Australian Gun Law Update
From: Ed Chenel, A police officer in Australia (Feb 2009)
Hi Yanks, I thought you all would like to see the now available data from Down Under. It has now been one year (12 months) since gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by our own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars.
The first year results are now available:
Australia-wide, homicides are up 6.2 percent;
Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6 percent;
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent);
In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent as compared with the last one year period when private ownership of a firearm was legal.
(NB: the law-abiding citizens did turn in their personal firearms, the criminal element did not and thus criminals in Australia still possess their guns.)
While data for the 25 years preceding the confiscation of privately owned guns showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months as criminals now are assured their victims will be unarmed.
There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the elderly, while the resident is at home.
Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in 'successfully ridding Australian society of guns.'
This story of well intentioned government intervention in the rights of lawful individuals to own and possess firearms won't be seen in the mainstream US media or on the American evening news. Senator Obama who advocates a similar confiscation in the US will not be reporting any of this to you.
But, the Australian experience speaks for itself. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws affect only the law-abiding citizens.
Americans may want to take note before it's too late!
FORWARD TO EVERYONE ON YOUR EMAIL LIST. DON'T BE A MEMBER OF THE SILENT MAJORITY. BE A PARTICIPANT IN THE VOCAL MINORITY WHO DOESN'T WANT TO SEE WHAT HAPPENED IN AUSTRALIA HAPPEN IN THE U.S.!
Gun Control in Butte, Montana
Shotgun preteen vs. illegal alien Home Invaders
Two illegal aliens, Ralphel Resindez, 23, and Enrico Garza, 26, probably believed they would easily overpower home-alone 11 year old Patricia Harrington after her father had left their two-story home. It seems the two crooks never learned two things: they were in Montana and Patricia had been a clay shooting champion since she was nine. Patricia was in her upstairs room when the two men broke through the front door of the house. She quickly ran to her father's room and grabbed his 12 gauge Mossberg 500 shotgun. Resindez was the first to get up to the second floor only to be the first to catch a near point blank blast of buckshot from the 11-year-old's knee crouch aim. He suffered fatal wounds to his abdomen and genitals.
When Garza ran to the foot of the stairs, he took a blast to the left shoulder and staggered out into the street where he bled to death before medical help could arrive. It was found out later that Resindez was armed with a stolen 45 caliber handgun he took from another home invasion robbery. That victim, 50-year-old David Burien, was not so lucky. He died from stab wounds to the chest.
Everwonder why good stuff never makes NBC, CBS, PBS, MSNBC,CNN, or ABC news........an 11 year old girl, properly trained, defended her home and herself ...... against two murderous, illegal immigrants ...... and she wins, she is still alive. Now that is Gun Control!
Thought for the day: Calling an illegal alien an 'undocumented immigrant' is like calling a drug dealer an 'unlicensed pharmacist'.
They are already talking about gun control in United States of American even before the inauguration. Gun control is favored by Obama, Biden, Pelosi and Reed.
A little Gun History Lesson
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million 'educated' people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up an d exterminated.
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.
It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more Than $500 million dollars. The first year results are now in:
Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent
Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!
In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still pos-sess their guns!
It will never happen here? I bet the Aussies said that too!
While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.
There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY. Aust ralian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.
You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.
Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.
Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!
The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind him of this history lesson.
With Guns...........We Are 'Citizens'.
Without Them........We Are 'Subjects'.
During W.W.II the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!
Note: Admiral Yamamoto who crafted the attack on Pearl Harbor had attended Harvard U 1919-1921 & was Naval Attaché to the U. S. 1925-28. Most of our Navy was destroyed at Pearl Harbor & our Army had been deprived of funding & was ill prepared to defend the country.
It was reported that when asked why Japan did not follow up the Pearl Harbor attack with an invasion of the U. S. Mainland, his reply was that he had lived in the U. S. & knew that almost all households had guns.
If you value your freedom, Please spread this anti-gun control message to all your friends!
November 3, 2018 at 8:46 pm | URL: https://wp.me/pfgJe-qih
really, really good.
Replies to 'Gun control, the other side of the argument'
He's correct. The bad guys manage to acquire a weapon, may it
be a gun or a knife while the vulnerable (women, handicapped,
students...) are defenseless.
Look at Toronto, they're shooting people every day or so. In
the U.S.A., shootings occur in gun-free areas or gun-free
Gun control, the other side of the argument
Excellent find, Eeyore. Trust a highly trained American
military soldier (like the speaker, with his deep firearms
familiarity) to lay things out so succinctly and eloquently.
Especially at video time point -- 00:04:20, when the speaker
enumerates exactly what it is that Democrats really want
with all their hue and cry about an armed citizenry.
I've always consider it extremely curious when there are
conspicuous convergences between (otherwise discordant)
ideologies, cultures, scientific disciplines, or interpersonal
relations in general. Lately, we've been seeing these
statistically improbable convergences with daily regularity.
So, here we have Islam's (ideological) water carrier, the US
Democrat party, perpetually nibbling around the edges of the
American Constitution's Second Amendment.
Isn't this precisely what we're seeing with Islam (be it in
the EU or USA)? Muslims use lawfare and hate-crime laws for
'clipping' the coin of American law. For those with the
gastrointestinal fortitude, here comes the fun stuff.
SIDEBAR: Clipping a coin could simply involve shearing off a
slight chord from the metal disc's edge. Otherwise, more
sophisticated shysters*, would use a sharp-edged tool to shave
off the coin's rim, a small curl of the thinner, similarly
valuable outer edge is struck from.
Crucial to this message is how the fundamental currency of
AMERICA'S SOCIETY IS BEING DEBASED. If I may
be so bold, America's coin-of-the-realm is its
Constitution and Rule of Law. Without either, the
USA might stand a slight chance in a fair-fight with, let's
say ... North Korea.e metal. Those grooves on the edge of your
quarter or dime (called 'reeding') specifically were invented
The take-away still stands at how these various methods of
removing value from whatever coin-of-the-realm all represent a
classic form of Currency Debasement.
This sort of Currency Debasement is as old (and far older)
than Ancient Rome.
To reiterate, just as with this nation's Second
Constitutional Amendment--currently we are bearing witness to
attempts at PERMANENT erosion of America's 'Face', by Sarah Rosenberg. Rule-of-Law.
Hate Crimes, 'Phobias', Privileges, Lawfare, the Dire Risk of
Hurt Feelings, a refusal to accept criticism of Islam,
Reinforcement of North America's preeminence in the MME
(Muslim Middle East).
Now, pile onto this monumental spit-heap consequences of
longstanding Black and Jewish friction. Then there's the
potential of Black and Caucasian abrasion. What about Black
and Asian fulminations? And none of this includes what might
* Mind you, only in the most modern times might you expect to
see the two words, 'sophisticated' and 'shysters', connected
so intimately in the same sentence. Please pardon me.
NRA Supporter Confronts STUPID Kids Against Guns at March for
Our Lives (Full Show)
Don't miss this brand-new episode of TheFallenState TV, as
host Jesse Lee Peterson hits the streets of downtown L.A. to
interview attendees protesting guns and the Second Amendment at
the "March for Our Lives"!
Support TheFallenState TV on Patreon!:
WATCH: Speech on Guns by Virginia Senate Candidate Causes
Democrat Walk-Out, Goes Massively Viral Online
A Speech by Virginia Delegate Nick Freitas, the liberty-minded
conservative who is challenging Senator Tim Kaine, discussing the
importance of the Second Amendment has been viewed over five
million times in the past 24 hours.
Friday's speech by Freitas before the Virginia House of
Delegates lead to many Democrats actually walking out and
demanding a recess so that they could calm down because they
were so outraged. [Many probably had to go to their "safe rooms"
to pet puppies and eat chocolate chip cookies afterward!]
Video on Facebook
Post reports that after Democrats settled down, Del.
Joseph Lindsey (D-Norfolk) told the House that 'today, I have
been offended as I can never recall since being a part of this
body. And I have seen many of my colleagues emotionally shaken
and bothered by either a lack of concern for facts or just
simply playing to the cameras, I don't know which.'
In the speech, Freitas discussed societal issues that may have
lead to an uptick in mass shootings.
'So, over the last several days, Mr. Speaker, there's been a
lot of discussion about an open and honest debate with respect
to school shootings, gun violence, gun control, etc...and an open
and honest debate as I understand it, is one that would rely on
data, facts, evidence, analysis, reason, logic, etcetera,
etcetera... and I'm certainly willing to have that deate,' Freitas
began. 'I think if we were going to look seriously at school
shootings and gun control, we would analyze things like: Why do
all mass shootings seem to take place in gun free zones?
Wouldn't it be reasonable to test whether or not the efficacy of
gun-free zones have actually achieved what they're intended
Freitas brought up the fact that most mass shooters come from
broken homes -- and pointed out some of the government policies
that have encouraged the breakdown of traditional families.
'We would start to look at...most of the shooters come
from broken homes. What sort of government policies have
actually encouraged broken homes? You can look at Left-leaning
think tanks like the Brookings Institute, that will actually
say that some of it can be attributed to various cultural
change that happened in the 60's to include the abortion
industry,' Freitas said. 'You can look at a more
conservative-leaning organizations that will say that the
welfare state contributes significantly to dismantling the
family as families became more and more dependent upon the
government than they were mothers and fathers in the home
The senate candidate also discussed how areas like Chicago, New
York and Washington, DC have strict gun laws, and yet, the gun
violence hasn't stopped.
Freitas also laid into the Democrats for claiming they only
want to get rid of bump stocks and impose background checks.
'If you're wanting the other reason why we can't have an honest
debate about this one is because, quite frankly, I don't think
any of us, on this side of the aisle, believe you when you say
that's all you want to do. It will be bump stocks, it will be
background checks, it will be a different kind of background
checks that register the guns... Then, after that, it will be 'We
need to ban assault weapons.' 'What's an assault weapon?'
'Something that looks scary,'' Freitas asserted. 'Then after
that it will be semi-automatic rifles, then it will be
semi-automatic hand guns. Then it will be revolvers, shotguns...
because when the policies fail to produce the results you were
promising your constituents, you will be back with more reasons
for why we've got to infringe on Second Amendment rights.'
Freitas point was that the Democrats refuse to consider other
options to end societal violence that do not consist of 'tearing
apart or gutting the Second Amendment.'
Freitas served with the 82nd Airborne Division and 25th Light
Infantry Division as an Infantryman. Following the terror attack
on September 11 2001, Nick volunteered for US Army Special
Forces (Green Berets) and eventually served 2 tours in Iraq as a
Special Forces Weapons Sergeant and Special Forces Intelligence
After being honorably discharged in 2009, Freitas became the
Director of Operations for a disabled veteran owned company that
provides direct support to our service men and women conducting
counter insurgency and counter IED operations in Iraq and
'I've proven both on the battlefield overseas and on
the battlefield of ideas, I am willing to stand by what I
believe in and fight for it,' Freitas previously
told the Gateway Pundit.
More information about Freitas' campaign can be found on his website, Facebook
and Twitter. He
is constantly updating his social media with videos and
information about where he stands on specific issues.
Here's a link to an article on the Dem walkout and what
happened after the speech.
As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or
remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity,
threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive
attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of
multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of
this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators
and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned
without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.
Antipodean33 7 months ago
every tyrannical leader throughout history disarms the citizens first before
they start slaughtering them
Bosingr 6 months ago
The truth "triggered" those Communists, I mean, AHEM, Democrats.
Patrick Henry 6 months ago
damn. I'd vote for this dude. Logic bombs.
PromiserOfDeath2 5 months ago
Sounds to me like Nicholas J. Freitas needs to run for President; he would have my vote.
glwing1200 6 months ago
His big mistake was saying "an open and honest debate with date,
facts, evidence, analysis, reason, logic, etcetera,
etcetera" to a Democrat is like sunshine to a vampire, they
can't take it.
Cop Gets A Second Amendment Lesson
Man Has The Best Argument Against Gun Control Ever
Anthony Garcia 6 months ago (edited)
Shit this man did his homework and he is really
articulate despite him saying English
isn't his first language.
RoAcH812 6 months ago
this man is awesome. people like him are EXACTLY who
we need more of in this country. peoples
like him are what make this country
Habitacion 101 6 months ago
Sometimes non natural citizens end up being more
american than some who cover themselves
with our flag.
Man Has The Best Argument Against Gun Control Ever
It is the decay of society that is the problem, not the guns.
The Young Turks Rebuttal: Second Amendment Lies