman who called herself a feminist and a supporter of gay rights. Calling Hamas and Hizbullah "progressive" should stick in the throat of anyone who knows how they disregard human rights, oppress women and murder homosexuals.

One man, Edward Said, did grave damage to public perceptions of Western values, including democracy. His 1978 book Orientalism was held -- mystifyingly -- in high esteem by many scholars who should know have known better, considering his manifold deceptions, as, for example, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. [1]

Of course, many people who also should have known better, believed in mirages such as Communism, and many still believe -- despite such examples as the catastrophe of Venezuela -- in Socialism.

Said promoted the conceit that the West, with its history of imperialism and colonialism has left Middle Easterners and Muslims (especially the Palestinians) the world's victims. The Western democracies, according to him, are the greatest villains of history, with Israel the source of all evil in the Middle East and far beyond.

By ignoring the remarkable achievements of the West and whitewashing the many wrongs committed down the centuries by Muslims, not to mention the stark traditionalism that has mired all Islamic countries in most of the oppressive policies that liberals would normally condemn, Said tried to make anti-Western and pro-Islamic attitudes and policies respectable among the gullible. The only vocal kickback to this indulgence for Islam has, in yet another sad exercise of "shoot the messenger", come from people now accused -- often unjustly -- of being "racist" or "Islamophobic".

This "broad brush" defamation has created problems, as doubtless intended, for those who offer balanced criticisms of Islam but are frequently tarred with the same brush.

A blanket refusal to listen to serious concerns about Islam as an ideology and political enterprise stems from what is in many ways the most dangerous, yet unwitting, position taken by the middle ground. One loses track of the number of Western politicians and church leaders who blithely maintain that "Islam is a religion of peace" or who, when faced with jihadi terrorism, maintain that it "has nothing to do with Islam". A sort of paralysis engendered by a fear of being thought an "Islamophobe" makes it hard if not impossible for people in the public eye to admit that there is another truth, that has, unfortunately, been well known for centuries.

Perhaps the most vivid recent example of one version of Islam clashing with another is a letter posted online on Christmas Day last year. It is addressed to Pope Francis, who was on record saying that "Islam is a religion of peace, one which is compatible with respect for human rights and peaceful coexistence." The very intelligent and strongly argued letter was written on behalf of more than a thousand former Muslims who had converted to Catholicism and wanted to explain that they had known Islam at first hand, which was precisely why they had embraced Christianity instead. The quotations from Christian and Islamic scripture make abundantly clear just what the differences are between the two faiths.

It is time for some home truths. Islam has been at war with the West for some 1,384 years, with very little respite. When Muslim Arab armies invaded Syria in 634, went on to destroy all but a rump of the Christian Byzantine empire (which it finally defeated when the Ottoman Turks conquered Constantinople in 1453), took control of Spain, Portugal, Sicily and other lands on the north Mediterranean coast, it was the start of endless jihad wars. These wars did not end during the centuries of the Barbary slave trade during which Christians were routinely snatched by Muslim pirates and sold in markets in Algiers and elsewhere on the North African coast. Nor did attacks end when European countries colonized or created protectorates over Muslim states such as the Mughal empire of northern India, Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco and Egypt. By the 1920s, Britain controlled about half the Muslims in the world and had defeated the largest Muslim empire in history, that of the Ottomans. But this expansion of European power only served to foster resentment and encourage violence against the imperial powers. This Islamic offensive against Western power has given way to large, often international groupings such as the Taliban, al-Qa'eda, Islamic State, Hamas, Hizbullah, and hundreds of other Islamic terror militants or armies.

Unfortunately, concluding that modern terrorism "has nothing to do with Islam" or that "Islam is a religion of peace" visibly contradicts the historical record. It is this sort of thinking that deflates modern democracies. Most importantly, we do not seem able to understand that Islam is, above all else, a totalitarian project covering all aspects of human life from the spiritual to the material, from law to government to clothing to food to sex to taxation and more. This totalitarianism rejects democracy in the most basic way, as having come from mere humans rather than divinely, from Allah.

Modern Muslim radicals from Hasan al-Banna', Sayyid Qutb, Abu A'la Mawdudi to the currently jailed British radical, Anjem Choudary, all insist that, since only God can make laws, the idea that human beings can legislate through parliamentary democracies is abhorrent, as is the idea of freedom for all citizens. Choudary, for example, spelled this rejection out in no uncertain terms during a public address:

  "No to democracy, No to freedom," Anjem Choudary shouted through a microphone. "No to liberalism, no to secularism. No to Christianity. No to Judaism. No to Sikhsm. No to Buddhism. No to Socialism. No to Communism. No to Liberalism. No to Democracy. Democracy, go to Hell! Democracy, go to Hell!"


Pictured: Anjem Choudary (right), a British Islamic radical who is currently in jail, speaks at a protest in London on March 21, 2011. (Photo by Oli Scarff/Getty Images)

You probably cannot get much more radical than that. When Western academics, however, such as John Esposito and Juan Cole defend extremists and pretend that they actually mean the opposite of what they say, their weakness spreads into the rest of society.

For example, here is Esposito on Sami Al-Arian, who pled guilty in 2006 for providing goods and services to terrorist group Palestinian Islamic Jihad:

  Sami is dedicated family man....Sami Al-Arian is a proud, dedicated and committed American as well as a proud and committed Palestinian. He is an extraordinarily bright, articulate scholar and intellectual-activist, a man of conscience with a strong commitment to peace and social justice.

And here he is again, this time on the 9/11 attacks: "September 11," he said, "has made everyone aware of the fact that not addressing the kinds of issues involved here, of tolerance and pluralism, have catastrophic repercussions."

And here is how he speaks of Palestinian suicide bombers:

  Do not call them suicide bombers, call them shuhada [martyrs] as they have not escaped the miseries of life. They gave their life. Life is sacred, but some things like truth and justice are more sacred than life. They are not desperate, they are hopefuls.... [The Israelis] have guns, we have the human bomb. We love death, they love life.

Cole too bends over backwards not to call a spade a spade:

  It is because both in Arabic and in other languages "Islamic" refers to the ideals of the Muslim religion that both Muslims and people with good English diction object strenuously to a phrase such as "Islamic terrorism" or "Islamic fascism".

According to A. J. Caschetta,

  One of the preeminent tenured apologists for Islam, Cole is a great equivocator, always ready with an analogy of Western misconduct to downplay and offset Islamic wrongdoing. His go-to response is to blame Orientalism for all the Muslim world's ills.

In her 2016 article "It was Britain's hopeless tolerance which allowed Anjem Choudary's hate to thrive", British journalist Allison Pearson castigated our inability to arrest one of the country's most dangerous men for two decades.

Failures to acknowledge Islamic radicalism by many of the people elected or employed to protect European citizens from danger have exposed us to terrorist attacks that have killed and maimed hundreds. In a matter of some twenty years, we have all found ourselves living in security-focussed towns and cities, afraid to walk down our high streets, shop in our markets, attend rock concerts, or visit government buildings. Meanwhile, thousands of Jews are leaving Europe, driven out by fears sparked by a new wave of antisemitism that has been led in many places by Muslim fundamentalists. France, with its 750 no-go zones and its privileged Islamist population, is the worst affected, even though it had Europe's largest Jewish community in its midst.

Over the past three decades, Western societies have been rendered all but impotent in the face of ideologies that challenge their most basic values. Having rejected many expressions of political and religious extremism, bigotry, and cruelty; having abandoned imperialism and colonialism; and having enacted laws about hate crimes, Europeans and Americans are still condemned by activists who espouse the tenets of radical political correctness. To many in a wide range of US and European universities who seem like bigoted fanatics in their zeal to close down the free speech if anyone opposes their views, anything whatever that smacks of criticism of ethnic, gender, or religious minorities must be condemned outright. All too often, the only response to this hyper-sensitivity comes from other bigoted fanatics, many increasingly popular in European countries such as Hungary. [2]

In The Rape of the Masters: How Political Correctness Sabotages Art, the American author Roger Kimball explores the damage across the arts disciplines by post-modernist politically correct thinkers. In the preface (p. xix), he writes:

  The second reason that the assaults on tradition... matter is that they represent one front in a much larger war, a war over the tenor and shape of our culture, over our shared understanding of what the Greeks used to call "the good life for man." "The rape of the masters" .... is part of... a process of de-civilization. In other words, what we are witnessing is not simply a betrayal of an academic discipline: it is an assault on a culture, on a way of looking at and valuing the world and our place in it.

"De-civilization." Yet here we go, led by a politically correct intelligentsia, churches, and political parties, effectively handing over our civilization to people who hate it.

Later, Kimball writes:

  It has often been noted that totalitarian ideologies exploit democratic freedoms precisely in order to destroy freedom and abolish democracy. Democratic societies preach tolerance, very well, the clever totalitarian loudly demands tolerance for his own activities while scrupulously obliterating the conditions that make tolerance possible. (p. 79).

That is exactly what we have allowed to take place in the Western democracies. A combination of these aspiring totalitarians and Muslims have criminalized one of the world's most democratic countries, Israel, and have been taking over the General Assembly of the United Nations, UNESCO, the UN Human Rights Council, UNWRA, and other bodies in order to do so. The Human Rights Council never ceases to condemn Israel, all the while seldom if ever denouncing the many Muslim tyrannies. If we are ever to save Western civilization and democracy, we must urgently rally our forces to stand up to all those who seek to trash it.

  Dr. Denis MacEoin is an Islamicist and a Distinguished Senior Fellow at New York's Gatestone Institute. He lives in the UK.

[1] Several writers have published critiques of Said and his work, emphasizing his duplicity and inaccuracies; among the best is Joshua Muravchik's short account, "Edward Said Conquers Academia for Palestine", chapter seven of his wider study Making David into Goliath: How the World Turned against Israel (Encounter Books, New York/London, 2014.)

[2] On Hungary, see Kirchik, The End of Europe, chapter 2.

Sexual Harassment East and West, 2018-01-05
by Denis MacEoin
January 5, 2018 at 5:00 am

Translations of this item:

  "I say that when a girl walks about like that, it is a patriotic duty to sexually harass her and a national duty to rape her."  --  Nabih Wahsh, Islamist lawyer, on Egypt's al-Assema TV, October 19, 2017.

  The Iranian Revolution of 1979 sparked off increasingly revolutionary movements across the Islamic world, and in the process saw women in many countries denied the freedoms they had started to acquire under earlier regimes. The veil returned widely, notably in Turkey, following the growing power of authoritarian and fundamentalist President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, with women's rights being increasingly denied.

  We urgently need to drop our unwillingness to contrast Western and Islamic values -- whether regarding violence, treatment of religious minorities, anti-Semitism, or treatment of women. There are also growing numbers of Muslims, as we are seeing today in Iran, who find wider Islamic attitudes abhorrent and work hard, mostly against the odds, to bring their faith closer to modern values.

For a time, one could not open a newspaper or visit an online news site without finding yet another scandal about sexual harassment. Lawyers are presumably going to have a field day for years to come. In the UK, a further wave of accusations has shaken an already shaky parliament and the Government, whose Cabinet is increasingly in disarray. In the US Congress, Hollywood and elsewhere, similar claims are still being made, with #MeToo stories being shared by women, while there is an unknown number of accusations in US statehouses.

Sex scandals in the West are far from new.[1] The irony is that this brings us face to face with attitudes to the same problem in the Islamic world.

For many years in the West, it was common practice for sexual harassment and rape among celebrities and public figures to be hushed up. To secure silence, abusers often used bribes or threats. Young women feared the loss of their careers or reputations; in many instances, the police would reject claims of abuse. This happened more than once in the UK, when young victims of "Asian" grooming gangs were not believed by social workers and police; in Europe authorities tried -- and still try (see here, here and here) -- to cover up harassment and rape committed by Muslim migrants. There will be a lot of work to do to protect women and children from the excesses of so many men.

Just watch and marvel at this short clip from a debate on Egypt's al-Assema TV, aired on October 19, 2017, or read an English transcript. The Director-General of al-Assema is Brigadier-General Muhammad Samir, a former spokesman for the Egyptian armed forces. His appointment has been criticized on the grounds that it is "a miserable attempt by the military regime authorities to nationalize the media, unify its message, and block any opposing voices against the government". In that sense, al-Assema represents a semi-official voice.

The debate on Egypt's al-Assema TV included a lawyer, Nabih [el] Wahsh, an Islamist who has filed countless hesba [2] cases against intellectuals, artists, religious leaders and government ministers for acts he deems immoral or blasphemous. With Wahsh on air were three women: Shadia Thabet, a member of the Egyptian parliament, Abeer Soleiman, a women's rights activist, and Ashgaan Nabil, a life coach.

Wahsh began by stressing that, regardless of Egypt being a civil state, it had to conform to Islamic religious rules and norms. On that basis, he engages in an argument which leads him to the following confrontation with Soleiman, whom he effectively silences by bullying her:

  Nabih Wahsh: "Are you happy when you see a girl walking down the street with half of her behind showing?"

  Abeer Suleiman: "Do you think that we don't care about our girls?"

  Nabih Wahsh: "I say that when a girl walks about like that, it is a patriotic duty to sexually harass her and a national duty to rape her."

  Abeer Suleiman: "No, no, no, no! I totally oppose this kind of talk. This is sexual harassment live on air..."

  Nabih Wahsh: "It is a national duty to rape such a girl! What she allows herself to do constitutes depravity."

Egyptian lawyer Nabih Wahsh recently advocated on television for sexual harassment and rape in retaliation for the temptation caused by uncovered women. (Image source: MEMRI)

This open espousal by a lawyer of sexual harassment and rape in retaliation for the temptation caused by uncovered women was backed by a heavily-covered member of parliament and followed by a "life coach" urging ten-year prison terms for homosexuals -- all during a television broadcast -- would, of course, finish their careers anywhere in the Western world within minutes. Men behave badly in Europe and the United States, and some very badly indeed; but to boast publicly about wishing to do so would be unthinkable.[3]

In the West, however, women have been fighting back for generations. The rise of sane feminism (as distinct from its shrill and politically-correct cousin)[4] has elevated the status of women in all the democracies and given courage to the many women who now find themselves empowered to call out powerful men who have sexually abused, groped and raped them.

There are feminists in the Islamic world. Countless books have been written about them and the growth of feminism in countries from Egypt and Iran to Indonesia. During the twentieth century, progress in establishing women's rights was made in several places: the veil was abandoned, more women moved into professional life and even into politics -- notably, the assassinated Benazir Bhutto, the first Muslim woman democratically elected (twice) as Prime Minister of Pakistan.

Real advances, nevertheless, have been slow. Even as things were starting to improve for women, religious minorities, and others in some countries, such as Turkey, the Salafi style of fundamentalist Islam, based on a demand to return to the practices of the Islamic prophet Muhammad and the first three generations of his followers (salaf means "predecessors"), was already underway from the early years of the twentieth century, notably through the work of the Egyptian writer Rashid Rida. For Rida, and later for Salafis down to the Islamic State enterprise, reform meant turning away from the Western models that had inspired new legislation, and back to the earliest days of Islam as embodied in the Qur'an, the ahadith (sayings and acts of the prophet), and the biographies of Muhammad. In 1928, another Egyptian, the schoolteacher Hasan al-Banna, established the Muslim Brotherhood, the leading revivalist movement in Islam since the 1920s, which remains to this day a major international force for reviving fundamentalist Islam.

Ironically, one prominent individual to have been caught up in the current wave of harassment revelations is Tariq Ramadan, Professor of Contemporary Islamic Studies at Oxford University. Ramadan's grandfather was none other than Hasan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood. Masquerading as the respectable voice of modern Islamic thought and practice, Ramadan has been exposed by several writers as a front for the Brotherhood and its anti-Western values. French journalist Caroline Fourest published an exposé, Brother Tariq: The Doublespeak of Tariq Ramadan, in which she shows how he says one thing to his Western audience and quite another to Muslims in France and abroad.

The American author Paul Berman wrote clearly of this in a long article about Tariq Ramadan in New Republic:

  Ramadan's harsher critics would argue that in speaking... the way he did on these abstract and historical questions, not to mention on his grandfather's ideals, he was cagily deploying a "double discourse"  --  a language intended to deceive Western liberals about the grain of his own thought. An accusation of "double discourse" has dogged Ramadan for many years in France. It is a chief complaint against him, and a big source of anxiety among his critics. Fourest, in Brother Tariq, documents what appears to be rather a lot of "double discourse," instances in which Ramadan appears to have said one thing to the general public and something else to his Muslim audiences.

In his many books and lectures, Ramadan has promoted the worldview of the hardline Brotherhood while posing as a Western-style philosopher in tune with modern liberal values. That is the basis for his duplicity: the Islam he promulgates in carefully phrased and disingenuous terms has nothing in common with Western values at all. It is this ability to pull the wool over the eyes of thinkers and politicians, a deception that has given him a professorship at Oxford University, that makes him a truly dangerous individual.

In addition to Caroline Fourest's series of articles in the French journal Marianne, detailing Ramadan's use of sexual harassment, rape, and general misogynist practices, he has also been accused by the American academic Phyllis Chesler "of having violently raped, battered, humiliated, confined, and death threatened them [his victims] if they talked".

In response to these claims, Oxford University acted promptly, placing him on leave while his predations are investigated and, as seems likely, subjected to criminal charges. Not surprisingly, as the journalist Abigail Esman has pointed out:

  Tariq Ramadan's many fans -- more than 600,000 people follow him on Twitter and he has more than 2 million Facebook followers -- have had plenty to say. He is innocent, they are certain. In their comments on both social media sites, they assure him that Allah will protect him. The women are liars, or part of a conspiracy: against Muslims, against the Muslim leader himself, against Islam -- all the insidious, but entirely predictable, work of the world's Jews.

The Iranian Revolution of 1979 sparked off increasingly more revolutionary movements across the Islamic world, and in the process saw women in many countries, across the Islamic world, denied the freedoms they had started to acquire under earlier regimes. The veil returned widely, notably in Turkey, following the growing power of authoritarian and fundamentalist President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, with women's rights being increasingly denied. Erdogan recently condemned Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad ibn Salman's vow to engender a "moderate Islam," calling it a fake Islam supposedly imposed by the West.

Men in Western democracies certainly have much to be ashamed of; the women who call out predators are right to do so. If identifying powerful figures who manipulate vulnerable women will help create a more level playing field for both sexes in countries that have worked hard to put all citizens on a basis of equality, it cannot but be a boon for democracy. Whatever we have done wrong, we have also done much to rectify distortions in our societies. The very fact that in the West, such men are considered shameful and contrary to our better values is itself a sign of how far things have changed.

The Islamic world in general remains enmeshed in ancient attitudes, going backwards rather than forwards, despite sterling efforts by various reformers to confront patriarchy in several Muslim countries, efforts backed by many Muslim women.[5] Those attitudes are rooted in a wide range of assaults on women and their lives: female genital mutilation (FGM) sanctioned by religious tradition; honor killings even for girls who have been raped; legally-enforced marriage to a woman's rapist; floggings and stonings for women suspected of marital or pre-marital adultery, or even who have been raped; veiling; marital rape; and denial of independence (a woman must always be subject to a male guardian -- father, brother, uncle, male cousin -- whose permission is needed for most things). Beyond this, it has always been permissible for Muslim men to capture or buy non-Muslim women as sex slaves, as we have seen recently with Boko Haram and Islamic State, and in Saudi Arabia, Mauritania, Singapore, Sudan, Mauritius, Libya, the United States and Europe.

Muslim men, however, have enormous freedoms. They may marry four women; they can divorce a wife by merely pronouncing "I divorce you"; if they are Shi'is, they can take temporary wives through nikah mut'a,[6] ("pleasure marriage"), that can be contracted for hours or months or years, and as easily terminated. If they are Sunnis, they can take temporary wives through nikah misyar, ("traveller's marriage"), used in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf to allow men to keep wives in towns they visit from time to time or, more widely, by married men who seek legal mistresses.

Polygamy continues to be popular, even for Muslim men living in the West. A website set up by British businessman Azad Chaiwala, "Secondwife.com", which enables men to find further wives in the way non-Muslims use dating sites, has over 100,000 members, including 25,000 in the UK. Although polygamy in Britain carries a seven-year prison term for men, the Muslim version is seemingly exempt as it is considered a religious arrangement. Muslim men in Britain and on the Continent are never prosecuted as polygamists, even though Islamic marriage laws place women in jeopardy in respect of divorce and child custody. The government has even encouraged polygamous marriages to be contracted abroad, and at one point offered £10,000 in benefits for families with four wives.

We urgently need to drop our unwillingness to contrast Western and Islamic values -- whether regarding violence, treatment of religious minorities, anti-Semitism, or treatment of women. It is not only non-Muslim Westerners who are entitled to make such comparisons -- there are also growing numbers of Muslims, as we are seeing today in Iran, who find wider Islamic attitudes abhorrent and work hard, mostly against the odds, to bring their faith closer to modern values.

Many Western politicians, churchmen and sundry do-gooders choose to find no fault in Islam and describe any form of criticism as "Islamophobia" -- even punishing honest critics of the religion or the actions of some of its followers for daring to breach the code of silence and multicultural acquiescence. These would-be moralists do no favours to us, to Muslim women and children, or to Muslim reformers. Ours is not a perfect civilization. But crying mea culpa, while passing over the problems of a civilization that also has faults, does not seem the way to assuage a communal guilt.

  Dr. Denis MacEoin taught Islamic Studies at a UK university, has published books and articles on Islamic themes, and contributed to academic encyclopedias dealing with the subject, such as the second edition of the massive Encyclopedia of Islam. He is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Gatestone Institute.

[1] The harm they do has been dissected by Northwestern University professor Laura Kipniss, in her study How to Become a Scandal: Adventures in Bad Behavior, New York, 2010, and in her recent exposure of witch hunts in US colleges, Unwanted Advances: Sexual Paranoia Comes to Campus, New York, 2017.

[2] Hesba or hisba is the duty to identify and prevent or punish contraventions of Islamic law in Muslim states.

[3] To give credit to the Egyptian government, Wahsh was arrested for these remarks and is currently serving a three-year prison term. See here.

[4] For an intelligent discussion of the differences, see Christina Hoff Sommers, Who Stole Feminism?: How Women Have Betrayed Women, New York, 1995.

[5] Note, in particular, Ida Lichter, Muslim Women Reformers: Inspiring Voices against Oppression, Amherst, NY, 2009. See here.

[6] For a full academic account, see Shahla Haeri, Law of Desire: Temporary Marriage in Shi'i Iran, rev. ed., Syracuse University Press, 2014; and see Sachiko Murata, Temporary Marriage in Islamic Law, privately published, 2017.

Iran Sends More to the Gallows, 2018-01-04

The US Embassy Move to Jerusalem vs. The "Peace Process", 2017-12-19

receive the latest by email: subscribe to the free gatestone institute mailing list.

Britain: The Hijab as the Entry Point for Islam [muslims demand continuous concessions to Sharia law, until the country is Sharia]
by Khadija Khan
February 21, 2018 at 5:00 am

  Islamists seem to be influencing the British school system with ease: there is simply no solid opposition to them. The government even stays silent about the harassment and intimidation.

  Islamists in Britain seem to be intent on establishing regressive requirements, such as the hijab for young girls, wife beating, making homosexuality illegal, death for apostates, halala rituals in divorce, and exploitation of women and children through Sharia courts as part and parcel of British culture.

  That St. Stephen's School allowed itself to be blackmailed in this way bodes ill for both Britain and its education system.

St. Stephen's School in East London recently imposed a ban on hijabs (Islamic headscarves), but reversed its decision after administrators received hundreds of threats from enraged Muslims.

Among the targeted officials from the primary school was the head of governors, Arif Qawi, who had supported the ban on the grounds that the girls wearing hijabs were less likely to integrate socially with their peers. As a result of the outcry, Qawi submitted his resignation, saying that members of the staff were afraid to come to the school.

Head teacher Neena Lall, whose educational philosophy has turned St. Stephen's into one of the best secular primary schools in Britain's capital -- in spite of its being in Newham, a poor neighborhood where English is spoken predominantly as a second language -- was bombarded with e-mails calling her a "pedophile" who "deserved what she had coming." Lall, of Punjabi origin, was even compared to Hitler in a video uploaded to YouTube.

St. Stephen's School, in East London. (Image source: Google Street View)

It is not the first time that British educators have been intimidated by Muslim extremists. The head of Anderton Park School in Birmingham, Ms. Sarah Hewitt-Clarkson, received similar threats on social media.

Anderton Park School was inspected as part of the "Trojan Horse" scandal, in which the British government discovered that Muslim extremists had been trying to take over Britain's secular school system.

One death threat to Hewitt-Clarkson read: "Any head teacher who teaches my children it's alright to be gay will be at the end of my shotgun."

Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services, as well as Chief Inspector of the Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted), Amanda Spielman, was also targeted when she expressed public support for Lall. School principals, she said, "must have the right to set school uniform policies as they see fit, in order to promote cohesion." Spielman was also subjected to anti-Semitic abuse, apparently based merely on the sound of her name.

Spielman was already the recipient of what she called "nasty tweets" and threatening messages -- such as, "We know where you live and we can get you anytime we want to" -- from a mixture of "Islamic extremists and the hard left," after an Ofsted report critical of conservative faith schools that were apparently "spreading beliefs that clash with British values."

The unprecedented scale of this harassment -- even against the government -- indicates the alarming degree to which extremist elements have penetrated British society and threaten the careers of anyone who would speak against Islamic extremism.

Activists who had lobbied for the banning of hijabs in the British primary schools were apparently crestfallen. One British activist, Amina Lone, tweeted:

  "This is an important step in promoting religious extremism, mob rule and refusing to give #Muslim young girls equal gender equality rights.... So much for choice and individual liberty. Terribly sad day for a secular democracy."

While secular British values need to be upheld to provide equal opportunities to everyone, regardless of caste, creed, gender or color, Islamists seem to be influencing the British school system with ease: there is simply no solid opposition to them. The government even stays silent about the harassment and intimidation.

Was St. Stephen's forced to succumb to the pressure of ignorant zealots, who either do not know or choose to ignore that under Islamic law (Sharia), girls are not required to cover their heads until they reach puberty? Ignorance also seems not to have prevented them from accusing anyone who says or acts otherwise of "Islamophobia." It is a form of political blackmail used by Muslim extremists against the Western institutions, the values of which they abhor.

Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for the School System, Lord Agnew of Oulton, pledged to support the schools that are trying to ban hijabs as well as obligatory fasting: in Islam, young children are not subject to either.

Lord Agnew said that the government should support head teachers in making difficult and "sensitive" decisions in the face of vitriolic opposition. We have yet to see the effects of his statement. Supporting head teachers is one thing, but there is also a dire need to confront these extremists on all levels, including law enforcement, if they try to harass or intimidate anyone.

Someone please needs to back up Lord Agnew: there are only a few such policy-makers left willing to offer rational help during such crises.

Islamists in Britain seem to be intent on establishing regressive requirements, such as the hijab for young girls, wife-beating, halala rituals in divorce, making homosexuality illegal, death for apostates, and the exploitation of women and children through Sharia courts as part and parcel with British culture.

Instead of making statements, the British government needs to take concrete steps to stop the further infiltration of these practices into Britain's social fabric, the warping of children's minds, and the harassment of whoever disagrees with those plans.

That St. Stephen's allowed itself to be blackmailed in this way bodes ill for both Britain and its education system.

  Khadija Khan is a Pakistani journalist and commentator, currently based in Germany.

Europe: The Rapid Spread of Dhimmitude
by Judith Bergman
by Judith Bergman
February 22, 2018 at 5:00 am

Translations of this item:

  One of the most troubling aspects of this rapidly spreading dhimmitude, is the de-facto enforcement of Islamic blasphemy laws. Local European authorities have been utilizing "hate speech" laws to prohibit criticism of Islam, even though Islam represents an idea, not a nationality or an ethnicity. The conventional purpose of most hate-speech laws is to protect people from hatred, not ideas.

  The British Foreign Office, which has ignored Iranian women's desperate fight for freedom and stayed shamefully silent during the Iranian people's recent protests against Iran's regime, unbelievably handed out free headscarves to its staff. Meanwhile, at least 29 Iranian women were arrested for shedding the hijab, and were likely subjected to rape and other torture, as is common in Iranian prisons. Yet British MPs and Foreign Office employees were perversely celebrating the hijab as some sort of twisted tool of "female empowerment".

  Counter-jihad measures have been obstructed by Western leaders everywhere since immediately after 9/11. President George W. Bush declared that "Islam is peace". President Obama removed all references to Islam in FBI terror training manuals that Muslims deemed offensive. New York City's current leadership threatened New Yorkers, immediately after the October terror attack in Manhattan, not to link the terror attack to Islam. UK Prime Minister Theresa May claimed that Islam is a "religion of peace".

Although Europe is not part of the Muslim world, many European authorities nevertheless seem to feel obliged to submit to Islam in more or less subtle ways. This voluntary submission appears to be unprecedented: Dhimmi, historically speaking, is the Arabic term for the conquered non-Muslim, who agrees to live as a second-rate, "tolerated" citizen, under Islamic rule, submitting to a separate, demeaning set of laws and the demands of his Islamic masters.

In Europe, submitting to the demands of Islam, in the name of "diversity" and "human rights", has also been happening voluntarily. This submission to Islam is, of course, highly ironic, as the Western concepts of "diversity" and "human rights" do not exist within the foundational texts of Islam. On the contrary, these texts denounce in the strongest -- and supremacist - terms those who refuse to submit to the Islamic concept of divinity, Allah, as infidels who must either convert, pay the jizya ["protection"] tax or die.

One of the most troubling aspects of this rapidly spreading dhimmitude, is the de-facto enforcement of Islamic blasphemy laws within European jurisdictions. Local European authorities have been utilizing "hate speech" laws to prohibit criticism of Islam, even though Islam represents an idea -- a religion and ideology - not a nationality or an ethnicity. The conventional purpose of most "hate-speech" laws is to protect people from hatred, not ideas. It would therefore appear that European authorities are under no legal obligation to prosecute people for criticizing Islam, especially as Islamic law, Sharia, is not part of European law; yet they do so only too willingly.

The most recent example of this kind of dhimmitude comes from Sweden, where a pensioner has been indicted for calling Islam a 'fascist' ideology on Facebook. The legal provision under which he is being charged, (Brottsbalken chapter 16, § 8,1 st), explicitly talks of "incitement" (Swedish: "hets mot folkgrupp") against groups of people defined by their 'race, skin color, national or ethnic origin, faith or sexual preference'. However, the provision does not criminalize criticism of religion, ideology or ideas, because Western democracies, back when they were genuine democracies, did not criminalize the free exchange of ideas.

Dhimmitude in Europe is manifested in many other respects, as well. On World Hijab Day a yearly recurring February event founded in 2013 by a Bangladeshi immigrant to the US, Nazma Khan, "to fight discrimination against Muslim women through awareness and education", several British MPs chose to don the hijab. These included MP Anne McLaughlin and Labour's former shadow Equalities Minister Dawn Butler and MP Naseem Shah. Furthermore, the British Foreign Office, which appears to ignore Iranian women's desperate fight for freedom, and which stayed comparatively quiet during the Iranian people's recent protests against the Iranian regime[1], unbelievably handed out free headscarves to its staff. According to the Evening Standard, an email reportedly sent to staff said:

  "Would you like to try on a hijab or learn why Muslim women wear the headscarf? Come along to our walk-in event. Free scarves for all those that choose to wear it for the day or part of the day. Muslim women, along with followers of many other religions, choose to wear the hijab. Many find liberation, respect and security through wearing it. #StrongInHijab. Join us for #WorldHijabDay."

Meanwhile, at least 29 Iranian women were arrested for shedding the hijab, and were likely subjected to rape and other torture, as is common in Iranian prisons. Yet British MPs and Foreign Office employees were perversely celebrating the hijab as some sort of twisted tool of "female empowerment".

The above incident is hardly surprising: Britain is rife with some of the most jarring examples of dhimmitude. Mass rapes of children by Muslim gangs in many British cities, went on for years with the knowledge of the British authorities, who did not stop these crimes for fear of appearing "racist" or "Islamophobic"

The dhimmitude is also apparent in the lengths to which British authorities will go to excuse or explain away customs that are practiced by British Muslim communities. The police commander responsible for tackling honor crimes, female genital mutilation (FGM) and forced marriage, Ivan Balchatchet, recently wrote a letter in which he said that the reason there have not yet been any convictions for FGM (which was criminalized in 1985), despite an estimate that 137,000 women and girls are affected by FGM in England and Wales, is that the crime has "many nuances". He later apologized for the statement:

  "I apologise for this letter... FGM is the appalling abuse of children. It is unacceptable that there have been no successful prosecutions. Working with others, this is something that needs to change."

Similarly, according to new figures, hundreds of "honor" violence and forced marriage crimes go unpunished in London. Data shows that between 2015 and 2017, police recorded 759 "honor" crimes and 265 forced marriages in London alone -- but only 138 people were charged with offenses. Diana Nammi, executive director of the Iranian & Kurdish Women's Rights Organisation, which provides refuge for victims, said

  "What makes it so alarming is that figures that we obtained through freedom of information requests show that, at the same time, since the criminalisation of forced marriage in 2014, many more people at risk than ever before are coming forward for help".

Dhimmitude, however, leads not "only" to child rape, female genital mutilation and "honor" killings, all spreading under the willfully blind eyes of national authorities, but also to the obstruction of counterterrorism efforts. In a recent interview for SVT public television, Peder Hyllengren, a researcher at the Swedish Defense College, said:

  "You risk being identified as racist in a way that you have not seen in other European countries. There, this question has been as uncontroversial as the importance of combating Nazism and right wing extremism. But in Sweden it took a long time before it was acceptable to discuss jihadism in the same way that we have been discussing Nazism".

Hyllengren is being too harsh on Sweden: Counter-jihad measures have been obstructed by Western leaders everywhere since immediately after 9/11, when President George W. Bush declared that "Islam is peace". President Obama removed all references to Islam in FBI terror training manuals that Muslims deemed offensive. Theresa May claimed that Islam is a "religion of peace". New York City's current leadership threatened New Yorkers, immediately after the October terror attack in Manhattan, not to link the terror attack to Islam.

Most recently, the British government's terror watchdog and independent reviewer of terrorism legislation Max Hill QC, said that it is "fundamentally wrong" to use the phrase "Islamist terrorism" to describe attacks carried out in Britain and elsewhere. According to a report by the Evening Standard, he said that the word terrorism should not be attached "to any of the world religions" and that the term "Daesh-inspired terrorism" should be used instead. Last year, Max Hill opined that some jihadis returning from Syria and Iraq should escape prosecution as they were "naive".

In Germany, dhimmitude now runs so deep that the minister of family affairs recently suggested that sexual assaults by Muslim migrants could be prevented by inviting more Muslim migrants into the country -- the mothers and sisters of the male Muslim migrants already there. This was the German minister's answer to a question in the Bundestag about what "concrete educational and danger prevention measures" her ministry was planning to "protect and inform women and girls in the long term about the disproportionately increased physical and sexual and life threatening attacks that have taken place since 2015" by migrants. This was the minister's pathetic answer:

  "... On the one hand this concerns the accommodation where the young unaccompanied refugees live. Also of course to the...yes... the macho culture from which they often come... That one does not conceal this and attempts to discuss this there, and of course influence them, this is quite obvious... We have the expert's report from Professor Pfeiffer here, which gives very precise starting points... we must work with the youth and we also know that family reunification is important... he [the professor] says it is just the same with young men whether they are from here or elsewhere, they are easier to handle when they have their mothers and sisters with them".

Europe is rife with other recent examples of dhimmitude, exhibited by countless state and commercial actors. There was the removal of a cross by the presiding judge in a German courtroom during the trial of an Afghan charged with threatening another Muslim for converting to Christianity; H&M recalling a range of socks after Muslims complained that the pattern on them resembled the word "Allah" written in Arabic upside down; a French court dropping hate crime charges from the indictment of a Muslim murder suspect, who confessed to killing his 66 year old Jewish neighbor, a woman whom he tortured, before throwing her to her death off her balcony, while shouting "Allahu Akbar". He had also reportedly called the victim's daughter "dirty Jewess" two years prior to the murder.

The list goes on. Sheikh Yussuf Qaradawi, the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, who has said that Europe will be conquered not through the sword, but through dawa, probably could not be happier. Europe is leaping to fulfill his request.


Pictured: Women wearing Islamic niqab veils stand outside the French Embassy during a demonstration on April 11, 2011 in London, England. (Photo by Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images)

  Judith Bergman is a columnist, lawyer and political analyst.

[1] Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson merely said:

  "...there should be meaningful debate about the legitimate and important issues the protesters are raising and we look to the Iranian authorities to permit this... people should be able to have freedom of expression and to demonstrate peacefully within the law... We ...call on all concerned to refrain from violence and for international obligations on human rights to be observed".

#MeToo in the Mosque
by Giulio Meotti

by Giulio Meotti
February 23, 2018 at 5:00 am


  "While the brave Iranian women protested against hijab laws, Western feminists celebrated hijab".  --  Rita Panahi, Herald Sun, Australia.

  Instead of a celebration of Islamist discrimination against women, the West should promote a #MeToo in the mosque, the idea of an Egyptian, Mona Eltahawi. She would like to raise the issue of rape and sexual abuse suffered by Muslim women during the hajj pilgrimage to Mecca.

  Will Western advocates of women's rights also stand for the rights of Muslim women, or, in the name of "multiculturalism", the will they keep appeasing those who persecute them instead?

While the march for women's rights in Washington this year took place under the banner of #MeToo against sexual harassment, in Iran dozens of women were taking to the streets to protest against theocracy and compulsory wearing of the hijab. The Iranian women waved white flags to fight against the mullahs' obligation to veil. But the white flag was not a surrender; it was apparently a symbol of Western feminists. As the Australian Rita Panahi wrote, "while the brave Iranian women protested against hijab laws, Western feminists celebrated hijab".

On February 1, many of these Iranian women were arrested for not wearing a hijab. On that very day, the World Hijab Day was celebrated in the West, and Western appeasers celebrated the veil. Even British PM Theresa May backed the claim that women should be "free" to wear hijab. A few days after that, the American department store Macy's decided to sell the hijab as an item of fashion clothing. Unfortunately, in some Islamic countries, women are not "free" to wear the veil; they are obliged to wear the veil, as the arrests in Iran show us.

Instead of a celebration of Islamist discrimination against women, the West should promote a #MeToo in the mosque -- the idea of an Egyptian, Mona Eltahawi. She would like to raise the issue of rape and sexual abuse suffered by Muslim women during the hajj pilgrimage to Mecca.

Seyran Ates, a Turkish-German woman, recently opened in Berlin the first mosque where unveiled women and gays are welcome. Her decision was rather braver than a Twitter hashtag. Ates was immediately flooded with death threats, and had to be put under police protection.


In Berlin, Germany, the first mosque to welcome unveiled women and gays opened last year, co-founded by Turkish-German human-rights activist Seyran Ates. In contrast to traditional mosques, males and females worship together in the new mosque. (Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty Images)

The French philosopher Alain Finkielkraut recently called feminists "dishonest players" who will not admit to having won the game. In the West, the feminist adventure is, for the most part, over: women have conquered most of their rights and have earned respect.

Feminists would be wise now not to allow their battle to be turned into a grotesque caricature by banning "sexist" poems and art. This has already happened in a museum in Manchester and a school in Berlin. Western feminism, instead, could renew and ennoble itself by embracing the desperate fight of many Muslim women: Nigerian girls abducted by Boko Haram; Yazidi women sexually enslaved by ISIS; Indonesian women lashed for "adultery"; women captured and sold as slaves; girls subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM), girls married off while they are still children to men they do not even know; and girls in Iran now in prison -- and possibly tortured and raped -- for taking off their veils.

Take the three European countries hosting the largest Muslim communities: Britain, Germany and France. In Britain, a new case of female genital mutilation (FGM) is being either discovered or treated every hour, according to National Health Service statistics. In Germany, a nongovernmental organization, Terre des Femmes, has said that 13,000 underage girls living there are at risk of being forced to undergo this brutal disfigurement. A few days ago, reports surfaced that in the suburbs of Paris 30% of Muslim girls are threatened with it.

Will Western advocates of women's rights also stand for the rights of Muslim women, or, in the name of "multiculturalism", the will they keep appeasing those who persecute them instead?

For years, Western cultural relativists have denounced Judeo-Christian values for "repressing women", and "progressives" proclaimed a duty to be "open minded". That is why they fought for female bishops to be appointed to the Church of England and for "egalitarian" Jewish prayer services at the Western Wall in Jerusalem. The paradox is that every time it comes to Islam, the same progressives lose their voice.

Western feminism needs to make a strategic choice. The West, which prides itself on being the world of "inclusivity" and "rights", really needs to decide if it stands with Muslim icons of Western elites such as Linda Sarsour, who wished Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a critic of Islam and a victim of genital mutilation, to have her vagina "taken away" (whatever that means), or join with the real reformers in Islam who are fighting to open their religion to kindness, tolerance, reason and modernity.

Fundamentalism or freedom: the choice is up to us.

  Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.

Europe's Migrant Crisis

Writings by Topic: Europe's Migrant Crisis [see full article at link for links to these]
Title     Author     Date
France: Migrant Crisis Spirals Out of Control    Soeren Kern    2018/02/06
Europe: Making Islam Great Again    Judith Bergman    2018/02/03
The 'Goodness' of Migrants: When Feelings Trump Facts    Douglas Murray    2018/02/01
Why the EU's Migration Commissioner Should Resign    Jan Wójcik    2018/01/11
Mass Migration: The European Commission's New "Norm"    Alain Destexhe    2018/01/08
Germany's Batty Plan to Deter Migrants    Stefan Frank    2017/12/12
Europe's Migrant Crisis: Millions Still to Come    Soeren Kern    2017/12/03
Germany: Surge in Migrant Attacks on Police    Soeren Kern    2017/11/29
The Migrant Crisis Upended Europe    Giulio Meotti    2017/11/06
Germany: Violence Spirals in Refugee Shelters    Soeren Kern    2017/11/02
'Muhammad' is the Future of Europe    Giulio Meotti    2017/10/28
The Goal of Western Leaders: Avoid Change, Duck Accountability    Douglas Murray    2017/10/06
Refugees, Intersectionalists, and Jews    Denis MacEoin    2017/10/03
EU: Delusions without Borders    Judith Bergman    2017/09/21
Mass-Migration: The Tiniest Dose of Reality Hits    Douglas Murray    2017/09/19
Geert Wilders: "In My Opinion, Islam Is Not a Religion"    Telegraaf and Geert Wilders    2017/09/16
European Court Orders EU Countries to Take Migrants    Soeren Kern    2017/09/07
Europe's New Lie: Comparing Asylum Shelters to Nazi Concentration Camps    Giulio Meotti    2017/09/04
Europe: Jihadists Posing as Migrants    Soeren Kern    2017/09/03
New NGO Racket: Smuggling, Inc.    Douglas Murray    2017/09/02
Europe: Migrant Crisis Reaches Spain    Soeren Kern    2017/08/16
Germany: Infectious Diseases Spreading as Migrants Settle In    Soeren Kern    2017/07/14
Europe's Mass Migration: The Leaders vs. the Public    Douglas Murray    2017/07/09
Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis?    Giulio Meotti    2017/07/05
Europe's Migrant Crisis: Views from Central Europe    Soeren Kern    2017/07/02
A Replacement of Population is Taking Place in Europe    Giulio Meotti    2017/06/14
Germany: Migrant Sex Crimes Double in One Year    Soeren Kern    2017/06/12
Europe's Leaders: Shielding Themselves from Reality    Judith Bergman    2017/05/23
Germany: Should Migrants Integrate?    Soeren Kern    2017/05/19
Germany Confiscating Homes to Use for Migrants    Soeren Kern    2017/05/14
Europe: Denying the Threat of Islamic Imperialism    Maria Polizoidou    2017/05/11
Europe: More Migrants Coming    Soeren Kern    2017/05/05
Germany: Migrant Crime Spiked in 2016    Soeren Kern    2017/05/02
Germany Hit by Merkel's Imported Crime Wave    Vijeta Uniyal    2017/05/02
Merkel's Migrant Deception    Vijeta Uniyal    2017/03/15
Welcome to Sweden, Eldorado for Migrants!    Nima Gholam Ali Pour    2017/02/18
Germany's Migrant Rape Crisis: January 2017    Soeren Kern    2017/02/13
Germany's Muslim Demographic Future    Soeren Kern    2017/02/08
Austria: Does the Church Really Care about Terrorism?    Judith Bergman    2017/01/29
Germany Downplayed Threat of Jihadists Posing as Migrants    Soeren Kern    2017/01/27
European Immigration: Mainly Muslim, Mainly Male, Mainly Young    Douglas Murray    2017/01/05
The Suicide of Germany    Guy Millière    2016/12/26
Merkel Government Still in Denial    Vijeta Uniyal    2016/12/20
Europe's Planned Migrant Revolution    Yves Mamou    2016/11/12
German Streets Descend into Lawlessness    Soeren Kern    2016/10/31
Germany's Migrant Rape Crisis: Where is the Public Outrage?    Soeren Kern    2016/10/26
Germans Leaving Germany 'In Droves'    Soeren Kern    2016/10/20
Refugees or an Occupation Army?    Maria Polizoidou    2016/10/11
Hungary to Amend Constitution to Block EU Migrant Plan    Soeren Kern    2016/10/09
France: 'The Jungle' Migrant Camp    Soeren Kern    2016/09/30
France: The Great Wall of Calais    Soeren Kern    2016/09/23
Eastern Europe: The Last Barrier between Christianity and Islam    Giulio Meotti    2016/09/20
Greece: The Freedom-of-Speech Canary Died    Maria Polizoidou    2016/08/29
Europe: The Substitution of a Population    Giulio Meotti    2016/08/27
Migrant Issue: Turkey's Dubious Role    Mohshin Habib    2016/08/22
Migrant Problems Still Threaten Europe    George Igler    2016/08/20
Germany's Migrant Rape Crisis Spirals out of Control    Soeren Kern    2016/08/09
Turkey Sets Ultimatum for EU Migrant Deal    Soeren Kern    2016/08/02
Germany: "No Change to Open-Door Migration Policy"    Soeren Kern    2016/07/29
Germany: Christian Names for Muslim Migrants?    Soeren Kern    2016/07/26
VIDEO: Is Europe Doomed by Migrants?        2016/06/18
Paris Becomes Massive Camp for Illegal Migrants    Soeren Kern    2016/06/06
VIDEO: Sweden's Migrant Rape Epidemic        2016/05/30
Germany's New "Integration Law"    Soeren Kern    2016/05/29
Germany: Christian Refugees Persecuted by Muslims    Soeren Kern    2016/05/15
The EU's Kiss of Death    Judith Bergman    2016/05/10
The Failure of the Swedish Establishment    Nima Gholam Ali Pour    2016/05/06
Migrant Rape Epidemic Reaches Austria    Soeren Kern    2016/05/05
Europe's Migration Crisis: No End in Sight    Judith Bergman    2016/05/02
Turkey Blackmails Europe on Visa-Free Travel    Soeren Kern    2016/04/24
Sweden Facing Another Migrant Invasion?    Ingrid Carlqvist    2016/04/21
Sweden: A Beggar on Every Corner    Ingrid Carlqvist    2016/04/09
Germany's Merkel to Voters: "No Change to Migration Policy"    Soeren Kern    2016/03/18
Islamic State Closing in on Germany    Soeren Kern    2016/03/13
Sweden: Sexual Assaults at Swimming Pools    Ingrid Carlqvist    2016/03/07
Finland's Immigration Crisis    Dawid Bunikowski    2016/03/06
Germany: Migrant Rape Crisis Worsens    Soeren Kern    2016/03/05
Sweden's Migration Industry    Nima Gholam Ali Pour    2016/02/29
Germany: Migrant Crime Skyrockets    Soeren Kern    2016/02/21
Germany's Migrant Crisis: January 2016    Soeren Kern    2016/02/12
Sweden: Death by Immigration    Ingrid Carlqvist    2016/02/04
Germany's Migrant Deportation Plan: "Political Charade"    Soeren Kern    2016/02/01
Sweden: Shambles in Asylum Heaven    Ingrid Carlqvist    2015/12/13
Germany: Salafist "Aid Workers" Recruiting Refugees    Soeren Kern    2015/12/09
Germans Opposed to Mass Migration are "Free to Leave"    Soeren Kern    2015/11/24
Hungary's Migrant Crisis Ends, Europe's Has Just Begun    George Igler    2015/11/12
Germany: Migration Crisis Becomes Public Health Crisis    Soeren Kern    2015/11/08
Germany: Asylum Seekers Make Demands    Soeren Kern    2015/10/23
Germany: Migrant Crime Wave, Police Capitulate    Soeren Kern    2015/10/11
Germany's Sharia Refugee Shelters    Soeren Kern    2015/10/01
Migration Crisis: "Islam Will Conquer Europe Without Firing a Shot"    Bassam Tawil    2015/09/28
Germany: Migrants In, Germans Out    Soeren Kern    2015/09/27
Migration Crisis: Germany Wants to Be "Miss Congeniality"    Vijeta Uniyal    2015/09/20
Germany: Migrants' Rape Epidemic    Soeren Kern    2015/09/18
Why Do Muslims Flock to The "Evil West"?    Burak Bekdil    2015/09/17
The Arab States and the Refugees    Denis MacEoin    2015/09/16
Muslim Immigration and How to Handle It    Uzay Bulut    2015/09/14
Solving the European Migrant Problem    Barry Shaw    2015/09/13
Europe's Migration Crisis: "Not Giving Us Like in Germany"    Soeren Kern    2015/09/09
Is the Migration Crisis Killing the European Dream?    Douglas Murray    2015/09/04
Germany's Muslim Demographic Revolution    Soeren Kern    2015/08/31
Mass Immigration and the Undoing of Europe    Vijeta Uniyal    2015/08/25
"Refugee Children" Invade Sweden    Ingrid Carlqvist    2015/07/23
Europe's Great Migration Crisis    Soeren Kern    2015/07/12
Asylum Seekers, Beheaders and Mega Mosques    Soeren Kern    2015/05/24

"Don't Dare Sit with Us if You Want to Live"
by Raymond Ibrahim
February 25, 2018 at 5:00 am

  "They get paid for every Coptic Christian girl they bring in. In some cases, police provide the kidnappers with drugs they seize. The drugs are then given to the girls to weaken their resistance... I even know of cases in which police offered helped to beat up the girls to make them recite the Islamic creed."  --  World Watch Monitor, Egypt; September 14, 2017.

  On September 14, a court sentenced a Christian man to death for "blasphemy" against the prophet of Islam. Nadeem James, a 27-year-old father of two, was originally arrested in July 2016, after a Muslim angry with him for personal reasons falsely accused James, who is illiterate, of texting a poem deemed "blasphemous" of Muhammad.  --  Pakistan.

  School textbooks taught her that "it was the Christians who wanted to plunder the lands and the riches of the Muslim world" and Turks merely responded by "defend[ing] what was rightfully theirs." (In reality, modern day Turkey consists of territory that was Christian for more than a thousand years before it was conquered by Turks in the name of jihad.) "Everything is used to make the Christians look like villains," she said, adding, "It's the same all through Muslim countries."  --  Turkey.

Muslim Slaughter of Christians

Pakistan: Sharoon, a Christian boy who achieved academic excellence despite years of entrenched discrimination and bullying -- and whose poverty-stricken parents had worked hard to put him in MC Model Boys Government High School -- was beaten to death by Muslim pupils. On his first day at the school, the teacher slapped him across the face while blurting an anti-Christian slur. Having set a precedent, the rest of the classroom of Muslim boys continued harassing him throughout the same first day: they hurled out derogatory terms against Christians, denied him access to drinking water, and told him, "You're a Christian don't dare sit with us if you want to live." According to one report: "His academic prowess ... only added to the disdain for him felt by other pupils." Another report said, "there were repeated attempts to convert him to Islam. Sharoon however, never quit his faith to the chagrin of the Muslim children around him, exacerbating his pariah status." Then, on August 27 -- his fourth day at the prestigious Model school -- Muslim students attacked him in the classroom (the teacher supposedly did not notice; he was reading his paper). "The violence," continues the report, "was of such sickening ferocity that poor Sharoon died where he was in the classroom." A cacophony of insults accompanied the beating; he was called a "filthy Christian" and a "demon." According to the murdered teen's mother:

  "My son was a kind-hearted, hard-working and affable boy. He has always been loved by teachers and pupils alike and shared great sorrow that he was being targeted by students at his new school because of his faith. Sharoon and I cried every night as he described the daily torture he was subjected to.... The evil boys that hated my child are now refusing to reveal who else was involved in his murder. Nevertheless one day God will have His judgement."

Kenya: Islamic militants from Al Shabaab, centered in neighboring Somalia, beheaded four Christian men in two separate attacks. Approximately 30 heavily-armed assailants surrounded several homes in two different areas; they called victims out by name, before pulling them out and slitting their throats or decapitating them. In the previous two months (August and July), Al Shabaab militants slaughtered thirteen other Christians in a similar manner. "The knock at the door confirmed our fears that what happened in nearby Malamande village in 2014 [was] happening again," recounts one of the slain men's wives:

  "We were reluctant to open [the door] and that is when the gang of about 20 broke in and dragged my husband out. I climbed and hid in a space up the roof and I heard everything that was going on. My husband was struggling and screaming for help but the gang overpowered him, slit his throat and chopped off his head. I am very bitter and worried about how I will live without [Gerald]. I treasured him because he loved me and provided everything that I needed. I am still in shock from what I saw that night; blood all over, his body lying lifeless and the head a few meters away. Why did they kill my husband?"

Separately, suspected Islamist militants opened fire on and killed two police officers guarding a church. After the gunmen encountered police standing guard at the entrance of an Anglican church, they "sprayed the officers with bullets," notes the report, before fleeing on motorbikes. "One officer was shot in the head and died on the spot while the other," police confirmed, "died in hospital."

"Islamic terrorist group al-Shabaab's beheadings and attacks against Christians will continue to rise," according to another report, "with the Somali-based militants having an estimated 9,000 jihadis at their disposal." It quotes the American Center for Law and Justice as saying:

  "[Y]et another radical Islamic jihadist army  --  just like ISIS, the Islamic State  --  is ruthlessly murdering Christians, targeting them for their faith. This global and historic persecution continues.... Al-Shabaab's actions are clearly deadly, demented, disturbing, and disgusting. We must defeat and destroy these Islamic jihadists."

Nigeria: Muslim Fulani herdsmen, accompanied by known "Islamic extremist militants," states a report, raided a Christian village and massacred 20 Christians, including a three-month-old baby and eight other children, as they slept sometime after midnight, Friday September 8. Police, who apparently treated the incident with some indifference, said it was a "reprisal" attack for the discovery of a decapitated Muslim boy; but dumbfounded Christians argued that the murder happened in another village more than a year ago and that they had nothing to do with it.

In another incident, a Catholic priest, Cyriacus Onunkwo, was abducted by Islamic gunmen on Friday, September 1 and found slaughtered in the bushes the following day. Nothing was stolen from his car and no ransom was demanded for his release.

Muslim mob uprisings in Jos also left scores of Christians wounded and one dead. On September 15, a mob attacked a vehicle with four Christians who were leaving a weekly prayer meeting at the University of Jos chapel. "Just as I pulled out of the main gate and [was] about to make a left turn," Professor Timothy Oyetunde recalled, "the mob, from the Muslim-dominated neighborhood opposite the campus, ran across the street, surrounded us and started smashing the van" with clubs, stones and actual weapons. Two of the passengers, including another professor, were stabbed; they all fled the van before the Muslim mob torched it. "In a separate attack," the report continued, "two university students were attacked in a different Muslim-dominated area of downtown Jos and stabbed. One student died in the hospital while receiving treatment."

Muslim Rape of Christians

Pakistan: On September 13, a Christian boy (age not provided) was misled to an isolated area, beaten, "gang raped," and ordered to recite the Islamic profession of faith by seven Muslim men. According to the report, "initially they started beating him violently and stripped off his clothes. They sexually assaulted Sher Dil [the youth] and forced him to recite Kalma. Sher Dil was again beaten and fell unconscious, and was taken to a local hospital by the alleged rapists. They warned him of dire consequences if he would disclose the details of the incident to anyone." Police were "reluctant" to respond and, when pressed to act by the victim's father, "took sides" with the rapists, noted the report. The boy is under threat of death from his tormenters for going to the police, even as his father implored the Ministry of Human Rights for help.

Egypt: An ex-kidnapper, an ex-kidnapper known only as "G," explained the process of how Christian girls are targeted for abduction, forced conversions and "marriages" to Muslims. According to the report, he related that "they get paid for every Coptic Christian girl they bring in. In some cases, police provide the kidnappers with drugs they seize. The drugs are then given to the girls to weaken their resistance as they put them under pressure. I even know of cases in which police offered helped to beat up the girls to make them recite the Islamic creed." He "admits he was in a network actively targeting Coptic girls for years before he left Islam." Although such networks have been around since the 1970s, they reached their "highest levels now, in the era of President Sisi," he said. A portion of his testimony notes that:

  A group of kidnappers meets in a mosque to discuss potential victims. They keep a close eye on Christians' houses and monitor everything that's going on. On that basis, they weave a spider's web around [the girls].... I remember a Coptic Christian girl from a rich, well-known family in Minya. She was kidnapped by five Muslim men. They held her in a house, stripped her and filmed her naked. In the video, one of them also undressed. They threatened to make the video public if the girl wouldn't marry him.... The kidnappers receive large amounts of money. Police can help them in different ways, and when they do, they might also receive a part of the financial reward the kidnappers are paid by the Islamisation organisations.... And the value of the reward increases whenever the girl has a position. For example, when she is the daughter of a priest or comes from a well-known family.... The Salafist group I knew rented apartments in different areas of Egypt to hide kidnapped Coptic. There, they put them under pressure and threaten them to convert to Islam. And once they reach the legal age, a specially arranged Islamic representative comes in to make the conversion official, issue a certificate and accordingly they change their ID.... If all goes to plan, the girls are also forced into marriage with a strict Muslim. Their husbands don't love them, they just marry her to make her a Muslim. She will be hit and humiliated. And if she tries to escape, or convert back to her original religion, she will be killed.

Muslim Attacks on Apostates to Christianity

Germany: A group of Muslims attacked a 23-year-old Muslim convert to Christianity. He was assaulted because "his attackers saw his Christian cross and were angry he had converted from Islam, says the report. "They asked him why he had changed his religion," before "one of the attackers tore the chain off him and threw it to the ground." The report continues:

  The unidentified man then punched the Afghan in the face several times. The second attacker then held the Christian by the arms as the first man took out a blade and cut him twice on the upper body with it..... The attack happened less than a mile away from the most notorious radical Islamist mosque in Berlin, the Al-Nur Mosque. An attack of this nature is also not the first to happen this year in Berlin. In August, another man ... was attacked by three men of North African appearance who also objected to his cross. The three men brutally beat the 39-year-old and shouted abuse at him. Earlier this year in May ...yet another man was attacked for wearing a cross necklace. ...The Christian charity Open Doors claim to have recorded thousands of cases of violence and abuse directed towards Christians in Germany. Earlier this year, an Arabic translator working with asylum seekers in Germany said that many of the Muslims in asylum homes express hatred toward Christians. "Pure hatred against non-believers is preached, and children are brought here from an early age here in Germany. It's very similar in asylum housing, where Muslim boys refuse to play with Christians," the translator said.

Nigeria: The Muslim family of a man, Bulus, a convert to Christianity, harassed, ostracized, threatened to kill, and finally made false charges against him that landed him in prison -- possibly for as much as ten years. His family responded by trying to do "whatever they could to make him return to their faith," according to a report. "When Bulus refused, his father threatened to disown him. Bulus lost his inheritance, the support from the extended family circle for everyday life, the protection of the status of the clan and the privilege of an arranged marriage -- in other words, and from their perspective, his entire future. When he still refused to change his mind, his family threatened to kill him. That was when Bulus says he knew it was time to go. He fled to Jos, further south, where no-one knew him, and enrolled in theological training." During his training, "I learned a lot about forgiveness," says Bulus. "After I graduated I wanted to go home to see if there was any way my parents and I could be reunited." He instead discovered that:

  "Their hatred had increased, especially when they heard I had become a pastor. Before I could leave, relatives trapped me and started beating me. I thought I was going to die, but they dragged me to the police station and accused me of stealing some of their goats. Despite the fact that there was no proof, the police locked me up. Five days later they took me to court. I did not have the opportunity to defend myself but was kept in prison anyway."

As of the last report, Bulus was incarcerated under extremely unhealthy and unhygienic conditions. "He doesn't know when this ordeal will end," said the report, "and dares not fuel any expectations of a speedy release."

Maldives: Although "Christians in the Maldives [already] have few rights," a September report notes:

  "the government is increasingly controlling the courts and simply ignoring the law, leaving Christians in an even more vulnerable state.... Despite being a popular tourist destination, the Maldives is one of the most difficult places in the world to be a Christian. The 2008 Maldivian constitution bans Muslims from becoming Christians, which leaves open the question as to whether someone who becomes a Christian could be stripped of their citizenship."

Earlier the government "arrested 50 Maldivians suspected of having become Christians, and is thought to have tortured them. Any Maldivian even found to have a Bible in their house faces a prison sentence."

Iran: Iranian national media reported that several Christians, almost all of whom are converts, in Tehran, Rey, and Pardis, were arrested after a video surfaced showing dozens of Bibles and other Christian literature, allegedly also confiscated by authorities. Little other information is provided.

Muslim Attacks on "Blasphemous" Christians

Egypt: In response to an old Facebook post, a Muslim mob attacked Christians in Tawa village and destroyed several homes, buildings, and cars on September 14. After the slaughter of several Christians traveling to a monastery four months earlier, in May, Bassem, a 22-year-old Christian from the village, had written:

  "Are we [Christian] Egyptians not from Egypt? No matter that you try to hurt us, one day all your ways will fail.... When you demolish the homes of his [Jesus'] children, you attack him. I ask Jesus to touch your heart and change you. Our Lord knows and sees what is happening to us. Continue and increase your terrorism, but I'm not afraid because it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of God."

Although he deleted the post one day later, a cached copy was seen by and shared with other Muslims four months later. Deeming it "an insult to Islam ... [m]any Muslims gathered and the mob began to attack Christian homes and shops," notes an eyewitness. "They were pelting stones at the homes while shouting 'Allah Akbar.' They hurled bricks and stones at Mar Girgis (St. George) Coptic Orthodox Church..."

Pakistan: On September 14, a court sentenced a Christian man to death for "blasphemy" against the prophet of Islam. Nadeem James, a 27-year-old father of two, was originally arrested in July 2016, after a Muslim angry with him for personal reasons falsely accused James, who is illiterate, of texting a poem deemed "blasphemous" of Muhammad. The condemned's brother explained what next transpired: "We were not at home when the police raided our house to arrest Nadeem. However, when the cops couldn't find any of us in the premises, they took away two women of the family -- my wife and the wife of my elder brother, Faryad." Around the same time, local mosques began calling on megaphones that if he did not surrender himself, Christian homes would burn. Nadeem surrendered himself and the women were released. "The charge against my brother is completely baseless," the brother maintains. "Nadeem is uneducated and could not have possibly sent that text message. I'm certain that Yasir Bashir [Muslim accuser] downloaded the supposedly blasphemous text onto Nadeem's phone and then forwarded it to his cell number to build a case against my brother." Nadeem's lawyer said they will challenge the conviction in a high court.

Separately -- and despite being "mentally challenged" -- a Christian teen accused of blasphemy against Islam had his first court hearing in September. A Muslim, Muhammed Nawaz, had accused Asif Stephen, 16, of stealing at a local bazaar; he beat the boy, and then told the local imam -- who, according to the initial report, "has a history of preaching hatred towards minority Christians" -- that the youth had also burned a Koran. Nawaz and the imam tracked down the boy and beat him again. When a passerby saw the violence and contacted police, "instead of protecting the teenager from his attackers, [police] arrested and booked him into prison on blasphemy charges." Hours later, the imam and "a mob of more than 300 Muslim fundamentalists surrounded the prison, calling for a public lynching of Stephen. As the mob overwhelmed local police, Stephen was removed from his cell and handed over to the mob, which consequently beat him until reinforcement officers stepped in to calm the situation. Police then moved Stephen to a higher security district jail where he pleaded guilty to blasphemy in what his family believed was a coerced confession." His father said that "Muhammed Nawaz has always had a grudge against my son" and "has often threatened Asif and told him that the tomb area is designated for him to collect recyclables as he is a Muslim and Asif is only a worthless and untouchable Christian."

Indonesia: The world's largest Muslim nation "made it clear that the country's dangerously ambiguous blasphemy law is here to stay -- which is bad news for beleaguered religious minorities," Human Rights Watch said after the nation rejected the UN's stated recommendations that it "introduce legislation to repeal the blasphemy law." Indonesia further "rejected a recommendation it amend or revoke laws that limit the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion in the country," Human Rights Watch said. Among those recently to suffer from these laws is Ahok, a Christian and former governor of Jakarta, who was sentenced to two years in prison for blaspheming against Islam. "By rejecting pleas from U.N. member states to abolish the blasphemy law," continued Human Rights Watch, "the Indonesian government is telling the world that it will continue to pander to bigotry and discrimination at the expense of the rights of religious minorities."

Indonesia joined other repressive Muslim nations in May 2017 when it sentenced the Christian governor of Jakarta, known as "Ahok," to a two-year prison term on the charge that he committed "blasphemy" against Islam. Pictured: Ahok on the day of his election, February 15, 2017. (Photo by Oscar Siagian/Getty Images)

Muslim Attacks on Christian Churches

Mali: Not only were several Catholic churches "ransacked and torched, forcing parishioners to flee" throughout September, but "militants told Christians they would be killed if they were seen in church," a report noted. A Catholic church leader explained:

  "Our churches and chapels are now being targeted by extremists who've told Christians not to gather to pray.... But we're also alarmed the attacks are being mounted by isolated Islamist groups, acting in their own name.... On previous occasions, the government has deployed military units in our parishes. But this still hasn't been done against these new attacks."

Turkey: Photos taken clandestinely of the largest Armenian cathedral in the Middle East "reveal considerable damage to the sanctuary and walls of the now desecrated church in southeast Turkey," a report disclosed. Its crucifix was "defaced," its windows smashed, and its pews used as firewood; garbage was dumped in its sanctuary. First built in the 1600s, Surp Giragos Armenian Apostolic Church is one of six Christian churches in the Sur district to be confiscated by the state. For three years now, Christians -- Armenian, Assyrian, Chaldean, and Protestant -- have been unable to worship in their churches as authorities placed all Christian property in Diyarbakir on the Turkish cabinet's expropriation plan. "We have been exposed to ethnic and religious discrimination for years," said a local pastor.

Malaysia: Police managed to foil an Islamic State terror plot targeting Christian churches and other non-Muslim places of worship after they arrested a 21-year-old Muslim affiliated with the jihadi group. According to the General of Police, the Muslim youth had "received instructions from a Malaysian Daesh (Islamic State) member in Syria to buy a pistol, a M-16 rifle, an AK-47 rifle and hand grenades from a neighbouring country with the aim of launching attacks on non-Muslims and their places of worship." Chemicals used to assemble the devices were discovered in his house. Although Malaysia is Muslim majority, sizeable populations of Christians, Buddhists, and Hindus also live there.

Muslim Hate Preaching and General Contempt for Christians

Turkey: A former Muslim woman who converted to Christianity explained how "her opinion of Christians was very low because of the things she and others were taught to believe about Christians in a Muslim society," noted a report. According to the convert, who now lives in the U.S. and goes by the pseudonym Derya Little, "An anti-Christian attitude is a big part of the national identity, so anyone or anything that promotes Christianity is automatically suspicious." School textbooks taught her that "it was the Christians who wanted to plunder the lands and the riches of the Muslim world" and Turks merely responded by "defend[ing] what was rightfully theirs." (In reality, modern day Turkey consists of territory that was Christian for more than a thousand years before it was conquered by Turks in the name of jihad.) "Everything is used to make the Christians look like villains," she said, adding, "It's the same all through Muslim countries."

Saudi Arabia: School textbooks continue to promote animosity for, and violence against, non-Muslims. "As early as first grade, students in Saudi schools are being taught hatred toward all those perceived to be of a different faith or school of thought," said Human Rights Watch. "The lessons in hate are reinforced with each following year," Textbooks teach that Christians are "kafirs" (or infidels) and that it is the duty of Muslims to disavow them: "For whoever does not or whoever doubts their religious infidelity is himself an unbeliever." Another textbook teaches that "The hour will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews and Muslims will kill the Jews. The Jew will hide under the rock and tree and the rock or tree will say O Muslim, servant of Allah, this Jew is behind me, kill him."

Iran: The government "ordered children belonging to families of one of the country's largest house church movements to study the Koran and Shi'a Islam teachings or face expulsion from school," another report relates. This policy "deprives Christian children of primary and secondary education unless they agree to religious instruction that does not conform to their faith." According to Firouz Khandjani, a Church of Iran council member who lives in hiding:

  "Right now [Iranian President Hassan] Rouhani wants to prove that he is a good Muslim by persecuting Christians.... Most of the new Christians are former Muslims.... The authorities are trying to eradicate Christianity, just as the Islamic State group, but smarter."

Sudan: "Christian children in Sudan's refugee camps are not receiving food unless they say Islamic prayers," according to a report. After describing South Sudanese Christian refugees as living "in a terrible situation," a local source elaborated:

  "We have heard stories where children are conditioned to say Islamic prayers before [being] given food. This is not right. These children are Christian. They should be respected for that.... The majority are left in camps, some in a very terrible situation. They are confined in those places. They are not allowed to go further north to the cities."

About this Series

While not all, or even most, Muslims are involved, persecution of Christians by Muslims is growing. The report posits that such Muslim persecution is not random but rather systematic, and takes place irrespective of language, ethnicity, or location.

  Raymond Ibrahim is the author of Crucified Again: Exposing Islam's New War on Christians (published by Regnery with Gatestone Institute, April 2013).

Previous reports [see full article at link for links to these]

  August, 2017
  July, 2017
  June, 2017
  May, 2017
  April, 2017
  March, 2017
  February, 2017
  January, 2017
  December, 2016
  November, 2016
  October, 2016
  September, 2016
  August, 2016
  July, 2016
  June, 2016
  May, 2016
  April, 2016
  March, 2016
  February, 2016
  January, 2016
  December, 2015
  November, 2015
  October, 2015
  September, 2015
  August, 2015
  July, 2015
  June, 2015
  May, 2015
  April, 2015
  March, 2015
  February, 2015
  January, 2015
  December, 2014
  November, 2014
  October, 2014
  September, 2014
  August, 2014
  July, 2014
  June, 2014
  May, 2014
  April, 2014
  March, 2014
  February, 2014
  January, 2014
  December, 2013
  November, 2013
  October, 2013
  September, 2013
  August, 2013
  June, 2013
  May, 2013
  April, 2013
  March, 2013
  February, 2013
  January, 2013
  December, 2012
  November, 2012
  October, 2012
  September, 2012
  August, 2012
  July, 2012
  June, 2012
  May, 2012
  April, 2012
  March, 2012
  February, 2012
  January, 2012
  December, 2011
  November, 2011
  October, 2011
  September, 2011
  August, 2011

  Follow Raymond Ibrahim on Twitter and Facebook

Brigitte Gabriel gives FANTASTIC answer to Muslim woman claiming all Muslims are portrayed badly

Brigitte Gabriel's Epic and Brilliant Answer To "Most Muslims Are Peaceful..."

Brigitte Gabriel On Reason Why Muslims Won't Assimilate Into Western Culture

Brigitte Gabriel Reads the Muslim Brotherhood Plan for America
ACT for America president and founder Brigitte Gabriel, speaks at the Family Research Council's Watchmen on the Wall event about the threat of radical Islam. In this clip she outlines the Muslim Brotherhood's plan for the destruction of Western civilization. The Muslim Brotherhood has spawned dozens and dozens of organizations across the globe, including the terrorist organizations al Qaeda, Hamas, and numerous Muslim organizations in America. To learn more about this visit: http://bit.ly/MuslimBrotherhoodPlan To learn more about ACT for America visit: actforamerica.org

Top Muslim Scholar: Western politicians should stop pretending terrorism has nothing to do with Islam

DING! DING! DING! Finally, after 20 years, the Islamic jihadi training camp in "Islamberg" NY has been raided by the FBI

What If Islam Really Is Different?

The following is the "About Us" page [http://thereligionofpeace.com/pages/site/about-site.aspx" target="_blank] on TheReligionOfPeace.com. It was so good I gained permission to republish it here (and on Inquiry Into Islam).

TheReligionofPeace.com (TROP) is a pluralistic, non-partisan site concerned with Islam's true political and religious teachings according to its own texts. The purpose is to underscore the threat that Islam poses to human dignity and freedom, part of which includes documenting the violence and dysfunction that ensues as a direct consequence of this religion's supremacist teachings.

TROP is not associated with any organization. The site does not promote any religion, but it is not hostile to religion. We generally support the rights of atheists, Christians, Hindus, Jews, homosexuals, women, Muslims and anyone else on the planet to live as they wish without violating the rights of others.

TheReligionofPeace.com strongly condemns any attempt to harm or harass any Muslim anywhere in the world because of their religion. Every human being is entitled to be treated as an individual and judged only by his or her own words and deeds. (see About Muslims [http://thereligionofpeace.com/pages/site/about-muslims.aspx]).

We also denounce any act of vandalism against mosques or other property, including juvenile attempts to offend Muslims by desecrating copies of the Quran. (The best way of discrediting the Quran is to tell non-Muslims what it [http://thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/quran-hate.aspx] actually says about them).

At the same time, we see no use in pretending that Islam is just another religion - which always seems to be the assumption of those preferring not to look too closely.

In fact, Islam is dreadfully unique -- and it should be OK to say so.

What other religion's most devoted members videotape themselves cutting people's throats while screaming praises to their god? What other faith has tens of thousands of terrorists across the globe united by an [http://thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/in-the-name-of-allah.aspx] explicit commitment to advance the cause of their religion by pursuing horrific mass murder and [http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/20/somali-islamists-schoolboy-amputation-ordeal] mutilation?

What other religion has clerics lauded as 'moderates', 'bridge-builders', and advocates of 'peace and tolerance' [https://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/2016/04/23/imam-who-threatened-ayaan-hirsi-ali-with-death-for-apostasy-led-interfaith-service-after-paris-attacks/] who, at best cannot even bring themselves to condemn [http://www.aolnews.com/opinion/article/opinion-suicide-bombers-in-heaven-imam-rauf-won-t-say-no/19609034] suicide bombers or denounce [http://bigpeace.com/abostom/2010/08/29/imam-feisal-rauf-and-the-genocidal-hamas-covenant/] Islamist terror organizations, or at worst actually support [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/09/world/09awlaki.html] terrorism, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/oct/29/religion.uk1] wife-beating, female genital mutilation, praise Islamist [http://atimes.com/2016/03/glasgow-imam-praises-extremist-who-killed-pakistan-governor-for-secular-views/] assassins and justify the killing of [http://web.archive.org/web/20080415175225/http:/www.islamonline.net/English/contemporary/2006/04/article01c.shtml] apostates and [http://web.archive.org/web/20061002054147/www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1170%20target=] homosexuals?

What other religion [http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2015/01/07/video-paris-shooters-shout-allahu-akbar-n1939818] kills innocent people over cartoons and teddy bears, [http://www.ansamed.info/ansamed/en/news/sections/generalnews/2013/11/22/Turkish-artists-burn-works-commemorate-Alevi-massacre_9666509.html] burns] poets and intellectuals alive and [http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hvWEqwq3CrRvaQCmt21MfoYhjZJQD9HHG5AO2] murders humanitarian workers of other faiths who are merely trying to help them?

What other religion childishly brags about its [http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/Games-Muslims-Play.htm#fastest] growth while at the same time openly denies other religions equal opportunity to [http://theundergroundsite.com/index.php/2010/08/russian-pastor-killed-after-media-report-called-for-his-murder-13217] evangelize -- and even endorses [http://www.realcourage.org/2009/08/somalia-christian-shot-dead-near-kenya-border/] killing those who [http://www.worthynews.com/9674-news-alert-iran-releases-pastors-wife-as-husband-faces-execution] leave?

What other religion has prominent PR organizations and charities so closely tied to terrorism - organizations like [http://www.anti-cair-net.org/] CAIR, which whine about dress codes and [http://www.mail-archive.com/osint@yahoogroups.com/msg35804.html] rubber ducks in the West while ignoring the Jihad genocide of thousands in Darfur?

What other religion has verses in its holy book that remind men of their divine permission to [http://thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/wife-beating.aspx] beat their wives and [http://thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/slavery.aspx] rape their slaves?
The list could go on (and does -- each day on http://TheReligionofPeace.com). Islam so routinely produces horrible atrocities in the name of Allah that no one is all that surprised when...

Adults are [http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/ISL50111.htm] tied to a tree or planted in the ground and [http://www.stop-killing.org/en/node/433] bludgeoned to death by fundamentalists for engaging in consensual sex...

A New York woman trying to file for divorce is [http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/14/the-barbaric-muslim-beheading-in-buffalo/] beheaded by her husband, who also happens to be the founder of a Muslim-American TV channel dedicated to combating "misconceptions" and "stereotypes" about Islam...

One of Europe's largest mosques publicly [http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/262085/uk-megamosque-backs-persecution-christians-daniel-greenfield] eulogizes a terrorist who killed for the cause of persecuting Christians...

Religious [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Nacer_Benbrika] leaders are charged by authorities with plotting spectacular acts of mass murder in the name of their god...

A Christian woman is arrested, raped and tortured by police who also [http://www.mnnonline.org/article/12056] starve her children in an explicit effort to get her to return to Islam...

Gunmen take time out to [http://edition.cnn.com/2013/10/17/world/africa/kenya-mall-attack-footage/] pray to Allah in amidst shooting and [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/kenya-shopping-mall-attack-nairobi-hostages-were-tortured-before-they-were-killed-says-police-doctor-8842509.html] torturing dozens of innocent people at a shopping mall because they are not [http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2013/09/21/muslims-kenya-tell-victims-name-muhammads-mother-couldnt-answer-got-shot/] true believers as a cleric [http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/10/muslim-cleric-says-kenya-mall-jihad-murder-attack-right-thing-to-do] applauds...

Clerics advocate [http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/133214] raping virgins prior to executing them for verbal crimes and political dissent...

Pollsters [http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/066chpzg.asp?pg=1] admit that about 1 out of 3 Muslims worldwide (450 million) view the terrorism of 9/11 as justified...

The most prominent self-proclaimed Muslim "civil rights" group in America (CAIR) bluntly refuses to condemn an organization (Hamas) that kills innocent people specifically in the name of Islam...

A Christian is murdered in front of his own family for leaving Islam, and his children are then kidnapped and 'conscripted' [http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/6732477-murdered-somali-christian-children-conscripted-for-military-training] by his killers...Muslims express no outrage when an admitted terrorist is assigned by a government to [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/8901188/Insurgent-commander-who-planned-bomb-attacks-that-blew-soliders-to-bits-is-granted-amnesty.html] oversee "Islamic Affairs", nor even when unrepentant [http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.10844/pub_detail.asp] child killers are [http://www.middleeastmonitor.org.uk/news/middle-east/3038-saudi-kings-private-aircraft-to-take-ex-prisoners-for-hajj] invited to make the holy pilgrimage with VIP treatment... 80% of all federal [http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.8935/pub_detail.asp] terror prosecutions involve a religion that is practiced by only 1% of all Americans...Each of the top 10 global terrorists in the world happens to share a devout commitment to the [http://edition.cnn.com/2013/10/09/world/meast/top-10-terrorists/index.html] same religion...
How shocking any of this would be if it didn't involve the Islamic religion. As it is, much of it barely registers in the media. The very fact that the bar of expectation is set so low for "the Religion of Peace" underscores just how different it really is.

No other religion has to attach "phobia" on the end of its name in order to bully others into silence - lest they be accused of harboring irrational fear for suggesting that Islam is different. Yet, all other religions combined do not account for even a fraction of terrorism in the name of their god that Islam produces each day. No religion is so demanding of respect while doing so little to earn it.

In fact, Islam is more than a religion. It is a rigid political and cultural system with a mandate to conquer and govern the lives of others via necessary force "[http://thereligionofpeace.com/quran/noble/sura8.html#39] until religion is only for Allah." Violence is sanctioned by the Quran, a book which not once tells Muslims to love those outside the faith.

The enemy of this orthodoxy is not just intellectual dissent and free speech, but human freedom. The divine charter of Islam is to impose itself and thus prevent the individual from discovering a different meaning for their own lives.

Islam breeds arrogance and self-absorption, which accounts for the collective petulance and perpetual grievance that characterizes Muslim populations in general -- along with the astonishing unwillingness to extend equal moral consideration to those outside the religion.

This disregard for others is rooted in the supremacist ideology of the Quran and Islamic law, which unashamedly draws the sharpest distinction between those within the group of believers and those without -- towards whom arbitrary denigration is cast and [http://thereligionofpeace.com/quran/noble/sura8.html#55] hatred, [http://thereligionofpeace.com/quran/noble/sura9.html#123] harsh treatment] and [http://thereligionofpeace.com/quran/noble/sura22.html#19] eternal punishment is prescribed.

As a consequence, not a day goes by without someone, somewhere in the world being horribly murdered by devout Muslims in the name of this religion - over ten thousand persons each year. More innocent lives were snuffed out in just two hours by devout Muslims on 9/11 than by the Ku Klux Klan in its entire 145-year history ([http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_people_were_killed_by_the_Ku_Klux_Klan] source]). Yet, there was never one massed protest against Osama bin Laden in the entire Muslim world (although many [http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42927020/ns/world_news-death_of_bin_laden/t/protesters-condemn-brutal-killing-bin-laden/#.Vtm-K5wrKUk] condemned] his killing).

Where Islam dominates, there is systematic discrimination and oppression of those of other faiths. Where Muslims are a minority, there is a trend toward peevish self-interest, disloyalty and eventual rebellion and terror when demands for special privilege and entitlements are not met - all part of the eternal jihad to bring about the rule of Islam as Muhammad instructed.

It [http://www.rightsidenews.com/2010121412329/us/islam-in-america/who-will-teach-tolerance-to-the-muslims.html] isn't the victims who need lessons in tolerance and understanding -- it is the Islamic world.

Can one name a single country in the West in which the significant influx of Muslims has not been accompanied by severe social strain? Can one name any country affected in the same way by Hindu immigration?

Those willing to open their minds will find that, regardless of the excuse-du-jour, the remarkably wide-spread level of narcissism, repression and violence is deeply ingrained in the teachings, double standards and early history of the Islamic religion. While there is not a single verse in the Quran that commands love for those outside Islam, there are nearly 500 that either promote violence or allude to Allah's hatred for unbelievers - in a book that is [http://www.politicalislam.com/blog/statistics-and-the-meaning-of-islam/] largely about how to think of and deal [http://thereligionofpeace.com/quran/noble/sura48.html#29] harshly with those outside the "true" faith.

Why rely on rosy platitudes and carefully-edited fragments of Quran verses from apologists when Islam speaks so well for itself? Beyond the whitewashing are obvious reasons why so many devotees do horrible things in the name of Allah, while most of the rest never seem to get terribly upset by it - busy as they are throwing tantrums and demanding for themselves what they explicitly deny others.

How much favor are we really doing Muslims by not challenging them to the sort of self-critique necessary for moral progress? How much favor are we doing ourselves by desperately trying to accommodate that which has no intention of accommodating us, or by continuing to sacrifice blood and budgets for those who hate us in return? Is it really in our best interests to assist the expansion within our own borders of a religion that is consistently incapable of building countries in which even Muslims themselves want to live?

Tolerance is a good thing, but not when we allow it to be used cynically against us by those who have no use for it once they obtain power. We need to back away from the altar of political correctness and throw out our preconceptions. We need to embrace critical thinking.

The truth is that Islam is not a religion of peace and it is not like other religion. Sometimes the truth isn't comfortable. Sometimes the truth offends. But it is far better that we offend others than lose our own freedom.

See also:

FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

How We Feel about Muslims

Our Case Against Race

What to Do about the Islamic Threat

Good Sources of Information:

 Islam 101

 Political Islam

 The Religion of Peace

 Wiki Islam

 Everything you need to know about Islam

 Successes in the Fight Against Islam's Relentless Encroachment

 Recent News About Islam's Relentless Encroachment

 Concessions Islam Has Wrought From Non-Muslims

 Answering Islam

Inquiry Into Islam Table of Contents:

 Why Learn About Islam?

 Do Islamic Texts Encourage Violence?

 Criticism of Islam Versus Bigotry

 An Eight Minute Video About Islam

 What Makes Islam So Successful?

 Islam and Women's Rights

 Do You Know Much About Islam?

 A Muslim Woman Speaks About Islam

 An Easier Way to Read the Quran

 Critique of Pure Islam

 What is Taqiyya?

 Perfectly Legal Jihad

 The Allegory of Pleasantville

 A Conversation About Islam

Ex Saudi muslim warns Canadians about Islam
Vlad Tepesblog
Published on Jan 17, 2017
This is an important warning to Canadian parents especially, by an exceptionally brave ex Saudi muslim woman in Toronto. The disruption she did at a muslim propaganda meeting in Toronto is here I believe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfGS0...

Brigitte Gabriel: Radical Islam: The Plan to Destroy America from Within: Infiltration (2011)

Excellent video, The true intent of Muslims, they hate us. THE FACTS

Japan | No Country for Islam - Here's Why

Why Japan Refuses Immigration and Multiculturalism

MUSLIM PROBLEM IN JAPAN wake up people 560,567 views

Obama Behind Muslim Brotherhood Caliphate Conspiracy

Brigitte Gabriel annihilates Muslim stooge on national TV

Brigitte Gabriel gives FANTASTIC answer to Muslim woman claiming all Muslims are portrayed badly

Brigitte Gabriel's Epic and Brilliant Answer To "Most Muslims Are Peaceful..."

Brigitte Gabriel On Reason Why Muslims Won't Assimilate Into Western Culture

Brigitte Gabriel Reads the Muslim Brotherhood Plan for America
ACT for America president and founder Brigitte Gabriel, speaks at the Family Research Council's Watchmen on the Wall event about the threat of radical Islam. In this clip she outlines the Muslim Brotherhood's plan for the destruction of Western civilization. The Muslim Brotherhood has spawned dozens and dozens of organizations across the globe, including the terrorist organizations al Qaeda, Hamas, and numerous Muslim organizations in America. To learn more about this visit: http://bit.ly/MuslimBrotherhoodPlan To learn more about ACT for America visit: actforamerica.org

100% Video Proof of Radical Muslim Terrorist Training Camps in America - Bill O'Reilly

Terrorist Training Camps in America: 9 States - Which States are you in?

DING! DING! DING! Finally, after 20 years, the Islamic jihadi training camp in "Islamberg" NY has been raided by the FBI
You can thank President Trump for this one. He ordered the Feds to raid Islamberg, and hopefully all the other Islamberg-type jihadi training camps around the U.S. Not surprisingly, Barack Hussein Obama ignored these camps for 8 years, but so did George W. Bush, even after 9/11...

FBI Confirms Jihadi Training Camps In America: Think-Tank Report
The U.S. think-tank, Clarion Project, a non-profit organization that educates government officials, law enforcement and security officers, the U.S. military and the general public about the dangers of radical Islam, on Wednesday followed President Donald Trump's Tuesday night State of the Union (SOTU) address with the release of a disturbing report.........
By NWV Senior Political News Writer, Jim Kouri

The Great Deception New World Order & Muslim Brotherhood

The Muslim Agenda - Full Documentary - Banned in some countries

"Islam Strengthening in Europe with Blessing of the Church"
Sydney Cardinal George Pell then urged "a discussion of the consequences of the Islamic presence in the Western world".

*** Resettlement contractors receive the majority of their funding from taxpayers via PRM and ORR. One of the contractors is 99.5% funded by you, others are well up in the range of 95% plus. There can be no real reform of the UN/US Refugee Admissions Program if these 'non-profits' continue to call the shots. The minute a new Administration signals a slowdown for a few years, the contractors, which receive funding on a per (refugee) head basis, put their community organizer hats on and run to the Leftwing media screaming bloody murder.

The UN/US Refugee Admissions Program will never be reformed until we stop paying non-profit groups to advocate and lobby for their vested (Leftist!) interests.

*** These are the fake non-profits largely funded by US taxpayers to place refugees in cities and towns (and which use their financial power to propagandize against the Trump White House)!

*** These are the nine major US resettlement contractors and working under them (using your tax dollars) are hundreds of local subcontractors who are fighting tooth and nail to let nothing rock their cushy relationship with the DOS -- ***Federal contractors/middlemen/lobbyists/community organizers paid by your tax dollars to place refugees in your towns and cities:

. Church World Service (CWS)
. http://www.churchworldservice.org/
. Ethiopian Community Development Council (ECDC) (secular)
. http://www.ecdcinternational.org/
. Episcopal Migration Ministries (EMM)
. http://www.ecusa.anglican.org/emm/
. Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS)
. http://www.hias.org/
. International Rescue Committee (IRC) (secular)
. http://www.theirc.org/
. US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (USCRI) (secular)
. http://www.refugees.org/
. Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services (LIRS)
. http://www.lirs.org/
. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB)
. http://www.usccb.org/
. World Relief Corporation (WR)
. http://www.wr.org/

Episcopal Bishop in Maine: It is our moral obligation to take in refugees
by Ann Corcoran

But, is it the obligation of the US taxpayer to pay the Episcopal Church millions annually for THEIR Christian charity? Of course that is one of the major moral questions that has driven this blog for ten years!...

France's Death Spiral
by Guy Millière * March 5, 2017 at 5:00 am

Please Sign Petition: No Islam in Our Schools
From: David Horowitz <info@horowitzfreedomcenter.org>
Reply-To: info@horowitzfreedomcenter.org

I want to make sure you saw my e-mail about the No Islam In Our Schools Petition.

If not, please scroll down to read it right away.

As you know, I've sounded the alarm about the unholy alliance between the Left and radical Islam for decades. And it's getting worse and worse every day.

Now the Left and their radical Islamist allies are targeting the education system and indoctrinating our children with pro-Islamic propaganda.

That's why we've launched a nationwide petition to collect and deliver 1,000,000 signed No Islam In Our Schools Petitions to Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, demanding she make sure no taxpayer dollars are funding pro-Islamic lessons in America.

I know you care deeply about this issue so I'm urgently asking you to make a tax-deductible donation of $25 or more to fund this massive petition drive.

Your $25 gift will help us reach over 6,000 concerned citizens. And if you can give more, you'll help us reach 1,000,000 even faster.

You and I cannot let the unholy alliance get away with this. We must rally together to stop this brainwashing of our children.

Thank you in advance for your support.


Begin forwarded message:

From: David Horowitz
Date: Monday, January 29, 2018 at 9:06 AM
Subject: Sign the Petition: No Islam in our schools

David Horowitz Freedom Center

The radical left is using your tax dollars to rip God out of the classroom and replace him with Allah.

To stop this horrible action please sign this NO ISLAM IN OUR SCHOOLS PETITION right away.

Make no mistake about what the left is doing: They're indoctrinating our children with pro-Islamic anti-Christian messages. And their goal is to tear down God and destroy our Judeo-Christian history and values. With your tax dollars...

You and I have watched the left work for years to pull God out of our schools by suing any school that mentions God. But what we didn't know was at the same time they were funding new Pro-Islamic lessons with your tax dollars.

But now we know their crusade to get religion out of the classroom was a complete lie. It was just an excuse to remove God and replace him with Allah.

Here are a few examples we've seen across the country:

 New York promotes an "educational" video for teachers to use in the classroom called "Dying to be a Martyr." The video has interviews with Islamic terrorists who tell students why their attacks are justified.
 In a Florida school, students had to design and create Muslim prayer rugs.
 In Maryland, students had to write out the Shahada, which states, "There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah."

Do you think your tax dollars should be paying for this pro-Islamic liberal indoctrination?

If not, then please sign your NO ISLAM IN OUR SCHOOLS PETITION right now.

You see, the radical pro-Islamic leftists who orchestrating this campaign know they'll never change your views -- you already know the truth. So, they're targeting children and feeding them with lies about Islam and how peaceful it is.

They're not teaching the truth -- the killings, the bombings, the brutality.

This kind of indoctrination of our children is a tactic they learned from radical communist dictator Vladimir Lenin -- he said, "Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.

Today, right here in America, countless schools force children to learn and recite the five pillars of Islam. One even recited the Pledge of Allegiance in Arabic ending with, "one nation under Allah!"

You and I cannot allow the radical left to succeed with this sick indoctrination of our children.

That's why I'm asking you to immediately sign your NO ISLAM IN OUR SCHOOLS PETITION.

And let me tell you there is no better group than the David Horowitz Freedom Center to lead this fight. For the last 30 years we've been in the trenches fighting the radical left and its Islamist allies who are working to destroy our American values.

As you know, we've also been in the schools battling to protect students from indoctrination and intimidation from Islamic radicals and their efforts to infiltrate and subvert our schools.

Now, I'm asking you to join our fight by signing the NO ISLAM IN OUR SCHOOLS PETITION today.

I will send your signed petition to Education Secretary Betsy DeVos demanding she ensure NO taxpayer dollars are spent for pro-Islamic lessons and asking her to withhold federal funding from school districts that teach pro-Islamic lessons.

I will also send a copy of your petition to your Governor.

So please act today. Follow this link to sign your NO ISLAM IN OUR SCHOOLS PETITION back to me right away.

Now, for this massive effort to work we need an army of patriotic conservatives fighting together to stop the radical left...

So in addition to your signed Petition I'm also asking you to rush back a one-time, emergency, tax-deductible donation of $25 to help me collect 1,000,000 signed petitions.

Your one-time $25 gift will allow me to send over 6,000 concerned Americans this NO ISLAM IN OUR SCHOOLS PETITION.

And if you can give more today -- say $35, $50, $100, $250 or more -- it will help me reach my goal even faster.

I cannot do this alone. The only way I can grow this effort to critical mass is with your help today.

So please join me today by signing your NO ISLAM IN OUR SCHOOLS PETITION and making your very-best, one-time, emergency donation of $25, $50, $100, $250 or more today.

Thank you for taking the time to read my letter and for everything you've done to defend our Judeo-Christian values.


David Horowitz

P.S. The radical left is tearing God out of our schools and replacing him Allah -- and they're using your tax dollars to do it! It's all part of a coordinated campaign to destroy our Judeo-Christian history and values, and it's why I need your help today to fight back.

Please sign your NO ISLAM IN OUR SCHOOLS PETITION and then make your very-best, one-time, tax-deductible gift of $25, $35, $50, $100 $250 or more to keep Islam out of our children's classrooms.

Sign the Petition

The David Horowitz Freedom Center is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. All donations are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 55089 Sherman Oaks, CA 91499

© Copyright 2018, HorowitzFreedomCenter.org

EU officials livid that Donald Trump's next foreign trip is to Poland which has a 'No Muslim Migrant' policy
by BareNakedIslam

(See pictures at above link)

European Union (EU) panderers to Islam are in a panic over President Donald Trump's upcoming visit to Poland which they fear will bolster the populist, conservative government of Prime Minister Beata Szydlo, and encourage her continued defiance of the EU by rejecting Muslim migrants, and thereby damage "European unity."

Breitbart (h/t Emma) The president's one-day stop-off -- en route to the G20 summit in Hamburg -- is for a gathering dubbed the Three Seas project, bringing together leaders from Central Europe, the Baltic States, and the Balkans.
The event has been convened by Poland as it bids to garner influence outside the EU -- which has clashed with its nationalist government over migrant policy and sovereignty.

"One cannot but feel a bit suspicious if it isn't an attempt to break up European unity," an EU diplomat said about the Three Seas project, speaking to Reuters. Another senior EU official said it was part of Poland's push towards "self-ghettoisation".
Poland's ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party and Mr. Trump have similar views on migration and climate change and share a suspicion of international bodies and globalization.

The president also backed Brexit and predicted the further break-up of the EU; his dealings with the rebellious, right wing governments of Central Europe will be watched closely by Brussels.
Poland has taken a leading rolling in opening the rift between the ex-Communist, Eastern and Central EU nations (with largely right wing governments) and liberal Western European nations.
Most recently, Poland led a resistance to the EU's forced migrant resettlement quotas -- opposed by Romania, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary -- as the EU pushes to "sanction" nations that refuse to take thousands of Middle Eastern asylum seekers.

Polish Prime Minister Beata Szydlo recently called the migrant quota policy "a madness of Brussels elites" in a speech in parliament.

"We encourage Mr. Trump to get out and travel as much as he can. He needs to understand Europe and he can do that by getting out and speaking to people, to European leaders," said one European official, who declined to be named.
Tens of thousands of Polish citizens took part in an anti-Muslim migration march in 2015.

"[But] he can't do deals with individual countries over the head of the European Union," he added.
The president will be looking to push exports of U.S. gas on the trip as Poland attempts to reduce its reliance on Russia. Poland will seek reassurance of the president's commitment to NATO as it faces a perceived threat from Russia.
BareNakedIslam | June 30, 2017 at 9:26 pm | Categories: Donald Trump | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-1yBx    

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:

Europe: The Rapid Spread of Dhimmitude
by Judith Bergman * February 22, 2018 at 5:00 am

. One of the most troubling aspects of this rapidly spreading dhimmitude, is the de-facto enforcement of Islamic blasphemy laws. Local European authorities have been utilizing "hate speech" laws to prohibit criticism of Islam, even though Islam represents an idea, not a nationality or an ethnicity. The conventional purpose of most hate-speech laws is to protect people from hatred, not ideas.

. The British Foreign Office, which has ignored Iranian women's desperate fight for freedom and stayed shamefully silent during the Iranian people's recent protests against Iran's regime, unbelievably handed out free headscarves to its staff. Meanwhile, at least 29 Iranian women were arrested for shedding the hijab, and were likely subjected to rape and other torture, as is common in Iranian prisons. Yet British MPs and Foreign Office employees were perversely celebrating the hijab as some sort of twisted tool of "female empowerment".

. Counter-jihad measures have been obstructed by Western leaders everywhere since immediately after 9/11. President George W. Bush declared that "Islam is peace". President Obama removed all references to Islam in FBI terror training manuals that Muslims deemed offensive. New York City's current leadership threatened New Yorkers, immediately after the October terror attack in Manhattan, not to link the terror attack to Islam. UK Prime Minister Theresa May claimed that Islam is a "religion of peace".

Pictured: Women wearing Islamic niqab veils stand outside the French Embassy during a demonstration on April 11, 2011 in London, England. (Photo by Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images)

Although Europe is not part of the Muslim world, many European authorities nevertheless seem to feel obliged to submit to Islam in more or less subtle ways. This voluntary submission appears to be unprecedented: Dhimmi, historically speaking, is the Arabic term for the conquered non-Muslim, who agrees to live as a second-rate, "tolerated" citizen, under Islamic rule, submitting to a separate, demeaning set of laws and the demands of his Islamic masters [and to pay slave taxes ("jizya")].

Continue Reading Article

Hamas: Turkey's Longtime Love
by Burak Bekdil * February 22, 2018 at 4:00 am

. Erdogan's ideological love affair with Hamas is obligatory for all Islamists in this part of the world, and they do not tend to forget it. In February, a deported Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) board member, Sami al-Arian, denounced the United States as "our enemy."

. For Turkey's Islamist leaders, Hamas is not a tactical alliance or a geopolitical necessity for the country. It is an age-old feature of political Islam capturing not just minds but hearts.

Pictured: Palestinians, waving Hamas flags, hold a rally in support of Recep Tayyip Erdogan (then Turkey's Prime Minister) on January 30, 2009, in Gaza City. (Photo by Abid Katib/Getty Images)

Despite the nominal 'normalization' of diplomatic relations between Turkey and Israel, Ankara is still fully supporting a terrorist organization -- one that Washington, among others, lists as terrorist. The Shin Bet's report, the Istanbul conference and its contents, the official Turkish support for that conference and Turkish Foreign Ministry's explicit support of Hamas make new evidence that Turkey insists on siding ideologically with a terrorist organization -- ironically at a time when Erdogan claims Turkish troops are fighting terrorists in Syria.

In 2014, Turkey hosted Salah al-Arouri, a Hamas commander whom the Palestinian Authority had accused of planning multiple attacks against Israeli targets. At that time, the newspaper Israel Hayom called Turkey's important guest "an infamous arch-terrorist believed to be responsible for dozens of attacks against Israelis".

Continue Reading Article

Please tell the DOE that they should not claim that there is a "separation of church and state" for one religion but not for another; the government has no business indoctrinating our children!

The United States Department of Education provides no similar program for any other religion. If the DOE insists on doing things like this, please eliminate the DOE and let the states control education, like the Constitution says they should. Government agencies shouldn't be allowed to excessively tax us, especially when many of us are having a very hard time economically now, and use that money to control state governments and make the states follow a federal agenda. Please make this illegal.

Video: Dept of Education's Islamic indoctrination program for public schools
March 29, 2017 / creeping

via CAN

. The United States Department of Education has developed an Islamic indoctrination program for public schools called, 'Access Islam.'

. The lesson plans are written for grades 5 through 12. They include worksheets and videos to help students perform the 5 Pillars of Islam -- prayer, fasting, alms giving, pilgrimage to Mecca and the proclamation of Muslim faith.

. This short video contains excerpted clips taken from the "Access Islam' program which not only teaches children how to perform a Muslim prayer, but asks students such questions as: 'What does a Muslim prayer sound like?' 'What do the movements look like?' and 'What are some of the things Muslims say during prayer?'

. Children are also expected to memorize verses from the Quran and give the meaning of those verses.

. Taken as a whole, the U.S. Department of Education's 'Access Islam' program is nothing short of a Sunday school class on Islam.


Another example of the Islamic infiltration of the U.S. public school system sent by a reader recently.

. Below are links to information published in the Communique -- the official newsletter of the National Association of school psychologists.

And like all myths it exists only in the imagination of those who tell the stories.
And like all myths it exists only in the imagination of those who tell the stories.
And like all myths it exists only in the imagination of those who tell the stories.

And like all myths it exists only in the imagination of those who tell the stories.




In the November 2016 issue of the communique there is the 3rd of a series of articles about muslim students. The current article
is titled "Meeting the Needs of Muslim American Students."

 To access the online document you would need to be a NASP member. The second and 3rd links show the conference brochure for Arizona Association of School Psychologists. A 3-hour session is devoted to accommodating muslim students.




US Public Education Paid for by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Please Share & Help Wake America Up


(H.R.390), the Iraq and Syria Genocide Emergency Relief and Accountability Act is a bill providing that our nation once again stands with Christian victims of genocide in the Middle East.
This bill provides emergency relief to the victims of genocide in Iraq and Syria and holds the perpetrators accountable for their actions by supporting entities that conduct criminal investigations into the crimes committed. In addition, H.R. 390 would make it easier for surviving victims to apply for asylum in the United States by allowing applicants to be vetted without a referral from the United Nations. Christian men are being beheaded for their faith; their wives and daughters are being taken as sex slaves; and their sons forced to fight for radical Islamic armies. Christians, including children, who refuse to renounce their faith are being crucified, and others hung upside down like sheep in slaughterhouses where muslims collect their blood while killing them in order to wash their hands with it "so the muslims will get into heaven". Many of those in the group film the procedures and post them on Liveleaks and other sites in order to attract muslims from all over the world to join them. [Please introduce and support legislation to stop LiveLeaks and other sites from supporting terrorism by showing these videos!] Christian men are baked alive in their local bakery ovens, and over 250 children were "kneaded" to death in the bakery's industrial-sized mixers.

Under President Obama none of the tens of millions of dollars in aid sent to the Middle East reached persecuted Christians who are actual victims of genocide. Worse, Middle East Christians were placed at the back of the line for immigration.

Under President Trump, these practices must stop. Congress must give President Trump the authority and the funds to take action now.

Congress formally declared that Christians have been the victims of genocide in Iraq and Syria. Now it is time for Congress to act to help the Christian victims of genocide.

Congressmen Chris Smith and Anna Eshoo have introduced legislation to provide emergency relief to Christians who are survivors of genocide and ensure accountability for the perpetrators.

Please support the Iraq and Syria Genocide Emergency Relief and Accountability Act (H.R. 390) and its Senate equivalent to help the beleaguered Christian communities in Iraq and Syria.

The Iraq and Syria Genocide Emergency Relief and Accountability Act would direct the Trump Administration to:

  Support entities that are effectively serving genocide survivors in-country, including faith-based entities;
  Support entities that are conducting criminal investigations into perpetrators of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes in Iraq and Syria;
  Create a "Priority Two" ("P-2") designation that Christians and other genocide survivors from religious and ethnic minority communities are of "special humanitarian concern to the United States" and therefore able to access an overseas application interview for the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program without needing a referral from the UN.

Congress must pass this bill in order for the Trump administration to help the Christians who have survived the genocide perpetrated by Sunni Muslim terror groups such as the Islamic State (ISIS). Even the Obama State Department declared Christians are victims of genocide.
America is supposed to stand against oppression and genocide: instead, it is supporting and arming the very ones committing the torture, murder, rape and genocide, and is causing Syrians and muslims from other countries to leave their countries due to the violence from the US-government and CIA / Deep State supported so-called "moderate muslims", according to direct interviews with local residents (not propagandized reports in our media with an agenda of overthrowing Syria's and other countries governments).

What has shocked me the most is how the international community has utterly failed to help these persecuted victims of ongoing genocide. Christians in the Middle East cannot count on UN aid programs which mandate 90% or more of funds go to muslims. These Christian refugees are mostly ignored by the Islamic run charities and the muslim-dominated UN officials.

Under Obama, our CIA actively armed and trained radical Syrian rebels allied with the very ISIS terrorists committing genocide against Middle Eastern Christians, (and provided air support, as well as flew ISIS leaders out of harm).
No "Moderate Rebels" in Syria
For six years now, the U.S. and its allies have been arming/funding "moderate rebels" in Syria, resulting in millions of refugees and vast destruction of the country. Let us for a moment ignore the hypocrisy and insanity of this proxy war. How "moderate" are these rebels who are getting tens of billions of dollars of weapons, funding and training?

The official talking point is that these rebels of Free Syrian Army (FSA) are Syrians who are neither Islamists nor terrorists. The truth on the ground is that a majority of fighters are foreigners, and they are fanatical Islamists and terrorists (Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda and ISIS).

As Middle East expert Professor Joshua Landis succinctly put, "Every rebel group in Syria has been associated with Al Qaeda at some point."
Below are some pictures that show the US-supported "moderate rebels" (the flag with green-white-black stripes and red stars) hanging out with Al Qaeda and ISIS fighters. FSA spokesperson, Colonel Okaidi, has also said on TV interviews that his group gets along well with both ISIS "brothers" and Al Qaeda. This video also shows him hanging out with the US Ambassador to Syria.

There are also plenty of reports over the last six years that clearly indicate that supporting the FSA meant supporting Al Qaeda and ISIS. For example:

 Two of the largest CIA-vetted rebel groups surrendered US-supplied missiles and hi-tech weapons to Al Qaeda and ran away!
 Sometimes FSA fighters simply defected to join Al Qaeda
 FSA gave the US-supplied weapons to Al Qaeda
 FSA would defect and join ISIS
 FSA chose a Jihadist as their leader, someone with clear ties to ISIS & AQ
 FSA's military council coordinated with Al Qaeda on a daily basis
 FSA groups pledged allegiance to ISIS
 ISIS commanders joined FSA
 Fares Bayoush is an important figure in the FSA and a representative of the opposition in official peace talks. He's also often interviewed by the western media, as seen in this New Yorker article. He put a spin on Al Qaeda-FSA cooperation by saying that the "moderate rebels" have to work with Al Qaeda in Syria -- it's just a matter of pragmatism.

Here are some examples of the barbaric nature of these moderate rebels. One FSA/Al Qaeda commander killed a Syrian soldier, ripped out the heart and ate it! In another incident, a bunch of CIA-vetted/armed rebels beheaded a 10-year-old boy on video.

More recently, another group of rebels bombed a few buses that were transferring women and children out of the rebel-held area. About 70 children died in the blast. While the children in the buses were burning, the rebels were celebrating, shouting "Allahu Akbar" and cursing the Shiites as pigs. Why so much hatred? The rebels are Sunni Muslims and the civilians were Shia Muslims. That's how rabid, vicious and monstrous these "moderate rebels" are. Below is a short clip; you can watch the entire video here.


In the areas they control, the rebels have strict Taliban/Saudi-style Salafist Sharia Law -- women have to be covered from head to toe. They even advertise such rules through graffiti and billboards. (In the picture on the left, it shows three wrong ways to dress and one right way.)

Below are two pictures that show a pro-Assad rally and a pro-rebel rally. As you can see, Assad represents a secular, progressive nation and the rebels represent fundamentalist, repressive, Salafist ideas.

The Syrian moderate rebels also have indoctrination camps for kids to breed the next generation of Jihadists. You can watch a short documentary from Vice on one such camp. The pics below are from another camp run by Uzbekistan's Al Qaeda fighters (yes, there are more than 30,000 foreign fighters in Syria).
So, that's the truth about the "moderate Syrian rebels" -- they are not moderate, they are not Syrian and they are not rebels. They should be called "Salafist Foreign Terrorists."

How America Armed Terrorists in Syria
The policy of arming military groups committed to overthrowing the government of President Bashar al-Assad began in September 2011, when President Barack Obama was pressed by his Sunni allies -- Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar -- to supply heavy weapons to a military opposition to Assad they were determined to establish... The CIA's covert arms shipments from Libya came to an abrupt halt in September 2012 when Libyan militants attacked and burned the embassy annex in Benghazi that had been used to support the operation. By then, however, a much larger channel for arming anti-government forces was opening up. The CIA put the Saudis in touch with a senior Croatian official who had offered to sell large quantities of arms left over from the Balkan Wars of the 1990s. And the CIA helped them shop for weapons from arms dealers and governments in several other former Soviet bloc countries...

We are still arming and funding these radical terrorists who are persecuting Syria's Christians -- the very ones that Assad protects. In this video, Luke gives us breaking news on Donald Trump's 180 degree flip-flops that have left even his most staunch supporters, like Ann Coulter calling for his impeachment. In a stunning reversal from his announcement a couple of months ago that he would stop funding the secret CIA operation to train and arm radical jihadists in Syria, we have the recent revelation that the CIA and the Pentagon have been covering up the smuggling $2.2 billion in weapons under diplomatic cover from the government of Azerbaijan.
Video: (17 mins):
WeAreChange: What the Hell Really Happened Last Week?

US Coalition Announces They'??ll Defend ISIS by Attacking Syrian Army if They Go After Them by Matt Agorist
Syria: In a blatantly ominous move ??solidifying the notion that the U.S. military machine supports and sustains the proliferation of ISIS, ??U.S.-backed rebels openly stated they will prevent the Syrian army from crossing the Euphrates River to recover eastern Syria from ISIS militants.

The roots of the church founded by the Saints are being torn out and Christians are being slaughtered using weapons furnished by this nation. Jesus stopped Saul on the road to Damascus and told him not to persecute Christians. Under Obama, for the last six years our tax dollars have been used to supply weapons using that exact same road to Sunni Muslim militants to persecute and kill Christians in Syria. Now that he has left office, please reverse course and do everything you can to protecct these people!

Also, please pass and support legislation to train, arm, fund and support the Middle Eastern Christians, instead of terrorists, so that they can defend themselves from genocide, and to get us out of these wars that are used to topple governments and which are responsible for creating the refugee problem in the first place!

Trump hit with ultimatum on global 'atrocity'
President Trump is under growing pressure to make the one bold move that many believe could drive a final stake into the heart of the globalist agenda.
And now a desperate plea has been added to the mix, to force the U.S. to act swiftly and decisively against those who "hate humanity" ... 'We call for swift and decisive action by the international community'
Published: 15 hours ago
Bob Unruh

21 Coptic Christians were beheaded by ISIS terrorists in February, putting Christian persecution, which has been going on for decades in the Middle East, on the world media's radar screen.

An organization representing the sentiments of more than a quarter-million Americans is asking the nation's new U.N. ambassador, Nikki Haley, to urge the global body to launch a campaign to protect Christians and other religious minorities from the "wholesale destruction" intended by Islamic terrorists in the Middle East.

"It is imperative that the United Nations formally recognize that the ongoing atrocities committed by ISIS against Christians, Yazidis, and other religious and ethnic minorities in Iraq, Syria and elsewhere constitute genocide for purposes of implicating the obligations of the international community pursuant to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, and the well-established responsibilities to protect the victims of genocide," says a letter to Haley from the American Center for Law and Justice.

"While we call for swift and decisive action by the international community to stop the genocide and protect the victims, we are also aware that the first step is for the United Nations to formally recognize that the atrocities constitute genocide, and to recognize all those victimized, thereby, including Christians," the letter says.

"ISIS' systematic pattern of widespread murder and sexual abuse has forced thousands of Christians and other religious minorities to feel from Iraq and Syria. These acts are leading to the wholesale destruction of Christians as a group in the region."

ACLJ, which collected the signatures of nearly 280,000 people in support of its effort, warns that the ISIS bloodbath "will only end with U.S. and global leaders recognizing what is happening AND acting to end it."

It's just one of the failures of the United Nations that is driving a growing movement to urge the United States to stop funding the global body. Some want the U.S. to exit the U.N. and expel its headquarters from American soil.

The Big List of leaders [http://wnd.com/2017/02/big-list-of-leaders-calling-for-u-s-to-defund-u-n/] calling for the U.S. to take action against the U.N. has been growing since late last year when its Security Council issued yet another statement condemning U.S. ally Israel.

There is even a petition calling for the U.S. to make a definitive move against the U.N. and its far-left agenda.

A U.S. departure would be a major blow to the U.N., as more than 22 percent of its budget comes from the U.S.

On Jan. 25, WND reported that the White House was considering executive orders that would dramatically reduce U.S. funding to the U.N. and potentially result in U.S. withdrawal from certain multilateral treaties.

And in the halls of Congress, a bill, [http://wnd.com/2017/01/congress-eyes-plan-to-take-u-s-out-of-u-n/] the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2016, [https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/193] sponsored by Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., would also address the problem.

It would remove the United States from the U.N., ban any continued financial support, bar American military members from serving under U.N. command and remove the diplomatic immunity of U.N. officials.

The newest fight, over the U.N.'s inaction to protect Christians, prompted ACLJ to hand-deliver the letter to Haley.

"It is vital that the United Nations stand against the evils of the ongoing genocide and use all available options to halt the genocide and protect the victims," the letter says.

"The charter of the United Nations demands no less, and through the organs of the United Nations, equipped and empowered by the Genocide Convention, the United Nations has the unique capability to end the genocide and protect the Christians and other religious and ethnic minorities."

It continues, "The United Nations Human Rights Council's 34th Session which has just begun presents a perfect opportunity for your office to signal the United States' newfound resolve to stop ISIS's genocide once and for all," the letter told Haley.

See the Big List of whose calling for the U.S. to abandon the United Nations.

ISIS's bloody violence in the Middle East has horrified the world. Jihadists have beheaded, blown up, drowned burned and crucified opponents, often making videos to instill terror in anyone who stands in the way of their aim to create a state ruled by Islamic law.

Recently, at least seven Christians have been killed in Arish, in Egypt's North Sinai province.

And the BBC reported the killing of Christians in the Syrian town of al-Qaryatain.

Former Secretary of State John Kerry last year conceded that ISIS is committing genocide.

"In my judgment, [ISIS] is responsible for genocide against groups in territory under its control, including Yazidis, Christians and Shia Muslims," Kerry said then.

Big List: Now scientists want U.S. out of U.N. climate agency
300 agree: 'Actions ... not scientifically justified'

Three hundred scientists have written to President Donald Trump asking him to pull the United States out of the global warming campaign that is being run by the United Nations.

According to The Hill, the letter explains, "Since 2009, the U.S. and other governments have undertaken actions with respect to global climate that are not scientifically justified and that already have, and will continue to cause serious social and economic harm -- with no environmental benefits.

"While we support effective, affordable, reasonable and direct controls on conventional environmental pollutants, carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. To the contrary, there is clear evidence that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is environmentally helpful to food crops and other plants that nourish all life. It is plant food, not poison," the letter says.

It's the latest is a series of recommendations, suggestions and plans for the United States to quit paying for the international agency's agenda, leave the organization, and even have it removed from United States' soil.

It all developed after the U.N. late last year, once again, issued a statement condemning U.S. ally Israel. The statement essentially made it illegal for Israel to work on housing projects for its citizens.

Do your part to get the cartel of globalists, terrorism appeasers and Israel haters off our soil. Get the U.S. out of the U.N. and the U.N. out of the U.S. Sign the petition here! Make your voice heard! Stand up for American independence and the security of our allies!

A U.S. departure clearly would be a major blow to the U.N., as more than 22 percent of its budget comes from the U.S.

The Hill said the coalition, led by high-profile climate change skeptic Richard Lindzen, told Trump in a letter on Thursday that greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide simply don't cause the harm that global warming activists claim.

The report explains the Framework Convention on Climate Change treaty has been signed by more than 150 nations, and it requires countries to disclose certain greenhouse gas details. It also is the basis for the Paris agreement of 2015.

Trump previously promised to remove the U.S. from that.

Lindzen said, the Hill reported, "It is especially important for members of your administrative team to hear from people like the signers of this letter, with the training needed to evaluate climate facts, and to offer sound advice. Climate discussions have long been political debates -- not scientific discussions -- over whether citizens or bureaucrats should control energy, natural resources and other assets."

Some of those calls to action also have generated plans for action.

On Jan. 25, WND reported that the White House was considering executive orders that would dramatically reduce U.S. funding to the U.N. and potentially result in U.S. withdrawal from certain multilateral treaties.

Those seeing their access to U.S. tax dollars terminated under the order titled "Auditing and Reducing U.S. Funding of International Organizations" would include groups giving full membership to the Palestinian Authority or the Palestine Liberation Organization, organizations that fund abortion or are involved in activities that violate sanctions against North Korea or Iran. Any group "controlled or substantially influenced by any state that sponsors terrorism" or carries out persecution of marginalized groups is also covered.

In addition to terminating U.S. funding of agencies meeting these criteria, the Trump order would call for "at least a 40 percent overall decrease" in financial support for international organizations.

In the halls of Congress, a plan, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2016, sponsored by Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., would also do much to take care of the problem.

It would remove the United States from the U.N., ban any continued financial support, bar American military members from serving under U.N. command and remove the diplomatic immunity of U.N. officials.

According to the congressional description, it would repeal "the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 and other specified related laws."

"The bill requires: (1) the president to terminate U.S. membership in the United Nations (U.N.), including any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body; and (2) closure of the U.S. Mission to the United Nations," it explains.

Here are some of the other voices calling for decisive action:

Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, is drafting a bill to stop all U.S. funds to the United Nations until it rescinds the resolution. The bill also would prevent American money from assisting any foreign government that recognizes Palestine as an independent state.

Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas

Gohmert described the U.N. resolution as "anti-Semitic" and said the Obama administration tends to support "bullies over victims."

Israel is "the only place Muslims have complete freedom in the Middle East," he said.

Former Republican Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee says the U.S. should take the billions of dollars it now gives to the United Nations and instead give it to American soldiers who served "under the U.S. flag."

"We are getting zero benefits" from the U.N., he told the Fox News Channel's Eric Bolling on "The O'Reilly Factor." "And we are getting embarrassed by the actions of the U.N.

"That's money that ought to be spent on American servicemen and servicewomen, and I hope Donald Trump make it one of the first acts of his presidency."

Former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton, a member of the Trump transition team, said that if the new administration is unable to repeal the resolution, contributions should be cut off entirely.

John Bolton

"Personally, what I would recommend to the president-elect is once he takes office, he should say this resolution is illegitimate and the United States is going to seek to repeal it," Bolton told Fox News. "If that fails, and that's the most likely outcome, we should cut our contributions to the United Nations perhaps in toto until this resolution is repealed."

Bolton also said there should be "consequences" for the 14 nations that voted in favor of the resolution.

"It's just extremely distressing that even Great Britain didn't abstain on this resolution, and it shows just how much difficulty there is in the United Nations to try and carry out a coherent American foreign policy," Bolton said.

Syndicated columnist and Fox News contributor Charles Krauthammer said the U.N. headquarters in New York City should be turned into condos by President-elect Donald Trump, arguing the U.N. spends its time "trying to attack the only Jewish state on the planet" and "undermining the United States and democracy."

Charles Krauthammer

"We're paying an organization that spends half its time -- more than half its time and energy and resources and bureaucracy trying to attack the only Jewish state on the planet, a tiny little spec, while genocide, mayhem, murder, terrorism is going on all over the world," he said on the Fox News Channel's "Special Report" Dec. 26.

Krauthammer said it's "an obsession that to an outside observer appears to be insane."

"Why are we doing this? And the rest of the time is spend undermining the United States and democracy and our allies around the world," he said. "It as an organization that exacerbates tensions, it does not assuage them."

Krauthammer said the U.N. was "born in hope, the end of the Second World War."

"It turned out to be a disaster. Any move to minimize our support for it, any move to get it out of the U.S. -- imagine if headquarters were in Zimbabwe. The amount of weight and coverage it would get would be zero," he continued.

"I think that's good real estate in downtown New York City, and Trump ought to find a way to put his name on it and turn it into condos."

Harvard University Alan Dershowitz said the United States needs to "threaten to defund the United Nations."

Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz

"There is an automatic anti-Israel bias at the U.N. Consider the following story -- this happened less than a year ago -- the head of the U.N. Ban Ki-moon put Saudi Arabia on a blacklist of countries that mistreat children during wartime and the head of the Saudis called Ban Ki-moon and said unless you take us off of the blacklist we will stop sending money to the U.N., and Ban Ki-moon said alright and he took them off the blacklist," Dershowitz told "The Joe Piscopo Show."

"So money counts at the U.N. And so what the United States should do now is threaten to defund the United Nations unless the United Nations stops showing this incredible bias against Israel."

"Forty resolutions this year against Israel, four against the entire rest of the world at a time when Syria is imploding when Russia took over the Crimea," Dershowitz said. "So many violations of human rights are occurring in the world. Forty resolution against Israel, only four against the rest of the world. That shows you something about the bias of that U.N. building."

Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., said the American taxpayer should not be forced to "bankroll an international organization that works against America's interests around the world."

"The time is now to restore and protect American sovereignty and get out of the United Nations."

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said he doesn't want to pay for an organization that allows "two-bit Third World countries with no freedom to attack us and complain about the United States."

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.

"There's a lot of reasons why I don't like the U.N., and I think I'd be happy to dissolve it."

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. is pledging to propose a measure to cut U.S. funding to the United Nations unless it repeals the resolution demanding an end to Israeli settlements.

"It's that important to me," Graham told CNN. "This is a road we haven't gone down before. If you can't show the American people that international organizations can be more responsible, there is going to be a break. And I am going to lead that break."

Graham pledged to work to "leave no doubt about where America stands" when it comes to the Middle East and Israel.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said Congress "should end U.S. taxpayer funding for the United Nations unless and until the U.N. reverses this anti-Israel resolution, and I believe there will be considerable support in Congress, I hope in both parties, to do exactly that."

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas

Cruz also tweeted: "Spoke w/ Israeli PM @netanyahu tonight to wish him Happy Chanukah & assure him of strong support in Congress. No US $ for UN until reversed."

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said he supports Graham's measure.

"Sen. Graham is leading on that, and I'm with him every step of the way," he told BuzzFeed.

Former Alaska governor and Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin called for a #USexit, saying the United Nations works against American interests, and the U.S. should "get the heck out of the U.N. and get the U.N. out of the U.S."

Sarah Palin

"I think many of us have called for America to really step up and consider what it is that we are funding and supporting via the U.N., and how it works so hard really against U.S. interests, and just saying -- look what the U.K. just did," said Palin, referring to the U.K.'s vote to withdraw from the European Union.

"This is such an encouraging time, where it's not just us, but those across the pond, too, are understanding that their nation's sovereignty and security are on the line here, with the ties that bind us to interests that really don't further our agendas."

Do your part to get the cartel of globalists, terrorism appeasers and Israel haters off our soil. Get the U.S. out of the U.N. and the U.N. out of the U.S. Sign the petition here! Make your voice heard! Stand up for American independence and the security of our allies!

Columnist Rich Lowry wrote that the U.N. resolution "demonstrates the U.N.'s hostility to our closest ally in the Middle East affords an opportunity to force an overdue crisis in the U.S.-U.N. relationship."

"We are the chief funder of a swollen, unaccountable U.N. apparatus that has been a gross disappointment for more than 70 years now."

David Greenfield, a fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, wrote that the United Nations "does only two things consistently and effectively: waste money and bash Israel. Sometimes it manages to do both at the same time."

He pointed out that for its money, the U.S. gets a U.N. email system that was "used to distribute child pornography." U.N. staff members, he said, "have smuggled drugs, attacked each other with knives and pool cues, not to mention a tractor."

Defunding, he said, is "something that we and every sane country should have done decades ago."

"If you give money to the U.N., it will end up anywhere and everywhere except where it's supposed to go. But defunding the U.N. isn't enough. There is no reason for us to remain there at all."

He said the "billions we waste on the U.N. will go toward taking care of our people."

"And once we are free of the U.N., we will actually be able to promote real human rights instead of pandering to the dictators and Islamists of the United Nations."

Joseph Farah, founder, editor and CEO of WND, said the U.N. is "a massively corrupt and hopelessly broken institution."

"If ever there was a time and the right opportunity to put this on the front burner of a new administration that clearly opposes the kind of globalist vision that the U.N. offers and promotes, this is it," he said.

"Enough is a enough! Why are we supporting this twisted, anti-Israel rogues gallery with our tax dollars and debt? Why do we continue to permit them to operate within our country? If Donald Trump and the U.S. Congress don't seize this moment, a future administration will undoubtedly humiliate the U.S. and our allies, again, through the auspices of the United Nuisances."

Roger L. Simon, co-founder of PJ Media, wrote the U.N. would be a good place to cut the massive federal budget.

"Donald Trump -- who is seeking to spend a ton of taxpayer money on rebuilding our military and infrastructure -- is undoubtedly looking for places to save. Nowhere would be better to start than that moribund center of international corruption and megaphone for tin-pot dictators, the United Nations," Simon said.

"What started out after World War II as the idealistic coming together of nations to end war ended up being one of the giant ripoffs of all time. The U.N. oil-for-food scandal during the Iraq War showed how extreme it had become," he said, referring to the kickbacks and illegal surcharges that enabled Saddam Hussein to pocket $1.8 billion at the expense of Iraqis suffering under U.N. economic sanctions.

He noted that in 2015 alone the U.N. General Assembly adopted 20 resolutions singling out Israel for criticism, issuing only three resolutions on the rest of the world combined.

Raheem Kassam, an ex-Muslim British political activist and a former chief adviser to U.K. Independence Party (UKIP) leader Nigel Farage, said in a column for Breitbart.com, where he serves as London editor in chief, to "expect a resurgence of the American Sovereignty Act and an invigorated USexit movement in the next few months."

He sees the backlash to the U.N. resolution as "a chance for Donald Trump to drain the international swamp, too."

Jordan Schachtel, the national security correspondent for Conservative Review, wrote that if Congress won't defund the U.N. in its entirety, it should, at the very least, cut "off the support of its most cancerous institutions."

He listed them as the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees of the Near East, "a militantly anti-Israel organization that has embedded itself with Hamas terrorists"; the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, which passed a resolution denying Jewish and Christian claims to the Temple Mount in Jerusalem; the U.N. Human Rights Council, whose membership consists of tyrannical regimes that "use their status on the council to bury their human rights violations back home"; and the United Nations Information Centre, which "showcased its hyper-partisan ideology in late September when it tweeted out a link to a campaign calling for voters to defeat now-President-elect Donald Trump in the November elections."

David Ben Hooren, publisher of the Jewish Voice, held a rally at U.N. Plaza in New York City just after Christmas to send "a clarion call to the United States government to defund the morally bankrupt and highly tendentious United Nations."

He also called on "community leaders, elected officials across the nation and the president-elect to posit themselves in the forefront of the campaign to immediately cease payments to this world body that is purportedly predicated on maintaining the rights and dignity of all nations and the inhabitants therein but has proven itself a propaganda weapon in which to consistently denigrate and attack the one and only Jewish state."

Mark Biltz, pastor of El Shaddai Ministries, said "the United States and Israel should withdraw all funding from the United Nations, just for starters."

"The next step, if they do not overturn the resolution, would be to expel the organization from the United States. The U.N. is more like the United Nothings. And the two-state solution is more like the Final Solution and should be completely scrapped," he said.

Joel Richardson, host of "The Underground" and author of several books, including the New York Times bestseller "The Islamic Antichrist," said the hypocrisy and corruption of the U.N. is startling.

"This past year, 2016, the United Nations passed 20 resolutions that were distinctly anti-Israel," he said. "Only four resolutions against other nations were passed; one each for Syria, North Korea, Iran and Russia. This is more than a mockery of justice. The United Nations has become the de facto Palestinian branch of diplomatic jihad and propaganda."

Richardson called for total American withdrawal from the U.N. and said he hopes President Trump goes even further.

"Today, the United States pays for close to a quarter of the total budget of the U.N. Why? Not only should the United States defund the U.N., they should completely withdraw. As a person of conscience who deeply values the principles of honesty and justice, I'm praying President Trump will do what is right and kick this corrupt cartel out of New York."

Author, radio host and pastor Carl Gallups said "it is past time for the United States to withdraw from the United Nations."

"One rule shared by most successful people and nations is to never eternally invest in a concept, organization or philosophy to the extent that when that entity is drastically changed, or has become obsolete or corrupt, that you cannot pull out it," he said.

"In 1945, the United Nations was established with the main goal of maintaining international peace and security. What could go wrong with an idea like that? Well, here we are, and not only has the U.N. concept gone wrong, but it has, in the opinion of many, become corrupt to the very core."

Please help us get the cartel of globalists, terrorism appeasers and Israel haters off our soil. Get the U.S. out of the U.N. and the U.N. out of the U.S. Stand up for American independence and the security of our allies!
H.R.193 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

Religious leaders indict U.N. as 'anti-Christian'

Report: Kerry, Palestinians held 'secret meetings'

Huckabee: Take money from U.N. for U.S. soldiers

'War' coming between U.S., U.N.

 U.N. leader blames 'Islamophobia' for rising global terror

Parents: Tell Trump you oppose U.N. takeovers

Trump's next target: The U.N.

I am a long-time supporter of and contributor to the Heritage Foundation.

On the same subject as my previous email, please see the articles regarding what caused the refugee crisis (including freeloaders posing as "refugees" and muslims whose goal is to convert our Western countries to Sharia while living on welfare.

Please note that I do not support acts of war against Syria, especially without the consent of Congress, without even an investigation into who actually had fired the sarin or chlorine gases. Was U.S. national security in jeopardy? What great U.S. national interest(s) was at stake? Removing Assad will lead to utter chaos, making Syria into another Iraq or Libya after the removal of Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi, respectively, resulting in even more refugees unleashed on Europe and America [Gaddafi told us that he was holding the Jihadis in check there, but if we killed him then we would have to deal with them in the West, but we didn't believe him -- or didn't care]. This is not a way to Make America Great Again. You used the brutalization of little Syrian children as your pretext to fire 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at Syria, which also killed civilians, including children (talk about overkill). If you really care about little children, please do something about Pizzagate in America's own backyard.

Please see the articles below -- in particular, "In the Wake of US Airstrikes, A Message to President Trump From Homs, Syria...", in which a non-Jihadi Syrian explains how missile strikes are hurting non-violent Syrians. The Syrians who praised you for the attack are the Jihadis and others who support ISIS, al Queda and al Nusra, as well as Sharia law.

The Syrian people elected Assad, and it's up to them to determine who their president is -- not the US, Saudi Arabia or Israel. Also, Assad protects his Christian minorities (who like and support him), unlike Obama, Hillary, and other Western leaders.

Incidents involving chemical warfare should be properly investigated before deciding upon a course of action such as missile attacks and starting wars, toppling governments, etc. Please keep in mind that the Deep State has a history of manufacturing false flags justify overthrowing sovereign countries' governments.

[Please search on internet for: Wolfowitz Doctrine; Gen. Wesley Clark about how the US is going to overthrow 7 countries in 5 years (they did, just like the General foretold); Bilderberg; NWO; one world government; one world religion; CFR; US installed puppet regime; interventionalism; imperialism; Syria Debacle: CIA-Armed Militia Are Shooting Pentagon-Armed Militia; False Flags; Confessions of an Economic Hit Man: How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions; (Confessions of an Economic Hitman is about how the US also overthrows countries economically, and uses economic warfare against them, in addition to direct military force, the way they are using in Syria, Afghanistan and other countries. Note that the CIA has US troops protecting their opium crops in Afghanistan, which the Taliban has been trying to destroy (the Taliban is actually against addiction to opium, but the drug trade is a main source of money for the Deep State and Black Ops. See articles below); Libya Airstrikes: The Women Who Called for War; The FBI Just Indicted Hillary Clinton over Libyan War Crimes; Michael Savage: 'Muslim Sisterhood' runs White House; The explosive secret Huma is hiding; Hillary's top aide with terror ties saw all emails - WND; Manifesto puts Hillary chief in Saudi plot; Obama's Women Advisers Pushed War Against Libya; ]

The UN Is Determined To Swallow America And Its Wealth
Sep 13, 2017 Read More Articles by Ron Ewart [https://newswithviews.com/author/ronewart/]

Ever since President Wilson's failed League of Nations, to the United Nations (UN) created in 1945 after World War 2, an international movement has been underway to merge all nations into one-world-government under the umbrella of the United Nations and the iron fist of the world's central bankers. Although the original intent of a United Nations organization was to promote international cooperation, maintain world order and prevent war, the UN has assumed powers and has instituted international policies that virtually strip the sovereignty of member states, including the United States, but has not stopped wars.


Most of the policies the UN promotes and attempts to implement internationally, are based on socialist and Karl Marx principles. Its alleged objectives are to promote human rights, foster social and economic development, protect the environment and provide humanitarian aid in cases of famine, natural disasters, or armed conflict. The UN, for all intent and purposes, has become an international body that tries to enforce those socialist policies on all member states across the globe. America capitulates to the policies of the UN, while the rest of the countries, like Russia and China, thumb their noses at them. We "pay," while the two other super powers get off scot-free and then get in our way when we try to use the UN to perform its stated objectives.

It must be remembered that most of the member states to the UN are either the poorest of the poor, or run by dictators and despots, Russia and China included. The small ones beg at the door of the UN for money (our money) and aid (or special favors) and the UN gives it to them at our expense. The two other super powers manipulate and exploit UN weaknesses for their own self-interests. Climate change is just another way of the UN re-distributing the western world's wealth to the rest of the member states.

The total annual budget of the UN is well in excess of $5 billion. Twenty-four (24) member states, out of a total of 193, provide 87% of the funding for the UN, with the United States providing 22% of that 87%. America's share is well over $1 billion.

What does the United States get for that hefty contribution to the UN?

The UN gave us Agenda 21 wherein Agenda 21's policies can be summarized thusly:

"Agenda 21 is a non-binding, voluntarily implemented action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development. It is a product of the Earth Summit (UN Conference on Environment and Development) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. It is an action agenda for the UN, other multilateral organizations, and individual governments around the world that can be executed at local, national, and global levels."

Sidebar: Several years ago we asked seven environmental groups the meaning of sustainable development and got seven different answers.

Voluntary! Non-binding! Hardly? The United States has implemented most of Agenda 21 wholesale and the American people had no say in the decision. But the above definition belies the underlying intent of Agenda 21 and that is government owning and controlling all land. This "intent" has been publicly promoted in the following UN statement:

"Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. Social justice, urban renewal and development, the provision of decent dwellings-and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole."

Contrast this with Thomas Jefferson's statement on American land ownership:

 "The right to procure property and to use it for one's own enjoyment is essential to the freedom of every person, and our other rights would mean little without these rights of property ownership."

It doesn't stop with UN's control of the land. The UN wants to control all money, trade, fresh water, food, health care, the environment, the climate, the sea and establish an international army on a global scale. In effect, the UN wants to become the world government to which all other governments must bow down.

The UN's Agenda 21 policy is a direct threat to American sovereignty. Nevertheless past presidents and all American planning agencies have implemented those policies without a treaty being debated and ratified by Congress as required by the Constitution. Agenda 21 has been instituted in America in violation of the law and by stealth and the slight of hand, all at the direction of national and international environmentalists and socialists in bed with the UN.

What else has the UN imposed on the United States?

  An overt and covert socialist influence on our public schools.
  Massive UN and member state corruption
  Attacks on free enterprise and capitalism
  Interference in our elections (and you thought that just the Russians interfered in our elections)
  Propping up brutal dictators
  Promotes spending trillions of dollars to battle alleged climate change with no appreciable benefit (billions of American dollars)

Then there are UN Security Council Resolutions in their attempts to maintain world order and prevent war. The UN has passed worthless resolutions sanctioning Saddam Hussein's Iraq, Iran, Syria and North Korea. In every case, the sanctioned nations have ignored the resolutions and have proceeded down the path of nuclear proliferation or continued to gas or kill their own people.

Where are we now with UN sanctions? Saddam Hussein continued to gas and kill his own people in violation of numerous UN resolutions and thousands of Americans died stopping him. Dictator Basar Al Assad of Syria has gassed his people on multiple occasions.  Iran and North Korea are still expanding their nuclear super weapons and missile technology while telling the UN where to get off. Obama's Iran agreement is not worth the paper it is printed on.

War with North Korea becomes increasingly likely as Kim Jong Un continues to explode nuclear bombs and launch what could eventually be nuclear tipped Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles that could reach any part of America. He does it in the face of UN resolutions and sanctions. China has been no help and in fact has been a hindrance.

Russia, under X-KGB agent Vladimir Putin, has invaded sovereign territory in Ukraine and actually annexed parts of Georgia and all of Ukraine's Crimea. His troops are still in Eastern Ukraine. Neither America (Obama) or NATO didn't challenge him when he invaded Crimea and the UN stood by and did nothing.

China is claiming islands in international waters in the North China sea, setting up military air bases and ports in violation of international law. What has the UN or America done to stop the invasion?  Absolutely nothing!

The UN's attempt to maintain world order and prevent war is a miserable failure at the cost of over $5 Billion a year and over $1 Billion of American taxpayer dollars.

Both China and Russia sit on the UN five-member Security Council and can veto any UN resolution or action and yet China and Russia are open and notorious violators of international law and treaties. America has to immediately reduce its carbon emissions under the Paris Climate Accord but China, a larger polluter than America, doesn't have to start until 2030. That's fair, isn't it?

What good is an international body, like the United Nations, that purports to maintain order and stop wars when member states can blatantly ignore policies of that international body and small wars, that America is forced to fight, continue unabated? What has the UN done about Islamic terrorism? Nothing!

What American interests are served by being a member state of that body? What benefit does the American taxpayer get by paying over $1 Billion a year to an organization that does everything in its power to tear down American capitalism, free markets, sovereignty and freedom and instead implements policies that are contrary to American values? Why would anyone pay someone else to destroy their culture of freedom and put them in chains? Why indeed!

The United Nations has proven to be a toothless organization that sucks up billions of American dollars to pay a bunch of bureaucrats and diplomats to sit around twiddling their thumbs while "Rome Burns." If America continues its membership in the UN, it will swallow America in socialist swill and consume its wealth, its sovereignty and its freedom.

It is way past time for the United States of America to terminate its membership status in the UN and cease paying bribe money to an organization that would sooner see America as a third world country under the socialist thumb of an elite, international oligarchy, much like the European Union. The UN and the rest of the 192 other member states want American money and they want it re-distributed all around the world. After all, America has no right to be so rich.

To that end Congressman Mike Rogers of Alabama has introduced H. R. 193, the "American Sovereignty Restoration Act." This bill calls for withdrawing the United States from the United Nations and ceasing payments thereto. If the bill can make it to committee, it has a chance to expose the United Nations for the hopelessly corrupt organization it is and contrast UN socialist policies to American unalienable rights and individual freedom.

If enough Americans get behind this bill it might have a chance to make it to a floor vote, even though Democrats have shot down similar attempts at UN withdrawal.

A veteran freedom fighter, Tom DeWeese, has put together a Citizens Appeal for Legislative Action to support H. R. 193 and it is available on the American Policy Center website.

We urge our readers to take a look at Tom's "Citizens Appeal" and support his efforts. Tom and I gave back-to-back speeches at a freedom convention in Arizona several years ago. He has been a guest on many of the same talk shows we have been a guest. Tom has been a tireless fighter against Agenda 21 and UN actions and policies, while defending property rights and American sovereignty. His efforts are well known all across America. If there were many more Tom Deweeses, America wouldn't be in the dire straights it now finds itself.

Don't Arm Terrorists: Government Hates Competition
By Chris Campbell
Dec 16, 2016

--We don't talk crap about politicians here in our virtual pages because we hate politicians, per se. We talk crap about politicians because we hate war, love truth and believe principles are important.

The vast majority of politicians, on the other hand, tend to love war, hate truth and wouldn't know a principle if it underwrote the argument of kicking them in the cajones.

Hence, why we talk crap.

Some politicians, though, deserve at least a modicum of respect for being willing to stick their necks out and oppose that which is clearly wrong. Having a conscience in the midst of a black mass of mindless death wizards is no small feat.

One such politician, says our gut, is Democratic Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, whom, interestingly enough, according to a senior official on the Trump transition team, is "under serious consideration" for various cabinet positions, including secretary of state, secretary of defense, or United Nations ambassador.

Following their meeting last month at Trump Tower, the transition team official described the meeting to ABC as "terrific" and that they see her as very impressive.

A little background...

As a Captain in the U.S. Army National Guard, Gabbard was deployed twice overseas to the Middle East, including to Iraq in 2004. She now serves on the influential Armed Services and Foreign Affairs committees.

"House Democratic leadership," Daniel McAdams writes on the Ron Paul Institute blog, [http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2015/december/04/rep-tulsi-gabbard-is-overthrowing-the-syrian-government-worth-risking-nuclear-war-with-russia/] "may have thought seating a female combat veteran on these committees would add a politically-useful militaristic voice to their stable. If that is the case, they miscalculated in a big way.

"Rep. Gabbard," McAdams goes on, "first raised eyebrows... when she began to openly question President Obama's Middle East policies, and particularly his 'Assad must go' policy in Syria. It is unusual for a first-term Member of Congress to take such a public position in opposition to a sitting president in her own party  --  particularly if she has any interest in continuing her political career."

But she hasn't once backed down.

Last year, on CNN's Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer, when asked if Obama should be sending more troops to Iraq and Syria, Rep. Gabbard said:

The United States should not be in a nation-building mission... A large contingent of 10,000 or 100,000 regular U.S. ground troops or an occupying force in Iraq... would be counterproductive to us achieving our mission of defeating ISIS. It would play directly into their rhetoric of saying this is a war between Islam and the west.

Blitzer then asked her if the U.S. learned anything from the massive mistakes in Iraq. She responded:

No. And the reason for this is that after Iraq, the United States went ahead and did the very same thing in Libya, overthrowing Gaddafi. Now, ISIS is growing in strength, has a stronghold in Libya today with plans to continue to expand. And what's even crazier is that now the United States policy is looking to do the very same thing once again in Syria with this focus and determination on overthrowing the Syrian government of Assad which will only serve to make ISIS stronger.

If Syria is overthrown, ISIS (alongside, of course, the U.S.-funded "moderate rebels", al Nusra and al Queda) will, she said, "walk in the front door, take over all of Syria, and pose that greater threat to the region and increase the humanitarian crisis there ten-fold."

The proper way to analyze the situation in Syria, Nassim Taleb says in his latest Medium article [https://theinternationalreporter.org/2016/12/16/nassim-taleb-the-syrian-war-condensed-for-almost-dummies/] The Syrian War Condensed (For Almost Dummies), "is to look at the factions comparatively. You do not compare Assad's regime to the Danish or Norwegian governments, but to the alternative. The question becomes if there is anything in the left column that is worse than the right column?"

See "Some Pictures, Videos & Articles of Countries Before and After Islamization" (without the quotes) below.

Hmmm. Let's see...

"Regarding foreign policy," Patrick Henningsen points out in 21st Century Wire, "Gabbard's stance on Syria is remarkable, and holds great potential for a resolution to the 5-year conflict (not a civil war), as well as a chance to make positive inroads with Russia and other countries who have been perennial foes of both the Obama and Bush Administrations. Because of this, Gabbard has many enemies from on both the Republicans and Democratic chambers alike. Washington, with all of its untoward influence from the cartel of military defense contractor giants, and foreign lobbies like Israel and Saudi Arabia, will not go quietly overnight."

So what happened during her meeting with Trump? In her words:

"I shared with him my grave concerns that escalating the war in Syria by implementing a so-called no fly/safe zone would be disastrous for the Syrian people, our country, and the world. It would lead to more death and suffering, exacerbate the refugee crisis, strengthen ISIS and al-Qaeda and bring us into a direct conflict with Russia--potentially resulting in a nuclear war. We discussed my bill to end our country's illegal war to overthrow the Syrian government and the need to focus our precious resources on rebuilding our own country, and on defeating al-Qaeda, ISIS, and other terrorist groups who pose a threat to the American people."

If Trump is serious about wanting diplomacy and peace, Gabbard would at least be a step in the right direction.

[Sidenote: Unfortunately, she's no Ron Paul. Says Robert Wenzel: "She is not anti-war. She wants to fight Middle East terrorists real bad. She is more logical than most U.S. Empire killers but she is not against the killing. Just more focused killing."]

Her latest piece of legislation, The Stop Arming Terrorists Act, speaks for itself:

"If you or I," she said recently on the House floor, "gave money, weapons or support to al-Qaeda or ISIS, we would be thrown in jail. Yet the U.S. government has been violating this law for years, quietly supporting allies and partners of al-Qaeda, ISIL, Jabhat Fateh al Sham and other terrorist groups with money, weapons, and intelligence support, in their fight to overthrow the Syrian government.

"The CIA has also been funneling weapons [http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/world/middleeast/arms-airlift-to-syrian-rebels-expands-with-cia-aid.html] and money [http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/24/world/middleeast/us-relies-heavily-on-saudi-money-to-support-syrian-rebels.html] through Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and others who provide direct and indirect support to groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda. This support has allowed al-Qaeda and their fellow terrorist organizations to establish strongholds throughout Syria, including in Aleppo."

See the rest of her speech right here at this link.

Anything peaceful,

Chris Campbell
Managing editor, Laissez Faire Today

Arms Airlift to Syria Rebels Expands, With Aid From C.I.A.

U.S. Relies Heavily on Saudi Money to Support Syrian Rebels

VIDEO: Rep. Tulsi Gabbard introduces legislation to stop arming terrorists

Palestinians: The "Ugly Crime" of a School Curriculum
by Bassam Tawil *  March 1, 2018 at 5:00 am

  A recent study of Palestinian textbooks found that Palestinian children are being taught to glorify and value terrorism and violence. The Palestinian Authority and its Minister of Education, Sabri Saidam, want Arab schools in Jerusalem to teach the students why Muslims should be killing Jews.

  "Within the pages of the textbooks, children are being taught to be expendable. Messages such as: 'The Volcano of My Revenge'; 'The Longing of my Blood for my Land'; and 'I Shall Sacrifice My Blood to Saturate the Land' suffuse the [Palestinian] curriculum. Math books use numbers of dead martyrs to teach arithmetic. The vision of an Arab Palestine includes the entirety of what is now Israel, defined as the '1948 Occupied Territories.'"  --  IMPACT-se.

  How come the Arab citizens of Israel have never complained about the Israeli educational system? The answer is because they evidently like the education that Israel has been offering them. It teaches them to value life, freedom of speech and democracy, and Arab Israelis admire it. They love the education Israel offers them because it does not demonize any race or group of people. They love it because it does not teach them to kill Jews, but to live with them in peace and security. This is the truth that the Palestinian Authority does not want to hear. This is the truth that it does not want the rest of the world to hear.

"Within the pages of the [Palestinian Authority] textbooks, children are being taught to be expendable. Messages such as: 'The Longing of my Blood for my Land'; and 'I Shall Sacrifice My Blood to Saturate the Land'". (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Palestinian Authority (PA) Minister of Education, Sabri Saidam, is worried these days. He is not worried, he says, because Palestinian schoolchildren are being taught to hate Israel. He is not worried because Palestinian schoolchildren are being goaded by their leaders to carry out terror attacks against Jews, from stone-throwing to stabbings to ramming cars.

The PA minister of Education is worried, he says, about a "crime" that is about to be committed against Arab children in Jerusalem schools. The "crime," in his view, is that the children will be taught according to an Israeli, and not a Palestinian, curriculum.

Saidam sees the decision to apply the Israeli curriculum to Arab schools in Jerusalem as an "ugly crime of counterfeit." These are the exact words he used to denounce the decision to introduce the Israeli curriculum into Arab schools.

Continue Reading Article
======================= BEGIN: Some Pictures, Videos & Articles of Countries Before and After Islamization =========================

Comparison between Assad Regime and Moderate Rebels

Iranian Women Before and After 1978 Revolution:

Iran and Afghanistan before and after their Muslim takeovers

Syria Used to be Developed

Picture from Islamic Instruction Manual Shows How to Tie Up and Bind a Woman Just Prior to Stoning Her to Death. What More Do You Need to Convince You That Islam is Evil?

Iran 1970 vs 2009

Iran - Before & After the Islamic Revolution
In 1979:

1958, when Muslims laughed at the idea of imposing the hijab to women

"This shocked me the most  --  --  almost all Muslim countries were completely different long ago then they are now  --  --  "

This is what civilization Jihad really is: These before and after Islamization pictures are chilling

Iranian Revolution 1979 Iran (Middle East)
Change -- Revolutions The Iranian Revolution - ppt video online download

Modern Iran 1951 - Today

The 20 th Century in IRAN A Brief History. Constitutional Revolution Before the 1920s, Iran was ruled by various dynasties During WWI, Iran occupied by. - ppt download

Iran before islamic revolution and after - Shit Happens by novadragon79 - Meme Center

What Countries Look Like Before And After Islam [PHOTOS]
A Picture = 1000 Words; Should we be worried? Iran 1979 vs 2012; Afghanistan 1970 vs 2011; London 1980 vs 2012; Iraq 2014;

History of Iran Essential Question How has the relationship between the U.S. and Iran become what it is today - ppt video online download
Replaced pro-Western government with one that did not like the West; started executing women who did not cover their heads; claims that "people" wanted this (i.e., the Islamic fundamentalists wanted it). Mossadeq was friendly to the US, but the CIA didn't want him to also be friendly to Russia so the CIA sponsored a coup to overthrow him, and this led to Iran being controlled by a leader who hates the US and the West. [See Wolfowitz Doctrine (the US never wants Russia or China to be rivals again, so the US overthrows countries whose governments are friendly to these countries and replaces with ones hostile to them -- even if the countries are then hostile to the US also.]

Middle East Iran had been in a state of instability since 1951 It had once been a British colony, but in 1941 the British "withdrew" and placed the Shah
1 Middle East Iran had been in a state of instability since 1951 It had once been a British colony, but in 1941 the British "withdrew" and placed the Shah in power The British owned the main oil company in Iran and profited from it greatly The Iranian citizens were tired of being poor and wanted control of the company
2 Middle East First Truman, then Eisenhower fear that the struggling company would turn communist [actually, they were worried that it might also be friendly towards Russia - See Wolfowitz Doctrine]. The CIA staged a coup to overthrow the government They gave Mohammad Reza Pahlavi many supplies such as guns, trucks, and radio communications in 1953 so the Iranian rebels could overthrow the current government. After the coup the United States & Britain split most of the Oil profits.
3 Suez Crisis Was a military confrontation between Egypt and Britain, France, and Israel in 1956 The United States and the Soviet Union both supported Egypt. Israel invaded Egypt in 1956 in order to gain control of the Suez canal. They then received support from the British and French. The British and France wanted to remove Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser from power in order to place a leader in there more friendly toward them.

[Please search on internet for: Wolfowitz Doctrine; Gen. Wesley Clark about how the US is going to overthrow 7 countries in 5 years (they did, just like the General foretold); Bilderberg; NWO; one world government; one world religion; CFR; US installed puppet regime; interventionalism; imperialism; Syria Debacle: CIA-Armed Militia Are Shooting Pentagon-Armed Militia; False Flags; Confessions of an Economic Hit Man: How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions; (Confessions of an Economic Hitman is about how the US also overthrows countries economically, and uses economic warfare against them, in addition to direct military force, the way they are using in Syria, Afghanistan and other countries. Note that the CIA has US troops protecting their opium crops in Afghanistan, which the Taliban has been trying to destroy (the Taliban is actually against addiction to opium, but the drug trade is a main source of money for the Deep State and Black Ops. See articles below); Libya Airstrikes: The Women Who Called for War; The FBI Just Indicted Hillary Clinton over Libyan War Crimes; Michael Savage: 'Muslim Sisterhood' runs White House; The explosive secret Huma is hiding; Hillary's top aide with terror ties saw all emails - WND; Manifesto puts Hillary chief in Saudi plot; Obama's Women Advisers Pushed War Against Libya; ]

Cold War Divides the World How is the Middle East influenced by the Superpowers - ppt download
2. US tries to influence Iran 1941: Mohammed Reza Pahlavi becomes Shah after his father's death, embraces west, secular ideas & oil companies 1951: Muhammad Mossadeq is elected Prime Minister, he is backed by Iranian nationalists & Ayatollahs (religious leaders). Mossadeq nationalizes Iran's oil fields, gets rid of Pahlavi 1953: Worried Soviets may gain influence in Iran, CIA sponsors a counter-coup that removes Mossadeq & puts Pahlavi back as Shah. Shah begins to weaken the Ayatollahs' powers 1978-79: Ayatollah Khomeini starts a revolution & Shah is overthrown, Khomeini creates Islamic theocracy. Islamic students storm US embassy and hold Americans hostage for 444 days. Overthrown!
4. Iran/Iraq War Worried Soviets will support Iran, US supports Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein Hussein had established a secular government and was cracking down on Iraqi communists 1980: Iraq goes to war against Iran, US sends weapons (including poison gas) to Hussein Fearing Hussein could gain too much power US secretly sends weapons to Iran during the war, which lasts from 1980-1988 Soviets Invade Afghanistan Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev puts puppet Communist Gov in Afghanistan 1979:Islamic revolution begins against Communist Gov, rebels winning
5.Soviets expect easy win, but struggle against Islamic guerilla rebels called the Mujahideen Dec 1979: Soviet Union invades Afghanistan US begins aiding Mujahideen -- Pres Carter cuts off grain to USSR & boycotts Olympics Soviet economy is struggling because of the cost of the war. Soviets also losing the war-- Soviets withdraw in 1989 After war, US doesn't send any more aid to Afghanistan. Mujahideen splits into two groups Taliban & Northern Alliance each try to win control

Face It: Islam is Evil

Is islam the religion of peace?

Truth about Crusades

Islam in Schools

Jesus vs Mohammed

Bible vs Koran

Muslims are not happy, but come here and want to change it to be like the country where they were not happy

Illegal Immigration Penalties in Other Countries

Illegals cost 10X what Great Wall of China cost in just 1 year

When more than half the country refuse to work and demand the others take care of them, it's end of country

Islam and the Oppression of Women

White Liberals are only group of people ignorant enough to defend Islam who wants to destroy them

This moron won't stand for the national anthem because he's protesting the way Black people are treated in America. But he converted to Islam even though 30 million Black people are held in slavery today in Muslim countries.

The Koran Taught Me to Hate
Imam Siraj Wahhaj (in Charlotte, NC), says it is the duty of Muslims to replace the US Constitution with the Quran. He is endorsed by the DNC.

Parents shocked when they found Islamic teachings in their children's homework. Going further than just teaching about Islam, they are teaching children tenets of Islam as though it is fact! F**K COMMON CORE!

Never buy Halal - it supports jihad (terrorism)!

Islam and coexistence is a oxymoron. help the persecuted christians: www.opendoors.org

This is an administration so one-sidedly pro-Islamic that it refuses to tell the truth about people who are trying to kill us.  --  Newt Gingrich

Just Iran Old Days.. | Iran, Islamic and Revolution

Iran before and after - The Student Room

Beautiful IRAN before The Dark Revolution 1979
Iran in the 1970s before the Islamic Revolution
1963- Women gain the vote in Iran
Beautiful IRAN before The Dark Revolution 1979
Page F30 Iran in the 1970s before the Islamic Revolution  Persian  Pinterest  Iran, 1970s and Islamic
Saudi women in 1980 by the National Geographic
Beautiful IRAN before The Dark Islamic Revolution 1979
College students studying in library. Tehran 70s
Iranian Delegation and the International Council of Women
Miss Teen Iran Elaheh Azodi & Miss Teen World Finalists - 1968
Miss Teen Iran Elaheh Azodi & Miss Teen World Finalists - 1968 #Iran #Teen...  Persia  Pinterest  Iran, Iran tourism and Tehran iran
5.) Pre-Taliban Photo of Women in Afghanistan Looking Modern
Kabul University 1980s ... before the religious right took over  Afghanistan and Pakistan  Pinterest  Afghanistan and Photography
Something went terribly wrong... Women walking in the street in Kabul, Afghanistan, 1970s. Before the war. Before the Taliban.
Beautiful IRAN before The Dark Islamic Revolution 1979 - High school basketball team, Abadan, Iran (late 1960's)


Beyond the politics: The beauty of Iran in photos
Women pray during the Eid al-Fitr prayer in Tehran. Image: Ebrahim Noroozi/AP | www.piclectica.com #piclectica
Beautiful IRAN before The Dark Revolution 1979

Afghanistan Then and Now


This is Islam; kidnapped girl killed by her brother because she was forced to be a sex slave

Can a muslim be a good American?

Brigitte Gabriel Reads the Muslim Brotherhood Plan for America - YouTube

Ex-Muslim Woman Warns America, THEY'RE HERE TO KILL YOU!

Welcome to ACT for America
4 min video introduction to ACT for America by Brigitte Gabriel.

Sharia Hunting the Survivor to the West.
Global Faith Institute and 88 Tactical, Omaha, NE graciously hosted Aynaz Anni Cyrus at "The Real War on Women" seminar on Nov 14, 2017. Anni Cyrus of the Glazov Gang. A child bride in her home country of Iran, abused and imprisoned as a teen, she escaped to America and now advocates for women and girls, suffering under Sharia. Her mission is to bring hope and healing to women and girls who have been unfortunate enough to be exposed to the plague of Islamic ideology. She experienced, first hand, the horrors of living under Islamic theocracy in Iran. Please support The Glazov Gang because we are a fan-generated show and need your help to keep going. Make a contribution or set up a monthly pledge. Thank you! Generosity: https://igg.me/at/DYL9AKF-2-M PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/Glazovgang

Brigitte Gabriel Interview, A survivor of Islamic terror warns America!
While Brigitte Gabriel, President of ACT for America, and author of "They Must be Stopped" and "Because they Hate", was in Chicago, we had the opportunity to hear her story of living Under the bombs of terror in Lebanon growing up. Her story and survival clearly reveals that the hand of God has protected her. May you be inspired as you hear her story. Act for America website: www.actforamerica.org ACT! for America was founded by Brigitte Gabriel, a Lebanese immigrant who came to the United States after losing her country of birth to militant Muslim fundamentalists during the Lebanese Civil War. ACT! for America is a non-partisan, non-sectarian organization whose mission is to give Americans concerned about national security, terrorism, and the threat of radical Islam, a powerful, organized, informed and mobilized voice. Whether the specific threat is violent jihad, stealth jihad, the advance of sharia law, the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood, or the scourge of political correctness which is enabling the rise of radical Islam, ACT! for America stands ready to take action as the largest national security grassroots organization in America. Through informed community action, education, public policy initiatives and grassroots lobbying, ACT! for America is successfully combating the threat of radical Islam. Their Mission *  Create a nationwide network of chapters in order to more effectively inform, educate and mobilize Americans regarding the multiple threats of radical Islam, and what they can and must do to protect themselves and their country against this determined enemy. *  Through direct lobbying and grassroots action, speak out for public policies that protect our national security and our way of life. *  Arm activists with the information to get involved and take effective action. *  Hold our elected representatives accountable by educating voters as to how their representatives vote on issues of importance in the fight against radical Islam. *  Develop coalitions with like-minded organizations to magnify our voice and increase our effectiveness. *  Fearlessly speak out in defense of America, Israel and Western civilization.

Brigitte Gabriel- Truth About Islam. Truth About Quran, Muhammad, & Allah. World Caliphate Coming. - YouTube
An Evening with Brigitte Gabriel, hosted by Ramona TEA'd that the Ramona Mainstage, August 2, 2012.

Brigitte Gabriel EXPOSES Obama/Muslim Brotherhood

The Muslim Brotherhood in American Schools | Brigitte Gabriel

Disturbing textbooks [Syn: Islam in Schools; ]

Brigitte Gabriel On Reason Why Muslims Won't Assimilate Into Western Culture

Brigitte Gabriel Radical Islam The Plan to Destroy America from Within Infiltration

Brigitte Gabriel on Rise of Radical Islam in France
Brigitte Gabriel on Rise of Radical Islam in France - YouTube (this imam is lying, the qur'an does command the death of those who abandon islam and for those who won't convert to islam). The imams are the ones telling muslims that it does, are therefore responsible for all of the 'apostacy' deaths.

One Muslim Family on Welfare

Brigitte Gabriel Reads the Muslim Brotherhood Plan for America
ACT for America president and founder Brigitte Gabriel, speaks at the Family Research Council's Watchmen on the Wall event about the threat of radical Islam. In this clip she outlines the Muslim Brotherhood's plan for the destruction of Western civilization. The Muslim Brotherhood has spawned dozens and dozens of organizations across the globe, including the terrorist organizations al Qaeda, Hamas, and numerous Muslim organizations in America. To learn more about this visit: http://bit.ly/MuslimBrotherhoodPlan To learn more about ACT for America visit: actforamerica.org

"You Are A LIAR!" Brigette Gabriel SHUTS UP Linda Sarsour On LIVE TV

Islam - The Undeniable Truth - A quick lesson in the history of Islam - WS 2015 Brigitte Gabriel

Brigitte Gabriel's brilliant Answer to "not all"- question

Brigitte Gabriel : 1400 shocking years of Islam in 5 minutes

Islam the Quran and the Bible

Religion of Peace: A Brief History of Islam - Brigitte Gabriel #islam #religionofpeace
Brigitte Gabriel gives a short history lesson about Islam at the Values Voter Summit in 2015. As usual she gives an impassioned speech about the dangers that Islam poses to the United States and the world. Here's the link to her full speech at the conference:
Brigitte Gabriel: Values Voter Summit 2015
Author Brigitte Gabriel speaks to the dangers of political correctness and the history of radical Islam at FRC Action's 10th annual Values Voter Summit hosted by FRC Action in Washington, DC.

Brigitte Gabriel's Urgent Election Message
http://www.actforamerica.org ACT for America is the nation's largest non-profit, non-partisan, grassroots national security organization with 300,000 members and more than 1,000 chapters around the country focused on educating, engaging, and mobilizing citizens and elected officials to impact legislative outcomes to protect America. We're committed to recruiting, training, and mobilizing citizens community by community to help protect and preserve American culture and to keep this nation safe. ACT for America stands ready to take effective action as the only national security grassroots organization in America. If each of us does just a little, together we can accomplish a lot. We are America.

Brigitte Gabriel on Obama
Brigitte Gabriel, author of the book, They Must Be Stopped, on the Bill Cunningham Show, June 7, 2009.
Jon Voight tells the truth about Obama. Wake up America.

A Christmas Message From Brigitte Gabriel

Woman Leaves Islam, After READING the Quran for Herself

Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of Islam

Brigitte Gabriel- Truth About Islam. Truth About Quran, Muhammad, & Allah. World Caliphate Coming.
Brigitte Gabriel- Truth About Islam. Truth About Quran, Muhammad, & Allah. World Caliphate Coming. Islam Seeks World Domination.

New London Mayor: Submit or You Will be Less Safe

"He Has No Business In America!" Brigette Gabriel DESTROY London Mayor Sadiq Khan
Brigette Gabriel goes Beastmode on London mayor" He has no business lecturing Americans.

Brainwashed Muslim Confronts Sam Harris, Gets OWNED

Smart Man DESTROYS Islam with Facts - Geert Wilders
Smart Man DESTROYS Islam with Facts. Geert Wilders vs Islam

Bridgitte Gabriel

Brigitte Gabriel gives FANTASTIC answer to Muslim woman claiming all Muslims are portrayed badly

A Call To Action by Brigitte Gabriel
Brigitte Gabriel speaks her mind: Terrorists are utterly contemptuous of all "infidels" (non-Muslims) and regard them as enemies worthy of death. Madrassas in America are increasing in number and they are just one part of a growing terrorist army on U.S. soil. Terrorists exploits the U.S. legal system and America's protection of religion to spread their hatred for Western values. America must organize a unified voice that says "enough" to political correctness, and demands that government officials and elected representatives do whatever is necessary to protect us. Brigitte Gabriel has fearlessly faced down critics, death threats, and political correctness, and is one of the most sought-after terrorism experts in the world. They Must Be Stopped is her clarion call to action. Gabriel thoroughly addresses the historical and religious basis of terrorism, its frightening encroachment into societies around the world, and its abuses of democracy in the name of religion. "Most experts agree that more than twenty percent of Muslims are radicals. It is practically impossible to identify this group from the seventy-five or eighty percent who are not radicals; impossible. So I'm going to give you an example." Ms. Gabriel continues, "Let's say twenty percent of Chinese people are infected with a disease that is fatal on contact; fatal on contact. Would we just continue to allow Chinese to enter America rather than be called Chinaphobic? Or would we take the sensible approach of halting Chinese entering the country until we can figure out some way to know who was the carrier of the disease that is fatal on contact? Such as suicide bombers or terrorists when it comes to the refugee population." "And we would want to check also," says Gabriel, the Chinese people who were already in the country to make sure they are not carriers of the disease. That would be the sensible thing to do to protect the country and protect Americans. That's why Trump's approach makes sense. He cares about protecting Americans more than about being called names. Let's start being sensible and stop this political correctness that's going to kill us." Brigitte Gabriel spoke before a audience about growing up in Lebanon and "witnessing the horror and terror this neo-jihad wreaks on civilizations, nations and societies." "After having lived in a bomb shelter for seven years, and having seen most of my childhood friends killed by Islamic militants, I understand from firsthand experience the chilling implications of this original jihad inspired by the Prophet Mohammed." Gabriel is the founder and president of ACT! for America and author of "Why Do They Hate? and "They Must Be Stopped."

Bill Warner, PhD: To Know Islam, Know Mohammed

Brigitte Gabriel - Origin of Islam

Brigitte Gabriel keynote speaker at United Nations

Brigitte Gabriel and Dave Rubin: Terrorism, The Muslim Brotherhood, and Linda Sarsour

Brigitte Gabriel - Because They Hate (Part 1)
September 27,, 2006 - Brigitte Gabriel talked about her book, Because They Hate: A Survivor of Islamic Terror Warns America, published by St. Martin's Press. She argued that the U.S. is facing total destruction at the hands of Muslims. The author, a Christian survivor of the civil war between Lebanese Christians and Muslims in the 1970s, described her own experiences to support both the profiling of Muslims and the ban of what she calls "hate education" in Islamic institutions. After her presentation she responded to audience members' questions.
mmary952 1 year ago
I am ex-muslim and I know everything Brigitte says is 100% true. God bless Brigitte Gabriel. She is loved and respected vastly.?

Brigitte Gabriel's Life Story is to Warn Americans
Brigitte Gabriel speaks her mind: Terrorists are utterly contemptuous of all "infidels" (non-Muslims) and regard them as enemies worthy of death. Madrassas in America are increasing in number and they are just one part of a growing terrorist army on U.S. soil. Terrorists exploits the U.S. legal system and America's protection of religion to spread their hatred for Western values. America must organize a unified voice that says "enough" to political correctness, and demands that government officials and elected representatives do whatever is necessary to protect us. Brigitte Gabriel has fearlessly faced down critics, death threats, and political correctness, and is one of the most sought-after terrorism experts in the world. They Must Be Stopped is her clarion call to action. Gabriel thoroughly addresses the historical and religious basis of terrorism, it's frightening encroachment into societies around the world, and its abuses of democracy in the name of religion. "Most experts agree that more than twenty percent of Muslims are radicals. It is practically impossible to identify this group from the seventy-five or eighty percent who are not radicals; impossible. So I'm going to give you an example." Ms. Gabriel continues, "Let's say twenty percent of Chinese people are infected with a disease that is fatal on contact; fatal on contact. Would we just continue to allow Chinese to enter America rather than be called Chinaphobic? Or would we take the sensible approach of halting Chinese entering the country until we can figure out some way to know who was the carrier of the disease that is fatal on contact? Such as suicide bombers or terrorists when it comes to the refugee population." "And we would want to check also," says Gabriel, the Chinese people who were already in the country to make sure they are not carriers of the disease. That would be the sensible thing to do to protect the country and protect Americans. That's why Trump's approach makes sense. He cares about protecting Americans more than about being called names. Let's start being sensible and stop this political correctness that's going to kill us." Brigitte Gabriel spoke before a audience about growing up in Lebanon and "witnessing the horror and terror this neo-jihad wreaks on civilizations, nations and societies." "After having lived in a bomb shelter for seven years, and having seen most of my childhood friends killed by Islamic militants, I understand from firsthand experience the chilling implications of this original jihad inspired by the Prophet Mohammed." Gabriel is the founder and president of ACT! for America and author of "Why Do They Hate? and "They Must Be Stopped." In February 2017, she said that she provided a "national security briefing" to President Trump, and met with him at the White House in March 2017.

Islamic Jihad - Brigette Gabrielle (1 of 8)
With strident confidence, American Congress for Truth founder Brigitte Gabriel rebukes the American public for being "weak, asleep or careless" in the face of Muslim terrorism. A Christian survivor of the extermination Lebanese Christians by the Muslim population in the 1970s, Gabriel leans on her own terrifying experiences to explain the very real threat of Islam (as a set of ideas) -- its imperialism, inherent bigotry, and violent nature.

Ex-Muslim talks about escaping Shariah law
Amani Mustafa talks about escaping Egypt as a Christian and how Islam does not understand human rights

Interview with Brigitte Gabriel
Brigitte Gabriel is a Lebanese American journalist, author and activist. She is the founder of the American Congress For Truth, an organization dedicated to educating the public about Islam. This is her interview at Duke University in 2004.

Former muslim testifies at the Senate against sharia law
Ramin Parsa
Published on Feb 13, 2017
For many years Islamic governments and organizations have been attempting to make sharia law(Islamic laws) legal and practical in the United States and Europe. These laws are completely contrary to the constitution, the Bill of rights and the declaration of independence. The western civilization must rise up and defend its values against foreign governments, organizations and entities that are trying to promote and establish laws that are not compatible with basics of human right. According the sharia law a woman's intellect is half of a man, a woman's testimony in the court worth half of a man, a woman's inheritance is half of a man. Person that converts from Islam to any other religion is punishable by death etc In this senate hearing a former muslim testifies against sharia law in the senate against sharia law and expose the atrocities committed under sharia law. He has lived under sharia law, he has first hand experience about how life would be under sharia law. Most of sharia law advocates come in the name of religion and 1st amendment right. But this is a trick. sharia law is hiding behind religion and trying to get rights that come with religion.Refugee Crisis has happened as result of implementation of sharia law. Our very freedom is at stake. we need to speak out. we need to fight for our freedom. we need to fight for our democracy.

99.99999997% of all Muslims have Never Seen This [Dr. James White]
Clip taken from "Dr. James White - Islam A-Z (1/2)":

Daughter of Hamas Sheikh Tells Her Life Story
Maya was the Daughter of a high ranking Hamas Sheikh. Watch as Maya tells her riveting life story of suffering and redemption including her rescue through Yad L'Achim. Please help rescue other women like Maya by visiting http://bit.ly/SUPPORT-Yad-LAchim

Why We Are Afraid, A 1400 Year Secret, by Dr Bill Warner
Learn more about this topic. Go to my website bookstore http://www.politicalislam.com/shop/ to find short books that make islamic doctrine easy for everyone to understand.

Dr. Bill Warner - The True History of Muslim Conquests - Hour 1
Bill Warner holds a PhD in physics and math, NC State University, 1968. He has been a university professor, businessman, and applied physicist. Dr. Warner founded the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) and is its director. He has produced a dozen books, including a Koran, a biography of Mohammed and a summary of the political traditions of Mohammed. He also developed the first self-study course on Political Islam. He has given talks nationally and internationally about Islamic political doctrine. We begin by diving headfirst into the history of Islam. Bill differentiates between the historical Muhammad and the Muhammad of the Quran. Unbeknownst to many, Muhammad spent much of his life as a politician and jihadist, and was involved in many assassinations. Bill reminds us that jihad is not only of the sword, but also of of the tongue and pen -- meaning that Islam's war against the West is being waged on the cultural/political level as well. We also detail the process by which Islam subjugates non-Muslims after they have been conquered. In the members' hour, we discuss Islam's historical intolerance of other religions and cultures. Bill reminds us that much of the Middle East and North Africa were Christian prior to the spread of Islam, and that the crusades were in reality a reaction to this encroachment. We also touch upon the myth of the Islamic "Golden Age." We then shift the conversation toward more contemporary issues, such as the current threat Islam poses to the West and how political correctness prevents people from discussing this pressing issue. In conclusion, Bill argues that people need to simply tell the truth about Islam and stop worrying about being called "racists" or "Islamophobes." Guest's website: https://politicalislam.com Listen to the second hour of this show and get full access to our archives at http://redicemembers.com Subscribe and stream or download over 1000 programs, videos, films, Insight episodes, Red Ice TV & Weekend Warrior.

Raw video from our archives. Pamela Geller at the Tennessee Inaugural TEA Party Convention, May 23, 2010: "THE THREAT OF ISLAM"

Banned! Speech for ZOA: Pamela Geller speaks after Jewish Federation LA caves to Islamic demands

The Right Side - The Threat of Radical Islam

The Truth About Islam: An Interview With Brigitte Gabriel

Brigitte Gabriel: Islam Unveiled (1 of 8)

Pamela Geller Speaks at Brooklyn College, Speech, Q&A

Banned Speech at the Hyatt: Pamela Geller, "Truth is the New Hate Speech"
Pamela Geller speaks to the Sugar Land Tea Party in Sugar Land, Texas. This event was originally to be held at the HyattPlace in Sugar Land but was canceled with less than 30 hours notice after the hotel received one email threatening to protest her appearance. The event was relocated to the Sugar Land Community Center.

Islamic Rise of Radical Islam - Hannity Special - FULL
Civilization Jihad - We Entering Phase 6 of the Islamic Caliphate, which only has 7 Phases. Total Confrontation! Sean Hannity hosts this hour long special devoted to the Rise of Radical Islam. Special guests include David Webb, Brigitte Gabriel, Ryan Mauro, Lisa Daftari, Pamela Geller, and Zainab Kahn.

Islam Exposed a.k.a. "The Basics of islam" by Robert Spencer 13 talking points

Islam Exposed [collection] (2017)

US Woman Leaving Islam Exposes Dark Truth || Louder

Why does the church keep the victory of the Crusades a secret? by Dr Bill Warner
What are they ashamed you will find out? What you need to know is here. How could they want to keep the shedding of innocent blood a secret. When they are the ones that stopped it? What is so heienous in this story that they will not tell it? What disgusted King Richard so much after he took The city he never went in? He just sailed back to England. If I wanted to start some where I would start right here on this Video and do my research from here. This is the best compilation in short term I could find. Go the Dr Bills website and get more. This was done so much better than anything I could explain we posted it so you could go from here to their channel and get more of the story.... This will probably be enough..

The Truth About The Crusades
MP3: https://www.fdrpodcasts.com/#/3153/the-truth-about-the-crusades
Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/stefan-molyneux/fdr-3153-truth-about-crusades
Were the Crusades an unprovoked act of aggression on behalf of bloodthirsty Christians? Did the First Crusade mark the beginning of close to a millennium of hostility between Christianity and Islam, or did the conflict begin centuries earlier? Stefan Molyneux takes a closer look at the historical background of the Crusades and presents shocking information that is often hidden from the general population. What is the truth about the origins of the Crusades?

The Real History of The Crusades

The Truth About Crusades | Robert Spencer

The Roman Catholic and Islamic Connection
What is the connection between Roman Catholicism and Islam? Why do they both venerate Mary? Why do so called "apparitions of Mary" happen mainly to Catholics and Muslims? Did the Vatican create Islam? Find out in this interesting video.

Three Quran Verses Every Christian Should Know (David Wood)

DISCOVERY: Oldest Quran Found Has Little Similarity To Modern Version

Dr. James White mentioned that he did not have time to go through the transmission of the New Testament, so here is a video of his explanation: https://youtu.be/LuiayuxWwuI

man who shot 4 marines in TN was a 'refugee'

'Religion of Peace' doesn't mean what you think it does

Muslims must kill nonbelievers

Old Iran

Various countries before and after Islam

Iran When Evil comes to town Before Sharia and After the "Revolution" in 1979  The Muslim Issue

Iran Before Revolution

Afghanistan - backwards, not progressing forward for better life
afghan women
Una chica americana y otra de afganistan lamentando su pérdida.
This woman is being buried in preparation to stone her to death. Her terror and agony are unspeakable.
Socialism vs Capitalism
Hitler was a socialist

Muslims own over 27 million black slaves today

Carter banned Muslims but liberals said nothing

How real presidents deal with radical muslims

White Slaves by Muslims
If you think the Civil War was "JUST" about Slavery--you were poorly educated. And if you think Islam is the Religion of Peace---again, you were poorly educated.

The One Question Every Citizen in a Sanctuary City is Asking

Obama forgot about this law...... Islam, by law, is prohibited from US immigration. The Immigration and Nationality Act, passed June 27, 1952, revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationalilty for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by "force, violence, or other unconstitutional means." This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House. Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law, and the Hadith all require submission to Islam, which is antithethical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life's guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the politically correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a "religion" [it's actually an all-encompassing ideology, including a form of government -- political Islam -- that seeks to control every aspect of not only Muslims', but non-Muslims', lives, every minute of the day]. Whether or not it is a religion (also) is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any "organization" that advocates the overthrow of our government are probibited. -- Written by Sherrie Lynn Aldrich

Socialism vs Capitalism

Percentage of Illegals on Welfare

Canadian Citizens vs illegal muslims benefits

What real refugees look like

Islam is not allowed in the USA! 1952 McCarran Walters Act, revised and affirmed 1965, is the LAW and is still active and on the books.

Illegal Alien Facts

How Real Presidents Deal With Islam - Jefferson

Why Terrorists are not kidnapping Russians

Obama's Hitler Youth

NWO Stalin acts of terror to gain control of people

Obama's aunt living off taxpayers while Obama is a multimillionaire and never gave her (or his brother) a dime

Obama had all of his records sealed

Patriotism means to stand by the country - not any public official

Hillary sold nuclear materials to Soviets


If the government says you don't need a gun, you need a gun

Nooooo - I get PRIVATE insurance. Obamacare is for the peasants

We have to let the 'Syrians' in before we can tell who are terrorists

Snowden told on Obama and had to leave country. She refused to tell and got $3557.69 a week paid vacation

This man says he has the right to kill ANY American that HE decides is a threat, without any trial or rights, [national defense authorization act / NDAA] yet he bends over backwards to ensure the trial rights of Islamic terrorists who slaugther innocent Americans. Are you still wondering whose side he is on?

$1.3B spent on welfare under Obama

While we're supposed to cut back, Obama & wife spent $1.4B of OUR money on themselves

How many Islamic Terrorists does it take to destroy the greatest country in the World -- Just one

During the hostage crisis, Jimmy Carter banned Iranians & Shiite Muslims from entering the US, had the FBi re-evaluate those within our borders, and then deported Shiite & Iranian students -- NO liberals called him "racist".

Hey Eric Holder: Please explain to Nelson Mandela how voter ID is 'racist' (Mandela wearing a shirt that says 'Get an ID. Register. Vote.') South Africa requires photo ID to Register AND vote. If it was fair enough for Nelson Mandela, why isn't it fair enough for Democrats?

Clinton Body Count. Clintons: "I see dead people."

"How many Americans have to die before Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton decide they can tell the truth about the threat to the United States from Islamic supremacists?" - Newt Gingrich

Commited acts of espionage and treason, giving nuclear secrets to the soviets. Executed for their crimes. Clintons sold muclear materials to the Soviets including weapon grade yellow cake uranium that terrorists may use. Still running free.

Shahram Amiri, Iranian scientist secretly providing intelligence to US about Iranian nuclear weapons program. Hillary told 'staffers' in emails and I was executed on 8-7-16. Remember that on election day.

Rewarding illegal aliens with citizenship is unfair to immigrants who followed our laws and waited their turn

NWO written in 1989

NWO: Who rules the world
NWO Hitler was a Rothschild


NWO lies, false history, corporation

Killed by Illuminati

Buddhists on Islam

Churchill on Islam

Why they killed Muammar Gaddfi [syn: Ghaddafi]

Immigration / Only select Immigrants who will assimilate - Teddy Roosevelt [Islam]

Obama $1.3T in Welfare

NWO Your Birth Certificate is collateral

The Obama administration murdered over 20 Navy Seals in a rigged helicopter explosion (they knew that they didn't kill Osama bin Laden and it was all a hoax).
The CIA created, funded and is still using al Queda and ISIS to keep America in perpetual wars overthrowing foreign governments

US Arming Terrorists all over the world, but trying to take guns away from US Citizens


Teaching math 50 years

We are not each other enemies (class warfare by government to keep us fighting against each other instead of noticing what they are doing to us:

White Slaves by Muslims


Rules of Communism

Jefferson - democracy ceases to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work to give to those who would not


What happens after you're offended?



Carter banned muslims

White Liberals are only group of people ignorant enough to defend Islam who wants to destroy them

How Teachers in Israel Protect Students vs How America Protects School Children

Do Gun Free Zones Work?
The One Question Every Citizen in a Sanctuary City is Asking

The State must declare the child to be the precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived to be working for the children, people will happily endure the curailment of liberty - Hitler (Mein Kampf)
Bin Laden
Bin Laden was CIA agent in 1980s
Rothschild controls president



Socialism (Reagan)
socialism welcome to the Republican party
Before & After Feminist Movement

Poor people have been voting Democrat for 50 years and they're still poor

Liberal: we need to find ISIS jobs

NWO Slaves Rod Serling

know your civics rights

Reagan Socialism

NWO Rothschild

How to Reform Islam
Turkey did this for 90 years guys, for 90 years turkey had reformed islam, created moderate and secular muslims. Turkey even had military to defend secularism but one islamist government was enough to convert millions of those moderate muslims into islamist ones in 7-8 years. Yes, million of people are brainwashed into islamism.
Take a peek at this short video:
Do you see the nonhijabi old lady with glasses? She was the islam professor in secular turkey and here in video she is discussing with islamist hijabi woman why turkey's reformed islam interpretation is the correct one, why hijab is redundant in today's world and so on. And guess what happened to that professor? She got murdered by islamists in Turkey.
Yeah go for it guys, keep embracing secular and reformed islam rather than telling the truth about it. The result won't be any different than that of Turkey's case.
Ps: these are female imam schools teachers from turkey, yes they were not hijabi and wearing skirts:
... (excerpt)

Nicolai Sennels: Psychology: greater jihad is preparing for the lesser jihad  --  holy war

Ben Carson - White Liberals are the most racist people

Liberal whites are the greatest enemies of black Americans
Democrats didn't give blacks the right to vote; Republicans did!
re hyphenated Americans

Black Racism

JFK why he was murdered by NWO

welfare feeding birds

Obamacare, socialism, point of no return, Hitler - Thomas Sowell's warning

gun control hero saved people with her licensed gun

People who work for a living are being overwhelmed by people who vote for a living - welfare

white irish slaves

Hijab Muslim go back to your own country where they'll kill you for not wearing it
Earnest re welfare
socialism how people in Cuba live, even though there's free health care

CHRISTIANS were ARRESTED for praying near the capital. FIVE THOUSAND MUSLIMS were ALLOWED to pray on the WHITE HOUSE LAWN.   WHAT?

Fascinating photos show Iran before the 1979 revolution | Iran and Revolution

Old iran! | Beauty | Pinterest | Iran, Persian and Iranian

Beautiful IRAN before The Dark Islamic Revolution 1979 - | Beautiful IRAN before The Dark Islamic Revolution 1979 | Pinterest | Iran and Tehran

Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and Farah Pahlavi | iran | Pinterest | Iran, Royals and Royal house

Page F30: Iran in the 1970s before the Islamic Revolution | Persian | Pinterest | Iran, 1970s and Islamic

iran before and after - ??a??t?s? Google | history | Pinterest | Sharia law

======================= END: Some Pictures, Videos & Articles of Countries Before and After Islamization =========================


Trump Help Us! LA Times Put Out 10 Truths About Illegal Migrants in California You Can't Believe -- It's Insane
Friday, March 2, 2018 17:46

Percentage of Illegals on Welfare
Canadian Citizens vs illegal muslims benefits
What real refugees look like


Interesting that the LA Times did this. All the others are staying away from it. Whether you are a Democrat or Republican, this should be of great interest to you!

Just One State -- be sure and read the last part... try for 3 times.

This is only one State... If this doesn't open your eyes, nothing will!
Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More...

From the LA. Times.

1. 40% of all workers in LA County (10.2 million people) are working for cash; and not paying taxes. This is because they are predominantly illegal immigrants, working without a green card.

(Donald Trump was right)

2. 95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens.

3. 75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens.

4. Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal, whose births were paid for by taxpayers.

5. Nearly 35% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals; they are here illegally.

6. Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are living in garages.

7. The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border.

8. Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal.

9. 21 radio stations in LA are Spanish-speaking.

In LA County, 5.1 million people speak English; 3.9 million, speak Spanish. (There are 10.2 million people, in LA County.

(All 10 of the above facts were published in the Los Angeles Times)

Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops, but 29% are on welfare.
Over 70% of the United States' annual population growth, (and over 90% of California, Florida, and New York), results from immigration. Also, 29% of inmates in federal prisons are illegal aliens.

We are fools for letting this continue.


Send copies of this letter, to at least two other people. 100, would be even better.

This is only one State...If this doesn't open your eyes nothing will, and you wonder why Nancy Pelosi wants them to become voters!


Windfall Tax on Retirement Income... Adding a tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to the American people "you're so darn stupid that we're going to keep doing this until we drain every cent from you". Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income. In other words, tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement. This woman is a nut case! You aren't going to believe this

Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K and Mutual Funds)!

Alas, it is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed Minorities!

This woman is frightening. She quotes... 'We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income, (didn't Marx say something like this?) in our country; and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest. (I'm not rich, are you?)

When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied:

We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as Americans.

(Read that quote again and again and let it sink in.) 'Lower your retirement; give it to others who have not worked, as you have for your money.

Send this on to your friends. I just did! This lady is out of her mind!

Iran and Hezbollah's Terror in Argentina
by Lawrence A. Franklin *  March 1, 2018 at 4:00 am

  If efforts to expose Iran's and Hezbollah's roles in the Argentinean bombings are successful, the information will elucidate for regional leaders the dark side of Iran's ties to sub-state terrorist groups to increase even further its influence in Latin America.

  For decades, Iran has seemingly been employing both normative diplomatic ties and criminal links to export its Islamic revolution to the Western Hemisphere. By using similar methods of subversion, Iran appears already to have penetrated other Latin American nations, including Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Brazil and some island countries in the Caribbean.

Thousands of Argentinians protest on February 18, 2015 in Buenos Aires, with signs demanding "Truth and Justice," on the one-month anniversary of the murder of special prosecutor Alberto Nisman. Nisman was murdered by unknown assailants one day before he was officially to present allegations of treason against then-President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)

Iran's activities in Latin America are a direct challenge to U.S. primacy in the Western Hemisphere. Iran, it seems, wants to replace the U.S. as the power ally of Latin American countries.

While Iran's nuclear, ballistic missile, and expansionist policies in the Middle East are well known, most of the Islamic Republic's operations in Latin America appear to have been proceeding underway, below the radar, for several decades.

Continue Reading Article

How the Left Became its Own Worst Enemy -- Part I
by Denis MacEoin *  February 27, 2018 at 5:00 am

  Although genuine feminists have made strides for women's rights in Western countries, they have helped set back the rights of young Muslim women to break free from the oppressive codes of an Islam defined and controlled by Muslim men.

It is one of the ironies of modern politics that the same word can be susceptible to more than one meaning, creating confusion for everyone.

One of the reasons for the confusion is that liberal values are generally shared by moderates on both the left and right of politics. Not by the far left -- Marxists, Leninists, Trotskyites, and Stalinists or Britain's Labour Party under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn -- or by the far right -- Germany's Alternativ für Deutschland, Hungary's Jobbik, Austria's Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs, or Greece's Golden Dawn.

Leftist values underpinned both the American and French revolutions, helping to create the liberal democracies that remain our chief defence against Communism at one end of the political spectrum and Fascism on the other. Most of those values are taken for granted by mainstream populations in the U.S., Canada, Australia, and much of Europe. Writing in American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia, Ralph Raico describes classical liberalism as

  "the term used to designate the ideology advocating private property, an unhampered market economy, the rule of law, constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion and of the press, and international peace based on free trade. Up until around 1900, this ideology was generally known simply as liberalism."

One might also include civil rights; democratic institutions; equal justice under the law; separation of religion, state, judiciary and education, and international co-operation. Although there is, of course, more to liberal values than these, they are all enshrined in articles of the US Constitution and implied or stated in the constitutions and laws of other democracies.

The role of liberalism in the reformation of Europe following World War II is made clear by Oxford historian Professor Martin Conway:

  Liberalism, liberal values and liberal institutions formed an integral part of that process of European consolidation. Fifteen years after the end of the Second World War, the liberal and democratic identity of Western Europe had been reinforced on almost all sides by the definition of the West as a place of freedom. Set against the oppression in the Communist East, by the slow development of a greater understanding of the moral horror of Nazism, and by the engagement of intellectuals and others with the new states (and social and political systems) emerging in the non-European world to the south.

So far, so good. As Conway goes on to explain, however, a new liberalism inspired by Marxist-inspired left-wing ideology, began to replace the more classical forms across Europe and, to a lesser extent, the United States. Marxist glamorization has inspired many liberals to abandon their original principles and betray what were its own best values, values that are still proclaimed but have become overridden by quite opposite ideas.

One subtle shift has been the emergence of political correctness, a form of Cultural Marxism (the theory that culture more than politics drives inequality between races and classes in Western societies). Political correctness started as a reasonable exercise to protect vulnerable members of society -- blacks, women, Jews, gays, the disabled -- from offensive speech and action but ended as a modern totalitarianism that blocks free speech and open debate on just about everything.

Today's youth, particularly on university campuses, have adopted ways of thinking and behaving that contradict all the ideas that were the fundamentals of classic liberalism. There are many examples, but the one that stands out above the rest is support for radical Islam and hard-line Muslims.

The most famous instance in the UK was Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn's embrace of members of the terror outfits Hamas and Hezbollah, which he described as his "friends". It took him until the summer of 2016 to say that he regretted his engagement with the terrorists.

In several European countries, including France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and parts of Italy, governments have banned fully or in part the wearing of the Islamic veil; above all, the niqab and burqa, the full-face forms. One might have thought that Western feminists would be in the vanguard of such movements, as it could not be clearer that Islamic law oppresses women far more than ever happened in the West. A British Muslim physician, Qanta Ahmed, and Yasmin Alibhai-Brown have openly and repeatedly called for the abolition of all forms of veiling. Muslim women reformers across entire the Islamic world have called for an end to veils of all kinds.[1] In Iran this year, young women have been demonstrating on the streets without their compulsory hijabs, and at least 29 have been arrested as the regime clamps down again.

If some Muslim women call for the removal of the veil, however, they are often criticized by Western Muslims. The Franco-British academic, Dr. Myriam François-Cerrah, a hijab-wearing Muslim convert, published a vitriolic attack on Alibhai-Brown. Cerrah's piece, which appeared in the left-of-centre New Statesman, was entitled "The Feminist Case for the Veil". Alibhai-Brown, who describes herself as "leftie liberal, anti-racist, feminist, Shia Muslim, part-Pakistani", had just published a book entitled Refusing the Veil, in which she argues that Muslim women must abandon veiling because it conceals abuse, propagates eating disorders, and restricts access to sunlight and exercise; that it is imposed on babies and young girls, allows women to be shamed for not covering up, and has become associated with extremist factions; that it demonizes men, oppresses feminism, and presents obstacles to performance and success; and that it even encourages racism, distorts Muslim values, and strips women of autonomy and individuality. François-Cerrah bizarrely describes the book as "a socially conservative book that is dressed up as a liberal feminist manifesto" -- that from someone with an Oxford PhD.

That a clearly successful and independent woman such as Cerrah, who happens to be a Muslim convert, should attack this book so viciously is a clear testimony to just how the veil debate has created a serious rift within Western societies and has become a cause for concern, not just for non-Muslims, but for many Muslims, as well.

Other politically correct feminists also support universal wearing of the veil. In July 2015, a leading French feminist, Christine Delphy, published an opinion piece in the London Guardian in which she proclaimed that the French ban on veils and the tradition of French laïcité (secularism) were racist and that true feminists respect even the patriarchal customs of other races and religions.

Writing in New York's Jewish Tablet magazine in 2015, Heather Rogers relates how she at first dismissed criticism of misogyny within Muslim communities because "Westerners have no right to tell Muslims how to live" and downplayed arguments about the rate of Islamic honour killings. It was only on later reflection, she said, that she began to pose questions such as, "Why aren't more non-Muslim feminists speaking up about violence against women in Muslim-majority countries?" She then gives an example of how liberal feminists distort matters:

  "In searching the Internet, I begin to find the vestiges of a discussion of the subject among Leftists, which suggests some reasons why many non-Muslim feminists choose to stay silent. One controversy is to do with an essay Adele Wilde-Blavatsky wrote in 2012 for The Feminist Wire, an online women's studies journal. Her piece says the hijab is a symbol of male oppression. A storm ensued. One response, signed by 77 academics, writers, and activists, said the essay was an assertion of Wilde-Blavatsky's 'white feminist privilege and power.' Instead of facilitating a discussion, however, The Feminist Wire editorial collective took down the comments, pulling the essay off along with them."

Referring to Muslim women in Iran and Turkey who struggle to break free of the restrictions imposed on them, Khadija Khan exposes the hypocrisy of Western women -- those who support outright extremist Muslims who advocate for Islamic law, Sharia, which discriminates against women, such as Linda Sarsour:

  These women -- who are trapped in despotic Middle Eastern dictatorships, and who face possible prosecution and having their lives ruined -- were given no attention by the... women marchers in the U.S. Evidently, feminists in the West were too busy wearing hijabs in solidarity with Sarsour and other promoters of Islamic law (sharia), which advises husbands to beat their wives and that in court, a woman's testimony is worth half a man's testimony; that daughters can receive only half the inheritance of a son, and that if a woman is raped, she will need four male Muslim witnesses, supposedly at the scene, to prove that she was not committing adultery.

Sometimes defence of the veil by Muslims who regard themselves as feminists can be self-contradictory. In 2014, the Daily Telegraph reported on a series of comments on social media, in which a number of Muslim women explained why they choose to cover their heads or faces. One user writes:

  "I like to use it to promote feminism, however it is very hard to express it because of how people view it. There ARE a lot of women who are forced to wear it, and I think that's really wrong, no matter how religious or what country. The hijab is forced in some places in the world, or by certain people -- especially men in many cases. I will not deny this. This is not feminism. I want to take this hijab and make it my own. First choose if I even want to cover or not. Define WHY and HOW. I will choose what colors I will wear. What materials. Not just black and white. I control if I want to use hijab pins, rhinestones, lace, or brooches. When I will wear it, how I will tie it. When I choose to take it off. It is my right. Also I will choose WHY I wear it. NOT wear it because someone told me to. These points combined promote feminism within women."

What sort of feminism admits is it that women are forced by men to wear the veil, but believe that wearing it is an expression of women's liberty just because she controls the colour and materials of her hijab? It sounds like a prisoner who thinks he is free because he is allowed to choose the design of his chains.

Another woman, who says she is a lawyer, writes:

  "The biggest benefit that I enjoy by wearing [the hijab] is that people deal with me as an individual and not just according to my looks."

Why, though, would wearing a hijab make anyone more of an individual? If she has an attractive face, men will still take her looks into account, hijab or not. Worse, photographs of groups of Muslim women wearing full burqas and niqabs show them looking virtually identical, with their individuality totally erased.

There are, thankfully, some genuinely liberal feminists who see through this imposture. Award-winning journalist Abigail Esman recently published an article entitled, "The West Embraces the Hijab as Muslim Women Risk Their Lives for the Right to Choose":

  [T]he West's concern seems to be far more about perceived "Islamophobia" than misogyny...

  In fact, the new celebration of the hijab seems to be about celebrating all those things that we in the West generally condemn: pushing a new "must" trend for women in fashion and behavior... and above all, increasing the very real risks to those Muslim women who choose not to wear a head-covering by making models and icons of those who do.

Last year, an Irish journalist and government media advisor, Carol Hunt, condemned the double standards in an article for the Irish Times, "Why is feminism so quiet about Muslim women who refuse to wear the hijab":

  So why then, do liberal, feminist calls for equality stop at borders? I am at a loss to understand why equality is purely for one particular group of people and not for others. If I believe in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, then surely that shouldn't change no matter who I am or where I live....

She continues, arguing that some feminists and gay rights activists choose to support fundamentalist Muslims (who are anti-woman and anti-gay) instead of Muslim reformers:

  In December 2015, the feminist and LGBTQ societies in Goldsmith University in London allied with the college's fundamentalist Islamic society, against the ex-Muslim human rights campaigner, Maryam Namazie. Namazie is a trenchant opponent of the sort of discrimination that is now unacceptable in Christianity but somehow admirable in Islam. Similarly, Maajid Nawaz, who works tirelessly defending Muslim communities in Europe, Pakistan and elsewhere from the "diktats of Islamist theocrats", found himself on a liberal list as an "Anti-Muslim" extremist.

Again, referring to the ex-Muslim feminist Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Hunt continues:

  She [Ali] asks why do we loudly defend a woman's right to wear the hijab but when it comes to supporting Muslim girls who refuse to wear it, feminism is strangely quiet? Women who wish to wear a veil should be able to, without criticism or social pressure to do so. But elevating the wearing of the hijab to a symbol of feminism struggle is twisted in the extreme.

  Yet this is what happened earlier this year when women all over the US marched against the Trump ideology -- at their head in New York was religious fundamentalist, "home-girl in a hijab", Linda Sarsour, a pro-Sharia advocate and an apologist for the atrocious Saudi regime.

  What sort of benevolent bigotry is this? Meanwhile, liberal Muslims suffer, not just alienation and punishment from within their own culture, but a very loud silence from those of us who are terrified that by speaking out we may be dubbed Islamophobic or on the same side as the likes of Trump, Farage, et al.

Somali-born ex-Muslim author Ayaan Hirsi Ali "asks why do we loudly defend a woman's right to wear the hijab but when it comes to supporting Muslim girls who refuse to wear it, feminism is strangely quiet?" (Image source: Gage Skidmore)

In a recent piece [https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11861/sweden-feminism] for the Gatestone Institute, American author Bruce Bawer spotted the root of the problem. Giving examples of feminist support for Islamic practices that harm women, he focuses on Sweden:

  Sweden's preferred type [of feminism] is not about universal sisterhood and the spreading of sexual equality around the globe. No, it is "intersectional" feminism. What is "intersectional" feminism? It is a species of feminism that, in accordance with the relatively new academic concept of "intersectionality," accepts a hierarchy whereby other "victim groups" -- such as "people of color" and Muslims -- are higher up on the grievance ladder than women, and whereby women who belong to those other groups enjoy an even more exalted status as victims than white female Christians or Jews.

What this means is that, although genuine feminists have made strides for women's rights in Western countries, they have helped set back the rights of young Muslim women to break free from the oppressive codes of an Islam defined and controlled by Muslim men. And that is only one level of leftist self-harm, as I shall explain in the second part of this article.

  Dr. Denis MacEoin is a former lecturer in Arabic and Islamic Studies at a British university and the author of books, articles and entries for encyclopedias such as The Encyclopedia of Islam.

[1] For a long list, see Ida Lichter, Muslim Women Reformers: Inspiring Voices Against Oppression, Amherst, 2009.

How the Left Became its Own Worst Enemy - Part II
by Denis MacEoin *  March 2, 2018 at 5:00 am

  This willingness to indulge even the most anti-liberal beliefs and behaviour finds many of its roots in the general disdain many left-wingers and liberals seem to feel for Western democracy, human rights and individualism. But that does not explain why so many people, often decent people, are drawn to defend Islam, Islamic patriarchy, Islamic discrimination against women, violence and more, even when such defence is obviously anti-liberal in the extreme.

  I have never known a liberal to say a bad word about a more prevalent and arguably more damaging imperialism: Islamic imperialism. There have been many more imperialist Muslim empires than European ones.

  One might have thought that historical facts such as these would provoke human-rights activists to put the Muslim empires into the same category as the later European ones. Not a word of it. Nor do liberals mention another issue that should be close to their hearts: the Islamic slave trade.

Feminists are far from the only so-called left-wing or liberal group to betray their own basic principles out of a bizarre admiration for Islam, whether its history, its values, or its self-proclaimed victimization. Real liberals believe in human rights, women's rights, racial equality, free speech, and more, rejecting extremism on both the right and left. However, the left in the UK and elsewhere seems to have abandoned those principles and betrayed the very people they had previously supported.[1]

This willingness to indulge even the most anti-liberal beliefs and behaviour finds many of its roots in the general disdain that many so-called left-wingers and liberals seem to feel for Western democracy, human rights and individual freedom. This disdain, however, does not explain why so many people -- often decent people -- are drawn to defend Islam, Islamic patriarchy, Islamic discrimination against women, or violence in the name of Islam, especially when such defence is obviously anti-liberal in the extreme. Examples are not hard to find, for instance feminists who urge Muslim women to submit to the veil and abandon their rights as free women in favour of Muslim men and their power over them.

What possesses so many Westerners to regard Islam, Islamic religion, Islamic law, and Islamic intolerance through rose-tinted spectacles that obscure the obvious and blind observers from seeing what is in front of them?

Another of the most notable examples is the virtually universal attitude toward imperialism. We might all agree that imperialism is a thing of the past and that, for the most part, it has brought considerable suffering on indigenous peoples who found themselves under British, French, Belgian, Spanish or Portuguese rule. No country in the modern West would seek to bring back an imperial system that, mercifully, was dealt a death blow by the First and Second World Wars. This change, however, does not prevent Marxists and others of a similar ilk from claiming that imperialism continues to this day, through the power exerted by strong nations in the West such as Israel or the U.S. Even the United Nations has been condemned as "a tool of imperialism".

Mystifyingly, however, I have never known a liberal to say a bad word about a more prevalent and arguably more damaging imperialism: Islamic imperialism.[2] From the year 632 until 1918, there have been many more Muslim empires than European ones.

The first extensive Islamic empire was the Umayyad Caliphate (661-750), which extended from the Iberian peninsula (Spain and Portugal) to what is now Northern India and Pakistan's province of Sindh. At its height, it was the largest empire in the world and remains the fifth largest in history.

The Umayyads were replaced by the 'Abbasids (750-1258), who ruled a similar extent of territory, including Sardinia, Sicily, and southern Italy. A succession of such empires controlled territories from North Africa to India. The most extensive of all was the long-lasting Ottoman empire (1299-1918), the possessions of which rivalled those of the largest of all empires, that of Great Britain. Here is a rough list of the Ottoman dominions:

  Algeria, Tunis, Tripoli (Libya), Egypt, Western Arabia, Syria (a vast area), Mesopotamia (Iraq), Anatolia (Turkey), Croatia, Bosnia, Albania, Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria, Rumelia, Wallachia, Hungary, Poland, Transylvania, Moldova, Bessarabia, Crete, Cyprus, Crimea, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Daghestan, al-Hasa (in eastern Arabia).

Broadly speaking, the Ottoman empire lasted longer and covered more territory than even the long-lived (1415-1999) Portuguese empire in South America, Africa, India and farther east. European empires may have been -- and often were -- despotic, carrying out ethnic cleansing; genocides, such as Spain's and Portugal's in South America, as well as general brutality to the natives. Those are all causes for censure.

In addition, frighteningly high numbers of Hindus were massacred in India by Muslim rulers. A Sikh writer declares that the assault amounted to "the biggest holocaust in World history":

  With the invasion of India by Mahmud Ghazni about 1000 A.D., began the Muslim invasions into the Indian subcontinent and they lasted for several centuries. Nadir Shah made a mountain of the skulls of the Hindus he killed in Delhi alone. Babur raised towers of Hindu skulls at Khanua when he defeated Rana Sanga in 1527 and later he repeated the same horrors after capturing the fort of Chanderi. Akbar ordered a general massacre of 30,000 Rajputs after he captured Chithorgarh in 1568. The Bahamani Sultans had an annual agenda of killing a minimum of 100,000 Hindus every year.

The Belgian Indologist Dr. Koenrad Elst wrote that:

  There is no official estimate of the total death toll of Hindus at the hands of Islam. A first glance at important testimonies by Muslim chroniclers suggests that, over 13 centuries and a territory as vast as the Subcontinent, Muslim Holy Warriors easily killed more Hindus than the 6 million of the Holocaust. Ferishtha lists several occasions when the Bahmani sultans in central India (1347-1528) killed a hundred thousand Hindus, which they set as a minimum goal whenever they felt like "punishing" the Hindus; and they were only a third-rank provincial dynasty. The biggest slaughters took place during the raids of Mahmud Ghaznavi (ca. 1000 CE); during the actual conquest of North India by Mohammed Ghori and his lieutenants (1192 ff.); and under the Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526).... The Moghuls (1526-1857), even Babar and Aurangzeb, were fairly restrained tyrants by comparison. Prof. K.S. Lal once estimated that the Indian population declined by 50 million under the Sultanate, but that would be hard to substantiate; research into the magnitude of the damage Islam did to India is yet to start in right earnest.

He continues:

  Apart from actual killing, millions of Hindus disappeared by way of enslavement. After every conquest by a Muslim invader, slave markets in Bagdad and Samarkand were flooded with Hindus. Slaves were likely to die of hardship, e.g. the mountain range Hindu Koh, "Indian mountain", was renamed Hindu Kush, "Hindu-killer", when one cold night in the reign of Timur Lenk (1398-99), a hundred thousand Hindu slaves died there while on transport to Central Asia. Though Timur conquered Delhi from another Muslim ruler, he recorded in his journal that he made sure his pillaging soldiers spared the Muslim quarter, while in the Hindu areas, they took "twenty slaves each".

One might have thought that historical facts such as these would provoke human-rights activists to put the Muslim empires into the same category as the later European ones. Not a word of it. Nor do liberals mention another issue that should be close to their hearts: the Islamic slave trade.

Slavery has been an integral part of Islamic practice from the start. It is scripturally endorsed, embedded in shari'a law, and has been practiced from the seventh century until today. The slave trade was notably carried on by Arab merchants across the Sahara and brought Africans to North Africa. Liberals rightly condemn the European slave trade and its impact on North America; they -- again rightly -- act to eliminate modern slavery through trafficking -- which is estimated to involve some 40.3 million people worldwide by 2016. It is almost unheard of, nevertheless, for people on the left also to speak of the Islamic (mainly Arab) slave trade.

The educational website History World, for instance, has a substantial account entitled "History of Slavery", in which it describes the use of slaves in Babylon, Greece, Rome, the European Middle Ages, and the Portuguese and triangular (chiefly the Transatlantic) slave trades. Yet it only mentions Islamic slavery in passing, despite its having lasted far longer than the European and American versions. Here are the three short paragraphs the site devotes to the subject, all of which appear to argue that supposedly Muslim slavery was not altogether a bad thing:

  Slavery is an accepted part of life in Arabia during the time of Muhammad, in the 7th century, and the Qur'an offers no arguments against the practice. It merely states, particularly in relation to female slaves, that they must be well treated. In general that has been the case[3] compared with the barbaric treatment of slaves in some Christian communities.

  Meanwhile the Muslim habit of using slaves in the army has led to one unusual result - in itself an indication of the trust accorded to slaves in Middle Eastern communities.

  In 1250 the slave leaders of the Egyptian army, known as Mamelukes, depose the sultan and seize power. A succession of rulers from their own ranks control much of the Middle East, as the Mameluke dynasty, for nearly three centuries.

This article also does not mention the three centuries of the Barbary Slavers,: North African Muslims who went out as pirates into the Mediterranean to capture ships from European countries and take crews and passengers as slaves to be sold in the markets of Tunis, Algiers and other towns. Barbary pirates ventured as far as England and Ireland, where they would raid coastal villages, and carry residents off. Professor Robert Davis writes:

  "The fishermen and coastal dwellers of 17th-century Britain lived in terror of being kidnapped by pirates and sold into slavery in North Africa. Hundreds of thousands across Europe met wretched deaths on the Barbary Coast in this way".

As late as the early 19th century, the new US Navy fought two wars against the Barbary States, bringing the piracy to an end.[4]

Edward Moran's 1897 painting, depicting the burning USS Philadelphia at the Battle of Tripoli Harbor, during the First Barbary War in 1804. (Image source: U.S. Naval Academy Museum Collection/Wikimedia Commons)

Fantasies about the benign effects of slavery under Islam or, more widely, the tolerance enjoyed by non-Muslims living in the Muslim empires are still widespread. Muslims themselves insist that Islam is the most tolerant religion, and many progressives take this on board without much knowledge of the facts. Classroom, a website devoted to education, illustrates the naivety of excessively open-minded Westerners. In an article, "How Muslim Empires Treated Religion", Laura Leddy Turner writes:

  From Muhammad's founding of Islam and his unification of the Arab tribes in the seventh century, Muslims were instructed to practice respect towards other religions. This tolerance was essential to ensure peace and stability in Medina and throughout Asia Minor, as these lands were populated by Jews, Christians and other faiths. Most of the Islamic empires established in this region upheld the tradition of religious tolerance, although conflict between Sunni and Shiite Muslims was frequent.

Ms Turner holds a B.A. in literature and English from Ramapo College of New Jersey, with postgraduate coursework in business law. She has obviously never read a word of the Qur'an or the Hadith, or studied the history of Islam in any depth or she would not write such nonsense. Many religions can display intolerance towards non-believers, often in defiance of scriptural values (as in Christianity), but Islam in particular seems to stand out for a hatred for non-Muslims, and for other Muslim sects not like theirs, that is still practiced. Under Islamic law, Jews and Christians are forced live by a separate set of laws designed to remind them they are merely lower-class, "tolerated" residents, called dhimmis, and that they have to pay a "protection" tax merely to preserve their lives and keep their homes, synagogues or churches.

If they refuse to do so, they may be killed and their property confiscated. All other "disbelievers" are considered pagans, who may be killed with impunity if they do not convert to Islam on the spot. Tolerance?

A favourite focus for praise of life under Islamic rule is, of course, the Jewish and Christian experience under Umayyad rule in the Iberian peninsula, covering most of Spain and what, in 1128, became Portugal -- a territory best known as Andalusia (from the Arabic al-Andalus). A host of articles and lectures have described Islamic Spain as a haven of tolerance and civilization, representing a gold age in European history. Akbar Ahmed, for example, holds the Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC and served as the former Pakistani High Commissioner to the UK and Ireland. Writing in the Huffington Post, he states that:

  At its height, Andalusia produced a magnificent Muslim civilization  --  religious tolerance, poetry, music, learned scientists and scholars like Averroës, great libraries (the main library at Cordoba alone had 400,000 books), public baths, and splendid architecture (like the palace complex at the Alhambra and the Grand Mosque of Cordoba). These great achievements were the result of collaboration between Muslims, Christians and Jews  --  indeed the work of the great Jewish Rabbi Maimonides was written in the Arabic language. It was a time when a Muslim ruler had a Jewish chief minister and a Catholic archbishop as his foreign minister. The Spanish had a phrase for that period of history  --  La Convivencia, or co-existence.

While there may be some truth in this, it is in most respects a gross exaggeration that whitewashes the realities of life there for all non-Muslims. This exaggeration was in some measure contradicted by Edward Rothstein, writing (somewhat surprisingly) in the New York Times in 2003, in an article entitled, "Was the Islam Of Old Spain Truly Tolerant?":

  As many scholars have argued, this [idealized] image is distorted. Even the Umayyad dynasty, begun by Abd al-Rahman in 756, was far from enlightened. Issues of succession were often settled by force. One ruler murdered two sons and two brothers. Uprisings in 805 and 818 in Córdoba were answered with mass executions and the destruction of one of the city's suburbs. Wars were accompanied by plunder, kidnappings and ransom. Córdoba itself was finally sacked by Muslim Berbers in 1013, its epochal library destroyed.

  Andalusian governance was also based on a religious tribal model. Christians and Jews, who shared Islam's Abrahamic past, had the status of dhimmis -- alien minorities. They rose high but remained second-class citizens; one 11th-century legal text called them members of "the devil's party." They were subject to special taxes and, often, dress codes. Violence also erupted, including a massacre of thousands of Jews in Grenada in 1066 and the forced exile of many Christians in 1126.

More recently, and in much greater detail, Darío Fernádnez-Morera, an associate professor in Spanish and Portuguese at Northwestern University has published a ground-breaking study, The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise: Muslims, Christians, and Jews under Islamic Rule in Medieval Spain (2016). We have to hope that it, and future studies from a similar perspective, will help dispel the fog of ignorance that surrounds what life was really like under Islamic imperialism.

  Dr. Denis MacEoin (PhD Cambridge) formerly lectured in Arabic and Islamic Studies and has written numerous books, articles, and encyclopedia entries on Islam, including aspects of Iranian Shi'ism.

[1] For more on this, see What's Left? How the Left Lost its Way: How Liberals Lost Their Way, by Nick Cohen, one of Britain's leading journalists.

[2] For the most up-to-date study, see Efraim Karsh, Islamic Imperialism: A History, Yale University Press, 2006

[3] It is hard to know on what this "general" claim is based.

[4] There is decent literature on the Barbary Slave Trade because it relates directly to Europe. An excellent modern study is Robert Davis's Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800 (New York, 2003). There are fewer studies of the general Islamic trade, but a useful introduction is Bernard Lewis's Race and Slavery in the Middle East: An Historical Enquiry, new ed., Oxford University Press, 1992. In this, Lewis "examines the romantic myth of the Middle East as a racial utopia".


Feminism, Swedish Style

Recent Articles by Denis MacEoin

Does Jihad Really Have "Nothing to do with Islam"?, 2018-02-24

Death of Democracy? - Part II, 2018-02-12

Death of Democracy? - Part I, 2018-02-07

Sexual Harassment East and West, 2018-01-05

Tales of Radical Islam in Virginia

To Combat Islamism: Think Global, Act Local | Clarion Project Clarion Project

Hot Off the Presses: US' New Strategy to Fight ISIS | Clarion Project Clarion Project

Al-Qaeda Recruitment Methods Revealed | Clarion Project Clarion Project

History Lessons from Years Under Islamism
by Majid Rafizadeh
February 17, 2018 at 5:00 am

  My father's generation in Iran lived in an environment in which the Islamist party of the country's clergy cunningly depicted themselves as intending no harm, supportive of the people, and not interested in power. So, before the revolution, many Iranians did not think that Khomeini's party would be committing the atrocities that they are committing now or that they would have such an unrelenting hunger for power. Instead, during this time, the country thought it was on a smooth path towards democracy, with no expectation of ever returning to a barbaric era. Even the then-US President Jimmy Carter viewed Khomeini as a good religious holy man.

  Iranians did not just submit to these new laws; they rose up in protest. This uprising was met with torture, rape, and death. With the regime eager to wipe any who dared to resist, the people had no choice but to surrender. Everyone's daily activities were now under the scrutiny of the Islamists.

  Many will still think it is impossible for something like this to happen in their country. What they fail to understand is that Iran is an example of exactly how successful this meticulous grab for power can be. Islamists in other countries including the West are pursuing the same techniques on the path to seizing power. It is a quiet, and subtle process, until the moment you wake up with no rights, a culture of fear, and no promise that you will live in freedom or even to see the next day.

In Iran, my generation, the first after Islamism came to power, is called the Burnt Generation (Persian: Nasl-e Sukhteh). Our generation earned this name for having to endure the brutality of the Islamist and theocratic regime from the time we were born, to adulthood. This brutality included the regime's merciless efforts, such as mass executions, to establish its power, impose its barbaric and restrictive rules, and brainwash children and indoctrinate the younger generation with its extremist ideology through various methods including elementary schools, universities, state-controlled media outlets, imams and local mosques, and promoting chants such as "Death to America" and "Death to Israel".

Women and men were segregated. Teenagers were prevented from performing daily activities considered harmless by most of the world. Any kind of enjoyable social activities were barred, including listening to music, dancing, drinking, dating, women participating in a chess championship unless you were wearing a hijab or attending a football match or other sporting event if men were playing in it. If it made you smile, if it gave you hope, it was probably against the law, such as what could be worn, whom you were allowed to talk to, what you could listen to, and whether or not you pray or fast during Ramadan. Even the most personal and private issues became the business of the regime's forces.

The main purpose of these restrictions and the intense control of the people, especially youths, was for the regime to expand its Islamist agenda domestically and abroad. These laws were enforced with cruel and violent punishments such as public flogging along with the threat of even more dire consequences, including stoning, public hanging and amputations. My generation was raised in an atmosphere of terror. While the rest of the world became more modern and developed, we were left to grapple with following Islamist laws and restrictions that were impossible to obey.

My generation in Iran should be seen as a lesson for the West. Almost every state (and non-state actors) underestimated the power that these Islamists could wield. Warning signs were overlooked. No one believed that such a massive change could occur and be enforced. Many underestimated the crimes that these Islamists were willing to commit to maintain their power once they came into control. To this day, they continue to prove that there are no limits to the cruelty and lack of humanity that they will engage in, such as conducting mass executions, executing children and pregnant women, stoning, amputations, public hanging, flogging, torture, and rape just to maintain this power.

Jahangir Razmi's Pulitzer Prize-winning photograph of the execution of Kurdish men and others by the Iranian Islamic regime in 1979.

Many underestimated the smooth-talking strategy that these Islamists were using for decades to seize power. The radical group of Ayatollah Khomeini deceived many Iranians and the international community into believing that they were peaceful and divine people. Once they had power, the truth was revealed; by then it was too late to prevent the abuse that unfolded.

My father's generation in Iran lived in an environment in which the Islamist party of the country's clergy cunningly depicted themselves as intending no harm, supportive of the people, and not interested in power. So, before the revolution, many Iranians did not think that Khomeini's party would be committing the atrocities that they are committing now or that they would have such an unrelenting hunger for power.

Instead, the country thought it was on a smooth path towards democracy, with no expectation of returning to a barbaric era. Even then-US President Jimmy Carter viewed Khomeini as a good religious holy man. According to recently declassified documents, the Carter administration even paved the way for Khomeini to return to Iran. Many internationally known scholars such as Michelle Foucault thought highly of the Islamic revolution. Foucault's enthusiasm can be seen in his articles in European newspapers, written right before and after the revolution.

They portrayed themselves as leaders of the people, as spiritual and peaceful. However, once the Islamists rose to the top, all hell broke loose. As soon as they had a stranglehold on the country, they shifted gears to become one of the most ruthless regimes in history. Once in power, their true face was revealed; at that point, there was no way to turn back.

Thousands upon thousands of people were executed simply for voicing their opinion. Many also died for crimes they likely did not commit. The Islamic law (sharia) of the ruling Shiite party was imposed on everyone. Women were forced to wear a hijab and were stripped of their rights. They could no longer leave the country without the permission of their husbands. A women could not work in any occupation if her husband did not agree to it. Women's testimony in court, under sharia, is worth half a man's testimony. Women are banned from pursuing certain educational fields or occupations, such as being judges. Women are prohibited from entering sports stadiums or watching men's sports. Women are entitled to receive half as much inheritance as their brothers or other male relatives.

Many were shocked that this political party, which spoke about the religion of peace, would do such things. Iranians, however, did not just submit to these new laws; they rose up in protest. This uprising was met with torture, rape, and death. With the regime eager to wipe out anyone who dared to resist, the people had no choice but to surrender. Everyone's daily activities were now under the scrutiny of the Islamists.

In a four month period, some 30,000 political prisoners were hanged simply for suspected loyalties to anti-theocratic resistance groups, mainly the PMOI -- incidents largely ignored by media outlets.

These are only few examples of the Islamists' atrocities that took hold of a once thriving and modernizing country. Information about their crimes against humanity would fill several books. As bad as you may think all this is, you must understand that the reality is far, far worse. The Islamist Republic of Iran, according to Human Rights Watch, became the world leader in executing children. The legal age for girls to marry was reduced to 9. Women needed the approval of their parents to marry, and girls could not object to their guardian's decision in marrying them off.

It may be hard to believe that such a murderous force could come into power so easily and fast. What is important to understand is that the Islamists and their followers work covertly in a society for decades to deceive the people and reach the top. Iran's was a meticulously planned takeover that no one saw coming. The Islamists' willingness to be patient to complete their control of the society cannot be underestimated.

Despite openly reading about all this, many will still think it is impossible for something like this to happen in their country. What they fail to understand is that Iran is an example of exactly how successful this meticulous grab for power can be.

Seeing these shrewd and calculating strategies, Islamists in other countries including the West are pursuing the same techniques on the path to seizing power. It is a quiet, subtle process, until the moment you wake up with no rights, a culture of fear, and no promise that you will live in freedom or even to see the next day.

Now, those Islamists, whom almost everyone made light of, have not only been in power for almost four decades; they have expanded their expansionist ideology to other nations and taken first prize as being the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism and among its leading executioners.

This is a history lesson that Western and non-Islamist countries cannot afford to ignore. It is not just about history; it is about what can happen at any moment, in any country. It is about what is happening right now, beneath our noses -- in East Asia, Canada, South America and Europe. The only defense is to recognize it and confront it at its roots, before it has the opportunity to woo your politicians. Once they worry more about their popularity with voters than about the future of the country you are electing them to run, you are done. Once there is control of the ballot box, there will be more and more control over every aspect of your life, destroying any future you had planned and leaving the country you once had loved in ruins.

  Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, is a business strategist and advisor, Harvard-educated scholar, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He has authored several books on Islam and US Foreign Policy. He can be reached at Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu

  Follow Majid Rafizadeh on Twitter

Nassim Taleb: The Syrian War Condensed (For Almost Dummies)
Editor [https://theinternationalreporter.org/author/gailevans2/] / December 16, 2016

In the end I never imagined seeing the "left" siding with the AlQaeda of Sept 11, mourning the fighters of Aleppo and, aside from such independent journalists as Robert Fisk, spreading all manner of concoctions.

from Zero Hedge [http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-15/nassim-taleb-syrian-war-condensed-almost-dummies]:

Submitted by Nassim Nicholas Taleb via Medium.com,

Juxtaposition. The way to analyze the situation is to look at the factions comparatively. You do not compare Assad's regime to the Danish or Norwegian governments, but to the alternative. The question becomes if there is anything in the left column that is worse than the right column?


  Note 1. Assad father's operatives blew up my house in Amioun when my grandfather, then MP, voted for Bashir. In Skin in the Game I discuss this as "acting against one's interest" (the opposite of conflict of interest). So as a scientist and a humanist, I have been setting my grudge aside in considering the far, far, far, greater cancer of Salafism or Islamofascism.

  Note 2. Recall that I am a statistician. When I took a look at the statistics of the conflicts, most appear to be fabrications inflated by Qatari-funded think tanks and their useful idiots? -- ?by a mechanism the Indians call "Salma told Sabrina". For instance, we know that Hama's toll was not the 30--40,000 people report but the only real evidence is closer to 2,000.

  Note 3. One may ask: are the "rebels" all theocratic Salafis? No, but the groups became progressively so by the minority rule [https://medium.com/@nntaleb/the-most-intolerant-wins-the-dictatorship-of-the-small-minority-3f1f83ce4e15#.y1j4h5xkw]: you put a single Salafi in a group of five, and the five behave as Salafis. This, aside from Wahabi funding.

  Note 4. Counter-insurgencies (Army vs insurgents/terrorists, etc.) command a much higher rate of civilian casualties regardless of whether the army belongs to a liberal democracy or an autocracy.

  Note 5. One may ask: are all people who are mourning Aleppo that stupid, so gullible to the think tank operators? My answer, alas, is yes. And it takes some financial and intellectual independence and a great deal of integrity to analyze matters outside the main narrative as think tankers jump on you like flies.

In the end I never imagined seeing the "left" siding with the AlQaeda of Sept 11, mourning the fighters of Aleppo and, aside from such independent journalists as Robert Fisk, spreading all manner of concoctions.

Read More @ Zero Hedge.com

Aleppo: What is Going On?
By Chris Campbell
Dec 19, 2016

--In the Nov. 11, 1758 edition of The Idler magazine, if you ever happen upon one, you'll see this timeless line: "...among the calamities of war may be jointly numbered the diminution of the love of truth, by the falsehoods which interest dictates and credulity encourages."

In other words, "The first casualty when war comes," Senator Hiram Johnson said to the Senate in 1918, "is truth."

The fog of war, as you know, is thick in Aleppo.

I've personally talked to people who've helped refugees in Europe who said, indeed, Syrians were mostly running away from the regime's brutality.

On the other hand, I've talked to those who say, no, they are running away from bombings of external forces and most people love Assad. The whole chemical attack thing was a false flag.

Still others say they are running away from all of it  --  the proxy war  --  and nobody is innocent.

Some flee because they've lost everything. Others flee because they've been sold on living in the Western world, where the streets are paved with gold and they won't have to work to live like a king.

Meanwhile, the mainstream media says one thing and journalists who travel to Aleppo say something completely different.

Then, you have activists like him...


And her...

And him (an American)...

And him...

All apparent victims of the Syrian Arab Army, all releasing their videos at the same time, and saying the same thing (that pro-Assad forces are mowing people down indiscriminately), in what appears to be a coordinated PR campaign. (Is it? We'll get to that in a moment.)

Yeah, it's confusing.

But, for balance, let's talk about the side of the story that's not getting much airtime in the Western world. (Much of this information is likely not new to you, but let's start from the top anyway.)

According to two journalists who've been on the ground in west Aleppo  --  one Canadian journalist by the name of Eva Bartlett, [https://lfb.org/author/ccampbell/] and another British journalist, Vanessa Beeley  --  the corporate media is lying to you. And many of the "journalists" peddling these lies often have no clue they're doing so.

Both Bartlett and Beeley claim that the pro-Assad Syrian Army has been completely misrepresented and it is actually foreign terrorists who are wreaking havoc on the Syrian people, not the Syrian government.

Moreover, according to them, the Free Syrian Army  --  the "pro-democracy" Syrian rebels who have vowed to take down Assad  --  make up a small minority of the rebellion. Most of the rebels are actually splintered factions being funded by external forces. We'll get to that, too, in a moment.

First, it's important to discover where, exactly, the mainstream media is getting their information. According to Eva Bartlett, it comes from a small handful of far from impartial sources. On top of a revolving series of unnamed and named activists:

"These [media] organizations are relying on Syrian Observatory For Human Rights, which is based in Coventry, UK, which is one man. They're relying on compromised groups like the White Helmets, which, let's talk about the White Helmets. The White Helmets were founded in 2013 by a British ex-military officer. They have been funded to the tune of $100 million by the US, the UK, Europe and other States. They report to be rescuing civilians in eastern Aleppo, in Idlib, yet, no one in eastern Aleppo has heard of them. And I say no one bearing in mind that now 95% of these areas in eastern Aleppo are liberated."


Go to every Western mainstream media source and you'll see that the White Helmets are painted as this neutral humanitarian force. Heroes without capes.

They call themselves "nonaligned" and "independent."

Yet, says Bartlett, "they can be found carrying guns and standing on the dead bodies of Syrian soldiers. And their video footage actually contains children that have been recycled in different reports."


"They are not credible," Bartlett says. "The SOHR is not credible. 'Unnamed activists' are not credible. Once or twice maybe, but every time, not credible."

As far as sources on the ground go, Bartlett says, the mainstream media simply doesn't have any.

"And," she goes on, "as for the agenda of corporate media?""It is the agenda of regime change. How can the New York Times, I was reading it this morning, or how can Democracy Now, which I was reading the other day, maintain until this day this is a civil war in Syria? How can they maintain until this day that the protests were unarmed and nonviolent until say 2012. That is absolutely not true.

"How can they maintain that the Syrian government is attacking civilians in Aleppo, when every person coming out of these areas occupied by terrorists is saying the opposite?"

According to Bartlett, the vast majority of Syrians don't see Assad, who was democratically elected into office in 2014, as the problem.

Regime change, she says, "is the agenda. If [the media] had told the truth about Syria from the beginning, we wouldn't be here now. We wouldn't have seen so many people killed."

Disturbingly, this story sounds familiar.

In October of 1999, journalist John Pilger, in his own words, "stood in a ward of dying children in Baghdad with Denis Halliday, who the previous year had resigned as assistant secretary general of the United Nations. [Halliday] said: 'We are waging a war through the United Nations on the people of Iraq. We're targeting civilians. Worse, we're targeting children . . . What is this all about?'"

Then, in 2003, fresh off of the heels of the invasion, journalist Pilger interviewed American journalist Charles Lewis. "What," Pilger asked, "if the freest media in the world had seriously challenged George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld and investigated their claims, instead of channeling what turned out to be crude propaganda?"

Had the journalists done their jobs, Lewis replied, "there is a very, very good chance we would not have gone to war in Iraq."

Mind you, though the reports are conflicting, as few as 151,000 and as many as 1 million Iraqis died as a result. Not to mention, of course, the 5,000 American soldiers who sacrificed their lives for "the cause." This is something real journalism may well have stopped in its tracks.

(This is a statement corroborated by Dan Rather, David Rose of the Observer, and, said Pilger, "senior journalists and producers in the BBS, who wished to remain anonymous...")

"In other words," Pilger went on, "had journalists done their job, had they questioned and investigated the propaganda instead of amplifying it, hundreds of thousands of men, women and children might be alive today; and millions might not have fled their homes; the sectarian war between Sunni and Shia might not have ignited, and the infamous Islamic State might not now exist."

Now, we ask, are mainstream journalists doing their jobs in Syria? Or are they simply unquestioningly peddling a false narrative? It's an important question, one everyone would be asking if we truly learned anything from Iraq.

In Western mainstream media we see one single narrative: Essentially, a genocide is taking place led by Assad forces and assisted by Russia and Iran. The trio, they say, are going from city to city, killing the Syrian people in what appears to be a maniacal rampage, taking no prisoners and shooting down any civilian who tries to escape the rebel-held areas. Aleppo's rebels, it is said, are the heroes who fight back to try to save what's left of Syria and the dignity of her people.

The other side, of which Eva Bartlett stands, says that this is not a civil war, as the media claims, but a war on Syria from mostly external factions, mostly funded by NATO States and Gulf States. Russia's intervention, this side claims, is justified. Syria, a sovereign nation, is being torn apart limb-by-limb by foreign-funded factions and mercenaries, led by the West and joined by Turkey, Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.

Journalist Vanessa Beeley, who has also been on the ground in western Aleppo, is in the latter camp.

"What we're seeing here," Beeley said in a recent interview with Mint Press News, [https://www.facebook.com/MintpressNewsMPN/videos/1308183575891841/] "in my opinion, is Aleppo representing a microcosm of what is happening in Syria. We see 75% of the population of west Aleppo, 1.5 million civilians in the west government-held area of Aleppo being completely marginalized, dehumanized, ignored in Western media, ignored by the UN, ignored by the humanitarian organizations, and ignored liberally in the West. Despite the fact that they have been under attack for those four years, from the NATO and Gulf State-funded terrorist factions embedded in East Aleppo, using hell cannon [and] various manners of missile launchers to launch mortars, missiles, explosives bullets  --  those came pretty close to us when we were in west Aleppo  --  which have completely eviscerated children, torn limbs from people, amputated limbs from children, destroyed lives and destroyed entire families for the last four years.

"Again, whereas the voices of the 25%  --  the minority  --  in east Aleppo, the majority of which are actually foreign militants, armed militants, and terrorist factions, their voices, not the voices of the Syrian civilians whose voices have also not been heard in east Aleppo until now, until their liberation. But the voices of the militant factions are the voices that have been amplified by our governments and our media, and this, as I say, is a reflection of what is going on in Syria.

"The majority voice of the Syrian people who support the Syrian government, the Syrian state and the Syrian army, are against any forms of sectarian divisions that are being imposed upon them externally. Their voices are being muted, ignored, marginalized, while the voices of the minority, those who violently oppose the Syrian government, are being amplified. And we know now that the majority of the armed factions inside Syria are actually mercenaries funded by the Gulf States and NATO states.

"The 'moderate rebels' that existed in the beginning, the Free Syrian Army, we know now they are such a tiny percentage. So, again, there's very little amplification of the real, Syrian voices speaking out for the real Syrian voices speaking out for the real Syrian army, and the real Syrian state.

"One thing," Beeley goes on, "that I would really like to counter here: There have been what I would consider truly obscene and grotesque reports from Western media, completely unverified, the UN has produced reports saying that they are unverified, but still nevertheless running with them, of the Syrian-Arab army executing, massacring, raping even in some cases in some reports, the civilians in east Aleppo.

"This is grotesque. And I will explain why: The Syrian-Arab Army soldiers that we actually met inside east Aleppo in Hanahou, in the Old City, in all the various areas... that we visited... many of them are actually coming home. Many of them are actually returning to their own homes in east Aleppo where they grew up, where they went to school, where they had their friends and their families around them.

"To even suggest this of the soldiers of the national army, it's not as if it's Assad's army. This is the national army of Syria. They are the sons, the brothers, the uncles, the daughters of the families of Syria. To even imagine that these people who I saw in tears to be able to actually see their families again, to see their homes again in the liberated areas, would execute their own families, their own children, their own brothers, their own sisters, their own fathers, their own mothers, is one of the most grotesque propaganda forms of reporting I've actually ever seen. And the fact that the UN and the Western media are basing these reports on spurious sources such as, for example, the primarily British-funded White Helmets who were trained, as we know, by a British ex-military mercenary, set up in 2013 not in Syria but in Turkey, and embedded in Nusra-held and al-Qaeda held, ISIS-held areas across Syria but particularly in East Aleppo. Much of the accounts of Syria that have come out in the last five years have come from their reports.

"Now, when I spoke to civilians inside of East Aleppo, many of them had neither heard of or seen the White Helmets. But others were more disturbingly telling me, which is what we have suspected, that they were not a civil defense but they were working entirely with the terrorist factions, the majority with Nusra Front or with ISIS... This is not the neutral humanitarian organization... And not forgetting that our government who are funding the White Helmets to the tune of over $150 million have also a declared interest in regime-change in Syria.

"So," she says, "what we are seeing now is a breaking down of the propaganda and the lies that have underpinned the illegal NATO state and Gulf state intervention via proxy terrorist military against the war that is being waged in Syria, that is being shown, exposed, to be the criminal intervention into a sovereign nation that it really is."

While we receive reports of Syrians dancing in the streets because, according to some, the pro-Assad Syrian Arab Army (SAA) has made immense progress in liberating Aleppo from the [US funded, armed and supported terrorist] "rebels," we also see a few activists making videos claiming the SAA are gunning people down in the streets.

What is propaganda and what is not?

First, to see why it might be credible that Syrians would be dancing in the streets after being liberated by "moderate rebels," one needs only to take another look at Nassim Taleb's chart of the difference between the regime and the MRs.

Click here to expand.

To be sure, Taleb is far from pro-Assad. His father's operatives, he writes, "blew up my house in Amioun when my grandfather, then MP, voted for Bashir. In Skin in the Game I discuss this as "acting against one's interest" (the opposite of conflict of interest). So as a scientist and a humanist, I have been setting my grudge aside in considering the far, far, far, greater cancer of Salafism or Islamofascism."

And as for the anti-Assad activists...

All of them have the same story: "Because the SAA, led by Assad and helped by Russia and Iran is committing genocide here, this is the last time you will see me alive."

The activists, it appears, some of them at least, are trapped in a rebel stronghold surrounded by government forces. That little green area is where one activist, American Bilal Abdul Kareem, has been posting videos from.



And then there's Lina Shamy...


Editor-in-Chief of investigative watchdog journalism organization MintPress News, [http://www.mintpressnews.com/] Mnar Muhawesh said this about Shamy:

"If you look at her page... she is indeed a Syrian activist that is a major supporter and media collaborator for the Free Syrian Army  --  an armed opposition group that was formed, funded, armed and trained by the so called "Friends of Syria coalition" [al Nusra, anti-Syrian terrorists] in 2011 (which I have written extensively about)  --  the coalition was founded by NATO states including the US, UK, France, Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and others.

"This is the "pro-democracy" opposition group the CIA and State Department under Hillary Clinton's command helped form to topple the Assad government after their mission was complete in Libya. to topple Ghaddafi. While I do believe that many Syrians who sincerely wanted change within the government were manipulated and used by the CIA into creating the FSA to foment a sectarian civil war there  --  it's people like Lina Shamy who are purposely or unknowingly spreading misinformation about the crisis in Syria to ignite international support for a no-fly zone or an all out invasion of Syria that supports regime change. The CIA and the coalition of nations that are arming these rebels don't care about the Syrian people  --  they have sunk this country into chaos for their own economic interests. I feel bad for Lina and any other Syrian who are being used by these proxy nations or believe that a revolution is real when fighters sold out to foreign nations. Her FB page: https://www.facebook.com/blacky.rose.7..."
It is our belief that not a single "dog" in this fight is a complete angel.

The truth, just as it did in Iraq, will eventually come to light. And no matter what it is, no matter who is "most to blame" for this monstrosity, I suspect the American people aren't going to like that truth one bit.

Hopefully, for our future's sake, America doesn't just stick its head back in the sand when this truth comes to light. Otherwise, history will continue to repeat itself once again... until there's nothing left to destroy...

"Multicultural" Europe is a Disaster
By Chris Campbell
Jul 13, 2017

--"This [multicultural] approach has failed, utterly failed," Angela Merkel said in 2010 during a meeting with the Christian Democratic Union party.

So, fast-forward to 2017, instead of making mass immigration about "multiculturalism," it's now about filling in the blanks for an aging population. Rather than change the strategy, the politicos have just changed the narrative. (Because youth employment in Europe is so strong they need to pull people from other continents, right?)

Such is the nature of the "refugee" crisis.

It's no longer controversial: Four out of five migrants [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3240010/Number-refugees-arriving-Europe-soars-85-year-just-one-five-war-torn-Syria.html] coming into Europe are not escaping war-torn Syria. The vast majority of them are not refugees, by definition. They're coming from all over Africa and the Middle East, some of them even paying smugglers from $1,500 up to $15,000 to get them handed off to European aid workers.

To call this a "refugee crisis," then, is a bit disingenuous.

Problem? Allowing millions of people into countries willy-nilly with no regard for its citizens and with the expectation the State can reasonably take care of and subsidize everything is hardly sustainable. It hurts everyone involved. [Many would much rather be in a Muslim (Sharia) country but organizations make a lot of money bringing them to the West even when many are not very unhappy here.]

And there's a darker side...

The dark side...

There is a side of this mass immigration that Europeans aren't allowed to openly discuss. "Multiculturalism" is a political (not social) movement with many competing interests.

When I visited Brussels in late-2015, it was still in military lockdown after the attacks in Paris. The attackers were apparently from a small Islamic district called Molenbeek, often called by journalists "Jihad central" for its inexplicable ability to spawn terrorism in Europe.

During his reign, Molenbeek mayor Philippe Moureaux flooded the district with immigrants. It was largely assumed he did so to buy their votes with the public till and maintain his position. (Cue the shock and awe.) It's a common theme in many countries in Europe. But it didn't explain the rise of terrorists originating in Molenbeek specifically.

The view from my Airbnb

I learned, while talking in hushed tones to a Belgian in a pub (as if it were a huge secret there), that the Grand Mosque, of which was leased out to Saudi Arabia in 1967 in exchange for cheap oil, [http://www.dw.com/en/brussels-great-mosque-and-ties-with-salafism/a-18866998] was/is a cesspit of Salafism/Wahhabism.

This ideology, he said, is what led to the Paris attack  --  and, as far as we can tell, most other attacks in Europe, too.

Salafism is an ultra-conservative sect of Islam which calls for a literalist and absolutist interpretation of the Quran. It's an "either you think like us or you're an enemy" approach. It has no intention of integrating with the Western world. It's the rocket fuel for ISIS. And mass immigration into welfare states is a boon.

In a nutshell...

Salafists teach they are on a long-term mission to starve the "Beast" of Western world. Mainly through welfare and eventually outnumbering them by having as many kids as possible  --  it is only proper, they believe, to weaponize the compassion of the West.

Muslim imams are worried about the hate-filled rhetoric of Salafism.

All over the continent there are Muslim districts like Molenbeek. They are not integrative districts. They are insular and [intentionally] shut off from the rest of the population. [The muslims refuse to integrate; (even the so-called "moderate ones) are taught this in their mosques, by their imams and in the Koran) and make their areas into "no-go" zones and attack even police and firefighters with guns and bombs so that they have to leave people to die in order to protect themselves from the muslims.]
They do not integrate. The youth are self-marginalized, refusing to assimilate, with little to do to keep occupied. The Salafist imam opportunists swoop in and give them purpose. Salafism is, thus, the fastest-growing Islamist movement in Europe.
And Germany is getting the worst of it on both sides of the spectrum...

"Anti-Fascist" Germans unite with right-wing fascist Salafis

In Germany, also on the side of "multiculturalism," you also have, as we've seen recently in many G20 riot videos, [https://youtu.be/oiZ-nlRH4uA] roving bands of hard Left "Antifa" members  --  numbering in the tens of thousands.

And they aren't clean, compassionate do-gooders who want to "seize the means of production" from the filthy capitalists to feed people, create Star Trek replicators and create the utopia.


During the G20 riots, they targeted any journalist they referred to as "Nazis" (including American Luke Rudkowski and Canadian Lauren Southern) and threatened to kill them if they didn't leave.

Thus, they are the goons who stamp out any honest conversation of the dominant political agenda. (As a highly organized unit with their own news network, we wonder where they're getting their funding...)
Immigration is a complex issue.

Surely, we would want to see Syrians rebuild  --  and help them in any way we can along the way. We want to see oppressed cultures thrive. We want to see people free themselves of any chains that bind them.

But blind, hasty, mass immigration is starved for open, honest conversation. It has created a powder keg in Europe that's, if kept rolling, destined to blow.

"Multiculturalism" was just a political movement with no regard for the social implications. It's just a word used to fulfill a plethora of destructive agendas.

For some, it's a way to secure votes and power. For others, it's a long con to fulfill some maniacal Islamo-Fascist dream. For others still, it's a way to wipe out cultural identity and call people "Nazis" who disagree.

For the honest people, those looking for a better life, it's a way to get caught up as a pawn in someone else's game.

It's a trick.

And it won't end well for anyone.


Nicolai Sennels: What is Islamization?
January 12, 2015 Nicolai Sennels

Iran 1970 vs Iran 2012

(Photo above: Iran before and after the Islamic revolution in 1979)

In connection with the rising opposition to Islamisation -- most strongly expressed by the PEGIDA movement -- it is useful to have a clear overview of how Islamization sneaks its way into our society, how it manifests itself, and what the consequences are:

  What is Islamization?
  By Nicolai Sennels, psychologist

  Islamization is a phenomenon that has existed since the Muslim prophet Mohammed lived 1,400 years ago. The word 'Islamization' was originally coined by Muslims to describe the conversion of a kufr (infidel) society to an 'enlightened' (Islamic) society.

  Islamization has been effective, since Islam is now the main religion in 57 countries. The association of Islamic countries -- the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC), is today one of the world's largest supra-national organizations, surpassed only by the United Nations (UN).

  Three roads to Islamization
  One road to Islamization is to remove non-Islamic traditions and symbols. This is done to avoid offending Muslims or expose Muslims to proselytizing by other faiths. It also aims to reduce competition from the country's original religion and culture in order to improve the possibilities for further Islamization.

  An example is the Red Cross' refusal to decorate for Christmas in their stores, or when banks no longer hands out piggy banks to their customers' kids (because pigs are unclean in Islam). In both cases, this is done in order not to offend Muslims and thus lose Muslim customers.

  Another way Islamization is accomplished is by making Islamic traditions and rules part of non-Islamic societies.

  Examples of this phenomenon are construction or refurbishment of public sports facilities to cater for Muslims' inhibited views on nudity and contact between the sexes, or the imposition of forced leave on Islamic holidays.

  A third way Islamization occurs is when certain areas or neighbourhoods acquire such a high a proportion of Muslims that the country's indigenous culture and people are pushed out.

  One example is when non-Islamic authorities such as police and fire departments meet with disrespect, threats and/or violence, while imams, patrolling police-style Muslim fathers' groups, homemade Sharia Courts, and Islamic mediation meetings are free to exercise their power. Another example is when Jews cannot wear yarmulke or girls can not wear miniskirts in Muslim-dominated areas, because they risk being attacked.

  Islamization thus occurs through the systematic elimination of indigenous culture, the introduction of Islamic traditions and cultural practices through immigration and the gradual building of Muslim parallel societies.

  Disadvantages of Islamization
  There are many disadvantages of Islamization. The main issue is of course that it comes at the expense of our own culture, which is the foundation of our lifestyle, our sense of community and our well-functioning societies based on principles such as tolerance, universal human rights and free speech. Also, when compared with Muslim cultures, our Western culture is freer and more productive.

  Moreover, Western culture encourages people to be more self-confident, happy and loving, because it does not cultivate aggression, fragile feelings of honour, and intolerance against other faiths, unlike Muslim culture. Furthermore, we allow and encourage the Enlightenment principles of free speech and democracy, while allowing women and feminine qualities to bloom freely for the benefit of themselves, men and a balanced society.

  Every time we introduce more Islamization to our society, it takes us one further step away from our own culture, bringing us onestep closer to the Muslim culture and a Sharia-based society.

  Islamization occurs at the expense of indigenous culture and its norms. By harming the native culture, important life values are taken away from the people, undermining the values and norms that bind our community together. This sense of community is fundamental to quality of life for us "pack" animals, and common core values are the foundation of the mutual trust, helpfulness, openness, understanding and respect among a community, even in individualistic Western culture.

  Islamization dilutes national identity among indigenous populations, because it dilutes our common culture. At the same time, it strengthens the Muslims' Islamic identity at the expense of national identity. National identity and sense of community are important for morale, in relation to the paying of taxation, reluctance to fraudulently obtain social welfare benefits and respect towards the nation's laws and authorities. People who feel part of the community feel that they hurt themselves if they harm their community.

  Islamization allows inhumane traditions to take root in our society. The Koran's prescriptions and the Muslim culture's views on women's rights, free speech, and tolerance other faiths are medieval at best. They subvert the principles of democracy and human rights in our countries -- and whether it is in small or large increments, or restricted to certain geographical areas, no such thing should take root in our society.

  Islamization pushes the indigenous people out of areas where Muslims and Muslim culture dominate. This is because Muslim culture is so different from Western culture that we find it hard to feel at home and comfortable in an inhospitable culture, and because Islam and Muslim culture is racist towards non-Muslims.

  Islamization makes it possible to retain hard line Muslim traditionalists or Islamic extremists in our countries, because they can keep their conservative Islamic traditions often more easily in our 'tolerant' Western culture than they can back home. This is counter-productive to integration and a fertile source of home grown Islamic extremism.

  For every new Islamization of society, the step is even shorter to the next Islamization. It is easier for Muslims to make claims when they can refer to the fact that we have already accepted a large number of other similar claims.

  Islamization provides manoeuvring space for a political ideology that has oppression and extermination of all non-Muslims as both means and goal.

  Examples of Islamization
  The following examples of Islamization lead to one or more of the aforementioned disadvantages.

  It is Islamization of our cities when entire neighbourhoods are dominated so strongly by inhospitable Muslim culture, Islamic values and Muslim racism that the country's own culture and the indigenous population no longer feel at home and safe in the area. As the indigenous population, we should feel at home and welcome everywhere in our own country and it is unwise to accept anything short of this.

  It is arguably Islamization of our food supply when halal foods are not labelled as such.

  By keeping consumers ignorant of what is Islamic food, we are forced to eat halal. By buying it, we contribute to Islamic "charity", which helps fund terrorists, and support Muslim jobs at the expense of non-Muslims and low food prices  --  for halal slaughter requires a Muslim to assist with the slaughter, and Muslim organizations are paid to approve the procedure.

  Food products are already transparently labelled in detail in relation to content, health, and production methods to increase consumers' ability to make conscious choices concerning their food so we should not tolerate surreptitious halal certification, which should also be labelled as such.

  It is Islamization of children's schooling when the state allows and supports Islamic schools and madrassas. Primary schools are our society's most important cultural carrier and are intended to inform school children of the country's indigenous culture and values, not to drive impressionable minds away from our values.

  It is Islamization of our urban design and architectural culture when municipalities and the state permit the construction of large mosques and minarets that symbolise anti-Western values. Arabic architecture does not belong in Western cities, and certainly not at very central, historical or highly visible locations.

  It is Islamization of our country when mosques are permitted. The mosques enforce and increase Islamic values among the area's Muslims and often function as a springboard for extremist political activity that works to propagate the Islamization of the country.

  It is Islamization of our way of being together and the undermining of the status of women when we allow burqas and the niqab in public spaces. In a democratic society, we should see each other's faces. Women and men are equal and should be free to dress as they like, not to forcibly appear subservient to men.

  It is Islamization of our public sports facilities when swimming pools and locker rooms are closed altogether or reconstructed so that Muslims can use them. It should be up to personal choice and not to religion as to what view of nudity a person is comfortable with. Moreover, personal preferences should not restrict the citizens' global access to public taxpayer-funded facilities.

  It is Islamization of our schools, institutions, workplaces and the rhythm of the year when we create non-Western Muslim holidays,and when municipalities and unions print Muslim holidays in our calendars. We have an adequate number of holidays in our country, and more holidays harm children's academic development and lead to a loss of productivity in companies.

  The yearly rhythm is closely associated with a country's history, traditions, and culture, and plays an important role in national identity. This very basic rhythm of life should be experienced as it relates to our own history and culture, and not be Islamizedaway from Western values.

  It is Islamization of our schools when Muslims are treated as a special case and schoolchildren are excused from physical education and Christian education for religious reasons.

  It is Islamization of our stores when they choose not to use Christian, cultural or national symbols in order not to offend Muslims or lose Muslim customers. Shop decorations are part of our Western culture and our cities' streetscape, and they are definitely not offensive. They help mark the seasons with Christmas ornaments, Easter eggs, carnival decorations etc. Buyers should select stores that take a social responsibility for the continuation of our society and culture.

  It is Islamization of our public institutions and workplaces when halal foods are included on the menu. Special diets due solely to personal choices of religion should not be funded by the state.

  It is Islamization of our way of caring for children when we ignore that they are simply being starved for religious reasons. Ramadan damages children's ability to concentrate in school. Moreover, it affects children's social development, because hunger and fluctuating blood sugar make them emotionally unstable and aggressive. Starving of children should rightfully be categorized as neglect and punished as such.

  It is Islamization when we ignore the fact that a specific ethnic group of women in our own country are deprived of basic human rights on religious grounds. Women from non-Western countries should have regular visits or meetings with municipality employees. These employees must advise migrant women about family planning and contraception. Additionally, employees should make sure that these women are free and safe. Finally, it is important that migrant women know their rights include access to women's shelters, divorce and repatriation.

  It is Islamization of the Danish government when public sector workplaces have prayer rooms. Public workers are public servants, and thus taxpayers' money should not be used for the observance of non-secular religious practices.

  It is the Islamization of our jurisprudence when we do not effectively stop homemade Sharia Courts and Islamic mediation meetings. Such things are organized vigilantism and an assault on the foundations of our social structure, directly undermining our legal system and sense of justice, and should be removed with the necessary methods.

  It is Islamization of the justice system when police ignore Muslims' scorn, threats, and violence, and when the police invite Muslim fathers' groups to help stop Muslim riots and gangs. It is harmful to the sense of justice in the country and undermines police authority.

  It is the Islamization of our legal system when we allow Sharia courts or give reduced sentences to perpetrators who have committed a crime for religious or cultural reasons (honour crimes).

  It is Islamization of our population, electorates, and countries,when we allow immigration from Muslim countries and when our European leaders do not protect us effectively against illegal immigration and the silent Islamization of our Western European societies by surreptitious means.

Andrew says:    
January 30, 2015 at

A thorough and chilling description of our current situation and near future
EricJ says:    
January 31, 2015 at

We can trace what is happening today back to the defeat of the Ottoman Empire by the British, French, Italian and Japanese forces at the end of WW1 and the creation of the Mandate for Palestine. The purpose of this Muslim Brotherhood is to regain Palestine and they attempting to do this in a round about way over during this past century since the
creation of the Muslim Brotherhood in 1928. This is being done by growing the Muslim population in various countries such as Britain, France, US, etc using the Koran to justify 4 wives plus sex slaves to breed and grow their caliphates and in our democratic societies, they soon have the numbers to out vote us especially if we don't ourselves vote. They have
also invented Halal certification as a way to finance and take control using this money to finance mosques hat are just recruiting centers right under our eyes. Once they are in control of the very same
governments, US, Britain, France, and Italy, they then become in possession legally under international law to rescind the Palestine Mandate, and this resets the clock for them back 1400 years at least to occupy the lands they deem as theirs under the original Ottoman Empire, There are various key pieces on the internet, It is time to open our eyes and open our minds.
Who was in Israel first

  Shafiq says:    
  January 27, 2016 at

  As a Christian university professor in a Muslim country, I have to disagree. The Muslim behaviour in the west of forcing their hosts to accommodate to their sensibilities and practices is a preliminary form of the extreme dominance they exert here. Bit by bit they force you to abandon your culture and adopt theirs. It is jihad by stealth, conquest with the consent and willing compliance of the conquered. Come and live here for a month and you'll understand--if you survive.

  Let me share with you an amusing anecdote of defiance. A secular Indian Hindu colleague of mine attended the same engineering conference in Bangkok that I did. Unfortunately his university deputed a radical Muslim professor to attend with him, and for the entire flight the Muslim ranted about kuffar. My friend wanted desperately to avoid 4 nights sharing a hotel room with the beast, so he did something clever.

  When they arrived at the hotel, he went to the restaurant and talked to the room service waiter. He arranged for a large meal, featuring pork ribs and red wine, to be delivered to his room at exactly the time of the evening azaan (call to prayer). As the Muslim was unfurling his prayer rug and orienting it towards Mecca, a smiling waiter arrived with my friend's dinner, taking care to loudly point out each item. The Muslim quickly rolled up his rug and fled in horror, and my friend had 4 pleasant, peaceful nights in the hotel. Learn from him.

Keil says:    
April 20, 2015 at

When an entire civilization (the West) is under attack by mass-immigration from distinct underdeveloped (cultural, financial) areas, it is vital to hit back. Unfortunately, the West has elites of policy-makers who diminish the threat, just as the commenter Edwardx. Taken isolated one by one the Moslem demands seemed harmless but taken as a six-pack it's far too much. Even big countries are threatened by Moslem demands in everyday life. Small countries like Belgium or Denmark, it's a question of life and death within very few years. -- Sennels' analysis is accurate in every way. It's due time to make a ban on Islam.

knightsstrength says:    
May 25, 2015 at

Nicolai Sennels, right to the point and covers most.

We the free world must unite and push Islam back in it's hole out of much of the world back to Medina .
I could not trust any in government to get us out of this hole, we are in as they created it with the UN

I wish all would take the Constancies Labarum Cross in the name of Jesus Christ as I am sure it had special powers.


Brian says:    
June 2, 2015 at

Islam is a murderous, fascist, supremacist, misogynistic. totalitarian ideology with a veneer of religion, founded by a mass murderer and mass rapist that every Muslim is exhorted to emulate.

Aesir says:    
July 28, 2015 at

Dear Mr Ahmad...
Perhaps you are mentally disordered!?
Only People who have no backbone and are therefore cut-off from the benefits of a modern society seek shelter in backwards-oriented ideologies.
Those people are called Neo-Nazis or convertites.
The fastest growing religion!? Ridiculous. Families of a modern society only give birth to 1-2 children, families from your medieval society give birth to at least 3 children (all of whom are beaten into this kind of religious fascism or killed if they want to leave).

Lyra says:    
September 10, 2015 at

HA! Never forcefully converted anyone to Islam?! Bitch please! True, there are peaceful passages of the Quran, but it's also written in it that if there are any contradicting statements, Muslims must follow the newest ones -- and these are the violent ones.
"Never converted anyone to Islam" has to be the biggest fucking joke ever!
And not many western people would convert to such a sexist, violent and medieval religion. It's because the Muslims don't know how to use contraceptives because 90 % of them live in the Dark Ages!
Through it's 1400 year long life, Islam has easily proven to be the cruelest, most sexist and backwards thinking religion on the planet, and it would be fair if we were to ban it and send them back where they came from.
If Christian countries played the same stunts, then you either convert fully to Catholism (because that's the "meaner" of the two Christian faiths) and if you even THINK of Allah, we get to cut your head off!

Seem fair to you?!

      Gea says:    
      July 23, 2016 at

      You need a doctor as you clearly do not live in a real world. Anybody who had read Koran, Hadith and Sira (www.cspipublishing.com/pdfs/ATwoHourKoran.pdf) KNOWS what many EX-Muslism had warned us about Islam that Islam ITSELF is an IDEOLOGY WORSE than Nazism.

      Only sociopaths and losers would go for it.

nuthole says:    
December 30, 2015 at

Well, other than the mostly forced reproduction in the islamic world, I think we in West are too naive, too tolerant, too passive about the only one "religion" on this earth which is perfectly intolerant of anything non-islamic and is going to all measures to take over the world. But what happens when the house of war becomes the house of islam? Repression, innerfaith (islamic) warfare, unemployment, chaos, lynch justice, broken down infrastructure, almost non- existent econony, sickness, desease, cultural barreness, just to scratch the surface of the catastrophic fate of this world if we let it happen

skai says:    
January 6, 2016 at

Iftikhar Ahmad. You been writing same sort of BS in many other websites .No one take notice of it. We the infidels are much more knowledgeable than you muslims about the evil cult of your and its history. This is from a Book by Wali Khan called " Facts Are Facts The Untold Story Of India's Partition " In it he says " Muslims have always been denied access to truth and historical evidence .Luckily , however , history has a way of revealing itself sooner or later, no matter how much effort is made to camouflage it with pretty untruth . " That is the problem with you muslims. Your evil quran is nothing but an evil manual for muslim barbarians. Islam is NOT the fastest growing CULT. Dream on you paedophile's follower Now see http://www.thereligionofpeace.com and http://www.faithfreedom.org Tell us in how many days your allah created the planet./earth?

streeming says:    
February 1, 2016 at

It's "fastest growing" because of the high birth rates of the muslim family, you buffoon! Islam is a terrible religion made by an arrogant and narcissistic monster.

Just read the quran. the islamic deity repeated displays egomania, narcissism and hatred towards non-believers. Absolutely sick.

Just read the first 5 chapters and last 2 dozen. You don't even need to read thee whole book to realize how sick and twisted the cult is.

nuthole says:    
December 30, 2015 at

Takiyya is in other words "pull the wool over thier eyes"... which leads me to think "a wolf in sheep skin"

  Gea says:    
  July 23, 2016 at

  You are either delusional or are lying through your teeth as you were taught to lie in order to promote Islam among naive Kuffr (non-Muslims). According to your holly books,m women are to be treated s riding animals. That is why you see all those Muslims raping European women...

Joe says:    
September 21, 2015 at

No compulsion in religion,? Have you read this book Nia? You may have been able to get away with quoting peaceful verses that were abrogated to violent verses in past times. People these days have read the koran. People can easily find verses like "I have been ordered to fight the unbelievers until they say there is no god but aLlah and mohammed is his messenger ". And dont takk crap about the muslim violence being nothing to do with islam. Its everything to do with islam. Its because the islam wants war so it can kill all the Jews and bring on the end od days. Thats why isis films its attrocities and shows the world. They want the last big battle that bring the Mehrdie. Islam even believes that the rocks and trees will turn on the Jews. What shit is that? Nobody cares if you want to pray five times a day or not eat bacon sandwiches. Just dont pretend there isnt something very very wrong with the message of the koran and quote verses that every muslim knows isnt followed in there heart. It was written in a time for a murderous arab by a murderous arab to justify his insanity , and bloodlust. Unfortunately he left this world with his cursed book and told uneducated arabs it cant be altered and 25million people have had to suffer horrible deaths because of it. The koran contradicts itself many times. Muslims dont understand that because its ok with you that one verse becomes another . Its abrogated, not contradicted, right.? Of course Uthman knew of the contradictions in other versions of the koran so thats why he had them burnt.I bet youve never even wondered why the onlty book that supports the Koran IS the Koran. You wont have of course because muslims cannot question the koran. Convenient. So yes , the world is a mess and its probably the end of western civilization as we know it. We will have to deal with that. Just dont think most people are as stupid as our dhimmi politicians. Most of us know exactly whats going on and that its ALL about islam.

LUX says:    
October 2, 2015 at

I translated the important articel into German. I think its a good time to think about islamization in Germany: we have 10.000 Muslims daily coming into our country and on the other side the Pegida protests against islamization, which is growing, still is called rasist by the news and that there is no islamization in Germany.

The first sentence is new.

Momentan erlebt Europa, allen voran Deutschland und Schweden eine durch millionenfache muslimische Migranten stark beschleunigte Islamisierung.

Im Zusammenhang mit dem steigenden Widerstand gegen die jedoch schon länger stattfindende Islamisierung -- am stärksten von der PEGIDA Bewegung ausgedrückt --ist es nützlich, einen klaren Überblick darüber zu haben, wie die Islamisierung, sich ihren Weg in unsere Gesellschaft schleicht, wie sie sich offenbart, und welche Konsequenzen sie hat:

Was ist Islamisierung?
Islamisierung, als Phänomen, existiert seit 1400 Jahren, seit der Lebzeit des muslimischen Propheten Mohammed. Der Begriff „Islamisierung" wurde ursprünglich von den Muslimen selbst geprägt um die Umwandlung einer Gesellschaft der kufr (Ungläubigen) in eine „aufgeklärte" („islamische") Gesellschaft zu beschreiben.
Heute ist der Islam in 57 Ländern der Erde die wichtigste Religion, somit kann man sagen, dass eine Islamisierung bereits sehr erfolgreich war. Die Vereinigung der Islamischen Länder (OIC), ist die größte übernationale Organisation, die nur von den Vereinten Nationen (UN) übertroffen wird.

Drei Wege zur Islamisierung
Ein erster Weg eine Islamisierung herbeizuführen ist die Entfernung nicht-islamischer Traditionen und Symbole. Dies geschieht, um eine Beleidigung von Muslimen zu vermeiden oder um zu verhindern, dass Muslime der Missionierung durch andere Religionen ausgesetzt sind. Das zielt auch darauf ab, die Auseinandersetzung mit der ursprünglichen Religion und Kultur eines Landes zu verringern und somit die Möglichkeiten einer weiteren Islamisierung zu verbessern. Ein Beispiel hierfür ist die Weigerung des Roten Kreuzes in seinen Geschäften weihnachtlich zu dekorieren, oder wenn die Banken keine Sparschweine an die Kinder ihrer Kunden mehr ausgeben (weil Schweine im Islam als unrein gelten) -- in beiden Situationen sollen Muslime nicht verletzt werden und man will keine muslimischen Kunden verlieren.

Islamisierung wird auch noch auf einen zweiten Weg erreicht, nämlich indem man islamische Traditionen und Regeln zum Teil einer nicht-islamischen Gesellschaft macht. Beispiele dafür sind zum einen das Umgestalten öffentlicher Sporteinrichtungen, um Muslimen die Ansicht von Nacktheit und den Kontakt zwischen den Geschlechtern zu ersparen und zum anderen die Forderung an islamischen Feiertagen von der Arbeit fernbleiben zu können.

Ein dritter Weg der Islamisierung findet statt, wenn durch Ansiedelung einer hohen Anzahl an Muslimen in bestimmten Gegenden, die eingeborene Kultur des Landes und deren Bevölkerung heraus gedrängt werden. Ein Beispiel dafür ist, wenn nicht-islamische Autoritäten wie die Polizei und die Feuerwehr respektlos behandelt und manchmal sogar bedroht werden und Gewalt gegen sie angewendet wird, während die Imame in der Art der Polizei patrouillieren, muslimische Vätergruppen, selbstgemachte Schariagerichtshöfe und islamische Schlichtungsgruppen die Freiheit haben, ihre Macht ungehindert auszuüben. Ein weiteres Beispiel ist, wenn in muslimisch dominierten Gegenden Juden nicht mehr ihre Kippa und Mädchen keine Miniröcke mehr tragen können, weil sie sonst Gefahr laufen angegriffen zu werden.
So entsteht eine Islamisierung durch Eliminierung der einheimischen Kultur, der Einführung islamischer Traditionen und durch Immigration und dem Aufbau muslimischer Parallelgesellschaften.

Nachteile der Islamisierung
Eine Islamisierung hat viele Nachteile. Der Hauptnachteil besteht natürlich darin, dass sie auf Kosten unserer eigenen Kultur geschieht, welche die Grundlage unserer Lebensweise bildet, die Grundlage für unseren Gemeinschaftssinn und unsere gut funktionierende Gesellschaft. Unsere Gesellschaft stützt auf Prinzipien wie Toleranz, universellen Menschenrechten und Meinungsfreiheit. Daher ist unsere westliche Kultur im Vergleich zu den muslimischen Kulturen freier und produktiver. Hinzu kommt, dass die westliche Kultur den Menschen selbstbewusster, glücklicher und liebevoller macht, denn anders als die muslimische Kultur kultiviert sie keine Aggressionen, zerbrechliche Ehrgefühle und Intoleranz gegenüber anderen Religionen. Weiterhin gestatten wir aufgeklärte Werte wie Redefreiheit und Demokratie, während wir zulassen, dass Frauen und weibliche Qualitäten in Freiheit gedeihen können zum Wohle ihrer selbst, der Männer und der ausgeglichenen Gesellschaft.

Jedes Mal wenn wir mehr Islamisierung in unserer Gesellschaft einführen, bewegen wir uns einen Schritt weiter weg von unserer eigenen Kultur und einen Schritt näher an die muslimische Kultur heran, an eine Gesellschaft die auf der Scharia basiert.
*  Islamisierung geschieht immer auf Kosten der einheimischen Kulturen und ihrer Normen. Dies geschieht, indem man die ursprüngliche Kultur beschädigt, wichtige Werte des Lebens den Menschen wegnimmt und die Werte und Normen, die unsere Gesellschaft zusammenhalten, untergräbt. Der Gemeinschaftssinn ist grundlegend für die Lebensqualität von uns „Rudeltieren" und gemeinsame Grundwerte sind die Basis gegenseitigen Vertrauens, Hilfsbereitschaft, Offenheit, gegenseitigem Verständnis und Respekt innerhalb einer Bevölkerung. Dies gilt auch in der individualistischen westlichen Kultur.
*  Islamisierung verwässert die nationale Identität der einheimischen Bevölkerung, denn sie verwässert unsere gemeinsame Kultur. Gleichzeitig stärkt sie die muslimische islamische Identität auf Kosten der nationalen Identität. Nationale Identität und Gemeinschaftssinn sind wichtig für die Moral. So ist moralisches Erleben beispielsweise wichtig in Hinblick auf Steuerhinterziehung und Sozialhilfebetrug und für den Respekt gegenüber den Gesetzen und Autoritäten des Landes. Menschen, die sich als Teil der Gesellschaft empfinden, erleben, wie sie sich selbst schaden wenn sie der Gesellschaft schaden.
*  Islamisierung gestattet inhumanen Traditionen in unserer Gesellschaft Fuß zu fassen. Die Vorschriften des Korans und die muslimische Sicht auf Frauen, auf Meinungsfreiheit und auf andere Glaubensrichtungen sind mittelalterlich. Sie verhalten sich subversiv hinsichtlich der Demokratie und der Menschenrechte eines Landes -- und egal ob dies wenig oder viel geschieht oder ob dies nur auf ein bestimmtes geografisches Gebiet beschränkt ist, solch eine Sache darf in unserem Land nicht Fuß fassen.
*  Islamisierung drängt die eingeborene Bevölkerung aus den Gebieten heraus in welchen Muslime und die muslimische Kultur dominieren. Dies geschieht, weil die muslimische Kultur so anders ist als die westliche, so dass wir es schwierig finden uns mit einer unwirtlichen Kultur heimisch und wohl zu fühlen und nicht zu letzt weil der Islam und die muslimische Kultur sich gegenüber nicht-Muslimen rassistisch verhält.
*  Islamisierung bewirkt, dass muslimische Traditionalisten oder islamische Extremisten sich in unsere Länder zurückziehen, weil sie hier ihre islamischen Traditionen aufrechterhalten können. Dies ist kontraproduktiv für jegliche Integration und eine Quelle für hausgemachten islamischen Extremismus.
*  Denn jede neue Islamisierung einer Gesellschaft verkürzt den Weg hin zur nächsten Islamisierung. Es ist leicht für Muslime Forderungen zu stellen, wenn sie sich auf die Tatsache beziehen können, dass wir schon längst eine große Anzahl ähnlicher Forderungen erfüllt haben.
Islamisierung bietet Manöverspielraum für eine politische Ideologie, die sowohl die Unterdrückung als auch die Auslöschung aller nicht-Muslime mit allen Mitteln zum Ziel hat.

Beispiele für eine Islamisierung
Die im Folgenden geschilderten Beispiele für eine Islamisierung führen zu einem oder mehreren der zuvor beschriebenen Nachteile:

Eine Islamisierung unserer Städte ist gegeben, wenn gesamte Nachbarschaften so stark von der unwirtlichen muslimischen Kultur dominiert werden, von islamischen Werten und von muslimischem Rassismus, dass die Kultur des Landes und die eingeborene Bevölkerung sich nicht mehr länger heimisch und sicher in dieser Gegend fühlt. Wir sollten uns überall in unserem eigenen Land heimisch und willkommen fühlen, davon Abstriche zu machen ist unklug.

Eine Islamisierung unserer Nahrung ist gegeben wenn Halal Produkte nicht als solche gekennzeichnet werden. Wir werden gezwungen Halal zu essen, indem man die Kunden ahnungslos darüber hält, welche der Produkte im Lebensmittelregal islamische Nahrung ist. Wenn wir es kaufen tragen wir zu islamischer „Wohltätigkeit" bei, mit Hilfe derer Terroristen finanziert werden und wir unterstützen muslimische Arbeitsstellen auf Kosten nicht-muslimischer und auf Kosten der Nahrungsmittelpreise -- Halal Schlachtung benötigt einen Muslimen der bei der Schlachtung hilft und die muslimischen Organisationen werden dafür bezahlt diesen Vorgang zu unterstützen. Nahrungsmittel werden heute schon detailliert gekennzeichnet wenn es um Inhaltsstoffe geht, um die Gesundheit, und um die Produktionsmethoden, darum die Fähigkeiten der Konsumenten zu stärken hinsichtlich ihrer Nahrung eine bewusste Wahl zu treffen. Natürlich müssen Halal Produkten dann auch gekennzeichnet werden.

Eine Islamisierung der Schulen unserer Kinder ist gegeben wenn der Staat islamische Schulen und Koranschulen [Madrassen] erlaubt und unterstützt. Grundschulen sind in der Gesellschaft die wichtigsten Übermittler unserer Kultur und es ist Absicht, dass die Schulkinder unseres Landes über die einheimischen Kulturen und Werte des jeweiligen Landes informiert werden. Nicht jedoch sollten wir die leicht zu beeindruckenden Kinderköpfe weg von unseren Werten führen.

Eine Islamisierung unseres Stadtbildes und unserer architektonischen Kultur ist gegeben wenn Stadtverwaltungen und Staat den Bau von großen Moscheen und Minaretten erlauben. Die arabische Architektur gehört nicht in westliche Städte -- und sicherlich nicht ins Zentrum oder an historisch herausragende Orte.

Eine Islamisierung unserer Länder ist gegeben wenn man Moscheen gestattet. Moscheen verstärken und vermehren islamische Werte unter den Muslimen innerhalb eines muslimischen Gebiets und oft fungieren sie als Sprungbrett für politische Aktivitäten, die der Islamisierung eines Landes dienen.

Eine Islamisierung unserer Art des Zusammenlebens sowie der Rolle der Frau ist gegeben wenn wir es zulassen, dass Burkas und Niqabs in öffentlichen Räumen getragen werden dürfen. In einer demokratischen Gesellschaft sollten wir uns gegenseitig ins Gesicht schauen können und Frauen und Männer sollten gleich sein und die Freiheit besitzen sich so anzuziehen wie sie es wollen.

Eine Islamisierung unserer öffentlichen Sportangebote ist gegeben, wenn man Schwimmbäder schließt oder Umkleidekabinen so konstruiert, dass Muslime sie benutzen können. Es sollte die Wahl eines jeden einzelnen Menschen sein und nicht die einer Religion, mit wie viel Nacktheit sich ein Mensch wohl fühlt. Darüber hinaus sollte die individuelle Wahl sollte nicht den Zugang des Bürgers zu Einrichtungen behindern, die vom Steuerzahler finanziert werden.

Eine Islamisierung unserer Schulen, Institutionen, Arbeitsplätze und eine Umgestaltung des jahreszeitlichen Rhythmus ist gegeben wenn wir muslimische Ferien erschaffen und wenn Verwaltungen und Vereinigungen muslimische Feiertage in unsere Kalender eintragen. Wir haben eine angemessene Anzahl an Feiertagen in unserem Land und noch mehr Ferientage würden die akademische Entwicklung unserer Kinder beeinträchtigen sowie einen Rückgang der Produktivität unserer Firmen. Der jährliche Rhythmus ist eng an die Geschichte, Traditionen und Kultur unseres Landes angelehnt und spielt eine bedeutende Rolle bei unseren Erfahrungen, wie wir Ferien- und Jahreszeiten empfinden. Dieser grundlegende Lebensrhythmus sollte erfahren werden in Bezug auf unsere eigene Geschichte und Kultur und sollte nicht islamisiert werden.

Eine Islamisierung unserer Schulen ist gegeben wenn Muslime vom Sportunterricht und von christlicher Religionslehre aus religiösen Gründen entschuldigt sind.

Eine Islamisierung der Geschäfte ist gegeben wenn sie sich dafür entscheiden nicht mehr unsere christlichen oder nationalen Symbole zu benutzen um Muslime nicht zu beleidigen oder muslimische Kunden nicht zu verlieren. Dekorationen in Geschäften sind Teil unserer Kultur und der Straßenbildes in unseren Städten und sie helfen dabei mit, die Jahreszeiten durch christlichen Schmuck anzukündigen. Ostereier, Karnevalsdekorationen usw. Kunden sollten sich die Geschäfte aussuchen die eine soziale Verantwortung übernehmen für unsere Gesellschaft und unsere Kultur.

Eine Islamisierung unserer öffentlichen Einrichtungen und Arbeitsplätze ist gegeben wenn Halal Nahrungsmittel auf der Speisekarte enthalten sind. Spezielle Diäten, die einzig auf der persönlichen Wahl der Religion basieren, sollten nicht vom Staat subventioniert werden.

Eine Islamisierung unserer Art für Kinder zu sorgen ist gegeben wenn wir ignorieren, dass sie aus religiösen Gründen hungern müssen. Der Ramadan schädigt die Konzentrationsfähigkeit der Kinder in der Schule. Zusätzlich schädigt er die soziale Entwicklung der Kinder, denn Hunger und ein schwankender Blutzuckerspiegel machen sie emotional instabil und aggressiv. Hungernde Kinder kann man mit Recht als vernachlässigt und bestraft ansehen.

Islamisierung ist gegeben, wenn wir die Tatsache ignorieren, dass spezifische ethnische Frauengruppen in unserem eigenen Land ihrer grundlegenden Menschenrechte auf Grund religiöser Forderungen beraubt werden. Frauen aus nicht-westlichen Ländern sollten regelmäßige Termine bei oder Besuch von Angestellten der Stadtverwaltung haben. Die Angestellten sollten die Migrantenfrauen darin unterweisen, wie man mit Familienplanung und Empfängnisverhütung umgeht. Zusätzlich sollte man sicherstellen, dass die Frauen frei und sicher leben können. Letztendlich ist es wichtig, dass Migrantenfrauen ihre Rechte in Bezug auf Frauenhäuser, Scheidung und Rückführung in ihre Heimatländer kennen.

Eine Islamisierung der dänischen Regierung ist gegeben wenn Arbeitsplätze im öffentlichen Dienst Gebetsräume haben. Öffentliche Angestellte sind Beamte und so sollte das Geld des Steuerzahlers nicht für religiöse Praktiken ausgegeben werden.

Eine Islamisierung unseres Rechtssystems ist gegeben wenn wir es nicht schaffen auf effektive Weise die selbsternannten Schariagerichtshöfe und islamischen Mediationsversammlungen aufzuhalten. Solche Dinge sind organisierte Selbstjustiz und ein direkter Anschlag auf die Grundfesten unserer Sozialstruktur und unseres Gerechtigkeitssinns, und sie sollten mit den notwendigen Mitteln entfernt werden.

Eine Islamisierung unseres Rechtssystems ist gegeben wenn die Polizei muslimischen Spott, Drohungen und Gewalt ignoriert und wenn die Polizei muslimische Vätergruppen hinzuzieht, um muslimische Aufstände und Banden aufzuhalten. Es schadet unserem Rechtsverständnis in diesem Land und untergräbt die Autorität der Polizei.

Eine Islamisierung unseres Rechtssystems ist gegeben wenn wir Schariagerichtshöfe zulassen oder Tätern, die ein Verbrechen aus religiösen oder kulturellen Gründen begangen haben („Ehrenmorde") ein geringeres Strafmaß zubilligen.

Eine Islamisierung unserer Bevölkerung, der Wählerschaft und des Landes ist gegeben wenn wir die Immigration aus muslimischen Ländern erlauben und wenn unsere europäischen Staats- und Regierungschefs uns nicht effektiv gegen illegale Immigration schützen und gegen eine stille Islamisierung unserer westeuropäischen Gesellschaften durch verdeckte Mittel.

Helft die die Welt zu retten und teilt die Information!

Nicolai Sennels (geb. 1976) ist ein dänischer Diplom-Psychologe. Sennels ist Autor des Buches "Unter kriminellen Muslimen" (ins Englische und Schwedische übersetzt) und zahlreicher Artikel über die Psychologie des Islams und der muslimischen Mentalität. Er stützt seine Schlussfolgerungen auf seiner Arbeit mit mehr als 100 muslimischen Patienten und auf wissenschaftlicher Forschung. In den vergangen Jahr initiierte er die montäglich stattfindenden Pegida Kundgebungen in Kopenhagen.

  nuthole says:    
  December 30, 2015 at
  Lux, thanks for the translation. I've already started passing it on

LUX says:    
October 2, 2015 at
Maybe Journalistenwatch could publish this valuable article in German.
Thank you!

American Infidel says:    
October 29, 2015 at

Lars says:    
December 24, 2015 at
Thanks to websites such as this, the world is becoming educated about the evil nature of Fundamentalist Islam, which has about 800 million followers, i.e., one-half of the 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide. The Fundamentalists are absolute barbarians and it is from this pool of 800 million that the jihadists are born. So, it is not a minority as Obama wants you to believe, it is not a peaceful religion that Hillary Clinton wants you to believe, and it is not about cultural diversity that Stefan Löfven wants you to believe. There will be more Paris-style attacks in Europe and it is likely that these attacks will escalate in the number of casualties. It is only a matter of time before our current crop of politicians are voted out office for their ignorance.

Blitzing says:    
July 5, 2016 at

*laughs* !Mayflower1978, thank you for your precious input in this forum. You are a perfect example for the islamist innerent psycopathy that we are witnessing in our era. At first you tried to argue with composure but as soon you've noticed that your religious paradigm has no weight in a rational discussion you sir, turned into aggression and diffamation, a common tool folks like yourself are known to resort to. It's also interesting to see how your input in this article has spanned a period of several months, a year apparently. You've stalked the page over and over again and left several comments, mostly laced with cursing and offense.
We all have already met many a troglodyte like yourself in our modern societies, the typical caveman that when lacking arguments, often in any discussion, starts to offend and threaten with the ubiquitous "I fuck your mother", or the not less common "You want trouble, I kill you". If you would have the mental capability to think critically and understand, and consequently have the honesty to ackowledge how pathetic you write to be, you could also realize how much of your stance actually only reinforces the criticism expressed in this page and how much in fact you are a liability to your own folk and creed instead of the deffense you seem to believe you are providing.
It is in fact people like you, unable to think, to analyse, to express ideas in a civilized manner, to acknowledge different possibilities that are a threat to our society and make us so critical. Unfortunately for muslims, there is a large percentage of these among them. The honest and intelligent will know that this is what we are critical about and what we ALL must fight. The most imbecile among you will just take it as Islamophobia and an attack on their belief.
Being a proud muslim american as you say to be, and discussing in the manner you do proves unfortunately that the Land of the Free didn't inspire to think like one nor to understand its meaning.

Gea says:    
July 23, 2016 at

Your writing indicates "class". Any decent parent would have washed your mought withn soap ;-)!

BTW, Ted Cruz also wants to ban Muslims from entering USA as he had probably read Koran, Hadith and sira and KNOWS what the totalitarian, supremacist , apartheid and imperialistic Ideology of Islam teaches...

Get help to come down to earth rather then living a delusional life.

  Gea says:    
  July 23, 2016 at

  You are NO Mayflower, but need to be removed from a civilized society for your arrogance and ignorance.

  Perhaps you should read Koran, Hadith and Sira (www.cspipublishing.com/pdfs/ATwoHourKoran.pdf) to understand what Islam REALLY teaches and why Islam is an IDEOLOGY worse than Nazism because Islam also condones pedophilia, polygamy, rape, misogyny, slavery, FMG, apartheid, looting and mass murder, because Mohamed committed all those crimes against humanity and he is a role model for all 1,600 millions of Muslims, like you.

  Islam, just like Nazism, Communism and fascism always attracts losers in lie.

Stanislaw Infidel says:    
July 5, 2016 at
islam it is true fascism

Siddi Nasrani says:    
December 4, 2016 at
All I can say about Islam and its followers,
"They believe their own lies and deluded by their own fantasies"

By Anonymous

After three years of research in texts of 10 biggest religions linguist concludes: Islam is the most violent religion.
January 12, 2015 Nicolai Sennels
[Note: you don't need to study it; just count the bodies of its followers.]

What makes this research project special is that it is not done by somebody working inside the field of religion, but by a linguist. Magaard's conclusion that "If it is true that many Muslims view the Qur'an as God's own words that can not be interpreted or rephrased, we have a problem." is spot on. And unfortunately the answer is yes, it is true: 75 percent of Muslims in Europe think that the Quran can not be interpreted.

Translated from JP:

  "For three years a Danish linguist has analyzed the basic texts of 10 religions. She concludes that the texts of Islam stand out by encouraging terrorism and violence more than other religions. ...

  On the fourth anniversary of the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, the Danish linguist Tina Magaard presented an analysis that questions the relationship between Islam and terrorism, violence and holy war.

  Islam's religious texts call upon its followers to commit terror and to fight to a much higher degree than any other religion, concludes Tina Magaard, who graduated from the Sorbonne in Paris as a Ph.D. in Textual Analysis and Intercultural Communication after a three-year research project that compared the basic texts of 10 religions.

  'The texts in Islam are clearly distinct from the other religious texts as they to a much higher degree call for violence and aggression against followers of other faiths. There are also direct incitements to terror. This has long been a taboo in research in Islam, but it is a fact we have to acknowledge,' says Tina Magaard.

  Furthermore, the Quran contains hundreds of calls to fight against followers of other faiths.

  'If it is true that many Muslims view the Quran as God's own words that can not be interpreted or rephrased, we have a problem.'"


Shaun says:    
January 14, 2015 at

Muslims believe that the Koran is the perfect, eternal word of their god Allah. Through the Koran they are told to make war in order to spread Islam. They are told to hate, subjugate and kill non-Muslims and to not take any of them as friends. They are told to kill Jews. They are told that women are inherently inferior to men and that gays and apostates are to be killed. Muslim men are told that they can rape their wives and female slaves.

All Muslims support Islam. Some by blatantly promoting its barbaric, tribal values and some by lying about those values, saying that Islam is a religion of peace and that the acts of Muslim terrorists have nothing to do with Islam.

Western countries are betrayed by politicians, the media, royalty and other traitors who trot out those same lies and won't tell their people what Islam's instructions to Muslims really are.

Islam is poison and the West needs to be cleansed. Deport all Muslims to Islamic countries and deport the traitors with them.

Randy Ward says:    
January 14, 2015 at

Nice research, but is it really needed, since muslims have murdered over 250 million people and are by a large margin the most murderous group ever to have lived on the planet? Just wait until they get nuclear weapons and can fire them without caring about retaliation.
Bob Smith says:    
January 15, 2015 at

Let me point out a study published by Scientists at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in the July 22, 2011 online edition of the journal Physical Review E article titled "Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities" (http://news.rpi.edu/luwakkey/2902?destination=node/38887). This study found "that when just 10 percent of the population holds an unshakable belief, their belief will always be adopted by the majority of the society."

When you add in the incentive for violence it becomes clear.

A small minority of devout Muslims control all of Islam.

Without Islamic reformation this problem will continue.

Read my thesis on Islamic fear. It details the circular process that locks Islam in violence.

Islam's Fatal Flaw

Muslims are captive of a system they do not control - behind a "Crescent Curtain" of fear. Here is how it works.
Islam is Fear

Islam incites its followers to commit violence

by Bob Smith

Would you wear a T-shirt with a Mohammad cartoon printed on it?

You might in Montana. Don't try it in Mecca.


Because, Islam trains a small number of its most devout believers it's OK to kill. And Islamic killers have been trained to kill anyone who insults Allah and/or Mohammad.

In Montana you'd have a good chance none of these Islamic killers would see you.

In Mecca you wouldn't last five minutes. One of Islam's killers would come from out of nowhere and kill you. It is that simple.

You don't believe me? Ask any Muslim!

This article is about these Islamic killers and the fear they generate.

Islamic society is trapped by a self-replicating, endless cycle of violence and fear, driven by its most devout believers. The cycle goes like this.

The Violence

Within Islam, each generation's most devout believers train a small percentage of the next generation's most devout believers that it is OK to commit violence in the name of Islam. This becomes an endless cycle because these devout believers are:

  Instructed to kill anyone who tries to modify or stop the teaching of this violence.
  Instructed to be self-initiating.
  Trained in every part of the Islamic Uma.
  They blend in with the general population and cannot be easily identified until they commit their acts of violence.
  The number of these devout believers is high enough to reach a sort of critical mass -- which assures continuation of the endless loop.

The Fear

Because (1) these potential killers are trained everywhere within Islam and evenly distributed throughout the greater Islamic population (ummah) and (2) because they cannot be easily identified, it means any devout believer anywhere could be the next killer. Every Muslim is aware of this potential threat (fear) from these most devout believers. As a result all Muslims suffer from the same fear that drives the system.

The violence and fear created by these devout believers has a profound effect on Islam. It is at the core of what Islam has become. The violence/fear cycle is responsible for all the irregularities of Islamic society. It is why Muslims seem so pious (fear of a negative response from the most devout believers). It is why Muslims don't leave the faith and why they don't integrate when they emigrate. (The killers are trained to kill anyone who leaves the faith). It is why moderate Muslims never speak up (the killers are trained to kill anyone who questions the faith). It is why Muslims from Morocco to the Philippines riot over a handful of cartoons or a simple comment from the Pope. (The killers' riot and others go along in order to look pious.)

This violence/fear cycle leaves a deep psychic scar on Muslim society and is responsible for what Islam is. Understanding this violence/fear system is the ultimate key to understanding Islam. No attempts to deal with Islamic violence will ever succeed unless they address the cause of this violence/fear cycle.

Describing this violence/fear system - the Islamic killers - and their cyclical nature is difficult for a number of reasons. First and foremost the violence/fear system is huge. Even though it is in plain sight, its sheer size and uniqueness makes it difficult to see. Additionally most Muslims (and non-Muslim apologists) deny the existence of these killers. Furthermore because these killers are widely and evenly distributed throughout Islamic society and usually never seen until they commit their acts of violence, it is difficult to connect these independent killers into any kind of Islamic cyclical system. Also because the system is cyclical, the starting point of the discussion is difficult to identify.

Let's start by discussing the fear created by these killers.

Islamic Fear

Islamic fear is easy to understand and feel if you know what to look for. Let's look closely at two Islamic fear scenarios. The first is the case of the Mohammad cartoon T-shirt mentioned above. The second is the murder of Theo Van Gogh in Amsterdam and the subsequent publication of the Mohammad cartoons.

The Mohammad Cartoon T-Shirt Scenario

It is easy to understand how a person living in Montana could comfortably wear a Mohammad cartoon T-shirt. There are few, if any, Muslims in Montana. The chance of being spotted by one of these Islamic killers is slim. As a result, most people would not be intimidated. The Islamic fear factor in Montana -- low.

But in Dearborn Michigan the situation is different. Dearborn has a fairly large Muslim population. Wearing a Mohammad cartoon T-shirt in Dearborn Michigan could have some risk. Somewhere in the Muslim community, a devout believer might take offence. And that offence might lead to violence. As a result, some people might be intimidated. Islamic fear factor in Dearborn -- medium.

Now take the same Mohammad cartoon T-shirt scenario to an even larger Muslim population -- say the Muslim section of London. The Muslim section of London has a population of over one million. You can be sure, somewhere in this community there are a number of Islamic killers. Considering the recent transit attack that killed over 50, and the failed bombing attempts, it is easy to imagine a deeply devout Muslim taking offence. As a result, a large percentage of people might be intimidated. Islamic fear factor in London -- high.

Finally, let's imagine the fear you would feel in a nearly 100% Muslim society. Imagine wearing the Mohammad cartoon T-shirt in Mecca, Cairo or Tehran. The fear would be over powering. The simple fact is -- as I said above - you would not last five minutes. One of Islam's killers would come from out of nowhere and kill you. As a result, most reasonable people would be intimidated. Islamic fear factor in Mecca, Cairo, or Tehran -- exceptionally high.

(Two notes. (1) In a nearly all-Muslim population such as Mecca, Cairo or Tehran, the killer would, more than likely, walk away a free man. He would not be prosecuted for his act. At the local mosque he would be treated with respect for defending Islam. (2) If you are a non-Muslim in Mecca you would be killed outright -- non-Muslims are not allowed in Mecca.)

I have chosen this T-shirt scenario for two simple reasons. First, it is real. (I challenge anyone to prove otherwise with the following straightforward method. Simply wear a Mohammad cartoon T-shirt in a prominent place in Tehran. Make a short video and post it on YouTube.) Second, it is easy to understand. Montana -- almost no Muslims -- no Islamic fear. Mecca, Cairo and Tehran - almost all Muslims -- exceptionally high Islamic fear. If you look at this Mohammad cartoon T-shirt scenario it becomes quite clear - the greater the percentage of Muslims in a given situation - the greater the Islamic fear factor.

The most important thing to remember about this Mohammad cartoon T-shirt discussion is this. What exactly is it that causes this fear? The answer is this. There is a real fear that some deeply devout Muslim believer will come from out of nowhere and kill you. (This is an important detail. Keep it in mind.)

The Murder of Theo Van Gogh and the Mohammad cartoons

Now, let's look at the murder of Theo Van Gogh in Amsterdam and the subsequent reason for the publication of the Mohammad cartoons.

Theo Van Gogh had made a film that was critical of how Islam treats women. Van Gogh was murdered by an Islamic killer named Mohammed Bouyeri. According to published reports, Mr. Bouyeri, at his trial told the court, Van Gogh had insulted Islam. "What moved me to do what I did was purely my faith," Bouyeri said, "I was motivated by the law that commands me to cut off the head of anyone who insults Allah and his prophet."

Mr. Bouyeri in reality had done two things. First he had killed Theo Van Gogh. But even more importantly he had helped spread this same Islamic fear (the fear that some deeply devout Muslim believer will come from out of nowhere and kill you) throughout those parts of Western Europe where many Muslims (though only a minority of less than 10%) now live.

The Islamic fear spread by the murder of Van Gogh was part of the reason why Flemming Rose, the publisher of the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, published the "Mohammad cartoons".

Mr. Rose said in a Washington Post article February 19, 2006, he "commissioned the cartoons in response to several incidents of self-censorship in Europe caused by widening fears and feelings of intimidation in dealing with issues related to Islam. ... Our goal was simply to push back self-imposed limits on expression that seemed to be closing in tighter."

Flemming Rose was describing a form of the Islamic fear factor. (The fear some deeply devout Muslim believer will come from out of nowhere and kill you.) Similar to what I point out in the T-shirt scenario above.

Islamic Fear by the numbers

Now let's look at this European Islamic fear reality as described by Flemming Rose and see if it can help us understand the fear inside a nearly 100% Muslim society.

Keep in mind that Muslims make up less than 10% of Western European population. Yet, even when Muslims only represent this small percentage of the general population, the potential presence of Islamic killers has had the effect, according to, Flemming Rose, of creating "self-imposed limits on expression that seemed to be closing in tighter."

Think of this reality. Western Europeans, who have grown up believing in free speech, living in their own free and open societies, are afraid to talk critically about Islam when Muslims make up less than 10% of the Western European population.

So now think of what it must be like inside a Muslim society where essentially 100% of the population is Muslim. The fear factor must be at least 10 times greater.

Imagine a nearly 100% Muslim society, a Muslim society where unseen religious killers, like Bouyeri, roam literally everywhere. Free expression and critical discussion of Islam within Muslim society is essentially shut off. Shut off by Islam's dark force of fear. Shut off by the fear of the unseen religious killers.

This inability to talk critically about Islam inside Islamic society is one of the main reasons why Islam is stuck in its endless cycle of violence. Muslims can clearly see the violence surrounding them. But they know all too well, any critical discussion on the issue might draw the attention of a killer like Mohammed Bouyeri. As a result most Muslims live in fear of a system that keeps them quiet. Inside a system they have no control of.

So now we have a beginning idea of what the Islamic fear is, let's move on and discuss who these Islamic killers are.

Who are the killers?

In order to start the discussion on the Islamic killers let's look at a trait common to all religions. Religious believers come in all degrees of belief. Some are only marginal believers, and some are quite devout. For the sake of this discussion, let's arrange a horizontal line called a "Belief Index" scale. On it, we can spread out the believers from least devout to most devout.

It goes like this. On the far left you have the least devout believers. Some of these have so little belief they might be considered secular. On the right side we find the most devout.

Let's give the "belief index" scale numeric values from 1 to 10. Where 1 equals least devout and 10 equals most devout.

------------------------------Belief Index-----------------------------
Least Devout ------------------------------------------Most Devout
---- 1-----2-----3----- 4-----5----- 6-----7-----8-----9-----10 ---

Islamic killers come from the ranks of Islam's most devout believers. On the "belief index" scale these believers fall somewhere in the 9.75 to 10 range. These believers, under the right combination of facts and situation would be willing to commit violence in the name of Islam.

These most devout believers have been religiously trained to believe numerous calls to violence found within Islamic teachings. The Koran, Hadith, and Sunnah, the foundational base of Islam, all have numerous calls to violence. Additionally, Islamic scholars, the mullah infrastructure, fatwas and societal norms support violence in the name of Islam. Islam's most devout believers, accept as true, they have a God given authority to commit violence for the benefit of Islam. (Just as Mr. Bouyeri stated above.)

In actual numbers these most devout believers -- those willing to commit violence in the name of Islam - represent most likely somewhere between 1/10th of 1% and 10% of the general population. That is between one out of a thousand and one out of ten.

The Muslim population is presently about 1.3 billion. That means the number of potential killers ranges from as little as 1.3 million to as many as 130 million. Even at the lowest estimate, the 1.3 million killers becomes a huge threat. At 130 million the threat is hard to imagine.

This wide variation in the number of potential killers in the general population is due to a number of factors. First, the majority of these killers never really "sign up" to be part of an Islamic force per se, so it is impossible to know how many there actually are. Additionally, most act out of a deep religious conviction that could change from day to day. Also, the structure of Islam has no central authority; so on any given day any devout believer might independently decide to fulfill his religious destiny. Furthermore, certain important Islamic issues (such as defending Islam from perceived threats -- as in Iraq) might persuade a larger percentage of devout believers to fulfill their religious obligation.

To make matters worse, even though the numbers of these most devout believers -- the ones willing to commit violence for Islam - might be limited, there is second group who augment and amplify the effect of these killers. These are the sympathizers and supporters of religious violence.

These sympathizers and supporters (8-9.75 on "belief index" chart) in reality act as the eyes and ears of the killers. Even though the sympathizers might not be willing to commit violence, they are willing to support it. They are also willing to talk about what they see. When the sympathizers and the most devout gather at the mosques or other social situations, they engage in small talk and conversation, which brings new data to the killer's attention. This spreads the fear factor far and wide.

In sheer numbers, the combination of the sympathizers and the most devout, most likely make up about 20% of the general Muslim population. That means about one out of five individuals is either a killer or a sympathizer. Because their identities are transparent or unknown, the sympathizers' presence adds to the fear factor discussed above.

(Imagine being Muslim in this scenario. Each time you get together with 5 or more friends you could statistically be with one of these devout killers or sympathizers. Would you be willing to talk candidly about issues of religion unless you were really "sure" about your friends?)

Because of the Islamic principle of taqiyya (deception in the furtherance of Islam) Muslims for the most part refuse to acknowledge this "group" of killers. Furthermore, the killers would kill anyone who would shed light on or criticize them. Non-Muslims usually do not acknowledge these killers because of some combination of ignorance and political correctness. Additionally the veil of religious legitimacy given to Islam further confuses the issue.

These killers can be independent, unorganized individuals like Mohammed Bouyeri, the murderer of Theo Van Gogh in Amsterdam. These independent killers act like self-appointed "free agents". Under Islamic law they are independently empowered to enforce Islamic sharia law. Because of their (1) "free agency", (2) their ability to remain unnoticed until they act, (3) their even distribution within Islamic society, and (4) their sheer numbers - these "free agency" potential killers are responsible for the overwhelming majority of fear within Muslim society. When these "free agent' killers do their work in the non-Muslim world, their actions are usually seen as criminal acts, unrelated to Islamic calls to violence.

Islam's killers can also be organized into all sizes and types of groups - from two man cells to large organizations like al-Qaeda, Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Hezbollah or other terrorist organizations. These groups can act independently or in conjunction with other groups or individuals. Their actions require no central authority but may be coordinated with other groups. Any independent "free agent" can start his own organization. Size and reach is only limited by the organizational skills of the individuals involved. Any and all of these groups can help or receive help other groups. Muslim governments routinely provide clandestine support for many of these groups at the same time claiming these groups are "non-governmental actors."

While most of the killers come from the extreme right side of the religious index chart, some of the less devout believers may succumb to what has been called "sudden jihadi syndrome". That is, under the right set of circumstances, they could be swayed to commit violence.

Islam's killers can act anonymously. Like the killers who leave bombs in public places or the motorcyclist tossing a grenade into a crowd. Other killers proudly come out and do their work in public, like Mohammed Bouyeri the killer of Van Gogh.

Some Islamic killers are often quite easy to see. They can routinely be found in the news. The 19 men on September 11 were Islamic killers. The endless stream of Iraqi and Afghani suicide bombers are Islamic killers. The men in London who bombed the transit system were Islamic killers. The murderers in Beslan, Russia were part of the group.

In Thailand Islamic killers decapitate schoolgirls and gun down plantation workers. In the Philippines they bomb markets and ferries. In Spain they bombed the transit system. In Jordan they bomb weddings and gun down college professors. In Egypt they shoot tourists at the pyramids, bomb hotels and murder former president Anwar Sadat.

In India the killers have hit Mumbai a number of times and make life miserable in Kashmir. In Africa, Islam's killers work in Kenya setting off bombs at the US embassy. In Sudan they are responsible for the killing in Darfur. In Lebanon they launch missiles into Israel. In Argentina they bombed the Israeli embassy.

In Western Europe the killers work within the Muslim ghettos making sure that Muslims don't leave the faith. In France they bomb the subways and help incite the riots of 2006.

Even in the US, Islamic killers do their work. Nidal Malik Hasan killed 13 and wounded 30 others at Fort Hood, John Allen Muhammad shot ten people in the Washington DC area. In Salt Lake City Sulejmen Talovic killed five people in a shopping mall. In Seattle Naveed Afzal Haq killed one and wounded four. At the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, a recent graduate from Iran, Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar, drove his SUV into a crowd of students. In NJ six killers made plans to attack Fort Dix. (Note here. Conventional wisdom would have us believe these acts were all independent criminal acts. The reality is this. These acts were all part of what you should expect from Islam's violent cyclical system.)

Any place on the face of the globe where you find Muslims you will also find Islam's killers. Because these killers are relatively evenly dispersed throughout Islamic society, the more Muslims, the more killers.

The type of work these killers do depends on the percentage of Muslims in the society they are working in.

Inside Muslim society, their primary task is to keep Islam alive. They do this by killing anyone who (1) insults Allah or (2) insults Mohammad or (3) questions or tries to change Islam, or (4) tries to leave the faith. (This is why Muslims seem so pious, don't leave the faith and moderates don't speak up.) Additionally in Muslim society their task is to enhance adherence to and enforce Islamic Sharia law. In Afghanistan the killers blow up girls schools to enforce their ideal of a true Islamic state. In Egypt they killed Anwar Sadat because he had gone against Islamic law by trying to make peace with Israel.

In those places where Islamic society comes into contact with non-Muslim society, such as the situation now in Western Europe, one of their primary tasks is to make sure Muslims do not assimilate into their host society. (Again making sure that Islam is kept alive.) Their other tasks include terrorizing non-Muslims into conversion to Islam or acceptance of Islamic Sharia law. This terrorization can take the form of criminal behavior or, a constant low-grade gorilla war like conflict. Examples of the latter are Kashmir, the Balkans, Thailand, the Philippines, sub Sahara Africa, and now even Western Europe.

The killers are overwhelmingly young and male. Women have become a small number of recent killers. They come from all economic and educational strata. Poverty is not a cause, but does work to the advantage of devout believers looking for new "recruits".

This system even finds a way to harness the destructive power of its young male social misfits. They can practice their destructive ways on non-Muslims in the form of rapes, muggings, and general mayhem and receive positive feedback from the most devout. This is why Western European jails have such a high percentage of Muslim inmates.

The sad reality about Islam's killers is this; Because Islam makes a continuous claim of religious legitimacy, Islam, as a system, can rely on a huge, unpaid, unseen, unorganized, individually acting, empowered to act, widely distributed group of highly motivated devout believers who are willing to kill in order to keep Islam the way it is.

These devout believers in reality represent an unconventional unseen phantom army. An army where no one needs orders and each soldier knows exactly what to do. An army where no one is really in control. An army as deadly as any on earth.

How does the system continuously train the killers?

So now we know a bit about Islamic fear. We also have an idea of who some of the Islamic killers are. Let's look at where the killers come from and some of the rules, regulations, social traditions and societal norms that create Islam's self-replicating endless cycle of violence.

(This selection of rules, regulations and such, represents on a tiny fraction of the directives controlling Islam. In reality the Islamic system comes together like the "perfect storm", with literally thousands of directives working to keep Islam the way it is. The directives I have chosen to mention here are some of the easiest to see and understand.)

Islam isn't just a religion. It is a complete social system. (Numerous writers have called it a totalitarian system.) Islamic Sharia law includes rules for almost everything from birth to death. And a large portion of these rules work to perpetuate the Islam itself.

One key rule states; all children born to Muslims are automatically Muslim. This means all Muslims (except converts) have no say in their own participation in Islam. It also means that all parents have no say in whether or not their children are Muslims. It also insures a continuous crop of new potential devout believers -- the next generation of Islamic killers.

Another important rule says "Islam is more important than family." Because Islamic extended families are usually large, it is hard to imagine a family without either a deeply devout (potential killer) or a sympathizer. This means, within every extended family, the most religiously devout believers make sure the rest of the family is properly Islamic. It also means parents, will receive pressures from other family members making sure all children are exposed to Islamic dogma. As a result, all children receive Islamic training from birth on.

Once a child reaches school age the training becomes institutionalized. This starts at the lowest grades and continues throughout all of a child's education. While not all schools are strictly Islamic, all schools in Islamic society require all students to study Islamic subjects.

In poorer Islamic countries where government run schools may not exist or may not be free, there are usually Islamic schools. Most of these Islamic schools are free. These schools teach a more intense Islamic curricula.

In addition there are also thousands of madrassas (20,000+ in Pakistan alone) teaching millions of students spread throughout Islam. These madrassas teach an unyielding form of Islam. It can include rote memorization of the Koran, and teaching of the Islamic passages calling on devout believers to commit violence in the name of Islam.

Within the educational system, the devout believers and sympathizers again make their presence felt. Anyone trying to moderate the teaching of Islamic materials, risks the wrath of an unseen killer.

By the time children become adults, a small percent become their own generation's most devout believers, and about 20% become the sympathizers. Because this educational system is spread evenly throughout Islam, these devout believers and sympathizers are, as pointed out earlier, spread everywhere. And the violence/fear cycle continues.

(Note: It is bad enough that Muslims teach this hate inside their own societies, but immigrant Muslims teach the same hate under the noses of gullible western hosts. The London transit bombings of 2005 are a perfect example. I do not believe the young Islamic killers of this incident got their motivation inside the politically correct British educational system. The same thing can be said about the recent foiled June 06 terrorist plot in Canada. They did not learn their hatred of Canada inside the Canadian school system. Additionally, numerous investigative reports on this issue confirm this issue.)

Unfortunately, the training of children is only the beginning of a continuous process that assures everyone is properly Islamic. Within Islamic society, additional training and continuous reinforcement of Islamic dogma is literally everywhere.

Let's look at some of the common beliefs and practices that are part of the cyclical system. Keep in mind. -- (1) All of these issues are hot issues that would draw attention of the unseen killers. (2) Because of the fear of the unseen killers, no one ever questions any of these issues.

Five times a day Muslims are called to prayer. These prayer callings are a constant reminder to the most devout that it is their responsibility to ensure the purity of Islam. It is also a constant reminder to the least devout -- don't question Islam -- potential killers are everywhere. These prayer calls help keep the fear quotient high.

In Muslim society, because everyone is aware of the unseen killer, virtually no one ever speaks up on any issues counter to Islam. This process takes place literally on every level of society. From market place to office, from grocery store to shoe shop, from camel race to car race, from the library to the garden center no one ever speaks ill of anything Islamic.

Newspapers, radios and televisions in Muslim societies continuously put forth stories that convey the proper Islamic perspective. Because of a wide potential audience, media reporters risk dealing with numerous potential unseen killers for even small errors of judgment. Hence none are willing to take the risk or even the slightest questioning of Islamic issues.

To make matters worse, the media also takes an active role in furthering Islamic dogma. Numerous independent organizations, which monitor Islamic media, report articles inciting Muslims to violence, and instilling hatred toward non-Muslims.

The following is a list of items, reinforced daily, no one ever questions -- out of fear.

The Koran is the "perfect word of God." - This means it can't be questioned or changed.

Mohammad was the perfect human. - The fact he was a murderer, mugger, rapist, child pedophile and thief is ignored. The inability of Muslims to talk about this rationality is responsible for the erratic behavior Muslims sometimes exhibit.

All men should strive to be like Mohammad. This leads devout Muslims to fanatical and erratic behavior.

Lying in the furtherance of Islam is OK. -- More reason for erratic behavior.

Islam is the only true religion. All others are "not true." -- This belief is driven into the collective Muslim consciousness to such a high degree that even only marginal believers will agree.

Islam includes a form of 1984 style double talk. Islam is the freedom of God. Democracy is the tyranny of man.

Muslim superiority. Muslims have a rightful place ahead of others. -- Believed by large percentage of Muslim population. Even believed by only marginal believers.

Non-Muslim inferiority. -- Believed by large percentage of Muslim population.
(Of course non-Muslims can change their position by converting to Islam.)

All the world must be Muslim. God said it -- it must be true.

Any degradation of Islam, Mohammad, or the Koran is cause for death -- at the hand of an unseen killer.

Islam is perfect - No questions, No changes, Can't quit --  All are warned if they do any of these -- they could be killed.

Islam is more important than family.

Family members kill members who stray from Islam.

Family members, if they are non-believers, have nothing in common with you and should be abandoned or ignored.

Killing and other crimes in the name of Islam are usually never punished.

Trusted friends can only be Muslim. -- This is one reason why Muslims don't integrate when they emigrate to non-Muslims societies.

All Muslims have obligation to spread or help spread Islam.

If a Muslim cannot fight in jihad, Islamic law says he must aid the jihad in some way.

Islam is a political entity - Islam is the state.

This system elevates religion -- Islam - to the ultimate pinnacle of Muslim consciousness.

And then there is the Mosque/Mullah infrastructure.

The mosques and mullahs have an important role to play in the cyclical system. The mosques act as constant reminder of Islam's presence with their call to prayer five times a day. The Mullahs act as a center point to most devout believers and sympathizers. The mullahs' position is to reinforce Islamic dogma (including the items above) and encourage devout believers to ensure it is upheld.

One of Islam's strangest phenomena is as follows. These mosques become dangerous intellectual cesspools of Islam think. Only the most devout believers work their way into leadership positions. These people are the most likely to believe Islamic calls to violence. The inability to rationalize anything about Islam is at its height inside the mosques. There are numerous cases of mullahs being murdered by their own co-religionists for having not been conservative enough.

Let's look at how the fear, the killers, and the rules, create a complete cycle

So, all of these items come together in a random fashion. The order is not important. Everyone gets indoctrinated as a child. Indoctrination continues in adults. Everyone always talks good of Islam. No one ever speaks badly of Islam. There is a continuous preaching of the flaws of the non-Muslim world. There is a consistent preaching of Islamic perfection.

Family members watch families. Friends watch friends. The mullahs keep stoking the cyclical system. The most deeply devout - along with the sympathizers - make sure all Muslims stay within the expected norm. Reasonable questions never get asked. Unreasonable beliefs are reinforced. And all the time an unseen army of devout killers makes sure all of this happens.

So here is the self-replicating cycle. The fear leads to no one questioning the system. No one questioning the system leads to de-facto acceptance on issues of Islam. Because all accept the system the, system must be right. Because believers vocalize praise for Islam, everyone only hears praise for Islam. No one ever hears anything bad about Islam. No one quits. No one questions. No one criticizes. All children become part of the system.

Over and over and over, like a stuck phonograph. The system does the same thing again and again. Just like a computer caught in a software endless loop. Islam, as a society, is trapped in a self-replicating cycle of violence and fear.

Why Now?

This cyclical system, as described, has been going on inside of Islam since the time of Mohammad. And like most systems, there is a control mechanism. The fear that drives Islam, directly responds to the amount of money available to the mullah/mosque infrastructure. Since the first oil embargo of the 70's the amount of money pumped into Muslim oil producers has gone up hundreds of times. This has allowed the rich Muslim oil states to dump untold billions into the worldwide mullah/mosque infrastructure.

These monies have been used for a huge expansion of mosques throughout the Muslim world. This includes the thousands of new mosques built in Western societies. These monies have also been used to train and send out conservative mullahs throughout the world to preach the most conservative form of Islam.

When you step on the gas pedal of a car there is a slight lag time -- about 1/4 second - and the car goes faster. When oil rich Muslim states pump monies into the mullah/mosque infrastructure there is a slight lag time -- about 20-30 years -- and your get more of the super devout.

So today we are reaping the harvest of violence grown from the seeds of hate and fear planted over the past 30 years.

To My Readers

I request you comments on this theory.

A commentary on the recent news from the Middle East

The Problem is Islam

Mubarak is gone and the rest of the Middle East is in turmoil over populous calls for reform of their societies.

But it is impossible to fix a problem without first properly identifying it. And unfortunately the problem is Islam. Furthermore no one is willing to talk about it.

Virtually every place on earth where Muslims makes up a sizable percentage of the population bad governance is the rule - the more Islam in a society, the more dysfunctional the society.

By every measurement Islamic societies are failing. Worldwide the figures on Illiteracy, human rights, women's rights, minority rights, free press, and freedom to choose one's own religion put Islamic society on the bottom of the list.

Muslim society is saddled with a 1,400 year old system that hasn't been, and can't be changed or criticized. And to make matters worse, Islam as a system trains an unseen army of jihadis to commit violence in order to perpetuate the system.

And to add further insult, the jihadis presence within the system makes sure no one ever speaks up about the issue of Islam. As a result most Muslims never hear anything critical of Islam. Most Muslims are essentially brainwashed by a system so large that it is hard to see.

And the non-Muslim world can't seem to find the courage to say the obvious - Islam needs a reformation.

More to come.

Below is a list of articles. These document the widespread teaching of hatred within Islamic society. This widespread teaching of hatred is not "secret". It may purposely be kept from infidel's eyes, but anyone willing to look for it will find it.

Op-Ed: A Psychiatrist Talks About PA Children's Indoctrination

Denmark Immigrant children learn to hate

Education in hate for 'tender hearts'

Kasab thought he was on Mission Kashmir

How I came face to face with Taliban teen killers (This link may need to be copied and pasted to work properly)

Inside a Pakistani school where children are being brainwashed into terrorists (This link may need to be copied and pasted to work properly)

Islamic Textbook Teaches Its OK to Kill

Italy: Police arrest six Moroccan 'jihadists' in north

Kids learn hate at Afghan mosque (This article also includes a good video)

'Muslim Eton' at centre of Channel 4 hate-preaching allegations is forced to shut over far-Right safety fears

Psychologist: Western Quran schools are "terrorist factories"

Exclusive: over 60 per cent of Britain's Muslim schools have extremist links, says draft report

Pak textbooks build hate culture against India

Police probe into child beatings at mosques

Police warn of Jihad training for children

Preachers of separatism at work inside Britain's mosques

Provincial govt to review programmes in Islamic religious schools

Study offers glimpse into what it takes to be suicide bomber

Taliban using mosques as recruitment centres: Media reports

The 14-year-old Afghan suicide bomber

UK: Anti-Semitism Rampant in Muslim Schools Second Generation More Extreme than Parents

Here is listing of some of the books I have read in the process of coming up with this theory.

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam
The truth about Muhammad
The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran
Religion of Peace?: Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn't
Stealth Jihad: How Radical Islam is Subverting America without Guns or Bombs
The Myth of Islamic Tolerance: How Islamic Law Treats Non-Muslims
Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions about the World's Fastest-Growing Faith
All of the above by Robert Spencer

America Alone
Mark Steyn

Melanie Phillips

Decline and Fall
Europe's Slow-Motion suicide
Bruce Thornton

Why I am not a Muslim
Ibn Warraq

The Rage and Pride
The Force of Reason,
Oriana Fallaci

The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth, and Power
Melanie Phillips

Why We Left Islam
Susan Crimp and Joel Richardson

The Trouble with Islam Today: A Muslim's Call for Reform in Her Faith,
Irshad Manji

Princess: A True Story of Life Behind the Veil in Saudi Arabia
Jean Sasson

Surrender: Appeasing Islam, Sacrificing Freedom
Bruce Bawer

While Europe Slept: How Radical Islam is Destroying the West from Within,
Bruce Bawer

Because They Hate
Bridget Gabriel

Ayaan Hirsi Ali

The trouble with Islam
Bernard Lewis

The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims
Andrew Bostom

The Art of War on Terror
Moorthy Muthuswamy PhD

Islamic Fundamentalism
Mohammad Mohaddessin

Suicide of Reason
Lee Harris

Al Qaeda Reader
Raymond Ibrahim

The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror
Bernard Lewis

The Closing of the Muslim Mind: How Intellectual Suicide Created the Modern Islamist
Robert R. Reilly

A Time To Betray
Reza Kahlili

Bob Smith

James says:    
February 11, 2015 at

I would also be interested in an RSS feed for this Site. (I use feedly). The article seems to be a strong argument against the usual disagreement:

"It is the ideology of Islam that is the problem, (not necessarily all muslims)" -- "Islam is a peaceful religion, and its just a minority that have interpreted it in a negative way. The majority of muslims are moderate and peaceful."

Somehow: westerners, liberals, politicians, moderate muslims, and all islam defending non-muslims seem to be blind to the fact that Islam is a dangerous ideology and political weapon because the words that communicate this are the words of God, and from a Islamist perspective, the word of god cannot be interpreted or changed. If we want a reform of Islam, it most certainly seems near impossible.

The more research and hard facts and truths about Islam can be shared, the more hope we have of defending our freedoms and values in the west. The problem is that we are suffering from political correctness which adds the 'islamaphobic' fear which also does not help to speak out against the injustice which islam brings.

For most people it is hard to believe that the majority of the moderate muslims are actually not practising their own faith as their god and prophet laid out.

Islam was born out of Arabic culture. This does not fit with Western Culture. End of.

Anglojew says:    
April 1, 2015 at

She is correct.

I set out here how to reform Israel. The Muslim comments are telling;


Can Islam Be Reformed?
History and human nature say yes
by Daniel Pipes

Start Thinking Right
Of the sons of Issachar, men who understood the times, with knowledge of what Israel should do, their chiefs were two hundred; and all their kinsmen were at their command  --  1 Chronicles 12:32
- How The Completely Failed Liberal Foreign Policy Makes Donald's Trump 'Ban Muslims' Policy Make Sense [https://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2015/12/15/how-the-completely-failed-liberal-foreign-policy-makes-donalds-trump-ban-muslims-policy-make-sense/]
Obama Let In 9,500 'Immigrants' With Terrorist Ties, Revoked Their Visas After The Fact, And Now Has NO IDEA AT ALL Where They Are » [https://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2015/12/18/obama-let-in-9500-immigrants-with-terrorist-ties-revoked-their-visas-after-the-fact-and-now-has-no-idea-at-all-where-they-are/]

Islam's ONLY Hope For True Reform Comes From A Surprising Source. And What Of America's Only Hope For Reform?

I've recently been contemplating the Qur'an and the pathological tendency toward violence within Islam. And I've been contemplating how morally idiotic liberals irrationally and continually pronounce Islam as "a peaceful religion" when they would NEVER say the same thing about biblical Christianity given the Bible's blatantly clear stances of abortion, homosexuality and socialism.

Is Islam a religion of peace? Is Mars a planet with breathable atmosphere? No and no, with both deserving a "No, stupid" delivered with suitable incredulous and condescending stare.

I've made the points recently: both the Bible and the Qur'an contain commands to violence and death. Here's an article from a decidedly liberal (i.e., hostile to Judeo-Christianity) perspective about the Bible being even MORE violent than the Qur'an in the eyes of progressive liberalism. Penn State religious history professor Philip Jenkins launched his own "investigation" of the Bible vis a vis the Qur'an and concluded, ""Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible."

And of course everyone is agonizingly aware of the ten top Christian terrorist organizations inflicting mass death in tens of thousands of terror attacks. Oh, wait, they're not, BECAUSE THERE AREN'T ANY CHRISTIAN TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS the way we've suffered al Qaeda, Boko Haram, Islamic State, Taliban, al-Shabaab, Hezbollah, Hamas, Ansar al-Sharia, al-Nusra, Muslim Brotherhood, etc., etc.

It's just a complete mystery to liberals why a "religion of peace" like Islam is inspiring so much terror and hate and violence. When they believe with ever fiber of their being that it ought to be the Christianity that they so despise that is the true source of all the violence.

Let's consider this leftist professor's claims and see if they are actually true. I'll begin with the Bible and proceed to expose a critical fact that Jenkins leaves entirely out of his false comparison.

Yes, the God of the Bible, in judgment of sin, commands the Israelites to wipe out and exterminate the inhabitants of the land He is giving His people. God gives Abraham's descendants through Isaac the Promised Land. Shortly before Abraham dies, God tells Abraham this:

   "As for you, you shall go to your fathers in peace; you will be buried at a good old age. Then in the fourth generation they will return here, for the iniquity of the Amorite is not yet complete."  --  Genesis 15:15-16.

Understand that God had already promised Abraham this land that belonged to another people in Genesis 12. In the very passage I just quoted for you from Genesis 15, God immediately after verses 15-16 proceeds to specifically define the boundaries of the Promised Land that He just promised:

  On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abram and said, "To your descendants I give this land, from the Wadi of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates--the land of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites, Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites and Jebusites."  --  Genesis 15:18-21

So God tells Abraham, "I am giving you THIS land, land that other peoples are currently on. But not YET. God's promise unfolds throughout Genesis chapter 15. Look at the unfolding context:

  7He also said to him, "I am the LORD, who brought you out of Ur of the Chaldeans to give you this land to take possession of it."
  13Then the LORD said to him, "Know for certain that for four hundred years your descendants will be strangers in a country not their own and that they will be enslaved and mistreated there.
  14But I will punish the nation they serve as slaves, and afterward they will come out with great possessions.
  15You, however, will go to your ancestors in peace and be buried at a good old age.
  16In the fourth generation your descendants will come back here, for the sin of the Amorites has not yet reached its full measure."
  18On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abram and said, "To your descendants I give this land, from the Wadi of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates--
  19the land of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites,
  20Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites,
  21Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites and Jebusites."

The Book of Genesis records Israel being invited into Egypt by a grateful Pharaoh but ultimately being cruelly enslaved by a subsequent Pharaoh. And just as God had foretold to Abraham, Israel would spend 400 years in bondage as slaves. But the Israelites were finally delivered through Moses. And they came in and took the land that God had promised them. And God gave them this land after having given the wicked people who inhabited it 400 years to get their moral acts together.

God tells the Israelites under the command of Moses' successor Joshua to wipe out these peoples (i.e., the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites, Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites and Jebusites). In Deuteronomy 20:16-18 God commands:

  16"Only in the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance, you shall not leave alive anything that breathes. 17"But you shall utterly destroy them, the Hittite and the Amorite, the Canaanite and the Perizzite, the Hivite and the Jebusite, as the LORD your God has commanded you, 18 so that they may not teach you to do according to all their detestable things which they have done for their gods, so that you would sin against the LORD your God....

This theme -- and the reason behind it -- is repeated several times by God in the Old Testament, as Numbers 33:55 demonstrates:

  "'But if you do not drive out the inhabitants of the land, those you allow to remain will become barbs in your eyes and thorns in your sides. They will give you trouble in the land where you will live.

So in these passages we have the commandment and we also have the REASON FOR the commandment: if Israel destroys its enemies and wipes them out, they will not be corrupted. If they refuse or fail to wipe out their enemies, then the very same evil that brought God's judgment on their enemies will enter into Israel and God will have to bring judgment upon THEM.

Which, for the record, is ultimately precisely what happened to Israel as is declared in numerous biblical passages. We find in 1 Samuel 15:17-24 a simple statement that Israel refused to obey God's commands. They didn't drive out these wicked peoples, who ultimately morally contaminated them and perverted the righteous culture God commanded them to create where previously only the wicked cultures of the Amorite, Jebusite, etc. had been.

Because Israel did NOT drive out the wicked peoples who inhabited the land God gave them according to God's command, Israel became just as wicked if not MORE wicked than those people as their evil ways contaminated Israel's culture:

  But the people did not listen. Manasseh led them astray, so that they did more evil than the nations the LORD had destroyed before the Israelites.  --  2 Kings 21:9

Habakkuk chapter one records the people becoming evil and the LORD raising up the Babylonians to judge them.

And so just as God used the Israelites as His weapon against the wicked peoples who inhabited the land that God gave to Israel, so God used the mighty Gentile nations such as the Egyptians, the Assyrians and the Babylonians against Israel. God is sovereign over the nations, and He providentially uses them to ultimately accomplish His will. And in His sovereign providence He uses the righteous and the wicked alike.

Israel was first subjugated by Gentile powers and ultimately after rejecting their Messiah ceased to exist for two millennia until God, in fulfillment of His word through Ezekiel, literally resurrected the nation back from the "dry bones" of the dead. And in miraculous fulfillment of Isaiah 66:8 -- "Who has ever heard of such things? Who has ever seen things like this? Can a country be born in a day or a nation be brought forth in a moment? Yet no sooner is Zion in labor than she gives birth to her children" -- Israel was born in a day when the United Nations officially and historically declared her existence on May 14, 1948. This was in direct response out of international outrage over the world having allowed six million Jews to be slaughtered in the Holocaust. [http://www.therefinersfire.org/jews_return_to_israel.htm] See other links in full article: https://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2015/12/17/islams-only-hope-for-true-reform-comes-from-a-surprising-source-and-what-of-americas-only-hope-for-reform/

Liberals may not like it because they hate the God of the Bible, His righteousness, and His sovereignty over the nations when they yearn for a totalitarian socialist global new world order that exalts itself far above the God of the Bible.

God is sovereign over the nations. Liberals despise Him for that; they want a world where the nation -- the totalitarian human government -- is sovereign over God. They want a world where they dictate to God and to mankind what is right and what is wrong, what is good and what is evil. But I digress.

We have seen up to this point that in a violent world, God not only condoned but actually commanded His people Israel to employ the same violence that all the other people were employing.

BUT... we ultimately come to a critical turning point in the Bible: we come to the promise of a New Covenant. The Old Testament itself affirms a coming New Covenant:

  31 "Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, 32 not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the Lord. 33 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, 'Know the Lord,' for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more."  --  Jeremiah 31:31-34

Hebrews 8:6-13 also affirms that this New Covenant has been fulfilled in Christ Jesus.

During the Last Supper Jesus said:

  19And when He had taken some bread and given thanks, He broke it and gave it to them, saying, "This is My body which is given for you; do this in remembrance of Me." 20And in the same way He took the cup after they had eaten, saying, "This cup which is poured out for you is the new covenant in My blood."  --  Luke 22:19-21

Hebrews 9:15 states, "For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance--now that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant."

So we have a progression in both Testaments of the Bible from the Old Covenant to a New Covenant. And the New Covenant is literally and even physically embodied in the Word, Messiah Jesus.

And what is it that Jesus taught? What did He command? Violence? No, the Virgin-born fulfillment of Isaiah 9:6 came to be "the Prince of peace." And Jesus taught even as He was being led away to be viciously flogged and then crucified, "Put your sword back in its place," Jesus said to him, "for all who draw the sword will die by the sword."

Liberals completely fail to comprehend this: the Bible begins with violence and moves to peace.

Not so the Qur'an. Not so Muhammad. When you read a Qur'an, understand that "Muhammad was like two different persons at two different times and the Quran is like two contradictory books pasted together." [http://www.renewamerica.com/analyses/060630hutchison.htm] Understand that in Islam you have 1390 Years of Violence and only 10 years of Peace. [http://www.allenbwest.com/2015/11/folks-we-have-two-options-in-the-fight-against-islamic-jihadism/]

When Mohammad first began to proselytize his new religion in Mecca and claim that he was receiving revelations from Allah, he was decidedly the underdog. And correspondingly all of his revelations centered around peaceful coexistence and tolerance.

But then Mohammad went to Medina in what is today called "Al Hijra." He was able to garner followers and became militarily powerful. And suddenly all of the revelations of his Qur'an took a decidedly violent turn.

The Qur'an was NOT organized in any kind of chronological order; rather, it was organized by length, from the longest to the shortest suras. [http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Organization_of_the_Quran]

When you re-arrange the Qur'an by chronology, you get this order: and you get not violence to peace as the Holy Bible gives, but peace to VIOLENCE. [http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Chronological_Order_of_the_Qur'an]

So, for example, do your own research. Consider the very first violent Sura 2:191-193 found in the Qur'an which states, "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing... but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.  And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)". And lo and behold, when you examine the chronological order and look to the right column to see where it was organized according to the tradition based on length of sura, you find that this edict found in Sura 2 to "kill them wherever you may find them" is the VERY FIRST sura Mohammad conveniently claimed he received from Allah when he arrived in Medina and became the dominant power.

This is not merely a command for violence; it is a UNIVERSAL COMMAND for violence. I'll talk about that more.

Keep going down the list of violent suras and look at where they are found, whether they were written earlier in Mohammad's Mecca phase or later when he arrived at Medina and became militarily powerful.

You will find that without any question, the vast overwhelming majority of violent sura that commanded violence and death were given in Medina just as the vast overwhelming majority of suras commanding any kind of "peace" was given in Mecca.

A simple historic statement of fact: Mohammad and the Qur'an takes us from peace to viciousness and hate and murder and death and slaughter.

Now, this is bad, but it actually gets WORSE. Because Islam has a doctrine called "abrogation" by which later suras correct and supercede earlier ones. [http://www.meforum.org/1754/peace-or-jihad-abrogation-in-islam]

In other words, if Mohammad first said "peace" and then he said "war," the ONLY correct interpretation of the Qur'an MUST BE WAR. [http://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/Farooq_Ibrahim/abrogation.htm]

Now, abrogation is not necessarily such a terrible thing; every parent has done it: your child may ask you if she can go to a party, and then you find out something you don't like about the party that makes you change or mind, or your child misbehaves and you say, "Now you can't go." You've abrogated your previous statement. You've said yes and now you're saying no to the same thing you'd said yes to. So if your child comes to you and says, "You said on Monday I could go, so I went," you are enraged as you point out, "But I said on TUESDAY you could NOT go, so you are in a heap of trouble!"

It's different when it comes to a revelation from God, though: God isn't supposed to be caught by surprise or change His mind with new information or be wrong and then correct Himself. How did Mohammad respond to this dilemma? It seems that Qur'an 2:106 was "revealed" in response to skepticism directed at Muhammad that Allah's revelations were not entirely consistent over time. Muhammad's rebuttal was that "Allah is able to do all things"  --  even change his mind.

And hence we have examples of blatantly obvious abrogation in the Qur'an such as:

  In Surah 58, Al Mujadilah, verse 12, the believers are commanded to give alms before a private consultation with the Messenger. In verse 13 they are told that it is no longer necessary.

  In Surah 33, Al Ahzab, verses 50-51 Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) is allowed to marry and divorce an unlimited number of women. In verse 52 he is prohibited to continue to do so.

  In Surah 73, Al Muzzammil, verses 2-4, the prophet of Islam is commanded to spend about half of the night in prayer and reading of the Quran. In verse 20 of the same Surah this is changed into what is easy for him and those who followed his example.

But this Islamic view of Allah is in very direct contrast to the Judeo-Christian God of the Bible, and so we have passages like Numbers 23:19: "God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?"

Sneering liberal pseudo-intellectuals claim that Christianity has the same issue of abrogation, BUT WE DON'T. And they are frankly moral idiots of the very lowest order to make such a blatantly false claim. Here's why:

  In every single example of violence in the Old Testament, it is ALWAYS in EVERY CASE a specific command by God to a specific people to do a specific thing at a specific time for a specific reason. There is NO universalized commandment by God to always kill everyone the way we see in the Qur'an, no "kill them wherever you find them." There are no verses in the Bible that say "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you..." (Qur'an 2:216), no "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah" (Qur'an 4:76). God never gives a universal command that He later has to take back.
  If the Bible were given the same way the Qur'an is given, Moses would have commanded peace and Jesus would have come after Moses and subsequently taught, "But I tell you, hate your enemies and slaughter those who persecute you." When Jesus, in fulfillment of the New Covenant that even the Old Covenant itself anticipated hundreds of years before Jesus' arrival on earth, as the Prince of Peace, actually taught, "But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you" (Matthew 5:44). You need to comprehend how absolutely MASSIVE is the difference between a religion that begins with violence and then moves to peace (Christianity) verses a religion that begins with peace and then ends with commands to universalized violence.

  The Bible pointedly "abrogates" ITSELF in terms of violence because it promises a New Covenant and then it DELIVERS one in the form of the Prince of Peace, Jesus. The "abrogation" of violence was not for the sake of Jesus' convenience, the way the abrogation of peace for a call to violence clearly was politically oh-so-very convenient for Mohammad. Let me put it this way: Jesus told Peter, "Put away your sword" (Matthew 26:52) in order that He could be arrested and beaten and go to the cross where He would die a terrible, humiliating, agonizing death in our place for our sins. Versus Mohammad who said let's be peaceful when he was the underdog and then turned on a dime and ordered mass violence the moment his forces gained the upper hand.

  The Bible doesn't "abrogate" violence merely because times had changed and the world was no longer a violent place and the Bible was correcting a problem that was obviously out of step with the rest of the world. Any such notion is simply FALSE. The Romans at the time of Christ were as vicious and brutal as ANYONE ever had been; what they did to Jesus itself proves that. And Jesus' disciples wrote the New Testament not only in light of what Rome had done to Jesus, but in light of the fact that even as they were writing, Rome was treating Christians viciously. St. Peter and St. Paul were both executed by Rome, as were many other disciples.

  The God of the Bible is a God of wrath just as He is a God of love. But all of His attributes are perfectly balanced, such that His wrath is manifested in the attribute of justice that ultimately flows from love. And the toleration of evil results in a lack of justice. And so God gave His people the sword and used them as an instrument in defined, limited circumstances and only in accordance with His command. But ultimately He was always preparing for the arrival of His Son, the Prince of Peace.
  Finally, the thing that changed in the Bible was this: "But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those under the law, that we might receive adoption to sonship" (Galatians 4:4-5). God prophesied a coming Messiah who would epitomize and usher in a "new covenant," and Jesus came as foretold.

  And so Jesus completely fulfilled the Old Covenant (Matthew 5:17). The various laws and regulations and customs of the Old Testament weren't "abrogated," but rather they were fulfilled and served their purpose and were no longer necessary because the promised Messiah took their burden off our necks. And so Christians have realized even in the time of St. Peter that unless a principle or a command from the Old Covenant is specifically repeated/restated in the New Covenant, it was fulfilled by Christ and no longer applies to New Covenant believers. We can compare the Old Covenant and the New to the abacus vs. the computer or the horse vs. the automobile: the former things weren't "abrogated" and declared wrong; rather they served their purpose and we now use the superior things. Christ is the Superior which fulfilled the inferior and the inferior that served as a type or a shadow (see for example Colossians 2:17, Hebrews 8:5) of the Superior is therefore no longer needed.

It is for this reason that I point out the fact and hereby state for the historical record that Penn State religious history professor Philip Jenkins is an abject moral idiot and the worst kind of intellectual fraud. He is, as are all progressive liberals, a pathologically ignorant fool masquerading himself as someone who is wise and knowledgeable when he in fact teaches the precise opposite of wisdom and knowledge. Jenkins is not only utterly blind to what is actually going on all around him in the real world as Muslim terrorists murder and bomb innocent people in the name of Allah, but as I have just proven he is just as utterly blind to the religious theology that he claims that he is an expert in.

A passage from Colossians sums these liberal fools up well: "Don't let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ." -- Colossians 2:8. Tragically, modern universities teach very little BUT "empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense."

The fact that the Qur'an does NOT begin with violence and then end with peace, but rather the opposite, and the fact that abrogation forces true Muslims to accept that the later "revelations" to Mohammad supercede previous ones, puts Islam in a deep, dark pit of endless violence that is NOT true of Christianity.

Which is why Christianity and Christ are attacked all the damn TIME by liberals and Christians don't unleash waves of violent hate the way Muslims routinely do the moment they even THINK their Prophet might be getting insulted.

We are left with a giant problem of Islam: we find that Islam, Mohammad and the Qur'an spent ten years deceiving people by preaching peace and tolerance in order to grow strong and powerful, and then the rest of history practicing force and violence and terror the moment they were able to gain the upper hand.

We find that Islam does NOT mean "peace" as liberals love to adoringly say; it means "submission." AND YOU WILL SUBMIT OR ELSE YOU WILL BE KILLED.

A historical study of Mohammad's life reveals that the "Prophet of Peace" had fought in over thirty violent military campaigns and had at least another thirty campaigns planned at the time of his death in 632 AD. In fact I can quote you Islamic sources that state, "that the Prophet waged jihad operations 77 times in the first 10 years as head of the Muslim community in Medina." But it is a fact of history that when Mohammad showed up at Medina, he became a violent terrorist warmonger who waged unrelenting war until he defeated and subjugated everyone around him. What you will also find is that Islam did NOT practice peace after Mohammad's death; in fact it split due to terrifying, graphic and vicious violence that continues to this very day as the viciousness created Sunni and Shiite Islam. But within 100 years of Mohammad's death, warring, violent Muslims were attacking Christian Europe and had killed an looted and pillaged their way all across the entirety of Europe before finally being crushed by Charles "the Hammer" Martel at the Battle of Tours in France in 732. Violent warring Muslims had already poured across Africa and seized the Christian realms established by St. Augustine. All of the vast peaceful Christian provinces of North Africa had fallen to the bloody sword of Allah by 711. Violent, warring Muslims poured into Christian Spain to be finally defeated by El Cid. Violent, warring Muslims poured into the Christian Byzantine Empire and besieged Constantinople and the Christian Emperor pleaded with the Pope to send Christian warriors to defend a Christian realm from Muslim conquest in what became known as the Crusades.

The United States of America, from its infancy, almost immediately came into contact with violent, warring Islam as the violent, warring Muslims from the Islamic Barbary States began a vicious campaign against the United States. So we had ten years of "peace" and yes, fourteen centuries of violence and war.

The ONLY thing in history that has stopped Islam from violence against their "infidel" neighbors is raw military power and the Muslims' naked fear of the "infidels'" willingness to use it.

The Muslims who are attacking us are doing nothing more than reading their Qur'ans in light of the life of their moral and spiritual paradigm, their Prophet, Mohammad. Their lives are matching his teachings, and that is why they are "killing us wherever they may find us."

Jesus, by contrast, never harmed anyone. He was the Lamb of God who never harmed anyone or ever commanded anyone to ever harm anyone. Jesus is the antithesis of Mohammad.

If you want peace, there is ultimately one one place and one Person to go to: to the foot of the Cross, to the feet of Jesus, who came to allow violence to prevail so He could ultimately prevail against all violence when He returns as King of kings and Lord of lords.

So, how then do you reform Islam? If you have any honesty or intelligence, you ought to see the nearly insurmountable difficulty by now.

There is only one possible way and it is interesting where it is found:

It is found in the Qur'an itself.

What you have to do is go to one interesting and frankly incredibly embarrassing period for Muslims: when Mohammad received his "Satanic Verses."

Here are a couple of links to understand what is going on from Answering Islam (another here) and from Muhammadanism. But here's what happened in a historic nutshell: while Mohammad was in Medina (his "peaceful" period), he was weak and had few followers. He was estranged from even his own tribe. And he had a "revelation" that it was okay for his followers to acknowledge and affirm the existence of three pagan goddesses alongside Allah: Lat, Uzza, and Manat. When the inhabitants of Mecca heard Muhammad's confession of the ancient goddesses inside the Ka'aba, they immediately revoked the ban they had placed on him and gave his movement political breathing room. But the moment he was able to become strong enough to rescind his confession, he took it back by claiming that while he had believed it had come from Allah, it had actually come from Satan. And so he went back on his confession because what he had put in the Qur'an as a revelation from Allah had actually come from Satan. Hence the title, "the Satanic verses."

I'm just going to say it: the ONLY hope for Islam in terms of any meaningful reform into a religion of actual peace is for Islam to affirm that the ENTIRE Medina portion of the Qur'an came from Satan.

It is a simple and undisputable fact of history that Mohammad HIMSELF took back part of his Qur'an and claimed it had actually been from Satan; ultimately, Muslims are going to have to take back a much bigger chunk of it and recognize that every violent sura came from the same Satan.

Mohammad himself acknowledged that Satan could enter into him and alter his revelation. Run with it.

But what of the United States? What is our only hope for reform?

Another fact of history to point out is that the United States actually has some powerful experience with dealing with fanatic death cults. We faced one called "Imperial Japan." Believe it or not, Muslims were NOT the first people to fly planes loaded with bombs into human-inhabited structures: think "Kamikaze pilots" during World War II: not merely hundreds but THOUSANDS of them. 3,860 Japanese Kamikaze pilots died as their explosives-laden planes either crashed into American ships or were shot down trying to do so.

Oh, yes, America has dealt with "suicide bombers" and the ideology that sent them at us before. Do you understand me? WE'VE DEALT WITH THIS KIND OF VICIOUS MENTALITY BEFORE. And we did not prevail over it by adopting any modern liberal pile of inane Obama blathering drivel.

How we defeated that existential threat to freedom and peace is a matter of history.

The Japanese Imperial fascists were every BIT as much of a national death cult as what we are confronting now with Islam: but the United States of America stopped being "a sleeping giant" and woke up enough to unleash a violent jihad of our OWN and we BROKE THE NECK of that national death cult.

I remember the quote from the Japanese admiral who had planned the Pearl Harbor attack and then realized what he had done as America began to rise up in righteous anger:

  "I fear we have awakened a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve." Japanese Admiral Yamamoto

Islam is NOT going to reform by itself. Any more than the Japanese were going to reform by themselves. They're going to need some confrontation. They are going to need to be confronted with reason and with truth and with fact and with their own history and they are going to need to be confronted with a terrible resolve to use all the power we can bring against them until they are forced to see reason as the Japanese were forced to see reason.

But that means that the United States needs to reform as well if it is going to survive. We desperately need to manifest the same "terrible resolve" that we were able to find in the days of our greatness.

Pain can be an awesome tutor when it is combined with truth. That is the only chance to drive even a fool to finally see reason and do the right thing.

Liberals are people with a pathological hatred of truth. And so what they keep repeating in their condescending moral idiocy is that everyone ought to be just like them and ignore truth, ignore reason, ignore history, ignore reality and just follow the blatherings of Obama.

The TRUTH is that Islam has an inherent, intrinsic, pathological problem with violence. Ultimately, the ONLY way through to any genuine peace is to make Islam recognize that truth and DEAL with it. Any liberal notion that the path to peace is to ignore the truth, bury our head in the sand and hope the truth somehow goes away is another word for "suicide."

Liberals tell us over and over again that to confront Islam, to associate it with terrorism, will "radicalize" the Islamic world. But here's the thing: every single time liberals affirm this proposition, what they are in fact acknowledging is their own belief that every single Muslim is hair-trigger psycho and all it will take is the slightest provocation, the littlest nudge, to send them over the edge of madness and into bloodbath jihad. They acknowledge that the very Christianity they revile so is a FAR superior worldview to every other worldview including Islam, because it is only in Christianity that we can have peace even with our enemies as we follow the teachings of Jesus as true disciples. Let's get beyond "Piss Christ" (a crucifix of Christ placed in a jar of urine) and Ofili's "Holy Virgin Mary" (a mockery of the Virgin Mary smearing her with dung and pornographic images); just imagine the response if a Barack Obama tried to impose homosexual marriage on a Muslim country and imagine every single Muslim willing to crawl over the dead bodies of their own family members so they could get to Obama and cut his head off for his blasphemy. Or how about this one: why don't you Democrats try forcing the American people to fund "Piss Prophet" with tax dollars the same way you imposed "Piss Christ" on us and see how crazy insane Muslims get?

You don't DARE do that. Why not?

And the answer is: because the mere act of drawing a cartoon -- and let me assure you that a cartoon is FAR less offensive than your filthy, vile, disgusting urine, liberal -- is enough to set off the entire Islamic world into a murderous rage.

And the answer is: because you KNOW Christianity is the only true source of peace on earth -- as much as you hate it. Just as you KNOW Islam is the source of violence just waiting to explode regardless of your dishonest rhetoric about "the religion of peace."

Every single time a liberal so much as mentions the possibility of "radicalizing" the Muslim community, they affirm the spirit of violent hate just waiting to be unleashed by a religion that is manifestly violent. Nobody worries about "radicalizing" Christians because you know full bloody well we don't act that way. You fear Muslims "radicalizing" if you so much as breathe wrong because no matter how much you want to suppress reality, bury the truth, deep, deep down you know how very wrong you are.

Go ahead, be a good liberal and follow the liberal way of burying your head in the sand so you won't have to deal with REALITY:


The Bible spoke of wicked Israel before its judgment. Let it speak to us before ours as well:

  You boast, "We have struck a bargain to cheat death and have made a deal to dodge the grave. The coming destruction can never touch us, for we have built a strong refuge made of lies and deception."  --  Isaiah 28:15

And we'll see how long you keep your fool heads attached to your bodies the moment these people get to you:


If you bury your head in the sand to reality, you might as well lose your head, you deserve to lose your head -- and we now live in an age where lose it you surely will.

We absolutely cannot continue to ignore the true reality -- and yes, the terrifying reality -- that is Islam. We have to confront them with the truth and force them to acknowledge that truth and embrace the change they must embrace. Or we will surely be fighting until the end of the planet in nuclear Armageddon.


The Stupidest Lie In All Human History: It Has Nothing To Do With Islam When Muslims Force You To Recite Qur'an Or Die

Why Do Liberals Like Obama Embrace And Defend Islam?

Islam 101
By KGSaccess_time4 years agochat_bubble_outline1

I have repeatedly drawn the reader's attention to the excellent work of Professor Bill Warner regarding his observations on the principles of duality and abrogation in the Koran. Fortunately we have a wealth of trained experts equal to the task in bringing the average, interested and untrained observer, that much closer to effectively challenging the most evasive of Islamic apologists. Understanding Islam is the key to limiting its impact on our societies, and eventually, turning the tide of popular opinion against it.

Islam booted

Republished in part from the Gate of Vienna.
The Doctrine of Abrogation
Posted on December 7, 2013 by Baron Bodissey

In the comments on Geert Wilders' open letter to Pope Francis, a reader named MH indicated that he was unfamiliar with  --  or was pretending to be unfamiliar with  --  the Islamic doctrine of abrogation as it applies to contradictory verses within the Koran.

In a nutshell, any earlier verse of the Koran is considered "abrogated" if a later verse contradicts it. The chronology of the suras of the Koran has been well-established by a consensus of Islamic scholars, so an observant Muslim can be in no doubt as to whether any particular verse of the Koran is binding upon him under Islamic law.

Retired U.S. Army Major Stephen Coughlin is one of the foremost experts on Islamic law in the Western world. Several years ago I had the privilege of helping with the editing of material that Steve was putting together, including the following section on the Koranic basis for the doctrine of abrogation. The text below is reproduced with his permission.

The Doctrine of Abrogation

By Maj. Stephen Coughlin

At the very pinnacle of Islamic law is the Koran, which is the uncreated word of God as revealed through his Prophet.

So what is abrogation?

This is what Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee has to say about abrogation in Islamic Jurisprudence:[1]

  The law was laid down in the period of the Prophet (peace be unto him) gradually and in stages. The aim was to bring a society steeped in immorality to observe the highest standards of morality. This could not be done abruptly. It was done in stages, and doing so necessitated repeal and abrogation of certain laws.

As you can see, Nyazee acknowledges that the Koran contradicts itself. Upon discovering this fact, someone who knows little about Islam might say, "The Koran contradicts itself. Doesn't this mean it's broken?" But anyone who takes the time to look into the scholarship will learn that is well understood in Islam that the Koran contradicts itself. This fact is explained, and taken into account. There are methods for dealing with it.

This becomes significant when non-Muslims approach a Muslim cultural expert or "moderate" to ask about certain verses of the Koran that are cited by radicals to justify their violent jihad. The cultural expert or "moderate" will respond with something like this: "You (infidel) must read from the entire body of the Koran to understand the true meaning. Those radicals cherry-pick from the back of the Koran."

With this reply the cultural expert gives the impression that he does not agree with the radicals, but he never actually says that what they cherry-pick is wrong.

So what is the Koranic basis for the doctrine of abrogation?

  It is a Qur'an which We have divided into parts from time to time, in order that thou mightest recite it to men at intervals: We have Revealed it by stages. (Qur'an 17:106)

Concerning this verse, the Qur'an commentator Yusuf Ali says:[2]

More here.

The Doctrine of Abrogation
Posted on December 7, 2013 by Baron Bodissey    

In the comments on Geert Wilders' open letter to Pope Francis, a reader named MH indicated that he was unfamiliar with  --  or was pretending to be unfamiliar with  --  the Islamic doctrine of abrogation as it applies to contradictory verses within the Koran.

In a nutshell, any earlier verse of the Koran is considered "abrogated" if a later verse contradicts it. The chronology of the suras of the Koran has been well-established by a consensus of Islamic scholars, so an observant Muslim can be in no doubt as to whether any particular verse of the Koran is binding upon him under Islamic law.

Retired U.S. Army Major Stephen Coughlin is one of the foremost experts on Islamic law in the Western world. Several years ago I had the privilege of helping with the editing of material that Steve was putting together, including the following section on the Koranic basis for the doctrine of abrogation. The text below is reproduced with his permission.

[Muslim demonstrators with Koran]

The Doctrine of Abrogation
By Maj. Stephen Coughlin

At the very pinnacle of Islamic law is the Koran, which is the uncreated word of God as revealed through his Prophet.

So what is abrogation?

This is what Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee has to say about abrogation in Islamic Jurisprudence:[1]

  The law was laid down in the period of the Prophet (peace be unto him) gradually and in stages. The aim was to bring a society steeped in immorality to observe the highest standards of morality. This could not be done abruptly. It was done in stages, and doing so necessitated repeal and abrogation of certain laws.

As you can see, Nyazee acknowledges that the Koran contradicts itself. Upon discovering this fact, someone who knows little about Islam might say, "The Koran contradicts itself. Doesn't this mean it's broken?" But anyone who takes the time to look into the scholarship will learn that is well understood in Islam that the Koran contradicts itself. This fact is explained, and taken into account. There are methods for dealing with it.

This becomes significant when non-Muslims approach a Muslim cultural expert or "moderate" to ask about certain verses of the Koran that are cited by radicals to justify their violent jihad. The cultural expert or "moderate" will respond with something like this: "You (infidel) must read from the entire body of the Koran to understand the true meaning. Those radicals cherry-pick from the back of the Koran."

[Koran, 9th century AD]

With this reply the cultural expert gives the impression that he does not agree with the radicals, but he never actually says that what they cherry-pick is wrong.

So what is the Koranic basis for the doctrine of abrogation?

  It is a Qur'an which We have divided into parts from time to time, in order that thou mightest recite it to men at intervals: We have Revealed it by stages. (Qur'an 17:106)

Concerning this verse, the Qur'an commentator Yusuf Ali says:[2]

  The marvel is that these parts, revealed at different times and in different circumstances, should fit together so closely and consistently as they do. All revelation is progressive. The previous revelations were also progressive. Each of them marked a stage in the world's spiritual history. Man's mind does not take in more than his spiritual state will have prepared him for. Allah's revelation comes as a light to illuminate our difficulties and show us the way in actual situations that arise.

I sometimes run into very committed Christians who say, "We have progressive revelation in Christianity, too." And my answer is: "There's a pillar, go run your head into it!" When talking about Islamic concepts of progressive revelation, it is totally unprofessional to refer to Christian notions of progressive revelation.

Here is another verse covering the same subject:

  When We substitute one revelation for another -- and Allah knows best what He reveals in stages  --  They say, "Thou art but a forger": But most of them understand not. (Qur'an 16:101)

And once again, a comment by Yusuf Ali:[3]

  The doctrine of progressive revelation from age to age and time to time does not mean that Allah's fundamental Law changes. It is not fair to charge a Prophet of Allah with forgery because the Message, as revealed to him, is in a different form from that revealed before, when the core of the Truth is the same, for it comes from Allah.

Imagine that you are in 7th-century Arabia. Muhammad is receiving a revelation, and it contradicts something from an earlier revelation. Someone in the crowd stands up and says, "Dammit, Muhammad, you're making this stuff up. You're just making it up!" This causes a lot of controversy, and Muhammad then has another revelation  --  remember, he got them over a twenty-year period  --  in which Allah reveals that when he substitutes one revelation for another, he knows best what he does in stages. So how dare you accuse Muhammad of making this stuff up? You don't understand!

The final Koranic verse on progressive revelation:

  None of Our revelations do we abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but we substitute something better or similar; knowest thou not that Allah hath power over all things? (Qur'an 2:106)

Thus we have three different citations from the Koran in which Allah says he reveals things in stages, and that with each stage he abrogates the previous stages. We would expect  --  because it is the uncreated word of Allah  --  that what was said later would overrule what was said earlier. And any Islamic law which did not reflect this fact would be suspect.

That means that if the radicals are cherry-picking chronologically from the back of the Koran, they are correct.

1          Imran Asham Khan Nyazee, Islamic Jurisprudence, (Kuala Lumpur: The Other Press, 2003), 319.
2          Yusuf Ali, Qur'an, Comment 2317.
3          Yusuf Ali, Qur'an, Comment 2140.

Steve Coughlin's book Catastrophic Failure will be published early next year.
This entry was posted in Counterjihad, Europe, Geert Wilders, History, PC/MC, Sharia, USA by Baron Bodissey. Bookmark the permalink.

Daniel Greenfield explains Islam 101:    

"Every devout Muslim is an "Islamist". Islam is not a personal religion. It is a religion of the public space. A "moderate" Muslim would have to reject Islam as a religion of the public space, as theocracy, and that secularism would be a rejection of Islam.

Nothing in Islam exists apart from anything else. While liberals view culture and religion as a buffet that they can pick and choose from, it is a single integrated system. If you accept one part, you must accept the whole. Once you accept any aspect of Islam, you must accept its legal system and once you accept that, you must accept its governance and once you accept that, you lose your rights.''
What mainstream Islam really teaches, what they believe...



Mohammed's Koran: Why Muslims Kill For Islam by Peter McLoughlin (Author), Tommy Robinson (Author)

Analysis: Erdogan drops his mask after Iran's move in Syria Erdogan is antagonizing Greece, fighting the Kurds and pro-Assad groups in Syria. His dreams of grandeur may spark a major conflagration.

Illinois Christians refuse to accept 'Same God' indoctrination in public school
Posted: 07 Feb 2018 09:02 PM PST

"Dozens of people spoke out... against a homework assignment made at an Elgin-area U46 school in which it was asserted Christian, Muslim and Jewish faiths all believe in the same God..."


"Several people attacked the assignment, quoting Bible and Quran verses to support their argument that Christians do not follow the same God as Muslims."

Bravo for these informed and motivated Christian parents and citizens, who are not afraid to speak truth to power, to rebuke the sinister establishment and Islamic forces arrayed against them.

The "Same God" teaching is a cornerstone of Islamic dawah (proselytization), and is a deceptive "Trojan Horse" theological belief which, on the basis of seeking peace, actually sets up Christians to commit apostasy and deny Jesus Christ, thus cutting themselves off from the grace of God.

Mark Durie warns about this false teaching in his book Revelation: Do We Worship the Same God?:

  The traditional Islamic view is that if you want to know what the God of the Bible is like, then read the Koran. Not only must Muslims believe that "we worship the same God," but this message is always a central component of the presentation of Islam to Christians and Jews.

  [This message] provides the lynchpin of Muslims' efforts to convert the "People of the Book" to the faith of Muhammad. In addition, this belief, once accepted, can lead Christians to support Islamic perspectives in ways other than conversion. For example, embracing this Islamic doctrine wins a measure of respect and even support for Islam from Christians. (Durie, Revelation, pp 50-51, 75-76.)

I refute at length, through several arguments, the Same God Heresy in my book, Facing Islam - What the Ancient Church has to say about the Religion of Muhammad. For a serious Christian, there really is no other way to think about Islam than as a heresy and a "forerunner of Antichrist" (as St. John of Damascus wrote, and he was in a position to know, living under Muslim rule during Islam's first century). Christians today should be prepared to defend their faith, and to explain why Allah is a false god, and Islam a false religion, put forward by a false prophet, and that its primary purpose is the destruction of Christianity.

That Islam claims to worship the same God, and to venerate Jesus, should provide no comfort to Christians, but rather alarm, when Christians finally wake up, study Islam even a little bit, and learn that Islam teaches that Jesus will return, but as a Muslim, with a vendetta against Christians:

  In Islam, Prophet Isa is expected to return, but to condemn the Christians' misunderstanding of him as divine and to literally destroy Christianity and judge all non- Muslims; the Koran universally brands all unbelievers as "the vilest of creatures" (Sura 98:6).

  The Prophet Isa will be a "good Muslim," and will direct his followers to the Mahdi, the Muslim messiah, before taking a subservient position somewhat behind the Mahdi. Isa will "fight the people for the cause of Islam. He will break the cross, kill the swine and abolish jizya" and establish the rule of Allah throughout the world (Hadith from Sunan Abu Dawud, Book of Battles, 37:4310). (Facing Islam, p80.)

The "breaking of the cross" by this Muslim Jesus ("Isa") contains within it a clear reference to the Koran's denial that Jesus was crucified:

  In fact, they never killed him, they never crucified him  --  they were made to think that they did. All factions who are disputing in this matter are full of doubt concerning this issue. They possess no knowledge; they only conjecture. For certain, they never killed him. (Sura 4:157)

Liberal and milquetoast Christian academics, who routinely tell us "Muslims and Christians worship the same God," will likely dismiss these sincere and honest Christian citizens as "rubes" and "rednecks," lacking the learning to appreciate the "nuances" of Islam. We, however commend their bravery and zeal in standing against a blatant lie, falsehood and heresy being taught as "fact" in public schools, a brazen attempt to indoctrinate students into Islamic beliefs.

Illinois: Citizens protest school homework claiming Christians, Muslims and Jews all believe in same God

Creeping Sharia, February 4, 2018:

Source: Christians protest religion-themed assignment in Elgin-area school -- Elgin Courier-News


Dozens of people spoke out Monday against a homework assignment made at an Elgin-area U46 school in which it was asserted Christian, Muslim and Jewish faiths all believe in the same God.

One month after the assignment was criticized by U46 school board member Jeanette Ward, people who identified themselves as part of the Christian community attended the school board meeting Monday to add their opposition.

Several people attacked the assignment, quoting Bible and Quran verses to support their argument that Christians do not follow the same God as Muslims. Some of those who spoke live outside the U46 boundaries, including one person who came from Florida.

"To say that Allah of the Quran and the God of the Bible are the same is simply absurd," said Art Ellingsen, a church pastor from Arlington Heights.

Some also took offense at comments made last month by the Coalition of Elgin Religious Leaders, who spoke out against Ward's statements on Islam and argued that it was important that all religions be accepted and respected.

L. Dean Hufsey, of Elgin, said Coalition group should have commended Ward, not criticized her.

"By bringing this matter to light, Ms. Ward has done great service for all the sixth-graders and their parents in School District U46," Hufsey said.

Another speaker said U46 educators and board members were "playing with children's eternal lives" by incorporating religion into instruction.

"It's not just something flying in the wind, it's not just a political issue, it is a faith issue, and faith issues are very important to a lot of people in this community," said Mark Frusti, a church pastor from Streamwood.

Bill Ward, Jeanette Ward's husband, said he saw the article his sixth-grade daughter was told to read as part of the assignment and found it advocated atheism.

"Our country was founded primarily on Christian ideals," he said. "However, it established a secular government. The school district should be founded on these same principles."

Earlier in the evening, Ward requested that the two dozen speakers who wanted to speak on the issue be allowed to do so during the public comment portion early in the meeting. Her request was denied because the comments weren't related to anything on the agenda.

Board member Veronica Noland said she didn't think those at the meeting should have to sit through comments likely "drummed up by political issues" that didn't pertain to agenda topics under discussion.

Speakers were allowed to talk at the end of the meeting.

Related: Cardinal Raymond Burke: Muslims and Christians Don't Worship 'the Same God'

  "I hear people saying to me, well, we're all worshipping the same God. We all believe in love. But I say stop a minute, and let's examine carefully what Islam is, and what our Christian faith teaches us."

  "I don't believe it's true that we're all worshipping the same God, because the God of Islam is a governor," Burke said. "Sharia is their law, and that law, which comes from Allah, must dominate every man eventually."

'Kelly File' special: Defying the Sword
Islam's 'Reformation' Is Already Here -- and It's Called 'ISIS'
Reformist Approach to Sharia a Refreshing Break with Academic Apologists
Why Islam Needs a Reformation
Why Politicians Pretend Islam Has No Role in Violence
Sisi's religious revolution gets underway
Dr. Zuhdi Jasser: How to Win the New Cold War Against Muslim Theocracy


Why Islam Needs a Reformation
Posted on March 21, 2015    

[see images at full article link: https://counterjihadreport.com/2015/03/21/why-islam-needs-a-reformation/]
A man prays during the Muslim festival of Eid al-Adha, or the Festival of Sacrifice, at Jama Masjid in New Delhi on Oct. 6, 2014. Eid al-Adha marks the end of the Hajj, the annual pilgrimage to Mecca. PHOTO: AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES

WSJ, By AYAAN HIRSI ALI, March 20, 2015:

"Islam's borders are bloody," wrote the late political scientist Samuel Huntington in 1996, "and so are its innards." Nearly 20 years later, Huntington looks more right than ever before. According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, at least 70% of all the fatalities in armed conflicts around the world last year were in wars involving Muslims. In 2013, there were nearly 12,000 terrorist attacks world-wide. The lion's share were in Muslim-majority countries, and many of the others were carried out by Muslims. By far the most numerous victims of Muslim violence -- including executions and lynchings not captured in these statistics -- are Muslims themselves.

Not all of this violence is explicitly motivated by religion, but a great deal of it is. I believe that it is foolish to insist, as Western leaders habitually do, that the violent acts committed in the name of Islam can somehow be divorced from the religion itself. For more than a decade, my message has been simple: Islam is not a religion of peace.

When I assert this, I do not mean that Islamic belief makes all Muslims violent. This is manifestly not the case: There are many millions of peaceful Muslims in the world. What I do say is that the call to violence and the justification for it are explicitly stated in the sacred texts of Islam. Moreover, this theologically sanctioned violence is there to be activated by any number of offenses, including but not limited to apostasy, adultery, blasphemy and even something as vague as threats to family honor or to the honor of Islam itself.

It is not just al Qaeda and Islamic State that show the violent face of Islamic faith and practice. It is Pakistan, where any statement critical of the Prophet or Islam is labeled as blasphemy and punishable by death. It is Saudi Arabia, where churches and synagogues are outlawed and where beheadings are a legitimate form of punishment. It is Iran, where stoning is an acceptable punishment and homosexuals are hanged for their "crime."

As I see it, the fundamental problem is that the majority of otherwise peaceful and law-abiding Muslims are unwilling to acknowledge, much less to repudiate, the theological warrant for intolerance and violence embedded in their own religious texts. It simply will not do for Muslims to claim that their religion has been "hijacked" by extremists. The killers of Islamic State and Nigeria's Boko Haram cite the same religious texts that every other Muslim in the world considers sacrosanct.

Instead of letting Islam off the hook with bland clichés about the religion of peace, we in the West need to challenge and debate the very substance of Islamic thought and practice. We need to hold Islam accountable for the acts of its most violent adherents and to demand that it reform or disavow the key beliefs that are used to justify those acts.

As it turns out, the West has some experience with this sort of reformist project. It is precisely what took place in Judaism and Christianity over the centuries, as both traditions gradually consigned the violent passages of their own sacred texts to the past. Many parts of the Bible and the Talmud reflect patriarchal norms, and both also contain many stories of harsh human and divine retribution. As President Barack Obama said in remarks at the National Prayer Breakfast last month, "Remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ."

[see images at full article link: https://counterjihadreport.com/2015/03/21/why-islam-needs-a-reformation/]
Islamic State militants marching through Raqqa, Syria, a stronghold of the Sunni extremist group, in an undated file image posted on a militant website on Jan. 14, 2014. PHOTO: ASSOCIATED PRESS

Islamic State militants marching through Raqqa, Syria, a stronghold of the Sunni extremist group, in an undated file image posted on a militant website on Jan. 14, 2014. PHOTO: ASSOCIATED PRESS

Yet today, because their faiths went through a long, meaningful process of Reformation and Enlightenment, the vast majority of Jews and Christians have come to dismiss religious scripture that urges intolerance or violence. There are literalist fringes in both religions, but they are true fringes. Regrettably, in Islam, it is the other way around: It is those seeking religious reform who are the fringe element.

Any serious discussion of Islam must begin with its core creed, which is based on the Quran (the words said to have been revealed by the Angel Gabriel to the Prophet Muhammad) and the hadith (the accompanying works that detail Muhammad's life and words). Despite some sectarian differences, this creed unites all Muslims. All, without exception, know by heart these words: "I bear witness that there is no God but Allah; and Muhammad is His messenger." This is the Shahada, the Muslim profession of faith.

The Shahada might seem to be a declaration of belief no different from any other. But the reality is that the Shahada is both a religious and a political symbol.

In the early days of Islam, when Muhammad was going from door to door in Mecca trying to persuade the polytheists to abandon their idols of worship, he was inviting them to accept that there was no god but Allah and that he was Allah's messenger.

After 10 years of trying this kind of persuasion, however, he and his small band of believers went to Medina, and from that moment, Muhammad's mission took on a political dimension. Unbelievers were still invited to submit to Allah, but after Medina, they were attacked if they refused. If defeated, they were given the option to convert or to die. (Jews and Christians could retain their faith if they submitted to paying a special tax.)

No symbol represents the soul of Islam more than the Shahada. But today there is a contest within Islam for the ownership of that symbol. Who owns the Shahada? Is it those Muslims who want to emphasize Muhammad's years in Mecca or those who are inspired by his conquests after Medina? On this basis, I believe that we can distinguish three different groups of Muslims.

The first group is the most problematic. These are the fundamentalists who, when they say the Shahada, mean: "We must live by the strict letter of our creed." They envision a regime based on Shariah, Islamic religious law. They argue for an Islam largely or completely unchanged from its original seventh-century version. What is more, they take it as a requirement of their faith that they impose it on everyone else.

I shall call them Medina Muslims, in that they see the forcible imposition of Shariah as their religious duty. They aim not just to obey Muhammad's teaching but also to emulate his warlike conduct after his move to Medina. Even if they do not themselves engage in violence, they do not hesitate to condone it.

It is Medina Muslims who call Jews and Christians "pigs and monkeys." It is Medina Muslims who prescribe death for the crime of apostasy, death by stoning for adultery and hanging for homosexuality. It is Medina Muslims who put women in burqas and beat them if they leave their homes alone or if they are improperly veiled.

[see images at full article link: https://counterjihadreport.com/2015/03/21/why-islam-needs-a-reformation/]
Muslim children carry torches during a parade before Eid al-Fitr, at the end of the holy month of Ramadan, on July 27, 2014, in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES

Muslim children carry torches during a parade before Eid al-Fitr, at the end of the holy month of Ramadan, on July 27, 2014, in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES

The second group -- and the clear majority throughout the Muslim world -- consists of Muslims who are loyal to the core creed and worship devoutly but are not inclined to practice violence. I call them Mecca Muslims. Like devout Christians or Jews who attend religious services every day and abide by religious rules in what they eat and wear, Mecca Muslims focus on religious observance. I was born in Somalia and raised as a Mecca Muslim. So were the majority of Muslims from Casablanca to Jakarta.

Yet the Mecca Muslims have a problem: Their religious beliefs exist in an uneasy tension with modernity -- the complex of economic, cultural and political innovations that not only reshaped the Western world but also dramatically transformed the developing world as the West exported it. The rational, secular and individualistic values of modernity are fundamentally corrosive of traditional societies, especially hierarchies based on gender, age and inherited status.

Trapped between two worlds of belief and experience, these Muslims are engaged in a daily struggle to adhere to Islam in the context of a society that challenges their values and beliefs at every turn. Many are able to resolve this tension only by withdrawing into self-enclosed (and increasingly self-governing) enclaves. This is called cocooning, a practice whereby Muslim immigrants attempt to wall off outside influences, permitting only an Islamic education for their children and disengaging from the wider non-Muslim community.

It is my hope to engage this second group of Muslims -- those closer to Mecca than to Medina -- in a dialogue about the meaning and practice of their faith. I recognize that these Muslims are not likely to heed a call for doctrinal reformation from someone they regard as an apostate and infidel. But they may reconsider if I can persuade them to think of me not as an apostate but as a heretic: one of a growing number of people born into Islam who have sought to think critically about the faith we were raised in. It is with this third group -- only a few of whom have left Islam altogether -- that I would now identify myself.

These are the Muslim dissidents. A few of us have been forced by experience to conclude that we could not continue to be believers; yet we remain deeply engaged in the debate about Islam's future. The majority of dissidents are reforming believers -- among them clerics who have come to realize that their religion must change if its followers are not to be condemned to an interminable cycle of political violence.

How many Muslims belong to each group? Ed Husain of the Council on Foreign Relations estimates that only 3% of the world's Muslims understand Islam in the militant terms I associate with Muhammad's time in Medina. But out of well over 1.6 billion believers, or 23% of the globe's population, that 48 million seems to be more than enough. (I would put the number significantly higher, based on survey data on attitudes toward Shariah in Muslim countries.)

In any case, regardless of the numbers, it is the Medina Muslims who have captured the world's attention on the airwaves, over social media, in far too many mosques and, of course, on the battlefield.

The Medina Muslims pose a threat not just to non-Muslims. They also undermine the position of those Mecca Muslims attempting to lead a quiet life in their cultural cocoons throughout the Western world. But those under the greatest threat are the dissidents and reformers within Islam, who face ostracism and rejection, who must brave all manner of insults, who must deal with the death threats -- or face death itself.

For the world at large, the only viable strategy for containing the threat posed by the Medina Muslims is to side with the dissidents and reformers and to help them to do two things: first, identify and repudiate those parts of Muhammad's legacy that summon Muslims to intolerance and war, and second, persuade the great majority of believers -- the Mecca Muslims -- to accept this change.

Islam is at a crossroads. Muslims need to make a conscious decision to confront, debate and ultimately reject the violent elements within their religion. To some extent -- not least because of widespread revulsion at the atrocities of Islamic State, al Qaeda and the rest -- this process has already begun. But it needs leadership from the dissidents, and they in turn stand no chance without support from the West.

What needs to happen for us to defeat the extremists for good? Economic, political, judicial and military tools have been proposed and some of them deployed. But I believe that these will have little effect unless Islam itself is reformed.

Such a reformation has been called for repeatedly at least since the fall of the Ottoman Empire and the subsequent abolition of the caliphate. But I would like to specify precisely what needs to be reformed.

I have identified five precepts central to Islam that have made it resistant to historical change and adaptation. Only when the harmfulness of these ideas are recognized and they are repudiated will a true Muslim Reformation have been achieved.

Here are the five areas that require amendment:

1. Muhammad's semi-divine status, along with the literalist reading of the Quran.
Muhammad should not be seen as infallible, let alone as a source of divine writ. He should be seen as a historical figure who united the Arab tribes in a premodern context that cannot be replicated in the 21st century. And although Islam maintains that the Quran is the literal word of Allah, it is, in historical reality, a book that was shaped by human hands. Large parts of the Quran simply reflect the tribal values of the 7th-century Arabian context from which it emerged. The Quran's eternal spiritual values must be separated from the cultural accidents of the place and time of its birth.

2. The supremacy of life after death.
The appeal of martyrdom will fade only when Muslims assign a greater value to the rewards of this life than to those promised in the hereafter.

3. Shariah, the vast body of religious legislation.
Muslims should learn to put the dynamic, evolving laws made by human beings above those aspects of Shariah that are violent, intolerant or anachronistic.

4. The right of individual Muslims to enforce Islamic law.
There is no room in the modern world for religious police, vigilantes and politically empowered clerics.

5. The imperative to wage jihad, or holy war.
Islam must become a true religion of peace, which means rejecting the imposition of religion by the sword.

I know that this argument will make many Muslims uncomfortable. Some are bound to be offended by my proposed amendments. Others will contend that I am not qualified to discuss these complex issues of theology and law. I am also afraid -- genuinely afraid -- that it will make a few Muslims even more eager to silence me.

But this is not a work of theology. It is more in the nature of a public intervention in the debate about the future of Islam. The biggest obstacle to change within the Muslim world is precisely its suppression of the sort of critical thinking I am attempting here. If my proposal for reform helps to spark a serious discussion of these issues among Muslims themselves, I will consider it a success.

Let me make two things clear. I do not seek to inspire another war on terror or extremism -- violence in the name of Islam cannot be ended by military means alone. Nor am I any sort of "Islamophobe." At various times, I myself have been all three kinds of Muslim: a fundamentalist, a cocooned believer and a dissident. My journey has gone from Mecca to Medina to Manhattan.

For me, there seemed no way to reconcile my faith with the freedoms I came to the West to embrace. I left the faith, despite the threat of the death penalty prescribed by Shariah for apostates. Future generations of Muslims deserve better, safer options. Muslims should be able to welcome modernity, not be forced to wall themselves off, or live in a state of cognitive dissonance, or lash out in violent rejection.

But it is not only Muslims who would benefit from a reformation of Islam. We in the West have an enormous stake in how the struggle over Islam plays out. We cannot remain on the sidelines, as though the outcome has nothing to do with us. For if the Medina Muslims win and the hope for a Muslim Reformation dies, the rest of the world too will pay an enormous price -- not only in blood spilled but also in freedom lost.

This essay is adapted from Ms. Hirsi Ali's new book, "Heretic: Why Islam Needs a Reformation Now," to be published Tuesday by HarperCollins (which, like The Wall Street Journal, is owned by News Corp). Her previous books include "Infidel" and "Nomad: From Islam to America, A Personal Journey Through the Clash of Civilizations."
Share this:


Posted in Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Islam    | Tagged Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Counter Jihad Report, Islam, Reform of Islam    

Why Politicians Pretend Islam Has No Role in Violence
Posted on March 10, 2015    
by Daniel Pipes
The Washington Times
March 9, 2015

Prominent non-Muslim political figures have embarrassed themselves by denying the self-evident connection of Islam to the Islamic State (ISIS) and to Islamist violence in Paris and Copenhagen, even claiming these are contrary to Islam. What do they hope to achieve through these falsehoods and what is their significance?

First, a sampling of the double talk:

President Barack Obama tells the world that ISIS "is not Islamic" because its "actions represent no faith, least of all the Muslim faith." He holds "we are not at war with Islam [but] with people who have perverted Islam."

Prime Minister David Cameron and U.S. President Barack Obama agree that violence perverts Islam.

Secretary of State John Kerry echoes him: ISIS consists of "coldblooded killers masquerading as a religious movement" who promote a "hateful ideology has nothing do with Islam." His spokesperson, Jen Psaki, goes further: the terrorists "are enemies of Islam."

Jeh Johnson, the U.S. secretary of Homeland Security, assents: "ISIL is [not] Islamic." My favorite:Howard Dean, the former Democrat governor of Vermont, says of the Charlie Hebdo attackers, "They're about as Muslim as I am."

Howard Dean, former governor of Vermont, has declared himself a Muslim?

Europeans speak identically: David Cameron, the Conservative British prime minister, portrays ISISas "extremists who want to abuse Islam" and who "pervert the Islamic faith." He calls Islam "a religion of peace" and dismisses ISIS members as not Muslims, but "monsters." His immigration minister, James Brokenshire, argues that terrorism and extremism "have nothing to do with Islam."

On the Labour side, former British prime minister Tony Blair finds ISIS ideology to be "based in a complete perversion of the proper faith of Islam," while a former home secretary, Jack Straw, denounces "the medieval barbarity of ISIS and its ilk" which he deems "completely contrary to Islam."

Across the channel, French president François Hollande insists that the Charlie Hebdo and Hyper Cacher criminals "have nothing to do with the Muslim faith." His prime minister, Manuel Valls, concurs: "Islam has nothing to do with ISIS."

Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte echoes the same theme: "ISIS is a terrorist organization which misuses Islam." Daniel Cohn-Bendit, a left-wing German politician, calls the Paris murderers fascists, not Muslims. From Japan, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe agrees: "Extremism and Islam are completely different things."

This is not a new view: for example, prior U.S. presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush also aired their insights about what is and is not Islam, though less assertively.

Summarizing these statements, which come straight out of the Islamist playbook: Islam is purely a religion of peace, so violence and barbarism categorically have nothing to do with it; indeed, these "masquerade" and "pervert" Islam. By implication, more Islam is needed to solve these "monstrous" and "barbaric" problems.

But, of course, this interpretation neglects the scriptures of Islam and the history of Muslims, steeped in the assumption of superiority toward non-Muslims and the righteous violence of jihad. Ironically, ignoring the Islamic impulse means foregoing the best tool to defeat jihadism: for, if the problem results not from an interpretation of Islam, but from random evil and irrational impulses, how can one possibly counter it? Only acknowledging the legacy of Islamic imperialism opens ways to re-interpret the faith's scriptures in modern, moderate, and good-neighborly ways.

Why, then, do powerful politicians make ignorant and counterproductive arguments, ones they surely know to be false, especially as violent Islamism spreads (think of Boko Haram, Al-Shabaab, and the Taliban)? Cowardice and multiculturalism play a role, to be sure, but two other reasons have more importance:

First, they want not to offend Muslims, who they fear are more prone to violence if they perceive non-Muslims pursuing a "war on Islam." Second, they worry that focusing on Muslims means fundamental changes to the secular order, while denying an Islamic element permits avoid troubling issues. For example, it permits airplane security to look for passengers' weapons rather than engage in Israeli-style interrogations.

According to non-Muslim politicians these Taliban members have nothing to do with Islam.

My prediction: Denial will continue unless violence increases. In retrospect, the 3,000 victims of 9/11 did not shake non-Muslim complacency. The nearly 30,000 fatalities from Islamist terrorism since then also have not altered the official line. Perhaps 300,000 dead will cast aside worries about Islamist sensibilities and a reluctance to make profound social changes, replacing these with a determination to fight a radical utopian ideology; three million dead will surely suffice.

Without such casualties, however, politicians will likely continue with denial because it's easier that way. I regret this -- but prefer denial to the alternative.

  Mr. Pipes (DanielPipes.org, @DanielPipes) is president of the Middle East Forum. © 2015 by Daniel Pipes. All rights reserved.

March 9, 2015 addendum: For many more details on the cases cited here, see my weblog entry "Islam vs. History" at DanielPipes.org.

Islam vs. History  Daniel Pipes

The muslim brotherhood is a terrorist organization. It has already been banned in Egypt, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Bahrain and elsewhere. Take action and send a message to your member of Congress to declare it one.
Congress: It is your responsibility to take up and pass H.R. 377 and S.68 ("the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2017").

Ayaan Hirsi Ali says that Islam needs a gut-renovation style reform:

Transcript of interview with Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Dr. Jasser takes part in the Kelly File special "Defying the Sword" 05.25.2015






Guandolo: How Muslim Brotherhood Compromised the FBI & National Security

Clare Lopez: Gulen and the Gulenist Movement

Hayward: Free Syrian Army, Once the Great 'Moderate' Hope, Joins Turkey to Attack Kurds

Trump Admin Designates Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood Terror Wings

Exclusive: FBI Confirms Jihadi Training Camps in America

UTT Releases Video Revealing Senior FBI Execs Defending Terrorists

Islam's 'Reformation' Is Already Here -- and It's Called 'ISIS'
Posted on May 7, 2015    
By Raymond Ibrahim, May 7, 2015:

The idea that Islam needs to reform is again in the spotlight following the recent publication of Ayaan Hirsi Ali's new book, Heretic: Why Islam Needs a Reformation Now. While Ali makes the argument that Islam can reform -- and is in desperate need of taking the extreme measures she suggests to do so -- many of her critics offer a plethora of opposing claims, including that Islam need not reform at all.

The one argument not being made, however, is the one I make below -- namely, that Islam has already "reformed." And violence, intolerance, and extremism -- typified by the Islamic State ("ISIS") -- are the net result of this "reformation."

Such a claim only sounds absurd due to our understanding of the word "reform." Yet despite its positive connotations, "reform" simply means to "make changes (in something, typically a social, political, or economic institution or practice) in order to improve it."

Synonyms of "reform" include "make better," "ameliorate," and "improve" -- splendid words all, yet words all subjective and loaded with Western connotations.

Muslim notions of "improving" society can include purging it of "infidels" and "apostates," and segregating Muslim men from women, keeping the latter under wraps or quarantined at home. Banning many forms of freedoms taken for granted in the West -- from alcohol consumption to religious and gender equality -- is an "improvement" and a "betterment" of society from a strictly Islamic point of view.

In short, an Islamic reformation will not lead to what we think of as an "improvement" and "betterment" of society -- simply because "we" are not Muslims and do not share their first premises and refere